If you want to discuss something I feel is relevant

Do NOT, I repeat, do NOT reply to my personal e-mail.

The third time will most definately "be the charm," young Padawan.
I'll complain to your system admin. Get my drift here?

You sent this:

"
More LIES from Kane! How sad.

Doan

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


How many years now .... ... of posting that he wants "parents to make
up their own mind?"

How many years of attacking any information, opinion, or personal story
in support of non-spanking?

How many years of defending everything from the pro spanking side?

How many years of letting slide posters like Fern that supported
parents beating their children bloody publicly?

How many years of siding with people that, like Fern, advocated for
parents to have the last word on whether or not to beat children until
they bleed?

How many years of riding every bogus hobby horse of the pro spanking
noodniks like Lazerlere, and Dobson...the dog "trainer?" The one that
thinks raising children is a matter of going to war with them?

Doan, the first day I viewed this ng I spotted you for a phony. A quick
google search on your posting confirmed it. And nothing I've seen since
changes that.

You have no intention of allowing parents to make up their own mind,
or you would, like any truly objective fence sitter, treat each side of
the question equally or you'd hold your views.

You are a little child, stuck back where you were first betrayed by
your parents with those blows to your body and your mind.

It's apparently made you even lie to yourself, if you believe this ****
you've posted all these years about your neutrality on this subject.

A phony. How very childishly sad you appear.









0:- wrote:
How many years now .... ... of posting that he wants "parents to make
up their own mind?"

How many years of attacking any information, opinion, or personal story
in support of non-spanking?

How many years of defending everything from the pro spanking side?

How many years of letting slide posters like Fern that supported
parents beating their children bloody publicly?

How many years of siding with people that, like Fern, advocated for
parents to have the last word on whether or not to beat children until
they bleed?

How many years of riding every bogus hobby horse of the pro spanking
noodniks like Lazerlere, and Dobson...the dog "trainer?" The one that
thinks raising children is a matter of going to war with them?

Doan, the first day I viewed this ng I spotted you for a phony. A quick
google search on your posting confirmed it. And nothing I've seen since
changes that.

You have no intention of allowing parents to make up their own mind,
or you would, like any truly objective fence sitter, treat each side of
the question equally or you'd hold your views.

You are a little child, stuck back where you were first betrayed by
your parents with those blows to your body and your mind.

It's apparently made you even lie to yourself, if you believe this ****
you've posted all these years about your neutrality on this subject.

A phony. How very childishly sad you appear.

Sorry! I hit the wrong key.

Doan

On 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Do NOT, I repeat, do NOT reply to my personal e-mail.

The third time will most definately "be the charm," young Padawan.
I'll complain to your system admin. Get my drift here?

You sent this:

"
More LIES from Kane! How sad.

Doan

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


How many years now .... ... of posting that he wants "parents to make
up their own mind?"

How many years of attacking any information, opinion, or personal story
in support of non-spanking?

How many years of defending everything from the pro spanking side?

How many years of letting slide posters like Fern that supported
parents beating their children bloody publicly?

How many years of siding with people that, like Fern, advocated for
parents to have the last word on whether or not to beat children until
they bleed?

How many years of riding every bogus hobby horse of the pro spanking
noodniks like Lazerlere, and Dobson...the dog "trainer?" The one that
thinks raising children is a matter of going to war with them?

Doan, the first day I viewed this ng I spotted you for a phony. A quick
google search on your posting confirmed it. And nothing I've seen since
changes that.

You have no intention of allowing parents to make up their own mind,
or you would, like any truly objective fence sitter, treat each side of
the question equally or you'd hold your views.

You are a little child, stuck back where you were first betrayed by
your parents with those blows to your body and your mind.

It's apparently made you even lie to yourself, if you believe this ****
you've posted all these years about your neutrality on this subject.

A phony. How very childishly sad you appear.









0:- wrote:
How many years now .... ... of posting that he wants "parents to make
up their own mind?"

How many years of attacking any information, opinion, or personal story
in support of non-spanking?

How many years of defending everything from the pro spanking side?

How many years of letting slide posters like Fern that supported
parents beating their children bloody publicly?

