Beware of free self defense program SAVE International by Peter Letterese

Notice to parents...
A free self defense program called SAVE International is being offered
around the United States. This program is owned and operated by a man
named Peter Letterese who is a CONVICTED CHILD ABUSER and alleged CON
MAN.

Peter Letterese and Associates and his company SAVE International
target young womens groups like the Girl Scouts of America, middle and
high schools, and small neighborhood church organizations.

The money to run this operation comes from dozens of dentist who are
claiming they have been defrauded or scammed by Peter Letterese.

Former Kansas City Royals baseball coach Tom Gamboa is the national
spokesperson for SAVE International. I do not know if Mr. Gamboa is
aware of the alleged frauds or the conviction for child abuse of Mr.
Letterese, but Mr. Gamboa is actively pushing to get this program into
the professional sports market and dozens of schools and the Girl
Scouts of America.

Here is a portion of the police report concerning Peter Letterese'
attack on a 6 year old boy. For more details to a search on the web and
newsgroups to find out more and you decide if you want your children
involved with this man and his company.

Go to Http://dentistryalert.f2g.net
there you will find much more information on this man and his business.

See for yourself!
Partial Police Report:
Peter Letterese - Arrest Report
Aggravated Child Abuse

Pembroke Pines Police Department
9600 Pines Blvd
Pembroke Pines, Florida
431-2200

Case 96-08-46797
Offense /Arrest
Child Abuse /Aggravated /Arrest
Arrest 96-1419
Time / Date of Occurrence: 1830, 08-14-96


With the use of 10X50 binoculars the vehicle was observed until the
defendant struck the juvenile in the face with his right hand with a
backwards blow. This detective then entered his vehicle and drove to
the defendant's location. After identifying myself as a police officer
the defendant was asked to step from his vehicle and provide this
detective with his drivers license.

Upon observing the juvenile said juvenile was visibly trembling and
bleeding from the nose, and from behind his left ear. The juveniles
T-shirt also had blood on same on the left shoulder area which was from
the wound behind the juveniles ear. It should also be noted that the
juveniles left hand had two wounds on his little finger and on his
index finger. This detective then observed that the defendant had a
black in color nylon case which was carried on his belt on the right
side. The defendant was then asked if he was carrying a firearm at
which time he said he was. A CCF. license was then produced by the
defendant at which time the firearm was taken from the defendant and
placed in this detectives vehicle for officer safety (380 automatic
Walter PPK/S serial # S135953).

The six year old was then asked where the cuts on his nose came from
along with the cuts behind his left ear had come from. The juvenile
advised that he had been bad and the defendant bit him in the nose, and
had picked him up by the ears from behind and dropped him to the ground
after lifting him off the ground by same. It should be noted that the
juvenile continued to blame himself for the punishment he had received.
The juvenile also advised that he had been told by the defendant not to
tell anyone that he had been punished. When questioned the defendant
advised that he told the child that he would kill him if he told anyone
about the punishment. Said juvenile stated that he had also been hit
with a brown belt because he had again been bad and he needed to be
punished. A check of the juvenile's back revealed many small welts and
abrasion that were very fresh. The juvenile advised that he had been
punished at the defendant's home in Fort Lauderdale before he had been
taken to the construction site. While at the defendant's home just
prior to being taken to the construction site, the juvenile had been
repeatedly picked up by the ears from behind until his feet were off
the ground then dropped. The defendant had also bitten the juvenile in
the nose at the defendant's home along with being bitten in the hand
which caused the observed cuts. Due to these crimes having been
committed in B.S.O's jurisdiction detective Lori Moore #2246 was
contacted by detective Michaud and asked to respond to the PM Pines PD
at which time she did.

I found the full police report on Peter Letterese' child abuse charges.
For more information on child abusers and child sex offenders go to;
http://www.sexcriminals.com/
For more information on Miami-Dade Sheriff criminal and sex offenders
check out:
http://www.mdpd.com/bolo/default.htm


PETER LETTERESE ? ARREST REPORT
Aggravated Child Abuse


Case#:96-08-46797
Time & Date reported: 18:30, 08-14-96
Arrest#: 96-1419

SUSPECT: Peter D. Letterese
5000 SW 148 Ave.
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
431-2200

Report of Pembroke Pine Police Detective Earl Feugill:

While conducting surveillance at the above location for illegal
dumpers, the above vehicle driven by the defendant was observed
entering the above construction site with the victim (blank) sitting
in the right front passenger seat.

