If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
GSK's Swine Flu Vaccine Suspected Of Causing Narcolepsy In Children
"Bob Officer" wrote in message news On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:26:54 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:03:43 +0100, in misc.health.alternative, "john" wrote: http://whale.to/vaccine/gsk78.html Sweden opens inquiry into suspect flu vaccine http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...1-CeJ5s7RCnATA (AFP) - 19 August 2008 snip of stolen copyright material What john didn't cut and paste was the copyright notice. cited from the above web site Copyright © 2010 AFP. All rights reserved. /cite Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite Notice of the theft and use of copyright material has been forwarded to Google's abuse staff. Hey boob, That copyright notice, in case you haven't read it, says "shall not be used for COMMERCIAL purposes". Hey Carole, thanks for showing everyone you are an IDIOT. Next time read the entire Sentence from the beginning to the end. Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite Here is the sentence boob. The first part describes what can't part of an article can't be used for commercial purposes. The second part describes in what form it can't be used. Nowhere does it say that nobody can copy it, merely that it can't be used FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. I take it bob that comprehension isn't one of your strong suites. Oh, except for the manual and you probably get that wrong most of the time and have to have people explain it for you. carole www.conspiracee.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
GSK's Swine Flu Vaccine Suspected Of Causing Narcolepsy In Children
carole wrote:
"Bob Officer" wrote in message news On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:26:54 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message ... On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:03:43 +0100, in misc.health.alternative, "john" wrote: http://whale.to/vaccine/gsk78.html Sweden opens inquiry into suspect flu vaccine http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...1-CeJ5s7RCnATA (AFP) - 19 August 2008 snip of stolen copyright material What john didn't cut and paste was the copyright notice. cited from the above web site Copyright © 2010 AFP. All rights reserved. /cite Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite Notice of the theft and use of copyright material has been forwarded to Google's abuse staff. Hey boob, That copyright notice, in case you haven't read it, says "shall not be used for COMMERCIAL purposes". Hey Carole, thanks for showing everyone you are an IDIOT. Next time read the entire Sentence from the beginning to the end. Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite Here is the sentence boob. The first part describes what can't part of an article can't be used for commercial purposes. The second part describes in what form it can't be used. Nowhere does it say that nobody can copy it, merely that it can't be used FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. Are you that stupid? The copyright message isn't limited to commercial purposes. It means that the text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be reproduced, publishes, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. If the AFP allowed its work to be copied for noncommercial purposes, it would explicitly say that. It doesn't. The copyright messages means that it may not be copied for any reason, including, but not limited to, commercial purposes. I take it bob that comprehension isn't one of your strong suites. Look in the mirro when you say that. You have to be really stupid if you think the copyright messages means it is ok to copied for noncommercial purposes. Oh, except for the manual and you probably get that wrong most of the time and have to have people explain it for you. carole www.conspiracee.com When you get a clue, let us know. Jeff |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
GSK's Swine Flu Vaccine Suspected Of Causing Narcolepsy In Children
"dr_jeff" wrote in message ... carole wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message news On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:26:54 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message ... On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:03:43 +0100, in misc.health.alternative, "john" wrote: http://whale.to/vaccine/gsk78.html Sweden opens inquiry into suspect flu vaccine http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...1-CeJ5s7RCnATA (AFP) - 19 August 2008 snip of stolen copyright material What john didn't cut and paste was the copyright notice. cited from the above web site Copyright © 2010 AFP. All rights reserved. /cite Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite Notice of the theft and use of copyright material has been forwarded to Google's abuse staff. Hey boob, That copyright notice, in case you haven't read it, says "shall not be used for COMMERCIAL purposes". Hey Carole, thanks for showing everyone you are an IDIOT. Next time read the entire Sentence from the beginning to the end. Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite Here is the sentence boob. The first part describes what can't part of an article can't be used for commercial purposes. The second part describes in what form it can't be used. Nowhere does it say that nobody can copy it, merely that it can't be used FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. Are you that stupid? Are you? Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite The first part of the copyright namaes the parts which shall not be reproduced FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. The second part describes the type of media that can't copy it. Why do you think the words 'FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES' are included? Commercial use means anywhere that it is used for financial gain. If it didn't want people to copy it for ANY REASON it could say - "Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for ANY PURPOSE, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium." Carole www.conspiracee.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
GSK's Swine Flu Vaccine Suspected Of Causing Narcolepsy In Children
carole wrote:
"dr_jeff" wrote in message ... carole wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message news On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:26:54 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message ... On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:03:43 +0100, in misc.health.alternative, "john" wrote: http://whale.to/vaccine/gsk78.html Sweden opens inquiry into suspect flu vaccine http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...1-CeJ5s7RCnATA (AFP) - 19 August 2008 snip of stolen copyright material What john didn't cut and paste was the copyright notice. cited from the above web site Copyright © 2010 AFP. All rights reserved. /cite Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite Notice of the theft and use of copyright material has been forwarded to Google's abuse staff. Hey boob, That copyright notice, in case you haven't read it, says "shall not be used for COMMERCIAL purposes". Hey Carole, thanks for showing everyone you are an IDIOT. Next time read the entire Sentence from the beginning to the end. Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite Here is the sentence boob. The first part describes what can't part of an article can't be used for commercial purposes. The second part describes in what form it can't be used. Nowhere does it say that nobody can copy it, merely that it can't be used FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. Are you that stupid? Are you? Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite The first part of the copyright namaes the parts which shall not be reproduced FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. Wrong. It means the that parts shall not be used for commercial purposes - this is different from reproduced for commercial purposed. The second part describes the type of media that can't copy it. Wrong - the second part lists the other things that the logos, text, etc., shall not have done to them - reproduced, published, etc. Why do you think the words 'FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES' are included? It means that the logos, text, etc., may used for non-commercial purposes, but that is different than copying the material - which you can't do. Commercial use means anywhere that it is used for financial gain. If it didn't want people to copy it for ANY REASON it could say - "Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for ANY PURPOSE, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium." Wrong. Read it again. It says it can't be used for commercial purposes, but also that it can't be reproduced, published, etc. If verbs "reproduced", "published", "broadcast", "rewritten" and "used" do not go with "shall not", how come there are no words or punctuation to go with that change? I am not going to respond to you in this thread unless you actually show some intelligence. You are about as useful as the waste in my large intestine - except that can be used a fertilizer or even fuel. Your words are a waste of electrons and magnetic fields. Jeff Carole www.conspiracee.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
GSK's Swine Flu Vaccine Suspected Of Causing Narcolepsy In Children
"dr_jeff" wrote in message ... carole wrote: Hey Carole, thanks for showing everyone you are an IDIOT. Next time read the entire Sentence from the beginning to the end. Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite Here is the sentence boob. The first part describes what can't part of an article can't be used for commercial purposes. The second part describes in what form it can't be used. Nowhere does it say that nobody can copy it, merely that it can't be used FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. Are you that stupid? Are you? Cite Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. /cite The first part of the copyright namaes the parts which shall not be reproduced FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. Wrong. It means the that parts shall not be used for commercial purposes - this is different from reproduced for commercial purposed. The second part describes the type of media that can't copy it. Wrong - the second part lists the other things that the logos, text, etc., shall not have done to them - reproduced, published, etc. Why do you think the words 'FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES' are included? It means that the logos, text, etc., may used for non-commercial purposes, but that is different than copying the material - which you can't do. Commercial use means anywhere that it is used for financial gain. If it didn't want people to copy it for ANY REASON it could say - "Copyright © 2010 AFP. AFP text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for ANY PURPOSE, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium." Wrong. Read it again. It says it can't be used for commercial purposes, but also that it can't be reproduced, published, etc. If verbs "reproduced", "published", "broadcast", "rewritten" and "used" do not go with "shall not", how come there are no words or punctuation to go with that change? I am not going to respond to you in this thread unless you actually show some intelligence. You are about as useful as the waste in my large intestine - except that can be used a fertilizer or even fuel. Your words are a waste of electrons and magnetic fields. Jeff Jeff, I'm not going to continue getting into contentious discussions with idiots. You are wasting bandwidth. Save your replies for somebody who gives a ****. Carole www.conspiracee.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
GSK's Swine Flu Vaccine Suspected Of Causing Narcolepsy In Children
"Bob Officer" wrote in message news On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:25:32 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: Jeff, I'm not going to continue getting into contentious discussions with idiots. You are wasting bandwidth. Save your replies for somebody who gives a ****. Carole www.conspiracee.com and to think Carole you were worried about being show to be an idiot and then you outdid yourself. Take the copyright to a school where they teach basic english and have a teacher instruct you what it means. or better yet find a law student working in a legal clinic to explain it to you. Bob, it has truly been a un-enlightening experience I must say. Why don't you go back to sci.geo.geology? Oh, that's right, you've worn out your welcome there too. carole www.conspiracee.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
GSK's Swine Flu Vaccine Suspected Of Causing Narcolepsy In Children