How many years of siding with people that, like Fern, advocated for
parents to have the last word on whether or not to beat children until
they bleed?

How many years of riding every bogus hobby horse of the pro spanking
noodniks like Lazerlere, and Dobson...the dog "trainer?" The one that
thinks raising children is a matter of going to war with them?

Doan, the first day I viewed this ng I spotted you for a phony. A quick
google search on your posting confirmed it. And nothing I've seen since
changes that.

You have no intention of allowing parents to make up their own mind,
or you would, like any truly objective fence sitter, treat each side of
the question equally or you'd hold your views.

You are a little child, stuck back where you were first betrayed by
your parents with those blows to your body and your mind.

It's apparently made you even lie to yourself, if you believe this ****
you've posted all these years about your neutrality on this subject.

A phony. How very childishly sad you appear.

Doan wrote:
Sorry! I hit the wrong key.

If I were you, 0:-, this would be the moment I'd call you a "liar."

Doan

But not being you, thank goodness, it's possible you just hit the wrong
key.

Why not try another newsreader without such easily mistaken "keys?"

By the way, which "key" on your keyboard, would be the "wrong key?"

You have to hit enter, or click on a button, do you not?

You've taken mistakes of mine, that I admitted to by the way, and
insisted repeatedly and endlessly that you just proved I was a "liar."

You know what it means every time you do that, don't you?

0:-






On 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Do NOT, I repeat, do NOT reply to my personal e-mail.

The third time will most definately "be the charm," young Padawan.
I'll complain to your system admin. Get my drift here?

You sent this:

"
More LIES from Kane! How sad.

Doan

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:



How many years now .... ... of posting that he wants "parents to make
up their own mind?"

How many years of attacking any information, opinion, or personal story
in support of non-spanking?

How many years of defending everything from the pro spanking side?

How many years of letting slide posters like Fern that supported
parents beating their children bloody publicly?

How many years of siding with people that, like Fern, advocated for
parents to have the last word on whether or not to beat children until
they bleed?

How many years of riding every bogus hobby horse of the pro spanking
noodniks like Lazerlere, and Dobson...the dog "trainer?" The one that
thinks raising children is a matter of going to war with them?

Doan, the first day I viewed this ng I spotted you for a phony. A quick
google search on your posting confirmed it. And nothing I've seen since
changes that.

You have no intention of allowing parents to make up their own mind,
or you would, like any truly objective fence sitter, treat each side of
the question equally or you'd hold your views.

You are a little child, stuck back where you were first betrayed by
your parents with those blows to your body and your mind.

It's apparently made you even lie to yourself, if you believe this ****
you've posted all these years about your neutrality on this subject.

A phony. How very childishly sad you appear.









0:- wrote:

How many years now .... ... of posting that he wants "parents to make
up their own mind?"

How many years of attacking any information, opinion, or personal story
in support of non-spanking?

How many years of defending everything from the pro spanking side?

How many years of letting slide posters like Fern that supported
parents beating their children bloody publicly?

How many years of siding with people that, like Fern, advocated for
parents to have the last word on whether or not to beat children until
they bleed?

How many years of riding every bogus hobby horse of the pro spanking
noodniks like Lazerlere, and Dobson...the dog "trainer?" The one that
thinks raising children is a matter of going to war with them?

Doan, the first day I viewed this ng I spotted you for a phony. A quick
google search on your posting confirmed it. And nothing I've seen since
changes that.

You have no intention of allowing parents to make up their own mind,
or you would, like any truly objective fence sitter, treat each side of
the question equally or you'd hold your views.

You are a little child, stuck back where you were first betrayed by
your parents with those blows to your body and your mind.

It's apparently made you even lie to yourself, if you believe this ****
you've posted all these years about your neutrality on this subject.

A phony. How very childishly sad you appear.





--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006

Doan wrote:

Kane got caught with more LIES! ;-)

On 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

Well, beccafromlalaland. Kane has a special copy. ;-) According to Kane:

"You don't have a copy. There are none out there that did not come
directly from Dr. Embry."

Since I have already pointed you to where copies of this study are
available, the above claim by Kane is a LIE or a "mistake" in Kane's
world. ;-)

Doan

Isn't it strange you didn't point out these sources to "Aline/Alina,"
though.