It should be noted that to enter said construction site, there is also
a metal sign that states ?this area is a designated construction site,
and anyone trespassing on this property shall, upon conviction be
guilty of a felony?. The metal sign that states was posted on the
steel gate on the eastside of the gated entrance. Upon observing the
above vehicle enter the site, said vehicle was monitored for approx
twenty five minutes while the defendant was observed what appeared to
be yelling at the juvenile while continuously pointing his finger at
said juvenile. It should be noted that this detective was approx: one
hundred yards from the suspect vehicle on foot behind a wooded area
east of the defendants location within the site as not to be seen by
anyone entering the site.

With the use of 10X50 binoculars the vehicle was observed until the
defendant struck the juvenile in the face with his right hand with a
backwards blow. This detective then entered his vehicle and drove to
the defendant?s location. After identifying myself as a police officer
the defendant was asked to step from his vehicle and provide this
detective with his drivers license.

The defendant was then read his Miranda warnings from a printed card
at which time he was asked what his purpose for being within the
construction site was. The defendant advised that he was having a
discipline problem with his child and had brought the child to the
site (which is littered with various garbage and rubble) to discuss
said problem. Upon observing the juvenile said juvenile was visibly
trembling and bleeding from the nose, and from behind his left ear.
The juveniles T-shirt also had blood on same on the left shoulder area
which was from the wound behind the juvenile?s ear. It should also be
noted that the juvenile?s left hand had two wounds on his little
finger and on his index finger. This detective then observed that the
defendant had a black in color nylon case which was carried on his
belt on the right side. The defendant was then asked if he was
carrying a firearm at which time he said he was. A CCF. license was
then produced by the defendant at which time the firearm was taken
from the defendant and placed in this detectives vehicle for officer
safety (380 automatic Walter PPK/S serial # S135953). The defendant
was then asked why the juvenile was bleeding in several places and
appeared to be trembling. The defendant then advised that he had lost
his temper when disciplining the juvenile because the juvenile while
eating his evening meal had thrown up on purpose to aggravate his
mother. After backup units arrived this detective spoke with the
juvenile away from the defendant who is not the juveniles biological
father. The juvenile advised this detective that when he was eating
his evening meal, he could not finish same because he was full. The
defendant who was in the temporary custody of the juvenile then
threatened the juvenile that if he did not finish his meal he would be
sorry. The juvenile then advised that he tried to finish his meal but
got sick. The defendant then drove the juvenile to the
dump/construction site to show the juvenile where he would live if he
continued to be bad, as the juvenile advised.

The six year old was then asked where the cuts on his nose came from
along with the cuts behind his left ear had come from. The juvenile
advised that he had been bad and the defendant bit him in the nose,
and had picked him up by the ears from behind and dropped him to the
ground after lifting him off the ground by same. It should be noted
that the juvenile continued to blame himself for the punishment he had
received. The juvenile also advised that he had been told by the
defendant not to tell anyone that he had been punished. When
questioned the defendant advised that he told the child that he would
kill him if he told anyone about the punishment. Said juvenile stated
that he had also been hit with a brown belt because he had again been
bad and he needed to be punished. A check of the juvenile?s back
revealed many small welts and abrasion that were very fresh. The
juvenile advised that he had been punished at the defendant?s home in
Fort Lauderdale before he had been taken to the construction site.
While at the defendant?s home just prior to being taken to the
construction site, the juvenile had been repeatedly picked up by the
ears from behind until his feet were off the ground then dropped. The
defendant had also bitten the juvenile in the nose at the defendant?s
home along with being bitten in the hand which caused the observed
cuts. Due to these crimes having been committed in B.S.O?s
jurisdiction detective Lori Moore #2246 was contacted by detective
Michaud and asked to respond to the PM Pines PD at which time she did.

?The juvenile further advised that while sitting in the construction
site the defendant stuck his thumb down the child?s throat until the
child was forced to bite down on the defendant?s thumb while gasping
for air. A check of the defendant?s right hand at that time did
reveal several bite marks high up on the defendants hand to the rear
of the thumb knuckle ? approximately four inches up from the thumb.?
It should also be noted that when the juvenile was brought to the
Pembroke Pines Police Department, he was given food and drink at which
time he advised that he was hungry but could not swallow because it
hurt. The juvenile also advised that while he was at the construction
site the defendant bent the fingers of his left hand backwards several
times until it made the juvenile cry repeatedly. The juvenile
continuously advised that it was not the defendant?s fault for
punishing the child but it was his fault for being bad. The defendant
was then asked if he had punished the child in the manner that the
child described. The defendant advised that he did punish the
juvenile in all the ways that the juvenile had stated however none of
his methods would give the child lasting damage as stated by the
defendant. The child and the defendant were then transported to the PM
Pines Police Dept. separately. After this detective placed the
defendant under arrest for the above offenses he stated that he wished
to talk to this detective in order to give his side of the story.
Detective Michaud who is a juvenile detective then spoke with the
juvenile and conducted an interview with same. This detective along
with detective Michaud and Detective Lori Moore from B.S.O. then
conducted an interview with the defendant who admitted all the
juveniles? statements.

