If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#221
|
|||
|
|||
teaching algebra to elementary school students
Ericka Kammerer wrote: Beliavsky wrote: On Jan 18, 8:58 pm, Ericka Kammerer wrote: Jeff wrote: wrote: On Jan 17, 5:58�am, Beliavsky wrote: I wrote that MCAS were "a factor", not "the only factor", in an earlier message, and I agree that visiting aschoolmakes sense. I have not heard of neighborhood public schools offering open houses for potential residents, though. Schooltours are open to anyone -- they surely aren't going to check your address! --Helen S. Actually, in most places they're not. They usually have locked doors. And visitor must report directly to the office to sign in. Unless you have a reason to be there, they usually won't let you in. If they're having aschooltour, then they're expecting people, so of course they're going to let people in! (She didn't say schools are open to anyone; she saidschool*tours* are open.) And if they don't have tours, then they'll be expecting to talk to people by appointment, at which point they'll let you in to talk and probably give you a little tour too. I emailed the principal of a neighborhood public school that we are considering for our children (we'd need to buy a house), and asked her if we could visit. Here was her reply, slightly edited: Dear Mr. XYZ, I am sorry, but we do not provide opportunities for families who do not live in our ABC School district to visit. We have an incredible number of requests, and no staffing for this purpose. Signed, The principal I understand that individual tours for anyone interested could take up too much time, but at least a few scheduled events for the general public would be nice. The "incredible" demand for this is being ignored. Private schools certainly allow parents to visit, as do colleges. My wife and I did visit our son's Catholic school before enrolling him. Monopolistic government schools have much less reason to be accomodative. When it is difficult to get qualitative information about schools, many people will fall back on quantitative measures such as test scores. But surely one can see both sides of the situation. Private schools *have* to sell themselves to the parents. That's how they get students. That is not how public schools get their students. That depends on where they are. I've lived in places where the public schools *have* to woo middle- and upper-middle-class parents (of zoned or out-of-zone kids), or those parents will head off to private school in a heartbeat, and never look back. And of course the schools have an incentive to capture those kids - they want their test scores to be higher. I can only assume the school Beliavsky is looking at already has high test scores. Clisby Private schools budget for this sort of thing. Obviously, this particular public school doesn't have the budget for staff to serve this purpose. There's a lot of pressure on most public school systems to funnel as high a proportion of the budget to the classroom rather than administration--something you would probably push for if your children were in that school's classrooms. That said, you are hardly out of options. Contact the school's PTA/PTO and find out if they can arrange some parents to talk to you, or see if you can attend a meeting, or some such thing. Best wishes, Ericka |
#222
|
|||
|
|||
teaching algebra to elementary school students
In article , Clisby says...
Ericka Kammerer wrote: Beliavsky wrote: On Jan 18, 8:58 pm, Ericka Kammerer wrote: Jeff wrote: wrote: On Jan 17, 5:58�am, Beliavsky wrote: I wrote that MCAS were "a factor", not "the only factor", in an earlier message, and I agree that visiting aschoolmakes sense. I have not heard of neighborhood public schools offering open houses for potential residents, though. Schooltours are open to anyone -- they surely aren't going to check your address! --Helen S. Actually, in most places they're not. They usually have locked doors. And visitor must report directly to the office to sign in. Unless you have a reason to be there, they usually won't let you in. If they're having aschooltour, then they're expecting people, so of course they're going to let people in! (She didn't say schools are open to anyone; she saidschool*tours* are open.) And if they don't have tours, then they'll be expecting to talk to people by appointment, at which point they'll let you in to talk and probably give you a little tour too. I emailed the principal of a neighborhood public school that we are considering for our children (we'd need to buy a house), and asked her if we could visit. Here was her reply, slightly edited: Dear Mr. XYZ, I am sorry, but we do not provide opportunities for families who do not live in our ABC School district to visit. We have an incredible number of requests, and no staffing for this purpose. Signed, The principal I understand that individual tours for anyone interested could take up too much time, but at least a few scheduled events for the general public would be nice. The "incredible" demand for this is being ignored. Private schools certainly allow parents to visit, as do colleges. My wife and I did visit our son's Catholic school before enrolling him. Monopolistic government schools have much less reason to be accomodative. When it is difficult to get qualitative information about schools, many people will fall back on quantitative measures such as test scores. But surely one can see both sides of the situation. Private schools *have* to sell themselves to the parents. That's how they get students. That is not how public schools get their students. That depends on where they are. I've lived in places where the public schools *have* to woo middle- and upper-middle-class parents (of zoned or out-of-zone kids), Sometimes my kid is pretty 'zoned' - can we move where you are? :-) or those parents will head off to private school in a heartbeat, and never look back. And of course the schools have an incentive to capture those kids - they want their test scores to be higher. I can only assume the school Beliavsky is looking at already has high test scores. Which may or may not mean they're the best school. Or the best school for a particular child. It very much depends on the specifics. Banty |