0:-


I didn't point out your LIES???

With Aline/Alina?

You didn't point her to the studies you claimed you had a copy of, Doan.
Why now, but not then.

What, R R R R, could possibly be different now?

Were they not available through the same sources then? hehehehe.


Doan

A problem you long term liars have is that you grow increasingly unable
to sort out your lies, and lose track of them. Additionally you become
more sure of yourself and presume that others won't notice.

You count on new posters to just buy your bull**** without looking.
Sometimes you are right....R R R R ...and sometimes you are wrong.

And sometimes I'll point it out again.

So, why was it you told "Aline/Alina" she would have to send you a
stamped addressed envelope when she could have gotten it ONLINE, as the
post you included with the abstract said?
Hmmmmmmmm?

Faker.

I write Aline from time to time. Funny, she never responds. Now why is
that I wonder.

0:-

--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006

Doan wrote:

Kane got caught with more LIES! ;-)

On 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

Well, beccafromlalaland. Kane has a special copy. ;-) According to Kane:

"You don't have a copy. There are none out there that did not come
directly from Dr. Embry."

Since I have already pointed you to where copies of this study are
available, the above claim by Kane is a LIE or a "mistake" in Kane's
world. ;-)

Doan

Isn't it strange you didn't point out these sources to "Aline/Alina,"
though.

0:-


I didn't point out your LIES???

Doan

Do you really want me to start posting the evidence from what I refer to
below? Happy to, if you don't start coming clean and start admitting the
obvious; that you lied about being in favor of parents making up their
own minds. That's like Hitler saying he was just sending the Jews to
lovely rest camps. He sent them. The destination just wasn't as
described. Yours isn't either, Doan. You are lying. Probably even to
yourself. No surprize, for the spanked.

Duck little monkeyboy, here it comes again:

How many years now .... ... of posting that he wants "parents to make
up their own mind?"

How many years of attacking any information, opinion, or personal story
in support of non-spanking?

How many years of defending everything from the pro spanking side?

How many years of letting slide posters like Fern that supported
parents beating their children bloody publicly?

How many years of siding with people that, like Fern, advocated for
parents to have the last word on whether or not to beat children until
they bleed?

How many years of riding every bogus hobby horse of the pro spanking
noodniks like Lazerlere, and Dobson...the dog "trainer?" The one that
thinks raising children is a matter of going to war with them?

Doan, the first day I viewed this ng I spotted you for a phony. A quick
google search on your posting confirmed it. And nothing I've seen since
changes that.

You have no intention of allowing parents to make up their own mind,
or you would, like any truly objective fence sitter, treat each side of
the question equally or you'd hold your views.

You are a little child, stuck back where you were first betrayed by
your parents with those blows to your body and your mind.

It's apparently made you even lie to yourself, if you believe this ****
you've posted all these years about your neutrality on this subject.

A phony. How very childishly sad you appear.



--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
Sorry! I hit the wrong key.

If I were you, 0:-, this would be the moment I'd call you a "liar."

Doan

But not being you, thank goodness, it's possible you just hit the wrong
key.

Why not try another newsreader without such easily mistaken "keys?"

By the way, which "key" on your keyboard, would be the "wrong key?"

You have to hit enter, or click on a button, do you not?

You've taken mistakes of mine, that I admitted to by the way, and
insisted repeatedly and endlessly that you just proved I was a "liar."

You know what it means every time you do that, don't you?

0:-

I APOLOGIZED for my mistake, even to an ignoranus like you! ;-)
Now, how about you? When will you apologize to me about your "MISTAKES"
on the Hutterites, the MacMillan study and the Embry study?

I am not holding my breath! ;-)

Doan

Doan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
Sorry! I hit the wrong key.

If I were you, 0:-, this would be the moment I'd call you a "liar."

Doan

But not being you, thank goodness, it's possible you just hit the wrong
key.

Why not try another newsreader without such easily mistaken "keys?"

By the way, which "key" on your keyboard, would be the "wrong key?"

You have to hit enter, or click on a button, do you not?

You've taken mistakes of mine, that I admitted to by the way, and
insisted repeatedly and endlessly that you just proved I was a "liar."

