Chiro orthopedists and global UNREST - and babies...

"It is established obstetric teaching that a narrow pelvic outlet
predisposes to a difficult vaginal delivery..."
--Ass-Ärztin Dr. Andrea Froschauer-Frudinger et al. via
[Frudinger et al. Br J Obstet Gynaecol
2002;109(11):1207-12]

So first things first...

PREGNANT WOMEN: MDs are closing birth canals up to 30%. It's EASY to allow
your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%!

Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out! BUT - see WARNING,
WARNING, WARNING, below... (Frudinger et al. See MRI SEX AGAIN, below.)



Second things second...

MEDICARE X-RAY/SUBLUXATION CHIRO CRIME...

I do hope that chiropractic orthopedists will join me in stopping rather
obvious albeit relatively innocuous x-ray/subluxation CHIROPRACTIC crime
(Medicare x-ray/subluxation healthfraud) even as they work to stop the
gruesome MEDICAL crime discussed below ...

See US Atty Genl to 'quackbust' CSICOP 'skeptics'? (WILK v. AMA was a win
for organized medicine - not chiropractic)
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e....earthlink.net



Onward...


CHIRO ORTHOPEDISTS AND GLOBAL UNREST...

Open Letter (archived for global access***)

Floyd Larcher, DC, DABCO
President
American Board of Chiropractic Orthopedists/ABCO
Avila Beach, CA

(via ABCO Exec. Dir. Paul G. Smith, DC, MA, DABCO
and , fax
702-222-9095 1680 E. Flamingo, Ste. A, Las Vegas, NV 89119)

Floyd,

UNREST. Our culture is causing it - literally - globally.

It's a chiropractic orthopedic issue: Amid chiropractic silence, Western
children are losing bony "squatting" facets as they are robbed of an innate
way to rest on their feet for hours in virtually any terrain...

In 2001, Eve-Line Boule, chercheur associé at CÉPAM wrote:

"[S]quatting was a regular behavior used until the end of the Middle Ages,
and after this period a progressive decrease occurs..."
[Am J Phys Anthropol 2001 May;115(1):50-6]

I replied:

The Great Squat Robbery that started in the Middle Ages starts anew in
elementary schools every year!

See CÉPAM, the Great Squat Robbery (and mass obstetric crime)
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...700%40dfiatx1-
snr1.gtei.net

In 1986, the late Arthur Guyton, MD wrote:

"Even such simple activities as sitting for a long time...can cause tissue
destruction...Cessation of blood
flow to the skin...usually...cause[s] pain...[within]...20 to 30 minutes"
(p. 594)...when the skin becomes painful as a result of the ischemia, the
person shifts weight unconsciously" (p. 592). [Guyton AC. Textbook of
Medical Physiology. 7th ed. Phil: W.B. Saunders 1986]

Most humans on the planet can squat for hours, nearly motionless...

Chairdwelling children squirm in their chairs as they LOSE this precious
innate rest posture...

In 1987, Newsweek reported that children can only sit still for 15 minutes
at a time in their chairs:

"Educators say that many five-year olds really can't handle a highly
academic program. They're still learning how to sit still for more than
15 minutes at a time." [Kantrowitz B, Wingert P. The big grind in
kindergarten. Newsweek (Aug10)1987. From Gastaldo's peer review of the
AHCPR-sponsored Low Back Guideline draft.]

WHY are we forcing children to sit in chairs for so long?!

Why are we forcing ADULTS to sit in chairs for so long?!

POPE IGNORES GASTALDO...

I've already tried to reach the world's most famous chair dweller - the
Pope - to enlist his support on ending the spreading global unrest.

The Pope is often referred to as the chair in which he sometimes
sits (the Holy See) - and his corporate offices (Cathedrals) are named for
the chairs
(cathedra) they house...

His Holiness runs one of the largest chains of maternity hospitals in the
world - he could stop a LOT of MDs from closing birth canals...

Most recently, I tried to contact His Holiness via the Jesuits...

