If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
2-year-olds reading?
Beliavsky wrote:
On Mar 14, 5:46 am, Chookie wrote: [...] Of course, there are children who learn to read very early, or who really want to learn to read. There is no reason to prevent them. There is also no reason to inflict reading lessons on little kids who would rather be doing something else. The "something else" for my 4yo son is often watching TV or playing video games, in which case my wife and I have no qualms about making him read or practice some math with us. If you mean that literally – that you're making him do those activities instead of things that he wants to do – then I'd be very concerned that that might put him off ever wanting to do them. In the case of number work that probably isn't such a big deal, since the odds are that sitting down to do a few sums wasn't a hobby he was likely to take up anyway. But reading for pleasure can be such a great joy that running the risk of putting a child off it seems very sad indeed to me. BTW, it also sounds as though you're setting up a false dichotomy there. I can quite see not wanting your child to spend all day on TV or video games, but there are plenty of other things the two of you can be doing together, many of which are great for a child's development. Think very, very carefully about why you want your child to read early. Most reasons I have heard relate to the parent's desire for the child to Get Ahead in some way. That is, it's all about the parent, not about the child. How does that follow? Successful people are more likely to be happy people. What criteria were used to measure success in whatever study it is you're thinking of? And is there any work to show that pushing small children to master academic skills earlier or to spend time on them when they would rather be doing other things is likely to make them happier in the long run than simply being willing to spend time with them working with their interests? Again, I'd be very concerned it would have the opposite effect. All the best, Sarah -- http://www.goodenoughmummy.typepad.com "That which can be destroyed by the truth, should be" - P. C. Hodgell |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
2-year-olds reading?
Beliavsky wrote:
On Mar 14, 5:46 am, Chookie wrote: Of course, there are children who learn to read very early, or who really want to learn to read. There is no reason to prevent them. There is also no reason to inflict reading lessons on little kids who would rather be doing something else. The "something else" for my 4yo son is often watching TV or playing video games, in which case my wife and I have no qualms about making him read or practice some math with us. If your 4yo only has TV watching, playing video games as chosen leisure activities, I would ask why it is that there's such a poverty of imagination--something that is critical to success in many endeavors. Forced reading or other academic work don't really address that issue. Best wishes, Ericka |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
2-year-olds reading?
On Mar 16, 4:39 pm, Sarah Vaughan wrote:
Beliavsky wrote: On Mar 14, 5:46 am, Chookie wrote: [...] Of course, there are children who learn to read very early, or who really want to learn to read. There is no reason to prevent them. There is also no reason to inflict reading lessons on little kids who would rather be doing something else. The "something else" for my 4yo son is often watching TV or playing video games, in which case my wife and I have no qualms about making him read or practice some math with us. If you mean that literally - that you're making him do those activities instead of things that he wants to do - then I'd be very concerned that that might put him off ever wanting to do them. In the case of number work that probably isn't such a big deal, since the odds are that sitting down to do a few sums wasn't a hobby he was likely to take up anyway. But reading for pleasure can be such a great joy that running the risk of putting a child off it seems very sad indeed to me. I don't think our making him read regularly has soured him on it. TV and the Internet are just more exciting. When I do turn the TV off and have him read something with me (today, two issues of the Weekly Reader for 1st graders, one about rain and the other about frogs), he is interested in the material. Regarding math, he asks us questions out of the blue that go beyond what we have taught him, such as -- if 8 - 6 = 2, what is 6 - 8 -- are there numbers smaller than zero? -- is there a biggest number? -- are there numbers between 3 and 4? Instruction can stimulate more questions from a child. BTW, it also sounds as though you're setting up a false dichotomy there. I can quite see not wanting your child to spend all day on TV or video games, but there are plenty of other things the two of you can be doing together, many of which are great for a child's development. Some of those have been foreclosed by the seemingly unending cold weather, but I do look forward to playing outside with and going swimming in a nearby pond, as we did last summer. We do have lots of toys, but maybe not some of the more sophisticated ones that a bright 4yo would enjoy, such as a model train. However, the 2yo and 1yo would not let him play with such toys in peace. snip How does that follow? Successful people are more likely to be happy people. What criteria were used to measure success in whatever study it is you're thinking of? Well, don't you agree that failing at work, at school, and in relationships makes people unhappy? I have seen studies showing a positive correlation between income and happiness, although the effect is stronger when moving from a low to a medium income than a medium income to a high one. And is there any work to show that pushing small children to master academic skills earlier or to spend time on them when they would rather be doing other things is likely to make them happier in the long run than simply being willing to spend time with them working with their interests? Some research has found that gifted children who are accelerated academically have been more successful in their careers on average than similar children who were not, without creating deficits in other areas. One can look at http://www.nationdeceived.org/ . Of course there is still the question of how success relates to happiness. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
2-year-olds reading?