You know what it means every time you do that, don't you?

0:-

I APOLOGIZED for my mistake,

You covered your ass, you mean.

even to an ignoranus like you! ;-)

So thanks.

I didn't require an apology of you. Now did I?

Now, how about you?

How about me? Apologize? For what?

It's not an "apology" if it's forced from someone, Doan. That goes to
your poor upbringing and the assault on your poor helpless young body.

Notice I, the "neverspankedboy" R R R R, did NOT try to force an
apology from you?

When will you apologize to me about your "MISTAKES"
on the Hutterites,

No. An honest mistake does not require an apology. I'll make one if I
feel like it. I don't. But being more honest than you I, when I found
the mistake, made a public announcement of it.

And after that YOU continued to badger me about it, and did so without
at the same time acknowledging I had already admitted my mistake
publicly and fully. Who has the face now?

I do, dummy.

the MacMillan study

I don't accept your interpretation of the data. Hence I am not offering
either a retraction or an apology. Even if I did the former, you have
not right to ask for the latter.

and the Embry study?

You lost your right to have any reply from me on that. I told you I
would not debate you until you had the study and proved it. You refused
to prove it. And remember, YOURS was the first challenge. I had NO
obligation to respond, and you have EVERY obligation to show honestly
that you had it, and you refused.

You planning on apologizing to me, or just wallowing in your little
childish, "game, set, match?"

You are so immoral, Doan.

I am not holding my breath! ;-)

Please do. I'm fond of the color purple.

Doan

Tell you what. I'll agree I was wrong on some portions of the Mitchell
study if you'll answer my challenge on your claims of neutrality and
your belief in "let the parent make up his own mind," or admit you are
not neutral, and you wish to influence parents to spank more than you
wish parents to not spank.

Deal?

I'd also like an explanation for all those years of letting people like
Fern and Neal slip by without comment, and sometimes support by badging
people that challenged them.

Care to go over the related posts?

How about you admitting there is no possible way for a parent to know
precisely WHERE the line is between abuse and safe "spanking?"

You see, Doan, you are unethical. You are a liar. You are a shame to
your family. YOU may think you are clever, but you are just common, and
dishonest.

Mostly to yourself, I fear.

Now rather than actually answer my challenges, whip around and bring up
some other subject....your constant escape from having to face what you
really are.

Let's see you actually engage me on what I brought up and defend
yourself.

Hell, I have NO trouble at all with you correcting YOUR mistakes
either, and I'll not demand an apology from you (that's tacky, Doan,
just like your little vicious out of bounds threat here...if you ever
see me do such a thing to you...bring up other people, uninvolved
outsiders in your life...you let me know.)

You are cowardly, uncivil, pathetic piece of monkey****, Doan. And
you've gotten on here for years doing it, driving everyone away so that
this debate could NOT proceed at all.

Clever? ****, just vicious. Selfish. Mean. Small minded, and pathetic.

A whipped child. Sad.

0:-

Just like I though! ;-)

Doan

On 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
Sorry! I hit the wrong key.

If I were you, 0:-, this would be the moment I'd call you a "liar."

Doan

But not being you, thank goodness, it's possible you just hit the wrong
key.

Why not try another newsreader without such easily mistaken "keys?"

By the way, which "key" on your keyboard, would be the "wrong key?"

You have to hit enter, or click on a button, do you not?

You've taken mistakes of mine, that I admitted to by the way, and
insisted repeatedly and endlessly that you just proved I was a "liar."

You know what it means every time you do that, don't you?

0:-

I APOLOGIZED for my mistake,

You covered your ass, you mean.

even to an ignoranus like you! ;-)

So thanks.

I didn't require an apology of you. Now did I?

Now, how about you?

How about me? Apologize? For what?

It's not an "apology" if it's forced from someone, Doan. That goes to
your poor upbringing and the assault on your poor helpless young body.

Notice I, the "neverspankedboy" R R R R, did NOT try to force an
apology from you?

When will you apologize to me about your "MISTAKES"
on the Hutterites,

No. An honest mistake does not require an apology. I'll make one if I
feel like it. I don't. But being more honest than you I, when I found
the mistake, made a public announcement of it.