"Bob Officer" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:30:56 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message news On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:25:32 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: Jeff, I'm not going to continue getting into contentious discussions with idiots. You are wasting bandwidth. Save your replies for somebody who gives a ****. Carole www.conspiracee.com and to think Carole you were worried about being show to be an idiot and then you outdid yourself. Take the copyright to a school where they teach basic english and have a teacher instruct you what it means. or better yet find a law student working in a legal clinic to explain it to you. Bob, it has truly been a un-enlightening experience I must say. Why don't you go back to sci.geo.geology? Oh, that's right, you've worn out your welcome there too. That's why George and brain both popped by to say hi. Odd that two people from a group which I still read and reply once in a while would stop by to say Hi, If I had "worn out my welcome". Yes, and the easter bunny dropped by to see me. carole www.conspiracee.com |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
GSK's Swine Flu Vaccine Suspected Of Causing Narcolepsy In Children
"Bob Officer" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:15:30 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:30:56 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message news On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:25:32 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: Jeff, I'm not going to continue getting into contentious discussions with idiots. You are wasting bandwidth. Save your replies for somebody who gives a ****. Carole www.conspiracee.com and to think Carole you were worried about being show to be an idiot and then you outdid yourself. Take the copyright to a school where they teach basic english and have a teacher instruct you what it means. or better yet find a law student working in a legal clinic to explain it to you. Bob, it has truly been a un-enlightening experience I must say. Why don't you go back to sci.geo.geology? Oh, that's right, you've worn out your welcome there too. That's why George and Brian both popped by to say hi. Odd that two people from a group which I still read and reply once in a while would stop by to say Hi, If I had "worn out my welcome". Yes, and the easter bunny dropped by to see me. George and Brian are both real people. The easter bunny is a fictional animal. Carole, Do you find it strange you claim a fictional animal stopped by to see you? You know that problem you have about being shown to be an idiot. Do you know how to make it stop? Its called transference bob. You see your own inadequacies onto other people. Time for you to see a shrink. carole www.conspiracee.com |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
GSK's Swine Flu Vaccine Suspected Of Causing Narcolepsy In Children
"Bob Officer" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:25:23 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: You know that problem you have about being shown to be an idiot. Do you know how to make it stop? Its called transference bob. No Carole it is called Projection. drivel deleted You really need to work on your people skills. carole www.conspiracee.com |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
GSK's Swine Flu Vaccine Suspected Of Causing Narcolepsy In Children
Bob Officer wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:25:23 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:15:30 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:30:56 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message news On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:25:32 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: Jeff, I'm not going to continue getting into contentious discussions with idiots. You are wasting bandwidth. Save your replies for somebody who gives a ****. Carole www.conspiracee.com and to think Carole you were worried about being show to be an idiot and then you outdid yourself. Take the copyright to a school where they teach basic english and have a teacher instruct you what it means. or better yet find a law student working in a legal clinic to explain it to you. Bob, it has truly been a un-enlightening experience I must say. Why don't you go back to sci.geo.geology? Oh, that's right, you've worn out your welcome there too. That's why George and Brian both popped by to say hi. Odd that two people from a group which I still read and reply once in a while would stop by to say Hi, If I had "worn out my welcome". Yes, and the easter bunny dropped by to see me. George and Brian are both real people. The easter bunny is a fictional animal. Carole, Do you find it strange you claim a fictional animal stopped by to see you? You know that problem you have about being shown to be an idiot. Do you know how to make it stop? Its called transference bob. No Carole it is called Projection. You project your own short comings and lack of knowledge and a serious reading ability upon others. You call anyone with a education "Dumbed Down". Even when people do explain things to you in the most simple terms, you either call it boring, to complex, or just label irrelevant. You see your own inadequacies onto other people. Time for you to see a shrink. Carole you need to have your shrink explain the Two terns transference and projection and how you have been doing that to others for years. Show your shrink you web page. He or she might gain inside into your disorganized mind. Bobby, when they tested you for intelligence, the score was 66, not as you thought, 99. You were looking at the scores upside down. Kinda like the way you look at health. Upside down and ass backwards. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Swine flu vaccines appear to be causing more ill health than the swine flu | john[_5_] | Kids Health | 0 | December 14th 09 03:51 PM |
World Health Organization 'Manufactured' The Global Swine Flu Scare - Suspected Of Corruption | john[_5_] | Kids Health | 0 | November 27th 09 03:09 PM |
Two thousand schoolgirls suffer suspected ill-effects from cervical cancer vaccine | john[_5_] | Kids Health | 2 | September 15th 09 09:09 AM |
Vaccine findings confirm fears. Some parents long suspected mercury levels were too high. | john | Pregnancy | 1 | February 12th 05 12:51 AM |
Vaccine findings confirm fears. Some parents long suspected mercury levels were too high. | john | General | 1 | February 12th 05 12:51 AM |