Hi -- As the parent of two highly gifted children, I've learned a few things that may be of help for you. Of course, not all will apply in your situation, so use what you want and ignore the rest. 1. Never praise your child by telling him how "smart" or "intelligent" or "gifted" he is. Oddly enough, this sets up the wrong dynamic, making him less inclined to work hard and take risks. Instead, praise his hard work. There have been several articles that explain this in some depth, including one a year or so ago in, I think, the New York Times magazine section. 2. Gifted children are prone to being lazy and not paying attention. Why not? Everything comes easy to them, so when they are young they don't have an incentive to work hard at academics. (I suspect that the reason academically accelerated kids do well in the long run is that, having been thrown in over their heads, they've hard to learn how to work hard and be organized, while their non-accelerated peers don't learn this until too late.) So find reaasons for them to work hard and to pay close attention. It can be a challenge ... This paragraph of advice, by the way, doesn't apply until elementary school 3. Gifted children, just like other children, thrive on a variety of experiences. In the pre-school years (up to about age 5) they are best served by following their own interests, developing new interests, and gaining experiences that involve, over time, all five senses. Hands-on science museums are wonderful, as are trips to local farms and museums, gardening in their own yards or in flowerpots, playdates and trips to the playground, messy art projects, and so forth. During these years, art is about process rather than product, and workbooks (whether for reading, math, or just coloring in) tend to constrain their ideas of what is possible. Avoid them. (I'll write further on about non-workbook ways to encourage math and reading skills.) Limit TV and computer time to a maximum combined time of 30 minutes/day, but provide plenty of imagination-based toys such as costume pieces, legos (the big ones -- duplos -- are fine if there are babies in the house) or playmobile. OK. For reading skills: Identify the letters of the alphabet and find them on signs, in books, etc. Move on to looking for high-frequency words while you read to him. Don't push further than that until elementary school UNLESS your child requests it. It is FAR more important to develop a love of reading than to develop reading skills until sometime during 1st grade. DO work on telling stories aloud (your child tells you, I mean) and transcribing them for him. He can illustrate them too. You can also transcribe a brief description of his artwork on the front of the art, then hang them on the walls for the family to enjoy. Always read aloud books that are more challenging than he can read for himself, and continue this habit for as long as he'll let you. (We still read aloud to our kids, now 10 and 12, always books that they really couldn't read to themselves yet for reasons of archaic language or content that requires more contextual knowledge than they'd know on their own.) For math, start by counting. Count steps on the staircase, cookies, whatever. Count from one to ten, from uno to diez, from a to z, from hydrogen up through the periodic table ... This gives a very good, basic sense of numeracy. Count as high as you want to go. Then start skip-counting. (Count by 2s, by 3s, etc.) For addition and subtraction, add and subtract objects. Use buttons or pennies or whatever. Only when the concepts of addition and subtraction are well understood should you move on to memorizing math facts, and you can open that by discussing with your child how l-o-n-g it takes to count these basic addition facts, and how much easier it would be to learn more about numbers if the facts were memorized. And then make the memorizing a game. We found that, as the math became more complex, it was helpful to let the kids play educational computer games such as Ready for School. They liked these games until about age 8 or 9, at which point they became jaded and don't want to play those games any more. Finally, find something that your child is NOT naturally adept at, such as playing a musical instrument, something that truly will require work. In school achievement is, to some degree, subjective on the part of the teacher, and work-in doesn't always correlate to grade-out. But with an instrument, practice-in correlates highly to music-out and progress, and it's easy to see on a week to week basic. Baseball skills worked similarly for us. If you're lucky, your school district will have a highly-gifted program that really works. Ours has two classrooms in each of grades 4 and 5 for every 5-7 elementary schools. (So they're pulling 50 kids out of about 500 into the highly-gifted program.) The curriculum is both enriched and accelerated, and the teachers very experiences with the particuar issues that face highly gifted kids, both academic and social. Of course, as I said at the start, your mileage may vary. But I hope these thoughts help. --Beth Kevles -THE-COM-HERE http://web.mit.edu/kevles/www/nomilk.html -- a page for the milk-allergic Disclaimer: Nothing in this message should be construed as medical advice. Please consult with your own medical practicioner. NOTE: No email is read at my MIT address. Use the GMAIL one if you would like me to reply. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
2-year-olds reading?