See The uterus as 'home' (JESUITS: Babies *bizarrely* driven from their
'homes' by force...)
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...lm=k0Bq9.32626
%24OB5.2621293%40newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net

No luck...

Before the Pope started ignoring me, I was ignored by a panel of mostly MDs
(convened by AHCPR now gutted and called AHRQ) who wrote:

"Sitting is not dangerous...[Adults with severe low back symptoms can sit
for] 20 min...[Adults with NO low back symptoms can sit for] 50 min."
(!!!!!)
--Bigos et al. (mostly MDs but also two DCs: Triano and Haldeman).AHCPR
(now AHRQ) Guideline 14

Right under our noses, a minority of
humans on the planet - us - are being robbed of a way to take a rest on our
feet in virtually any terrain!

Chairdwelling is spreading.

FUNNY CHAIRDWELLING COINCIDENCE...

MD-obstetricians are senselessly closing birth canals, gruesomely
manipulating most babies' spines at birth...

MD-obstetricians (Gardosi et al.) blamed this bizarre medical birth behavior
on the fact that children are being robbed of their innate squatting
ability! (See Gardosi et al.'s 1989 Lancet "randomised controlled trial of
squatting" where nobody squatted.)

DC-orthopedists have an ethical obligation to stop both the mass robbery of
bony "squatting" facets AND the gruesome mass spinal manipulation of
MD-obstetricians...

See ACA and Birth Trauma, below...

Some interesting quotes...

"Chiropractic Education...include[s]...OBSTETRICS..."
--American Chiropractic Association/ACA Chairman James Edwards, DC and
Cynthia Vaughn, DC
http://www.jamesedwards.com/educate.htm (emphasis added)

"Obstetrics is the art of midwifery...If the accoucheur is a Chiropractor,
he can adjust...thereby preventing disease."
--Dr. DD Palmer, Founder of Chiropractic [1910:789]

Chiropractic physicians don't *need* to attend births - don't need to
practice
obstetrics or midwifery - to adjust to prevent
disease!

CHIROPRACTIC PHYSICIANS CLOSEST IN PHILOSOPHY TO MIDWIVES...

Marsden Wagner, MD^^^ once said:

"Chiropractic physicians are conceivably
closest in philosophy to the midwives due to their training in the non-use
of drugs...If a nurse or [medical] physician desires
to practice midwifery, then it is necessary for each to [undergo one year or
more of training] to literally 'unlearn' the pathological vision to get the
proper perspective of normality."

^^^Marsden Wagner, MD served for 15 years as the director of women's and
children's health for the World Health Organization. The quote above
appeared in Wagner's amicus brief in the Peckman midwifery case and was
published in NAPSAC News Spring 1991 by the InterNational Association of
Parents and Professionals for Safe Alternatives in Childbirth, Rt. 1, Box
646, Marble Hill, MO 63764 USA.


Again, chiropractic physicians don't *need* to attend births - don't need to
practice
obstetrics or midwifery - to adjust to prevent
disease!

ACA and BIRTH TRAUMA...

The American Chiropractic Association/ACA says that: 1) "[t]he chiropractic
profession recognizes that...birth trauma, may
be [a] common primary cause...of illness in children" and 2) that birth
trauma-caused illness "can have a
direct and significant impact on not only spinal biomechanics, but on other
bodily functions.....Ratified by the House of Delegates, July 1994."
http://www.amerchiro.org/about/policies.shtml

EDUCATION is the key...

ORTHOPEDICS STARTED OUT AS EDUCATION FOR PARENTS...

It was recently reported in the medical literature that André, "considered
the father of orthopaedics...wrote his book...for parents
and others who raise children, rather than as a text about any specific
condition."
--Michael Bonfiglio, MD reviewing Orthopedics: A History and Iconography by
Leonard F. Peltier, MD, PhD
http://www.normanpublishing.com/norm...hopedics/ortho
ped.shtml

Unfortunately, orthopedics got "Medicalized" (near totally "Surgerized")....