The defendant ended his statement with ?it is better to have emotional
damage than the child going to jail from becoming a criminal like his
brother.? It should be noted that the juvenile lives in a home on the
defendant?s property where the juvenile?s mother works as a farm
manager for the defendant. Because of disciplinary problems the
juvenile?s mother let the child live with the defendant temporarily.
The above child was later taken to H.R.S. in Lauderhill for his
safety. The juvenile?s mother responded to the PM Pines PD where she
was interviewed by Detective Michaud. The defendant was then
transported to B.S.O Main jail along with probable cause affidavits
from Detective Moore from B.S.O. This investigation continues with
Detective Michaud as the assigned investigator. See attached reports
by Detective Michaud concerning the above interviews conducted by her
along with taped statements. It should be noted that according to the
juvenile and the defendant, the juvenile had been taken to the above
location several times before the above date for disciplinary action
by the defendant. Upon contact with H.R.S. they were advised of the
child?s condition and at that time H.R.S. advised that would take the
juvenile to a facility for any medical treatment needed. Detective
Witte #174 who is also a detective with the PM Pines Police Dept then
transported the juvenile to H.R.S.. I.D. technicians took photos of
the child?s wounds and also the wounds of the defendant?s hands. The
defendant?s vehicle was later towed from the crime scene by All-
American towing.


Report of Pembroke Pine Police Detective Michaud:

On 08-14-96, this investigator was asked to respond to the above
location by Sgt. Golt in reference to a possible child abuse. Upon
arrival at the above location, the undersigned was advised by Det.
Feugill that while he was conducting a surveillance at the above
location for illegal dumpers, the suspect was observed entering the
above construction site with the victim sitting in the right front
passenger seat of his vehicle. Det. Feugill stated that while he was
monitoring the vehicle, that he observed what appeared to be yelling
at the victim by the suspect, who was continuously pointing his finger
at said child. Det. Feugill also observed the suspect strike the child
in the face with his right hand. After Det. Feugill confronted the
suspect and read him his Miranda rights, the suspect stated that he
was having disciplinary problems with the child, and that he had
brought him to this location to discuss these problems. Det. Feugill
also told this investigator that he observed the child to be bleeding
from the nose,
And from behind his left ear and when he questioned the child about
this, he (blank) told him that he had been bad and that the suspect
had bit him in the nose and picked him up by the ears. (Blank) also
told Det. Feugill that he had been hit on the back when a brown belt
and that the suspect had stuck his thumb down his throat. Det.
Feugill also told this investigator that when he confronted the
suspect with this, that he admitted that he had lost his temper when
disciplining the child. When this investigator got to the scene and
confronted the child, he advised this investigator that he was not
supposed to talk to anyone or to tell what had happened, but then he
started speaking up openly, at which time he was transported to the
Pembroke Pines PD to take a sworn taped statement from him. Upon
interviewing the child, he advised this investigator that he was
living with the suspect and his wife at this time, but that he
normally resided with his mother, adjacent to the suspect?s residence.
(Blank) told the undersigned that when he slept at the suspect?s
residence, that he slept in between him and his wife. (Blank) also
told the undersigned that the suspect had taken him to the above
location because he was bad, and that the suspect told him that this
place was a jail, and he wanted to see if he (blank) wanted to live
there. When the undersigned asked the child if this was the first
time that he had been to this location, he stated that it was not.
When the underside asked (blank) what he had done that the suspect
thought was real bad, he stated, ?I just threw up on accident ?cause I
was full and he said that I was gonna eat all?I?m going to have to eat
all the food, but then I felt full.? (Blank) stated that he first was
spanked on his buttocks and face, that a washcloth was then put in his
mouth, that the suspect bit his nose and thumb, and that the suspect
put his thumb down his/victim?s throat prior to ending up at the above
location??oh, after that, he made me face the wall and then took me in
the car and did some more of those same things.? When the undersigned
asked (blank) what the suspect did to him while in the vehicle, he
stated ?he put his fingers down my throat and he bended my fingers.?
(Blank) also told the undersigned that his mouth bled from the suspect
putting his thumb down his throat. When the undersigned asked (blank)
where he bled from, he stated ?right below my tongue, under my
tongue.??

