If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Help Eliminate an Instrument of Child Torture
Chris C in TX: Thanks. I know it's unlikely,
but I think it would be hilarious if the moderates reading alt.parenting.spanking would rebel more against extremists like Kane and cohorts. In a way, aren't you being held hostage by them? Their extremism misrepresents the moderates. I knew moderates were out there, but I don't blame you for avoiding confrontation with Kane and cohorts. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Help Eliminate an Instrument of Child Torture
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Help Eliminate an Instrument of Child Torture
Nice weather we're having.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Help Eliminate an Instrument of Child Torture
There's one.
Go ahead and believe that. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Help Eliminate an Instrument of Child Torture
Greg Hanson wrote:
Chris C in TX: Thanks. I know it's unlikely, but I think it would be hilarious if the moderates reading alt.parenting.spanking would rebel more against extremists like Kane and cohorts. ---------------------------- Only bullied abused children "rebel". If you are characterizing what you're promoting as "rebellion", then you're saying that you were abused, and that has made you support Evil. In a way, aren't you being held hostage by them? Their extremism misrepresents the moderates. ------------------------------- Ain't any, there are Good and Evil, and you're Evil. Can't be a compromise. Steve |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Help Eliminate an Instrument of Child Torture
Only bullied abused children "rebel".
I disagree. If you are characterizing what you're promoting as "rebellion", then you're saying that you were abused, and that has made you support Evil. Wasn't proposing, it was partly prediction, partly hypothesis. Your ""logical"" conclusion is totally illogical. Major thinking error. In a way, aren't you being held hostage by them? Their extremism misrepresents the moderates. ------------------------------- Ain't any, there are Good and Evil, and you're Evil. Can't be a compromise. Steve And you're complaining about the FUNDAMENTALISTS? You just described their position! (And I don't agree with it by the way.) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Help Eliminate an Instrument of Child Torture
Greg Hanson wrote:
Only bullied abused children "rebel". I disagree. -------------- You won't be right. If you are characterizing what you're promoting as "rebellion", then you're saying that you were abused, and that has made you support Evil. Wasn't proposing, it was partly prediction, partly hypothesis. Your ""logical"" conclusion is totally illogical. Major thinking error. ----------------------- Stating such doesn't make it so. Now if you actually presernted a sructured argument why hitting someone doesn't ACTUALLY make them want to kill you, then we might be interested, but absent that, you have done nothing but prate uselessly. You see, I have reason on MY side. That's your BIGGEST and MOST DIRE PROBLEM HERE!! In a way, aren't you being held hostage by them? Their extremism misrepresents the moderates. ------------------------------- Ain't any, there are Good and Evil, and you're Evil. Can't be a compromise. Steve And you're complaining about the FUNDAMENTALISTS? You just described their position! (And I don't agree with it by the way.) ----------------------------- That's NOT a description of Fundamentalism. That's a description of any system of True Morality. Fundamentalism is PHONY morality because its morals are phony and false revisionist versions of any Real Actual Goodness. Steve |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Help Eliminate an Instrument of Child Torture
S: Only bullied abused children "rebel".
G: I disagree. S: You won't be right. Were you abused, Steve? You sure seem to be rebelling. Being a COMMUNIST? Your apparent dislike for parents? Atheism? Come on, Steve, it's not really that unpredictable. You're young too, aren't you? What age? You seem to be struggling for a unique identity, only to fit a well known and repeated cookie cutter pattern. I've seen it before several times. Tell me you don't see adolescent rebellion in kids 16-25 who are into the anarchist scene.. Do you know Shawn? S: If you are characterizing what you're S: promoting as "rebellion", then you're S: saying that you were abused, and that S: has made you support Evil G: Wasn't proposing, it was partly prediction, G: partly hypothesis. G: Your ""logical"" conclusion is totally illogical. G: Major thinking error. S: Stating such doesn't make it so. Exactly. Apply that to this thinking error. S: If you are characterizing what you're S: promoting as "rebellion", then you're S: saying that you were abused, and that S: has made you support Evil. S: Now if you actually presernted a sructured S: argument why hitting someone doesn't S: ACTUALLY make them want to kill you, S: then we might be interested, WE again? Is Kane just one of your personalities? Who gives a rats behind if you're ""interested""? Megalomania running away with ya eh? (I noticed that OTHER people in the past have observed this in you also. If you're not Kane, in some way, then it is an amazing coincidence that two such HUGE cases of meglomania have paired up.) (And it seems unlikely that two people with such artificially inflated self images would be able to STAND each other even if they were pushing for the same issues.) S: but absent that, you have done nothing S: but prate uselessly. Thanks for worrying about my time management. I didn't know you cared so very much. S: You see, I have reason on MY side. S: That's your