Dr. DD Palmer, Founder of chiropractic, wrote:

"Orthopedy has become a part of Chiropractic but with the difference that
when Chiropractorized, it has but little or no resemblance to Medical
orthopedy...Chiropractic orthopedy makes a special study of etiology,
desiring to know the why of these abnormalities...[T]here is no resemblance
whatsoever between surgical orthopedy and chiropractic orthopedy..."
--Dr DD Palmer, Founder of Chiropractic [1910:786, 844]

CHIROPRACTIC ORTHOPEDICS TO THE RESCUE...

ACA recognizes the American Board of Chiropractic Orthopedics/ABCO as
"pre-eminent" certifying organization for chiropractic orthopedists...as in,
http://www.abconet.org/frequently_asked_questions.htm

ACA's Council on Chiropractic Orthopedics is "a primary council of the
American Chiropractic Association."
http://www.ccodc.org/

Both ACA http://www.ccodc.org/definition.htm and ABCO
http://www.abconet.org/about.htm make "continued acquisition of knowledge"
part of the DEFINITION of chiropractic
orthopedics, i.e., both ACA and ABCO use the following definition:

"Chiropractic Orthopedics is defined as the branch of chiropractic medicine
that includes the CONTINUED ACQUISITION OF KNOWLEDGE relative to both normal
functions and diseases of the body as they relate to the bones, joints,
capsules, discs, muscles, ligaments, tendons, their complete neurological
components, referred organ systems and contiguous tissues...

(NOTE: Chiropractic Founder Dr. DD Palmer defined chiropractic (in part) as
"the mental act of accumulating knowledge." [1910:19])

One of the stated Objectives of ACA's Council on Chiropractic
Orthopedics is:

"Shar[ing] knowledge with all doctors of chiropractic for the benefit of the
public and the
profession..."
http://www.ccodc.org/council.htm

Hopefully, ACA Council on Chiropractic Orthopedics officers (listed below)
will urge ACA to immediately forward broadcast this email to ALL DCs for
whom ACA has email addresses.

ATTENTION: ACA Council on Chiropractic Orthopedics President GARY L.
CARVER, D.C. 4409 Sterling Ave. Kansas City, MO 64133-1854
816-358-5100 Fax 816-358-6565

ATTENTION Vice-President LEO J. BRONSTON, D.C. 1122 Saint Andrew St. La
Crosse, WI
54603-2934 608-782-2225 608-781-2495

ATTENTION Secretary Harold Tondera, DC9119 South Gessner, #201Houston, TX
77074713-988-3223fax - 713-988-5643

ATTENTION Treasurer Dale Hungtington, DC700 W SunsetSpringdale, AR
72764-5434 -
479-751-8154fax - 479-751-5362

ATTENTION Immediate Past President ROGER A. RUSSELL, D.C. 715 Mall Ring
Circle Suite
205 Henderson, NV 89014-6657 702-990-2225 Fax 702-990-7711


ATTENTION A.C.A. Liaison Officer LINDA L. ZANGE, D, C., 3633 West Lake Ave.
Glenview,
IL 60025 847-724-2340 Fax 847-724-2356


ACA chiro orthopedists "shar[ing] knowledge with all doctors of chiropractic
for the benefit of the public and the
profession" - COULD rally ***ALL DCs IN AMERICA*** to stop MDs from closing
birth
canals.

Hopefully, they could do it by September 16 when the 2003 ACA House of
Delegates Meeting will be
held at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Albuquerque, NM.

Larry Markson, DC says,

"We need to clearly define chiropractic, and now is the time!"
http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/greenawalt/index.html (accessed July 9,
2003)

Larry, Dr. DD Palmer's fundamental chiropractic hypothesis is now published
as the definition of chiropractic in Dorland's Illustrated Medical
Dictionary...

See Breastfeeding = Chiropractic immunization!
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...lm=4IkNa.79630
%24Io.7318591%40newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net

Let's now define chiropractic via national/global ACTION - by saving tiny
lives and tiny limbs and PREVENTING more vertebral subluxations than DCs
will ever be able to adjust by hand...