?(Blank) also proceeded to tell this investigator that the suspect
made him lay on the floorboard enroute to the above location, and that
he did not allow him to sit on the seat and put his seatbelt on. When
the undersigned where they started off from, he stated ?from his job?.

(Blank) also told the undersigned that his finger was also bent while
he was in the suspect?s vehicle. When the undersigned asked (blank)
about being bit by the suspect on this date, he stated ?he did bite my
thumb where in?this red mark came from him biting my thumb today.?
When (blank) was asked if the suspect did anything to his nose, he
stated ?he bit it.? When the undersigned asked (blank) where this
took place, he stated ?that was at the office.? When (blank) was
questioned about what he was hit with on his buttocks, he stated ?a
belt.??

(Blank) also talked about going somewhere were there was water near
the above location wherein the suspect bend his fingers back to keep
him awake. When the undersigned questioned (blank) about the marks
behind his left ear, he stated that the suspect was grabbing him by
the ears, picking him up by the ears, shaking his head, and dropping
him on the ground. When the undersigned asked (blank) where this took
place at, he stated ?at the office in his bedroom. It was really in
the bathroom. Then we came out from the bathroom into the bedroom.??

?When the undersigned asked (blank) what the suspect had stated to him
about what would happen if he told someone about what was going on, he
stated ?he said if I tell anyone, I?m gonna be in big trouble and he
told me all about villainses.??

?When the undersigned asked (blank) if he had ever told anyone about
what the suspect had done to him, he stated that he had told his
mother. When the undersigned asked (blank) what he told his mother,
he stated that he told her everything that the suspect did to him the
first time. When (blank) was questioned further about this, he stated
that he told his mother about the marks on his back, that he sustained
from the suspect hitting him with a belt, and about the pinch marks
that he sustained from the suspect. (Blank) stated that his mother
talked to the suspect about what he had told her and that ?the second
time, I almost got in big trouble.? (Blank) did not think that the
suspect?s wife was aware of any of this and he stated that she would
never hit him like this. This investigator did have ID Tech Campisi
take pictures of the child, which shows the red marks on his nose, the
scratch marks behind his left ear and the blood on his T-shirt from
same, the pinch on his left upper arm, the marks on his back, and the
sores on his fingers from being bit, which have been made a part of
this file.?

When the undersigned asked (blank) where he was when the suspect bit
his fingers, he stated ?by the Bonaventure pool and that the suspect
had stated to him ?you?re gonna have to eat all that dirt and mud and
sleep in that mud.??

When (blank) asked about whether he had ever been bitten elsewhere
than on his fingers, he stated that he had been bitten on the lips by
the suspect on this date while at his office.?

?This investigator reported this to Wanda ID #0600 at the Abuse
Registry, who felt that this was not an immediate and therefore
advised that no one from H.R.S. would be responding to the PM Pines PD
on this evening. This investigator then contacted C.P.T. and asked
that someone call this investigator back about having the child
examined as he was complaining about his throat hurting him and not
being able to eat. This investigator was contacted by Andy Robins from
C.P.T., who advised that he would not see the child on this date and
that this was what emergency rooms were for. This investigator then
contacted CDC to have them contact a sergeant from the Child Abuse
Unit at B.S.O., which they did.

Sgt. Schleuter from B.S.O. did call and advise that she would make
contact with her Lt. and call back, which she did. This investigator
was advised that Det. Moore would be responding. Det. Moore contacted
this investigator and was advised of everything.

?Det Moore made contact with David Hoffert at H.R.S. and learned that
there was a prior referral involving this child. Hoffert?agreed to
fax a copy of the prior investigation to this investigator. Upon
reviewing same, this investigator learned that on 07-06-96, a report
was called in to the Abuse Registry alleging that the child often had
bruises and that he had a black eye. The report also alleged that the
suspect was the dominating one and that he was in total control of
disciplining the child. There was also mention in this report about
the child disappearing into the suspect?s bedroom for hours, about him
sleeping in the suspect?s bed and about him taking baths with the
suspect.?

Daisy Symons was the H.R.S. Investigator assigned to this case and
when she went out on a home visit to interview everyone, she noted
that the child told her that the suspect does not hurt him, that they
play fight so that he can learn how to defend himself. Symons did note
faded blue marks on the side of the child?s face, but the child told
her that this occurred when he was wrestling with the suspect, and
that it was not intentional. (Blank) told Symons that he does sleep
over at the suspect?s residence and that he has taken a shower with
him once in the past. The suspect told Symons that he has tried to
help (blank) by letter her live in one of his houses on the farm. The
suspect was very upset with this report and he denied hitting the
child. The suspect did tell Symons that the child had a bruise, but he
alleged that it was from wrestling with him. The suspect also denied
that the child slept with him and his wife. The suspect told Symons
that he leaves the disciplining to the child?s mother. When Symons
spoke with (blank) she stated that no one disciplines her child except
herself and she was very angry over this report. Mrs. Letterese stated
that her husband would never hurt a child or an animal. When the
undersigned confronted (blank) which this, he stated that he had
sustained a black eye when the suspect hit him in the face, but he
felt that the black eye was accidental. The child denied any
inappropriate touching.