#223
|
|||
|
|||
teaching algebra to elementary school students
Clisby wrote:
Ericka Kammerer wrote: But surely one can see both sides of the situation. Private schools *have* to sell themselves to the parents. That's how they get students. That is not how public schools get their students. That depends on where they are. I've lived in places where the public schools *have* to woo middle- and upper-middle-class parents (of zoned or out-of-zone kids), or those parents will head off to private school in a heartbeat, and never look back. And of course the schools have an incentive to capture those kids - they want their test scores to be higher. I can only assume the school Beliavsky is looking at already has high test scores. But in that case, they are still concerned with students in boundary who may or may not opt for private school, not so much potential buyers. We have those issues at some schools in our district, but I don't see a lot of time and money being spent to recruit potential home buyers. They publicize events and orientations and programs, but aren't out there begging folks to come schedule a private tour of the school, nor do they put on a big dog-and-pony show to try to entice new students. The main opportunities are the usual spring orientation for students who'll be entering the lowest grade level at the school (those are going on now, in our area), the open houses just before school starts, and the "Back to School" nights shortly after school starts. Besides all that, it strikes me that based on his previous postings, Beliavsky isn't even going to entertain a school likely to have these perception issues, regardless of the situation. Best wishes, Ericka |
#224
|
|||
|
|||
teaching algebra to elementary school students
Ericka Kammerer wrote: Clisby wrote: Ericka Kammerer wrote: But surely one can see both sides of the situation. Private schools *have* to sell themselves to the parents. That's how they get students. That is not how public schools get their students. That depends on where they are. I've lived in places where the public schools *have* to woo middle- and upper-middle-class parents (of zoned or out-of-zone kids), or those parents will head off to private school in a heartbeat, and never look back. And of course the schools have an incentive to capture those kids - they want their test scores to be higher. I can only assume the school Beliavsky is looking at already has high test scores. But in that case, they are still concerned with students in boundary who may or may not opt for private school, not so much potential buyers. In the cases I was thinking of, I don't believe they were concerned with potential buyers - they were concerned with potential transfers from out of zone. I'd say when the principal personally meets with a group from out of the zone, explains in detail how to naviagate the transfer process, and gives tips on how to fill out the forms to maximize your chances - they're interested in you, all right. Clisby We have those issues at some schools in our district, but I don't see a lot of time and money being spent to recruit potential home buyers. They publicize events and orientations and programs, but aren't out there begging folks to come schedule a private tour of the school, nor do they put on a big dog-and-pony show to try to entice new students. The main opportunities are the usual spring orientation for students who'll be entering the lowest grade level at the school (those are going on now, in our area), the open houses just before school starts, and the "Back to School" nights shortly after school starts. Besides all that, it strikes me that based on his previous postings, Beliavsky isn't even going to entertain a school likely to have these perception issues, regardless of the situation. Best wishes, Ericka |
#225
|
|||
|
|||
teaching algebra to elementary school students
Clisby wrote:
Ericka Kammerer wrote: Clisby wrote: Ericka Kammerer wrote: But surely one can see both sides of the situation. Private schools *have* to sell themselves to the parents. That's how they get students. That is not how public schools get their students. That depends on where they are. I've lived in places where the public schools *have* to woo middle- and upper-middle-class parents (of zoned or out-of-zone kids), or those parents will head off to private school in a heartbeat, and never look back. And of course the schools have an incentive to capture those kids - they want their test scores to be higher. I can only assume the school Beliavsky is looking at already has high test scores. But in that case, they are still concerned with students in boundary who may or may not opt for private school, not so much potential buyers. In the cases I was thinking of, I don't believe they were concerned with potential buyers - they were concerned with potential transfers from out of zone. I'd say when the principal personally meets with a group from out of the zone, explains in detail how to naviagate the transfer process, and gives tips on how to fill out the forms to maximize your chances - they're interested in you, all right. I'm sure they are, but this isn't likely to apply if there isn't at least some version of school choice. For instance, in my area you can "pupil place," but it's not easy to do and you're on your own for transportation. It's simply not an option for the vast majority, so it's not really a viable option for recruiting significant numbers of students. By and large, you go to your assigned school, you apply for a magnet school, or you pay for private school. It's a small percentage of students who are pupil placed, and most of those for reasons like their local school not providing an essential program for the particular student or a parent working in the school in which the child is placed. Best wishes, Ericka |