Stopping global UNREST (stopping the Great Squat Robbery) will naturally
follow...

Again, for room reservations in Albuquerque, ACA says: "Please call the
hotel at 800-233-1234 or 505-842-1234 to make your room reservations."
http://www.amerchiro.org/about/hod2003/hotel_info.shtml

Thanks for reading,

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS1 ABCO SHALL BE OPERATED...

"[T]he ABCO shall be operated...[t]o seek and foster cooperation and
contacts with other health specialty organizations, and to collaborate
on matters of common interest...[t]o provide a guiding influence in academic
and professional research in the field of chiropractic
orthopedics."
AMERICAN BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC
ORTHOPEDISTS, INC. (ABCO)
-BYLAWS-
http://www.abconet.org/pdfs/ABCOBylaws.pdf


I'm hoping ABCO diplomates (DABCOs) will use this "shall be operated" ABCO
Bylaw to call for chiropractic collaboration with "other health specialty
organizations" in doing the OBVIOUS simple MRI study I've called for...

See Flip women over, reach in vagina, *pull* on sacrum during MRI!
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...g.goog le.com

Copied to: Julia Allen, DC, DACNB
Secretary-Treasurer
American Chiropractic Neurology Board, Inc.
2803 Williams Drive, Suite 105
Georgetown, Texas 78628
(512) 863-2225 or FAX (512) 863-2233



Julia, perhaps chiropractic neurologists could team with chiropractic
orthopedists to rally America's DCs to stop MDs from closing birth canals
and gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines at birth?

Just a thought...

PS2 Floyd, *are* you the Floyd Larcher who is president of the DABCO
generator?

Sorry to be impatient Floyd, but MDs are LYING and some babies are DYING -
at the hands of America's most prolific spinal manipulators -
MD-obstetricians.

I hope you just got too busy and simply didn't have time to reply to my
second email, reproduced below.

Regardless whether you are the Floyd Larcher who is president of the DABCO
generator, I do hope you will help stop MDs from closing birth canals and
gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines at birth...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Todd Gastaldo"
To: "Floyd Larcher" snip
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 7:30 AM
Subject: Floyd from LACC?



----- Original Message -----
From: "Floyd Larcher" snip
To: "Todd Gastaldo"
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:49 AM
Subject: Floyd from LACC?


Hi Todd,

It's me.

Floyd


It's good to hear from you Floyd.

I'm hoping you're the Floyd Larcher who is president of the DABCO
generator...
http://www.abconet.org/about.htm

Todd




On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 08:40:00 -0700
"Todd Gastaldo" wrote:
That you, Floyd?

Todd



PS4 BREECH BABY: IS PLANNED CAESAREAN SAFER?

OPEN LETTER (archived for global access***)

Prof. Jim Thornton
Editor-in-Chief
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology/BJOG
27 Sussex Place
London NW1 4RG

To the Editor:

Rietberg et al. [1] offer evidence that term-breech-presentation-planned
caesareans may prevent a "twofold
increase in mortality, a sevenfold increase in low Apgar score and a
threefold increase in birth trauma" (relative to breech vaginal deliveries
or breech emergency caesareans).

Rietberg et al. did not mention birth position.

Nordström [2] writes, "The standard maternal position during the second
stage is lying on her back" - yet there is clinical and x-ray evidence
(summarized by Gastaldo [3]) that "lying on her back"
and semisitting delivery positions close the birth canal significantly.

Michel et al. [4] offer magnetic resonance imaging evidence that "lying on
her back" and semisitting delivery positions close the birth canal
significantly.

If the Rietberg et al. study included term breech vaginal deliveries (woman
"lying on her back" or semisitting), some of the adverse outcomes
may have derived - not from vaginal delivery - but from birth canals
senselessly being closed significantly due to medicine's irrational birth
behavior.