?This investigator then brought Mr. Letterese in for a statement, but
in the presence of Det. Moore and Feugill, he stated that he did not
want to give a taped statement, but that he did want to be given an
opportunity to explain himself as he felt that his intentions were
good. Mr. Letterese was given this opportunity, at which time he
stated that (blank) has been working for him for approximately one
year and that he recently allowed her to move on his farm with her
son. Mr. Letterese went on to state that the child started calling him
Daddy and that he took over the role as he and his wife can not have
children. Mr. Letterese stated that the child is a disciplinary
problem, and that his mother had talked about sending him away a few
days prior. Mr. Letterese talked about the child deliberately trying
to get his mother mad, about how he does not eat right, and how he
made himself throw up after eating a small portion of rice. Mr.
Letterese admitted to everything that had happened except for hitting
the child on the back, but he stated he wanted to hurt the child to
get his point across, not cause lasting damage. Mr. Letterese stated
that he had concerns about the child ending up in jail if he did not
change, and therefore he felt that emotional damage was better that
the child ending up in jail.?

When the undersigned questioned Mr. Letterese about telling his mother
about him disciplining him, he stated that he used to tell her, at
which time all forms of discipline ceased.

?When the undersigned asked Mr. Letterese what he had told the child
would happen if he told anyone about being disciplined by him, he
stated that he told him that it was bad to tell, and that he?d kill
him if he did.?

?When the forms of discipline ? biting, picking up by the ears, thumb
down the throat, bending fingers back and pinching ? were individually
discussed with Mr. Letterese, he felt that none of them had lasting
effects on the child. Mr. Letterese also stated that spanking the
child on the bottom did no good.?

When the undersigned asked Mr. Letterese if (blank) knew where he was
talking her son, he stated that he only told her that he was taking
him for a ride. When the undersigned asked Mr. Letterese if (blank)
knew about the forms of discipline he was using on her son, he stated
that he thought she did. Mr. Letterese felt that he should be given a
chance, he stated, ?I confess to stupidity?. Mr. Letterese also
stated that he was open to suggestions and he also felt that if he is
locked up that it would only slow down the process. When the
undersigned explained to Mr. Letterese that he was given an
opportunity when Symons was at his residence to get services that
might have assisted him with parenting techniques, he stated that he
did not recall being offered these services.

?Mr. Letterese showed this Investigator, Det Feugill and Det Moore his
right hand which did reveal several bite marks high up on the
defendant? hand near his thumb, which were also photographed.?

The child was taken to H.R.S. by Det. White due to concerns by this
investigator and Det. Moore. (Blank) responded to this agency with
Mrs. Letterese, at which time she agreed to give this investigator a
sworn taped statement. (Blank) admitted that her son had been staying
with the Lettereses this week, and when asked why, she replied ?to
give me a break?. When the undersigned asked (blank) if she was aware
of how Mr. Letterese disciplined her son, she stated ?only knew about
spanking?, which is contrary of what she told H.R.S. Investigator
Symons. (Blank) denied being aware of any other means of discipline.
When the undersigned asked (Blank) if her son ever told her about the
means of discipline used by Letterese, she stated ?no, he just says
that he?s got a spanking?, but she also later admitted that her son
had told her about being bit with a belt on one occasion. When the
undersigned asked (blank) if she had noticed any marks on her son?s
fingers, she stated ?a couple of days ago he had a scratch on his
pinky?, which she described as appearing like the skin was scraped
off. When the undersigned asked (blank) about the prior referral, she
stated that she felt like the report was made about her being abused,
that she was being forced to work hours that she did not want to work.
When the undersigned asked (blank) about the allegations on (blank)
she stated that she did mention some things, but that she could not
recall what they were. When the undersigned asked (blank) if Mr.
Letterese had discussed with her that emotional damage was better than
a child going to jail, she stated that he discussed with her about
helping her son to be a better person was better than him going to
jail.

Upon speaking with Mrs. Letterse, she stated that she did not have any
knowledge of her husband disciplining the child in manners discussed
in this report by the child and Mr. Letterese.

A copy of the Probable Cause Affidavit was sent to W.I.D. per policy
#36 as well as to David Hoffert from H.R.S.