BIGGEST and MOST DIRE PROBLEM HERE!! You have reason on your side to check into a rubber room. G: In a way, aren't you being held hostage by them? G: Their extremism misrepresents the moderates. S: Ain't any, there are Good and Evil, and you're Evil. S: Can't be a compromise. G: And you're complaining about the FUNDAMENTALISTS? G: You just described their position! G: (And I don't agree with it by the way.) S: That's NOT a description of Fundamentalism. S: That's a description of any system of True S: Morality. Any system of True Morality would recognize that the world is not all polarized Good or Evil. To ignore the shades of grey in our world and see only black and white would be Fundamental, My Dear Watson, Fundamental. It's also naive. S: Fundamentalism is PHONY morality S: because its morals are phony and false S: revisionist versions of any Real Actual Goodness. Isn't this the rhetoric people use against anything and everything they don't like? Certainly I could justify applying this to CPS. And this Good and Evil stuff you throw around, what does it have to SAY about a caseworker who has to tell a terrible LIE in order to make a case in Juvenile Court? In a polarized world, as you describe, wouldn't there be MUCH LESS tolerance for such LIES? In a polarized world, the imagined good ends WOULD NOT justify such bad means. A caseworker telling LIES would become MUCH MORE of an issue where GREYS are to be avoided. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Help Eliminate an Instrument of Child Torture
Greg Hanson wrote:
S: Only bullied abused children "rebel". G: I disagree. S: You won't be right. Were you abused, Steve? ---------------- I didn't rebel against my parents, never had to. You sure seem to be rebelling. ------------------- Against an abusive society, perhaps. Being a COMMUNIST? ---------------------- Agsinst abuse of people by rich bullies. Your apparent dislike for parents? ------------------------ Not mine. Undoubtedly yours, however. Atheism? Come on, Steve, it's not really that unpredictable. -------------------------- I'm not an atheist, how stupid are you to repeat this mindlessly. You're young too, aren't you? What age? -------------------------- Gee whiz, golly-gosh, I'll be 54 in March. You seem to be struggling for a unique identity, ---------------------------- A lifequest of all decent humans, undoubtedly. only to fit a well known and repeated cookie cutter pattern. I've seen it before several times. -------------------------- You've played in your **** the same way, too, I bet. Liar. You imagined it because it pleased you to say so. Tell me you don't see adolescent rebellion in kids 16-25 who are into the anarchist scene.. ----------------------------- I think they are stupid, but they have the right to learen from it, till society is forced to do better by them. Not my age-group though, by thirty or forty years. Do you know Shawn? ----------------------- What's a Shawn? G: Major thinking error. S: Stating such doesn't make it so. Exactly. Apply that to this thinking error. ---------------- That was YOUR thinking error, you lying distorting little ****head. S: Now if you actually presernted a sructured S: argument why hitting someone doesn't S: ACTUALLY make them want to kill you, S: then we might be interested, WE again? --------------- People like me. You'll meet more of them soon enough. Is Kane just one of your personalities? ----------------- Nope. I ONLY post by my own name. A matter of pride. (And it seems unlikely that two people with such artificially inflated self images would be able to STAND each other even if they were pushing for the same issues.) -------------------- You're dabbling in your delusions. Any system of True Morality would recognize that the world is not all polarized Good or Evil. ------------------------- The world isn't, people are. To ignore the shades of grey in our world and see only black and white would be Fundamental, My Dear Watson, Fundamental. It's also naive. ---------------------------- Now if you only knew what Fundamental means to religionists... S: Fundamentalism is PHONY morality S: because its morals are phony and false S: revisionist versions of any Real Actual Goodness. Isn't this the rhetoric people use against anything and everything they don't like? ------------------------ You mean Evil? Sure, I suppose so. You still don't get it, so you should worry. Certainly I could justify applying this to CPS. ------------------------ Now if you knew what Evil was, instead of mistaking Good for Evil. And this Good and Evil stuff you throw around, what does it have to SAY about a caseworker who has to tell a terrible LIE in order to make a case in Juvenile Court? ------------------------------ Depends on whether they are right. In a polarized world, as you describe, wouldn't there be MUCH LESS tolerance for such LIES? -------------------------------- When a Lie does Evil, it is wrong, when it does Good, it isn't!! In a polarized world, the imagined good ends WOULD NOT justify such bad means. ------------------------------------ Good cannot be merely imagined, it is real or it is Evil. But you're Evil, so you won't know that. Steve |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chemically beating children: THOR to hammer fluoridation finally? | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 18 | July 25th 04 05:31 PM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Spanking | 12 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
| U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking | Kane | Spanking | 142 | November 16th 03 07:46 PM |
A Plant's Motivation? | Kane | Spanking | 44 | October 16th 03 01:51 PM |
'Horrible' Home | Kane | General | 1 | July 16th 03 02:29 AM |