Dr. Todd Gastaldo
22115 NW Imbrie Dr.
#338
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA


References

1. CCTh Rietberg, PM Elferink-Stinkensb, R Brandc, AJ van Loond, OJS Van
Hemele, GHA Visserf, Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995
to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of
33,824 infants Br J Obstet Gynaecol 110 (2003), pp. 604-609.,

2. L Nordström, Letter (Fetal and maternal lactate increase during active
second stage of labour), Br J Obstet Gynaecol 110 (2003), pp. 85

3. TD Gastaldo, Letter (Labor posture), Birth 19 (1992), p. 230.

4. SC Michel, A Rake, K Treiber, B Seifert, R Chaoui, R Huch, B Marincek, RA
Kubik-Huch, MR obstetric pelvimetry: effect of birthing position on pelvic
bony dimensions.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 179 (2002), pp. 1063-1067.




MRI SEX - AGAIN...

Copied to: Michel et al. (just cited) via...

Rahel A. Kubik-Huch, MD
Department of Radiology
Kantonsspital Baden
CH-5404 Baden
Switzerland


Rahel,

My October 2002 usenet article "MRI sex" (which I copied to you) included a
brief discussion of your 2002 MRI study (reference 4 above, SC Michel, A
Rake, K Treiber, B Seifert, R Chaoui, R Huch, B Marincek, RA
Kubik-Huch, MR obstetric pelvimetry: effect of birthing position on pelvic
bony dimensions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 179 (2002), pp. 1063-1067)...
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...lm=KInn9.8739%
24OB5.866576%40newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net

You and your colleagues [Michel et al 2002] indicated that allowing women to
birth semisitting or on hands and knees "significantly expands female pelvic
bony dimensions, suggesting
facilitation of labor and delivery."

You failed to mention that it is the uterus (and abdominal musculature)
pushing the baby out that likely most significantly expands female pelvic
bony dimensions.

You failed to reach into the vagina and pull on the sacral tip in your
semisitting and hands and knees images.

Even so, it is remarkable that you were able to report: "With patients in
the hand-to-knee and squatting positions, the sagittal outlet (11.8 ± 1.3 cm
and 11.7 ± 1.3 cm) exceeded that in the supine position (11.5 ± 1.3 cm; p =
0.002 and p = 0.01, respectively)..."

Just now - in composing my Open Letter response to the Reitberg et al.
breech study - I found a 2003 MRI study which you co-authored with Keller et
al.:

TM Keller, A Rake, SCA Michel, B Seifert, G Efe, K Treiber, R Huch, B
Marincek, RA Kubik-Huch, Obstetric MR Pelvimetry: Reference Values and
Evaluation of Inter- and Intraobserver Error and Intraindividual
Variability. Radiology 2003;227:37-43.

I do not agree that you "confirmed that pelvimetric dimensions are
significantly smaller in women undergoing cesarean section and assisted
delivery than in those delivering vaginally." [Keller 2003]

....at least not in regard to sagittal pelvic outlet diameter.

I say this because your study [Keller 2003] was, in large part, a
retrospective study of "MR pelvimetry...performed with the patient in the
supine position."

Women in the supine position are lying on their sacra, closing their birth
canals. See below.

MASSIVE PELVIC OUTLET AREA DENIED...

You failed to mention sacroiliac motion in both studies - yet it is
sacroiliac motion which yields a "massive" change in sagittal pelvic outlet
dimension.

This "massive" amount of sacroiliac motion denied was noted in the 1969
article by JGB Russell which you and your colleagues cited in both of your
MRI studies...

Incidentally, "massive" was the word used by another group of researchers
(Lilford et al.)
who knowingly (or perhaps negligently) perpetrated a radiation fraud on the
recent parturients they studied.

See Gastaldo to delight BJOG editor Thornton
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...lm=hCIKa.13893
%24C83.1321663%40newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net

Given these rather major gaffs - I no longer believe your 2002 statement
that "ethical grounds" prohibited you from studying "recent parturients" in
2002.

I believe that you INTENTIONALLY failed to study "recent parturients" - to
help in the ongoing cover-up of a MASSIVE medical crime against mothers and
babies...