On 08-15-96, this investigator was contacted by Mr. M. Dutko, who is
an attorney, advising that he had been contacted by Mrs. Letterese on
this case and that he needed a copy of the Probable Cause Affidavit,
which this investigator did fax to him.

On 08-20-96, this investigator was contacted by Det. Moore, who
advised that H.R.S. had returned the child to his mother on the same
evening as this incident, and that there was a hearing schedule in
front of Judge Birken for placement of this child at 1300 hours on
this date. Det. Moore asked this investigator to attend this hearing,
which this investigator did and the child was placed. The undersigned
also learned at that time that the child was taken to C.P.T. on 08-19-
96, at which time he was examined by ARNP Kowalczy, who noted red
irritation to inner mouth with small white blister, injuries to the
fingers from being bitten, a bruise to the left arm and bruises behind
the ear.?

Kowalczy noted the means of discipline to this child as being extreme
and abnormal and that continuation of same could cause serious
physical and emotional damage to said child.?

?It should further be noted that the child told Kowalczy everything
that he told this investigator and Det. Feugill and also told her ?my
mom keeps a bad list for me then shows it to Peter, he?s my fake
father. When I?m bad Peter hurts me because I deserve it. He took me
to the dump Wednesday night to see if I wanted to live there. He
picked me up off the floor by my ears, he bends my fingers back, he
spanks me with a belt on my bottom, he slapped my face. I threw up by
accident. I told him that, but he kept bending my fingers back until
I said I did it on purpose, then he stuck his fingers in my mouth and
down my throat. When he took his fingers out his thumb had blood on
it. He had to wipe it off. I bit his finger by accident and he
slapped me hard until I fell down on the floor. My mom never hits me
in the face, she hits me with a belt, a switch, a branch or her hand
with I?m bad.??

?Kowalczy also noted that (blank) told her that Peter had told him in
the past not to tell anyone about the beatings. He also stated that
him mother told Peter wherever he was bad, but that he did not know
whether or not she knew Peter beat him. He also stated that Peter
would also make him stand facing a wall for hours and that when he
would fall asleep Peter would bend his fingers back.?

?(Blank) also told Kowalczy that he is afraid of Peter, but that he
does not tell him that. Again (blank) referred to Peter (Letterese)
as his ?fake father,? and he stated that he called him this because he
did not have a real father, that his mother had thrown him out.
(Blank) also denied any type of sexual abuse to Kowalczy, but he did
tell her that there were times when he slept at the Letterese
residence that the suspect slept naked, see copy of Medical Report
from C.P.T., which has been made a part of this file.

?Based on the foregoing, this case is being cleared by arrest and this
case is being filed with A.S.A. (Assistant State Attorney) L. Midler.?

To Whom It May Concern: Be Advised - Attorney Robert Amidon is a
covert-surrogate
attorney for The Church of Scientology. He represented them in a case
in the past
wherein a brain-damaged young man asked them back for $1.3 million they
had solicited from him (Los Angeles News Story attached).

Attached you will find additional adobe pdf files that outline first
Amidon's legal connections to the Church but also "the real reason"
for his looking desperately for a plausible "someone" to use to sue our
organizations. Only a lawsuit can be made public.
Arbitrations are private and confidential by nature.
Amidon isn't seeking justice but instead hopes
to accomplish character assassination.

His actions are transparent.

But Amidon's connections to Scientology go further.
His Marketing actions on behalf of the Church
are also documented from the Internet in the
first attached file.

His "lawsuit" on behalf of Baldwin is suspiciously
and hideously date-coincident with the second of the
attached cases as it moved toward the third case
(now filed and commenced in Federal Court).

The Church of Scientology has been charged in this Federal lawsuit with
violating the Federal Copyright laws
with regard to the published works of Les Dane. Mr. Dane's works are
books about
selling, closing sales ... which this Church wishes to go on using, but
apparently from all the
evidence we can gather, without any willingness to pay the usual
royalties for
such use which it has enjoyed royalty-free, for over 34 years,
long before our becoming the custodial agents for these materials.
Five years of "negotiating"
efforts on our part have produced what is apparently a zero willingness
on their part to
globally resolve this dispute by any means other than the "tactics of
character assassination",
which you see demonstrated above. Sadly, we find ourselves NOT to be
the
first such targets.

It is an interesting and somewhat ironic observation that Scientology
has for years declared
that just this kind of attack has been leveled against them by those
with nefarious
purposes. Ironic indeed.