"Beth Kevles" wrote in message ... Hi -- As the parent of two highly gifted children, I've learned a few things that may be of help for you. Of course, not all will apply in your situation, so use what you want and ignore the rest. 1. Never praise your child by telling him how "smart" or "intelligent" or "gifted" he is. Oddly enough, this sets up the wrong dynamic, making him less inclined to work hard and take risks. Instead, praise his hard work. There have been several articles that explain this in some depth, including one a year or so ago in, I think, the New York Times magazine section. 2. Gifted children are prone to being lazy and not paying attention. Why not? Everything comes easy to them, so when they are young they don't have an incentive to work hard at academics. (I suspect that the reason academically accelerated kids do well in the long run is that, having been thrown in over their heads, they've hard to learn how to work hard and be organized, while their non-accelerated peers don't learn this until too late.) So find reaasons for them to work hard and to pay close attention. It can be a challenge ... This paragraph of advice, by the way, doesn't apply until elementary school 3. Gifted children, just like other children, thrive on a variety of experiences. In the pre-school years (up to about age 5) they are best served by following their own interests, developing new interests, and gaining experiences that involve, over time, all five senses. Hands-on science museums are wonderful, as are trips to local farms and museums, gardening in their own yards or in flowerpots, playdates and trips to the playground, messy art projects, and so forth. During these years, art is about process rather than product, and workbooks (whether for reading, math, or just coloring in) tend to constrain their ideas of what is possible. Avoid them. (I'll write further on about non-workbook ways to encourage math and reading skills.) Limit TV and computer time to a maximum combined time of 30 minutes/day, but provide plenty of imagination-based toys such as costume pieces, legos (the big ones -- duplos -- are fine if there are babies in the house) or playmobile. One caveat on workbooks-you may find your child LIKES them. I was furious when my husband came home with my daughter and an ABC workbook from the Target dollar section when she was about 18 months old-until he said that she'd asked for it, and I sat and watched her do most of that workbook by herself, obviously having fun doing so. She has a small collection of workbooks now, which she's asked for, and she'll occasionally pull one out and do a few pages. Not every page in the book, and when I notice a book is mostly full and has been discarded, I toss it. It seems to be a soothing activity for her, just like reading mystery novels is for me. She's pretty eclectic in her selections-we have preschool colors books which are well below her level, and first grade ones which I know she can't handle the writing in, but she's the one who's made the choice. My daughter similarly likes card sets and posters-but it's always been her choice (and usually is from the Target dollar section or Dollar tree. It's kind of ironic that someone who is so into "Developmentally appropriate" should have a child who loves "playing school" as a favorite activity-but she does. OK. For reading skills: Identify the letters of the alphabet and find them on signs, in books, etc. Move on to looking for high-frequency words while you read to him. Don't push further than that until elementary school UNLESS your child requests it. It is FAR more important to develop a love of reading than to develop reading skills until sometime during 1st grade. DO work on telling stories aloud (your child tells you, I mean) and transcribing them for him. He can illustrate them too. You can also transcribe a brief description of his artwork on the front of the art, then hang them on the walls for the family to enjoy. Always read aloud books that are more challenging than he can read for himself, and continue this habit for as long as he'll let you. (We still read aloud to our kids, now 10 and 12, always books that they really couldn't read to themselves yet for reasons of archaic language or content that requires more contextual knowledge than they'd know on their own.) For math, start by counting. Count