Here is the relevant "ethical grounds" quote from your 2002 study:

"A limitation of our study is that we included no pregnant women. We made
this decision for two reasons: the limited space in the scanner bore
(upright scanning is technically impossible for a woman in late pregnancy)
and the ethics of scanning stress, particularly in the hand-to-knee and
squatting positions (even nonpregnant volunteers were exhausted by having to
remain immobile during the 10 min. of image acquisition). On these ethical
grounds, we even extended our noninclusion criteria to recent
parturients...We are aware that this limitation prevented us from measuring
the influence of pregnancy-related joint laxity in late gestation, for which
there is ample documentation. However, changes in pelvic dimensions
observed in nonpregnant women should become even more pronounced during
delivery..." [Michel et al. Am J Roentgenol 2002 Oct;179(4):1063-1067]

Yes, Rahel, changes in pelvic dimensions SHOULD become even more pronounced
during delivery - and in recent parturients - but NOT just because of
increased ligament laxity.

You failed miserably in your clinical purpose: "The clinical purpose of our
study was to provide obstetricians with guidance in predicting fetal-pelvic
disproportion..."

I say again:

You failed to mention in your 2002 study that it is the uterus (and
abdominal musculature) pushing the baby out that likely most significantly
expands female pelvic bony dimensions.

And you failed to reach into the vagina and pull on the sacral tip in your
semisitting and hands and knees images.

Your 2003 study helps MDs pretend (with Lilford et al.) that massive amounts
of sacroiliac motion aren't being denied by MDs.

Your 2003 study did contain this HOT quote:

"In choosing the mode of delivery, it is important to be able to test for
fetal-pelvic disproportion, since fetomaternal morbidity and mortality
increase with prolonged labor..."

Yes, PLEASE DO test for fetal-pelvic disproportion! Reach in the vagina and
pull
on the sacral tip and compare that AP pelvic outlet diameter with the AP
pelvic outlet diameter obtained with the mother lying on her sacrum.

"Fetomaternal morbidity and mortality increase with prolonged labor" - was
the EXACT point I was trying to make to BJOG Editor Jim Thornton
recently!

Jim IGNORED this point!

See again: Gastaldo to delight BJOG editor Thornton
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...lm=hCIKa.13893
%24C83.1321663%40newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net

You also wrote in your 2003 study: "[P]elvimetric differences of just a few
millimeters could have an important bearing on obstetric decision making..."

YES! If the OB is senselessly closing the birth canal up to 40
millimeters - you STOP him/her!

In some births, OBs are senselessly closing the birth canal MORE than 40
millimeters - at least this is what is indicated by the 2001 issue of
Williams Obstetrics, as in,

"...With increasing narrowing
of the pubic arch, the occiput cannot emerge directly beneath the symphysis
pubis but is forced increasingly farther down...the ischiopubic rami. In
extreme cases, the head must rotate around a line joining the ischial
tuberosities [!] (p. 438)..."

You failed to mention the pubic arch!

Here is a 1913 quote regarding the effect of the pubic arch:

"[M]oving backward of the tip of the sacrum...enlarges the available space
not merely directly in proportion to the distance backward, but more nearly
by the square of that distance." [Emmons, AB. A study of the variations in
the female pelvis, based on observations made on 217 specimens of the
American Indian squaw. Biometrika 1913; 9:34-47.]

Again quoting Williams Obstetrics: When the pubic arch is extremely narrow,
"the head must rotate around a line
joining the ischial
tuberosities [!] (p. 438)..."

FRUDINGER ET AL [2002]

"A narrow subpubic arch is strongly associated with prolonged labour and
postpartum anal incontinence in nulliparous women."
--Ass-Ärztin Dr. Andrea Froschauer-Frudinger et al. via
[Frudinger et al. Br J Obstet Gynaecol
2002;109(11):1207-12]

"HOWEVER" (write Frudinger et al. [2002, emphasis added]), "perineal and
anal sphincter trauma, assessed by ultrasound, does not account for the
higher rate of postpartum anal incontinence in women with a narrow subpubic
arch angle."

Fascinating. First let's stop MDs from closing birth canals - then let's
ponder this latter fascinating finding...