Amidon's effort is on behalf of Scientology. Amidon's "client" is
contractually
bound to arbitrate any dispute with Galileo=AE Systems International.
He refuses
to arbitrate as it would not serve Attorney Amidon's purpose to try to
discredit
the actions of the corporations he has been defaming. A libel suit is
being prepared
as this notice is being written. Amidon's client expressed no need to
resolve anything
between himself and Galileo=AE Systems International until Amidon
apparently solicited him
to do so. When this solicitation is confirmed with evidence we are
expecting momentarily, it will be a
violation of the professional ethics code supported by The California
Bar Association.
Evidence concerning a colleague of Amidon's, one attorney Norman Taylor
(himself a publicly identified
Scientologist), already exists in our possession; wherein Taylor, whom
Amidon has admitted is a
colleague, has been caught red-handed unethically soliciting
"plaintiffs" to attempt to discredit
the organizations under attack by the lot of of them.

SAVE!=99 International offers its 3-Hour Personal Security Presence=99
Training for $495 per
adult, satisfaction guaranteed. It has been reported by many who have
taken it, to be
more effective at teaching them to be safe in real-world crisis
situations than
years of more traditional self-defense training they had personally
gone through prior,
any and all of which costs thousands of dollars to go through. It has
been reported by
retired Army and Marine veterans as more useful than Special Forces
training,
(which was never designed for use by civilians, having other military
purposes),
when applied in the streets and neighborhoods of the United States.

That makes SAVE!=99 Training THE LEAST EXPENSIVE, EFFECTIVE Personal
Security Training
program in the country and perhaps the world. SAVE!=99's Personal
Security Presence=99 Training
also comes with one-year follow-up consulting, online, at no charge.

For over a year, S.A.V.E!=99 International has commenced a campaign to
train 50,000 young women ages 10-17 around the
United States (each accompanied by a parent or legal guardian)
ABSOLUTELY FOR FREE.
And a second program, equally FREE to High school and Little League
Athletes teaches young men and women
how to avoid violence in sports-related circumstances.
These may be reviewed at www.save-training.com.

We invite you to visit www.savetraining.com for information regarding
how this
priceless training (in either format) for your children and other loved
ones can be done
in your area - AT NO CHARGE WHATSOEVER.

Robert Amidon certainly and The Church of Scientology (apparently) are
opposed to the existence
of these programs and both have fought furiously to try to stop them
from occurring.

Scientology operatives have failed to stop young women from being
protected and trained with
one of their parents to avoid, deter and terminate legally, ethically
and morally) rape attempts,
abduction attempts, etc.

Their reason for doing so is that these programs do not fit the
fictional "profile" of
Galileo=AE Systems International and S.A.V.E!=99 International, whom
they are attacking
for nothing more than private, commercial purposes.

Amidon's single client, Baldwin, NEVER HAD ANY CONTACT WITH,
NEVER MADE ANY PAYMENT TO, NOR RECEIVED ANY TRAINING
WHATSOEVER FROM SAVE!tm INTERNATIONAL - NOT AT ANY TIME, EVER.

If you know of any further provable connections between Scientology and
Attorney Amidon, Attorney Taylor
their private investigator, Eugene Ingram (who is himself quite an
eyeful online,
with respect to his own lengthy and recidivist criminal past and his
continued
connections to Scientology), please let us know at
.
We will publish it here for those who may care.

We invite you to visit www.savetraining.com for information regarding
how S.A.V.E!=99's
priceless security training (in either format) for your children and
other loved ones can be done
in your area - AT NO CHARGE WHATSOEVER.

Thank you for your kind attention to these matters ....


The Board of Directors of Galileo=AE Systems International and
S=2EA.V.E!=99 International

http://www.techsell.com/amidon.pdf
http://www.techsell.com/draftcomplaint1.pdf
http://www.techsell.com/draftcomplaint2.pdf

To Whom It May Concern: Be Advised - Attorney Robert Amidon is a
covert-surrogate
attorney for The Church of Scientology. He represented them in a case
in the past
wherein a brain-damaged young man asked them back for $1.3 million they
had solicited from him (Los Angeles News Story attached).

Attached you will find additional adobe pdf files that outline first
Amidon's legal connections to the Church but also "the real reason"
for his looking desperately for a plausible "someone" to use to sue our
organizations. Only a lawsuit can be made public.
Arbitrations are private and confidential by nature.
Amidon isn't seeking justice but instead hopes
to accomplish character assassination.

His actions are transparent.

But Amidon's connections to Scientology go further.
His Marketing actions on behalf of the Church
are also documented from the Internet in the
first attached file.

His "lawsuit" on behalf of Baldwin is suspiciously
and hideously date-coincident with the second of the
attached cases as it moved toward the third case
(now filed and commenced in Federal Court).