steps on the staircase, cookies, whatever. Count from one to ten, from uno to diez, from a to z, from hydrogen up through the periodic table ... This gives a very good, basic sense of numeracy. Count as high as you want to go. Then start skip-counting. (Count by 2s, by 3s, etc.) For addition and subtraction, add and subtract objects. Use buttons or pennies or whatever. Only when the concepts of addition and subtraction are well understood should you move on to memorizing math facts, and you can open that by discussing with your child how l-o-n-g it takes to count these basic addition facts, and how much easier it would be to learn more about numbers if the facts were memorized. And then make the memorizing a game. We found that, as the math became more complex, it was helpful to let the kids play educational computer games such as Ready for School. They liked these games until about age 8 or 9, at which point they became jaded and don't want to play those games any more. I love the idea of "counting" the periodic table-given the way DD loves absorbing complicated words (state names, country names, dinosaur names, bones), I think she'd really enjoy the elements. One thing I'd like to add-allow your child pretty free reign in the library (within reason). I was surprised when my daughter moved to wanting us to read poetry to her at just under 2, and when she moved to non-fiction for her read-alouds at about 2 3/4-but she's been very consistent in having us read aloud in one section for awhile, then abandoning it and moving on-but she often then picks up reading in it by herself. My daughter also will often ask us to read books to her which she can easily read herself-but what I've noticed is that when she has us read the same book again and again, her fluency and inflections, and just general understanding of similar books seems to increase dramatically. So again, following what she wants seems to provide what she needs. I admit it's a little strange to be reading "Happy Birthday, Dear Dragon" to a child who is independently reading non-fiction books about dinosaur anatomy and Magic treehouse books, but it seems to serve a need for her, even if that need is just to be able to cuddle on mommy or daddy's lap and be a baby again for a short time. Finally, find something that your child is NOT naturally adept at, such as playing a musical instrument, something that truly will require work. In school achievement is, to some degree, subjective on the part of the teacher, and work-in doesn't always correlate to grade-out. But with an instrument, practice-in correlates highly to music-out and progress, and it's easy to see on a week to week basic. Baseball skills worked similarly for us. If you're lucky, your school district will have a highly-gifted program that really works. Ours has two classrooms in each of grades 4 and 5 for every 5-7 elementary schools. (So they're pulling 50 kids out of about 500 into the highly-gifted program.) The curriculum is both enriched and accelerated, and the teachers very experiences with the particuar issues that face highly gifted kids, both academic and social. Of course, as I said at the start, your mileage may vary. But I hope these thoughts help. --Beth Kevles -THE-COM-HERE http://web.mit.edu/kevles/www/nomilk.html -- a page for the milk-allergic Disclaimer: Nothing in this message should be construed as medical advice. Please consult with your own medical practicioner. NOTE: No email is read at my MIT address. Use the GMAIL one if you would like me to reply. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
2-year-olds reading?
Beth Kevles wrote:
Hi -- As the parent of two highly gifted children, I've learned a few things that may be of help for you. Of course, not all will apply in your situation, so use what you want and ignore the rest. 1. Never praise your child by telling him how "smart" or "intelligent" or "gifted" he is. Oddly enough, this sets up the wrong dynamic, making him less inclined to work hard and take risks. Instead, praise his hard work. There have been several articles that explain this in some depth, including one a year or so ago in, I think, the New York Times magazine section. New York Magazine had an article on this last year. http://nymag.com/news/features/27840/ Clisby |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
2-year-olds reading?