RUSSELL STARTED THE GAME...

Russell mentioned the intrapartum x-ray study of Borell and Fernstrom in his
1969 study - but NOT in his 1982 study...

Russell also suggested (fraudulently) that semisitting widens "all the
diameters."

Assuming that you guys actually read the 1969 paper by Russell (which you
cited in both MRI studies), you are either dumb or scum. I personally think
you guys are scum. You gave as a reason for your study: "We believed it
important to establish reference MR pelvimetric values"; when in fact, you
used MRI like Liford et al. used x-ray - to CONCEAL "pelvimetric values."
You concealed MASSIVE "pelvimetric" values to quote Lilford et al.'s bogus
study which attempted to conceal the value of previous x-ray and clinical
observations.)

Sorry to call you all scum. Perhaps some of you simply *weren't aware* of
the obvious ongoing obstetric criminal negligence discussed herein? Perhaps
you never read my email - or the relevant medical literature? Well
now you *are* aware.

PLEASE help stop MDs and MBs and nurses and midwives from closing birth
canals up to 30%.



PS4 PREGNANT WOMEN! It's EASY to open your birth canal an "extra" up to
30%!

Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out! PLEASE talk to your MD
about this NOW...

WARNING, WARNING, WARNING: Some MDs will let women "try" side-lying and
other
"alternative" delivery positions - but they will move women back to
semisitting -
close their birth canals (!) at
the very worst possible moment (as the baby is coming out)...

See GASTALDO'S ABSTRACT - my invited poster presentation at a recent
obstetric congress co-sponsored by the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists/ACOG. (NOTE: GASTALDO'S ABSTRACT is on the web: Search
"GASTALDO'S ABSTRACT
Paciornik"...)

GRUESOME SPINAL MANIPULATION BY MDs (and MBs)...

MDs routinely pull "gently"/gruesomely on babies' heads sticking out
vaginas/birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%.

(ALL spinal manipulation of fetuses is gruesome with the birth canal closed
up to 30%.)

UNNECESSARY EPIDURALS...

MDs routinely cause uteri to PUSH with birth canals senselessly closed up to
30% and in many births MDs chemically whip uteri to push harder/VIOLENTLY -
with oxytocin and Cytotec - with birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%!

No wonder some women literally BEG for epidurals!

UNNECESSARY FORCEPS/VACUUM EXTRACTIONS...

In 10 to 15% of births
MDs reach INSIDE vaginas - with forceps/vacuum extractors - and drag babies
out through birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%!

Sometimes MDs pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords!

MDs may occasionally be pulling the brain/cerebellum into the upper cervical
canal!

See again: Gastaldo's fibromyalgia hypothesis (Chiari/birth trauma)
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...lm=1K0Ka.10657
%24C83.1056213%40newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net

UNNECESSARY CESAREAN SECTIONS...

MDs close birth canals - CAUSE "cephalopelvic disproportion" - then perform
major abdominal surgeries called c-sections BEcause of "cephalopelvic
disproportion!

UNNECESSARY EPISIOTOMIES...

MDs routinely slash vaginas (euphemism "routine
episiotomy") -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring that everything possible is being done to
OPEN birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals up to 30%!

MDs offer women "generous" episiotomies when the baby's shoulders get
stuck...

The American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists/ACOG
indirectly ADMITS that MDs are routinely closing birth canals - why *else*
would ACOG's Shoulder Dystocia video show MDs how to OPEN the birth canal
maximally when the shoulders get stuck?

Unfortunately, ACOG's Shoulder Dystocia video method of "opening" the
birth
canal maximally - KEEPS THE BIRTH CANAL CLOSED!

See Blame, Attorney Weisbrod and the 'God within' (our courts of law)...
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...lm=Q28K8.883%2
4NG1.312%40newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net

Thanks for reading, everyone,

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


***This Open Letter will be archived for global access within 24 hours.
Search http://groups.google.com for "Chiro orthopedists and global UNREST -
and babies..."