The Church of Scientology has been charged in this Federal lawsuit with
violating the Federal Copyright laws
with regard to the published works of Les Dane. Mr. Dane's works are
books about
selling, closing sales ... which this Church wishes to go on using, but
apparently from all the
evidence we can gather, without any willingness to pay the usual
royalties for
such use which it has enjoyed royalty-free, for over 34 years,
long before our becoming the custodial agents for these materials.
Five years of "negotiating"
efforts on our part have produced what is apparently a zero willingness
on their part to
globally resolve this dispute by any means other than the "tactics of
character assassination",
which you see demonstrated above. Sadly, we find ourselves NOT to be
the
first such targets.

It is an interesting and somewhat ironic observation that Scientology
has for years declared
that just this kind of attack has been leveled against them by those
with nefarious
purposes. Ironic indeed.

Amidon's effort is on behalf of Scientology. Amidon's "client" is
contractually
bound to arbitrate any dispute with Galileo=AE Systems International.
He refuses
to arbitrate as it would not serve Attorney Amidon's purpose to try to
discredit
the actions of the corporations he has been defaming. A libel suit is
being prepared
as this notice is being written. Amidon's client expressed no need to
resolve anything
between himself and Galileo=AE Systems International until Amidon
apparently solicited him
to do so. When this solicitation is confirmed with evidence we are
expecting momentarily, it will be a
violation of the professional ethics code supported by The California
Bar Association.
Evidence concerning a colleague of Amidon's, one attorney Norman Taylor
(himself a publicly identified
Scientologist), already exists in our possession; wherein Taylor, whom
Amidon has admitted is a
colleague, has been caught red-handed unethically soliciting
"plaintiffs" to attempt to discredit
the organizations under attack by the lot of of them.

SAVE!=99 International offers its 3-Hour Personal Security Presence=99
Training for $495 per
adult, satisfaction guaranteed. It has been reported by many who have
taken it, to be
more effective at teaching them to be safe in real-world crisis
situations than
years of more traditional self-defense training they had personally
gone through prior,
any and all of which costs thousands of dollars to go through. It has
been reported by
retired Army and Marine veterans as more useful than Special Forces
training,
(which was never designed for use by civilians, having other military
purposes),
when applied in the streets and neighborhoods of the United States.

That makes SAVE!=99 Training THE LEAST EXPENSIVE, EFFECTIVE Personal
Security Training
program in the country and perhaps the world. SAVE!=99's Personal
Security Presence=99 Training
also comes with one-year follow-up consulting, online, at no charge.

For over a year, S.A.V.E!=99 International has commenced a campaign to
train 50,000 young women ages 10-17 around the
United States (each accompanied by a parent or legal guardian)
ABSOLUTELY FOR FREE.
And a second program, equally FREE to High school and Little League
Athletes teaches young men and women
how to avoid violence in sports-related circumstances.
These may be reviewed at www.save-training.com.

We invite you to visit www.savetraining.com for information regarding
how this
priceless training (in either format) for your children and other loved
ones can be done
in your area - AT NO CHARGE WHATSOEVER.

Robert Amidon certainly and The Church of Scientology (apparently) are
opposed to the existence
of these programs and both have fought furiously to try to stop them
from occurring.

Scientology operatives have failed to stop young women from being
protected and trained with
one of their parents to avoid, deter and terminate legally, ethically
and morally) rape attempts,
abduction attempts, etc.

Their reason for doing so is that these programs do not fit the
fictional "profile" of
Galileo=AE Systems International and S.A.V.E!=99 International, whom
they are attacking
for nothing more than private, commercial purposes.

Amidon's single client, Baldwin, NEVER HAD ANY CONTACT WITH,
NEVER MADE ANY PAYMENT TO, NOR RECEIVED ANY TRAINING
WHATSOEVER FROM SAVE!tm INTERNATIONAL - NOT AT ANY TIME, EVER.

If you know of any further provable connections between Scientology and
Attorney Amidon, Attorney Taylor
their private investigator, Eugene Ingram (who is himself quite an
eyeful online,
with respect to his own lengthy and recidivist criminal past and his
continued
connections to Scientology), please let us know at
.
We will publish it here for those who may care.

We invite you to visit www.savetraining.com for information regarding
how S.A.V.E!=99's
priceless security training (in either format) for your children and
other loved ones can be done
in your area - AT NO CHARGE WHATSOEVER.

Thank you for your kind attention to these matters ....


The Board of Directors of Galileo=AE Systems International and
S=2EA.V.E!=99 International

http://www.techsell.com/amidon.pdf
http://www.techsell.com/draftcomplaint1.pdf
http://www.techsell.com/draftcomplaint2.pdf