Beliavsky wrote:
We do have lots of toys, but maybe not some of the more sophisticated ones that a bright 4yo would enjoy, such as a model train. However, the 2yo and 1yo would not let him play with such toys in peace. ?! Certainly, older children need to understand that they have to make *some* compromises for the sake of younger children, but I don't think they should be denied access to age appropriate experiences simply because they have younger sibs. It's the responsibility of parents to find time and space for the older child to do things appropriate to his age and development on occasion and set up the household so that the little ones stay out of his stuff. Best wishes, Ericka |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
2-year-olds reading?
"Clisby" wrote in message ... Beth Kevles wrote: Hi -- As the parent of two highly gifted children, I've learned a few things that may be of help for you. Of course, not all will apply in your situation, so use what you want and ignore the rest. 1. Never praise your child by telling him how "smart" or "intelligent" or "gifted" he is. Oddly enough, this sets up the wrong dynamic, making him less inclined to work hard and take risks. Instead, praise his hard work. There have been several articles that explain this in some depth, including one a year or so ago in, I think, the New York Times magazine section. New York Magazine had an article on this last year. http://nymag.com/news/features/27840/ Clisby The problem I see with this recommendation is that, unless your child is very non-communicative in public, there's no good way to avoid getting the message from everyone else if they are at all out of the norm. I mean, my husband and I never made a big deal about DD's reading-but that doesn't mean that she hasn't figured out that other children her age can't read yet, and that she's smart because she does-because every single time she's read something in public, the response she gets from others is "Wow! You're really smart!" And I suspect she's going to hear it a lot more before she starts kindergarten. Fortunately, for her there's still a lot of areas where she has to work that I can praise her-getting dressed with all clothing items going the correct way is a struggle for a 3 yr old with a gross motor delay, and when she draws a picture that's recognizable as something more than a scribble, which is very hard for her right now, she just beams. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
2-year-olds reading?
On Mar 17, 7:30�am, Clisby wrote:
Beth Kevles wrote: Hi -- As the parent of two highly gifted children, I've learned a few things that may be of help for you. �Of course, not all will apply in your situation, so use what you want and ignore the rest. 1. �Never praise your child by telling him how "smart" or "intelligent" � � or "gifted" he is. �Oddly enough, this sets up the wrong dynamic, � � making him less inclined to work hard and take risks.. �Instead, � � praise his hard work. �There have been several articles that explain � � this in some depth, including one a year or so ago in, I think, the � � New York Times magazine section. New York Magazine had an article on this last year. http://nymag.com/news/features/27840/ Clisby That technique totally backfires, though, if you have the bad luck to praise the child for "working hard" on something that they didn't work hard on at all. That happened to me constantly as a child (mostly from teachers) and I can't say it did me any good -- if anything, it told me that someone like me didn't ever *have* to work hard in order to give the impression of doing so, and while I knew better, it wasn't a good idea to have planted in my head. (Plus, sometimes hard work isn't even the best option: it would be better to do something a clever way that took less work.) I think the best way to praise a child's work is to take a proper interest in it. Knowing someone cares and thinks your stuff is worth reading or looking at is huge. Would an author be happy to hear a fan say "You must have worked so hard on this! I bet you're proud of yourself"? Or would they rather hear "The part when X did Y was so cool!"? --Helen |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
2-year-olds reading?
"Donna Metler" wrote in message
One caveat on workbooks-you may find your child LIKES them. I was furious when my husband came home with my daughter and an ABC workbook from the Target dollar section when she was about 18 months old-until he said that she'd asked for it, and I sat and watched her do most of that workbook by herself, obviously having fun doing so. Okay, I am sorry, I just can't let this go. You were furious because he bought a workbook for her?? Why? -- Sue (mom to three girls) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How many naps for 1 year olds | [email protected] | General | 3 | December 28th 06 10:31 AM |
Question about 6 year olds | tired_mom | General | 5 | March 16th 05 01:07 AM |
Question about 6 year olds | tired_mom | General | 0 | March 9th 05 06:16 PM |
My 16 year olds pale skin | javatiger | General (moderated) | 3 | May 3rd 04 03:26 AM |
two-year olds and possessions | P. Tierney | General | 13 | March 29th 04 11:29 PM |