And after that YOU continued to badger me about it, and did so without
at the same time acknowledging I had already admitted my mistake
publicly and fully. Who has the face now?

I do, dummy.

the MacMillan study

I don't accept your interpretation of the data. Hence I am not offering
either a retraction or an apology. Even if I did the former, you have
not right to ask for the latter.

and the Embry study?

You lost your right to have any reply from me on that. I told you I
would not debate you until you had the study and proved it. You refused
to prove it. And remember, YOURS was the first challenge. I had NO
obligation to respond, and you have EVERY obligation to show honestly
that you had it, and you refused.

You planning on apologizing to me, or just wallowing in your little
childish, "game, set, match?"

You are so immoral, Doan.

I am not holding my breath! ;-)

Please do. I'm fond of the color purple.

Doan

Tell you what. I'll agree I was wrong on some portions of the Mitchell
study if you'll answer my challenge on your claims of neutrality and
your belief in "let the parent make up his own mind," or admit you are
not neutral, and you wish to influence parents to spank more than you
wish parents to not spank.

Deal?

I'd also like an explanation for all those years of letting people like
Fern and Neal slip by without comment, and sometimes support by badging
people that challenged them.

Care to go over the related posts?

How about you admitting there is no possible way for a parent to know
precisely WHERE the line is between abuse and safe "spanking?"

You see, Doan, you are unethical. You are a liar. You are a shame to
your family. YOU may think you are clever, but you are just common, and
dishonest.

Mostly to yourself, I fear.

Now rather than actually answer my challenges, whip around and bring up
some other subject....your constant escape from having to face what you
really are.

Let's see you actually engage me on what I brought up and defend
yourself.

Hell, I have NO trouble at all with you correcting YOUR mistakes
either, and I'll not demand an apology from you (that's tacky, Doan,
just like your little vicious out of bounds threat here...if you ever
see me do such a thing to you...bring up other people, uninvolved
outsiders in your life...you let me know.)

You are cowardly, uncivil, pathetic piece of monkey****, Doan. And
you've gotten on here for years doing it, driving everyone away so that
this debate could NOT proceed at all.

Clever? ****, just vicious. Selfish. Mean. Small minded, and pathetic.

A whipped child. Sad.

0:-

Doan wrote:
Just like I though! ;-)

In other words, you are exactly as I depicted. You won't answer when you
are caught at you lies. You make demands of others you have no moral
right to make.

You harass, as you did with the issue over the Hutterites after I
repeatedly set you straight on it, pointing out my OWN error publically.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...926fc598d75351

You are ****ed, Doan. A nothing.

"You are cowardly, uncivil, pathetic piece of monkey****, Doan. And
you've gotten on here for years doing it, driving everyone away so that
this debate could NOT proceed at all.

Clever? ****, just vicious. Selfish. Mean. Small minded, and pathetic.

A whipped child. Sad."

Just as I said.

And no, you are not "tough," just a liar. They are common as and similar
to dog****.

So, just as I thought, you won't answer the challenges to your lies.
Figgers.

0:-









Doan

On 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

Sorry! I hit the wrong key.

If I were you, 0:-, this would be the moment I'd call you a "liar."

Doan

But not being you, thank goodness, it's possible you just hit the wrong
key.

Why not try another newsreader without such easily mistaken "keys?"

By the way, which "key" on your keyboard, would be the "wrong key?"

You have to hit enter, or click on a button, do you not?

You've taken mistakes of mine, that I admitted to by the way, and
insisted repeatedly and endlessly that you just proved I was a "liar."

You know what it means every time you do that, don't you?

0:-

I APOLOGIZED for my mistake,

You covered your ass, you mean.

even to an ignoranus like you! ;-)

So thanks.

I didn't require an apology of you. Now did I?


Now, how about you?

How about me? Apologize? For what?

It's not an "apology" if it's forced from someone, Doan. That goes to
your poor upbringing and the assault on your poor helpless young body.

Notice I, the "neverspankedboy" R R R R, did NOT try to force an
apology from you?


When will you apologize to me about your "MISTAKES"
on the Hutterites,

No. An honest mistake does not require an apology. I'll make one if I
feel like it. I don't. But being more honest than you I, when I found
the mistake, made a public announcement of it.