#226
|
|||
|
|||
teaching algebra to elementary school students
In article
, Beliavsky wrote: On Jan 22, 5:53*am, Chookie wrote: Would you, by any chance, believe that both of the following propositions are true? (a) *Teachers should be rewarded on the basis of how well their students do on standardised tests. (b) *People of certain ethnic groups/races do more or less well on standardised tests because some ethnic groups/races are innately cleverer/stupider than others. I think (b) is true, when regarded as a statement about averages. Of course we're talking about averages! We're discussing groups. Jason Malloy of the Gene Expression blog has discussed the evidence at http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/10/jam...-truth_296.php in a post "James Watson Tells the Inconvenient Truth: Faces the Consequences". I think the the opening paragraph is worth quoting: I don't. Even going by the abstracts, this blogger is not dealing honestly with the Rindermann paper, which is arguing for the g-theory of intelligence, AFAICT. I support (a) as well, with test scores used as one factor. Part of the original article, which I did quote, said "teachers are being measured on how much their students improve on annual standardized tests." The word "improve" is key. The students' scores on a test from a year ago should serve to control for innate ability, so looking at changes in scores makes sense. This should be tested empirically. That assumes that improvement of clever and stupid people is identical, but it is (IMO) quite likely that stupid people don't improve at the same rate as clever ones. I would oppose teachers being evaluated based on absolute scores of students without accounting for relevant demographic variables in some way. There's the rub -- it's so expensive and difficult to do that the teachers' bonuses would all be swallowed up long before it was done. -- Chookie -- Sydney, Australia (Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply) http://chookiesbackyard.blogspot.com/ |
#227
|
|||
|
|||
teaching algebra to elementary school students
On Feb 5, 12:33 pm, Beliavsky wrote:
On Feb 5, 1:20 am, Caledonia wrote: On Feb 4, 5:13 pm, Ericka Kammerer wrote: I suspect that in Beliavsky's case, things may not be ask bleak as the principal's letter suggests. For instance, if there is a new family orientation or a kindergarten orientation, it may not be billed as something for outsiders, but I doubt they'll be checking for proof of residence at the door. Or perhaps the principal interpreted the request as being for an individual tour, but there are group orientations available at some point. There is typically a K-orientation in all MA towns, one in the Spring, one in the late Summer -- but to be honest, I know of no public K's which offer tours for prospective 'I'm thinking about moving here but maybe, maybe not' parents. As usual, you are being snide. Of course if you are visiting a school to see if you want to send your children there, that means you have not yet decided on a school. A group tour would be fine, which is what colleges offer, and it could be conducted by volunteers. The concern has been raised that volunteers could give incorrect information about school policies, but I would not rely on them for that purpose, since a school handbook listing policies can often be found online. It is true that non-residents don't yet pay the property taxes that fund a school, but they do pay income taxes here in Massachusetts, which is another source of school funding (the state transfers some money to the school districts). I wasn't aware of the snide tone -- I am not aware of public schools in MA offering tours for prospective residents. I'd be curious to know which ones do, if you're willing to share. For many districts -- located in towns with a high SES -- the bulk of school funding *is* generated by local property tax. Caledonia |
#228
|
|||
|
|||
teaching algebra to elementary school students
On Feb 8, 1:07�pm, Caledonia wrote:
I wasn't aware of the snide tone -- I am not aware of public schools in MA offering tours for prospective residents. I'd be curious to know which ones do, if you're willing to share. I think it was the way you summed up his position as "I'm thinking about moving here, but maybe, maybe not" that struck some people as sounding snide, as if you felt he was expressing a sense of privilege and were mocking that. (I didn't think you were, btw, but can see how someone could.) It's that whole thing about not being able to read tone of voice on the internet. --Helen S. |
#229
|
|||
|
|||
teaching algebra to elementary school students
On Feb 8, 4:26Â*pm, "
wrote: On Feb 8, 1:07�pm, Caledonia wrote: I wasn't aware of the snide tone -- I am not aware of public schools in MA offering tours for prospective residents. I'd be curious to know which ones do, if you're willing to share. I think it was the way you summed up his position as "I'm thinking about moving here, but maybe, maybe not" that struck some people as sounding snide, as if you felt he was expressing a sense of privilege and were mocking that. (I didn't think you were, btw, but can see how someone could.) It's that whole thing about not being able to read tone of voice on the internet. Yes, that was it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
School (elementary) question | blue | General | 17 | September 20th 06 11:44 AM |
Chosing a school (elementary) | goofeegyrl | General | 11 | May 5th 05 12:15 AM |
Bullying in Elementary School | Sue Larson | Solutions | 3 | May 18th 04 11:34 AM |
Do your kids go to Neidig Elementary School? | Anonymous | General | 0 | May 16th 04 06:45 AM |
Do your kids go to Neidig Elementary School? | Anonymous | General | 0 | May 16th 04 06:34 AM |