And after that YOU continued to badger me about it, and did so without
at the same time acknowledging I had already admitted my mistake
publicly and fully. Who has the face now?

I do, dummy.


the MacMillan study

I don't accept your interpretation of the data. Hence I am not offering
either a retraction or an apology. Even if I did the former, you have
not right to ask for the latter.


and the Embry study?

You lost your right to have any reply from me on that. I told you I
would not debate you until you had the study and proved it. You refused
to prove it. And remember, YOURS was the first challenge. I had NO
obligation to respond, and you have EVERY obligation to show honestly
that you had it, and you refused.

You planning on apologizing to me, or just wallowing in your little
childish, "game, set, match?"

You are so immoral, Doan.


I am not holding my breath! ;-)

Please do. I'm fond of the color purple.


Doan

Tell you what. I'll agree I was wrong on some portions of the Mitchell
study if you'll answer my challenge on your claims of neutrality and
your belief in "let the parent make up his own mind," or admit you are
not neutral, and you wish to influence parents to spank more than you
wish parents to not spank.

Deal?

I'd also like an explanation for all those years of letting people like
Fern and Neal slip by without comment, and sometimes support by badging
people that challenged them.

Care to go over the related posts?

How about you admitting there is no possible way for a parent to know
precisely WHERE the line is between abuse and safe "spanking?"

You see, Doan, you are unethical. You are a liar. You are a shame to
your family. YOU may think you are clever, but you are just common, and
dishonest.

Mostly to yourself, I fear.

Now rather than actually answer my challenges, whip around and bring up
some other subject....your constant escape from having to face what you
really are.

Let's see you actually engage me on what I brought up and defend
yourself.

Hell, I have NO trouble at all with you correcting YOUR mistakes
either, and I'll not demand an apology from you (that's tacky, Doan,
just like your little vicious out of bounds threat here...if you ever
see me do such a thing to you...bring up other people, uninvolved
outsiders in your life...you let me know.)

You are cowardly, uncivil, pathetic piece of monkey****, Doan. And
you've gotten on here for years doing it, driving everyone away so that
this debate could NOT proceed at all.

Clever? ****, just vicious. Selfish. Mean. Small minded, and pathetic.

A whipped child. Sad.

0:-





--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006

Doan wrote:
What a hypocrit!

What precisely would a ploy by you of Tu Quoque have to do with it, true
or not, with you not answering the challenge?

Even if I was a hypocrite, YOU have not answered the charge of being a
liar, and dishonorable, and misleading posters here.

You going to answer, or just dodge with Ad Hominem?

That, child, is hypocritical.

Like I said, and you still haven't responded to:

Tell you what. I'll agree I was wrong on some portions of the Mitchell
study if you'll answer my challenge on your claims of neutrality and
your belief in "let the parent make up his own mind," or admit you are
not neutral, and you wish to influence parents to spank more than you
wish parents to not spank.

Deal?

I'd also like an explanation for all those years of letting people like
Fern and Neal slip by without comment, and sometimes support by badging
people that challenged them.

Care to go over the related posts?

How about you admitting there is no possible way for a parent to know
precisely WHERE the line is between abuse and safe "spanking?"

You see, Doan, you are unethical. You are a liar. You are a shame to
your family. YOU may think you are clever, but you are just common, and
dishonest.

Mostly to yourself, I fear.

Now rather than actually answer my challenges, whip around and bring up
some other subject....your constant escape from having to face what you
really are.

Let's see you actually engage me on what I brought up and defend
yourself.

Hell, I have NO trouble at all with you correcting YOUR mistakes
either, and I'll not demand an apology from you (that's tacky, Doan,
just like your little vicious out of bounds threat here...if you ever
see me do such a thing to you...bring up other people, uninvolved
outsiders in your life...you let me know.)

You are cowardly, uncivil, pathetic piece of monkey****, Doan. And
you've gotten on here for years doing it, driving everyone away so that
this debate could NOT proceed at all.

Clever? ****, just vicious. Selfish. Mean. Small minded, and pathetic.


You have a problem with honesty? Sure looks like it!


0:-

--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006