If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
39w1d decrease in fundal height
I saw the doc yesterday and she said that I was 80% effaced and fingertip
dilated. I gather that its not exactly predictive of any certain time for delivery except that I've had lots of cervical discomfort and strong cramps on and off for the last two days. I'd say its getting closer anyway. In any case, she gave me my records to carry around with me to the hospital and, until this week, my fundal height had corresponded exactly with the number of weeks pregnant that I am. At 38 weeks I was 38 cm but at the 39 week appointment it decreased to 37 cm. I haven't gained weight in three weeks either. Do you think this just means that the baby has moved farther down or should I be concerned about his growth or lack thereof at this time? She didn't mention it to me so evidently she's not alarmed. It just seemed strange. Thanks, Susan M |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
39w1d decrease in fundal height
They don't even measure fundal height here in NZ routinely anymore. But
from what I have read on these and other groups, when babies head drops down into the pelvis your fundal height drops with it. So it may well be that your baby has engaged between 38 week and now. Take care. -- Pip My girls : DD1 Jasmine - 5 weeks early - 21 March 02 - Still as small as a peanut but as smart as a whip! DD2 Abby - 8 weeks early - 3 Feb 05 - I am very polite and say "Ank Ooooooo" whenever I'm given something. "Yes you can drive me insane just by talking to me!" -- "Susan M" wrote in message ... I saw the doc yesterday and she said that I was 80% effaced and fingertip dilated. I gather that its not exactly predictive of any certain time for delivery except that I've had lots of cervical discomfort and strong cramps on and off for the last two days. I'd say its getting closer anyway. In any case, she gave me my records to carry around with me to the hospital and, until this week, my fundal height had corresponded exactly with the number of weeks pregnant that I am. At 38 weeks I was 38 cm but at the 39 week appointment it decreased to 37 cm. I haven't gained weight in three weeks either. Do you think this just means that the baby has moved farther down or should I be concerned about his growth or lack thereof at this time? She didn't mention it to me so evidently she's not alarmed. It just seemed strange. Thanks, Susan M |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
39w1d decrease in fundal height
In any case, she gave me my records to carry around with me to the hospital and, until this week, my fundal height had corresponded exactly with the number of weeks pregnant that I am. At 38 weeks I was 38 cm but at the 39 week appointment it decreased to 37 cm. I haven't gained weight in three weeks either. Do you think this just means that the baby has moved farther down or should I be concerned about his growth or lack thereof at this time? She didn't mention it to me so evidently she's not alarmed. It just seemed strange. absolutely classic, meaning the baby has dropped, growth also does slow down towards the end, it is said babies put on half a pound a week in the last few weeks, but I'm not sure that beyond 40 weeks there is much evidence for that and lots of anecdotal that points in the opposite direction, even when they are piling on half a pound a week, it's mostly fat and not length, so it doesn't increase the fundal height in the same way that earlier growth does. Anne |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
39w1d decrease in fundal height
"Me Myself and I" wrote in message
news:1170445878.567837@ftpsrv1... They don't even measure fundal height here in NZ routinely anymore. But from what I have read on these and other groups, when babies head drops down into the pelvis your fundal height drops with it. So it may well be that your baby has engaged between 38 week and now. Thank you. I haven't been able to find anything on the Net about this but it makes sense that the baby could have engaged further by now. Susan M Otis and Chester |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
39w1d decrease in fundal height
"Anne Rogers" wrote in message
... absolutely classic, meaning the baby has dropped, growth also does slow down towards the end, it is said babies put on half a pound a week in the last few weeks, but I'm not sure that beyond 40 weeks there is much evidence for that and lots of anecdotal that points in the opposite direction, even when they are piling on half a pound a week, it's mostly fat and not length, so it doesn't increase the fundal height in the same way that earlier growth does. Thank you! That all makes perfect sense Susan M |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
39w1d decrease in fundal height
"Me Myself and I" wrote in message news:1170445878.567837@ftpsrv1... They don't even measure fundal height here in NZ routinely anymore. But from what I have read on these and other groups, when babies head drops down into the pelvis your fundal height drops with it. So it may well be that your baby has engaged between 38 week and now. Really? I had it measured every time I visited my midwife here in NZ from about 20 weeks onwards. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
39w1d decrease in fundal height
Well my experience was limited to my LMC midwife (useless bitch she was so
she was probably lazy) and I was also under the care of a specialist at Waikato Hospital. She was the one that told me that they NZ hospitals don't do it as routine because there are so many variables to take into account, weight gain, babies position etc. -- Pip My girls : DD1 Jasmine - 5 weeks early - 21 March 02 - Still as small as a peanut but as smart as a whip! DD2 Abby - 8 weeks early - 3 Feb 05 - I am very polite and say "Ank Ooooooo" whenever I'm given something. "Yes you can drive me insane just by talking to me!" -- "rangitotogirl" wrote in message ... "Me Myself and I" wrote in message news:1170445878.567837@ftpsrv1... They don't even measure fundal height here in NZ routinely anymore. But from what I have read on these and other groups, when babies head drops down into the pelvis your fundal height drops with it. So it may well be that your baby has engaged between 38 week and now. Really? I had it measured every time I visited my midwife here in NZ from about 20 weeks onwards. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
39w1d decrease in fundal height
Really? I had it measured every time I visited my midwife here in NZ from about 20 weeks onwards. I've also corresponded with NZ midwives who use it regularly, I think that a tape measure that actually has a slightly more realistic scale than 1cm per week originated there, because that is actually not very accurate for many women, so there is some desire for a better way of figuring out when there is a real concern, rather than automatically worrying when it's a certain number of cm behind. (Incidently, I've had an IUGR baby who measured spot on until 32 weeks, then no increase, therefore wasn't at the worry point of 4cm behind until 36+ weeks, but there being a problem was clear at 34 weeks, whereas my non IUGR baby was consistently 4cm behind, emphasising that changes from week to week are probably more important than the absolute value). Anne |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
39w1d decrease in fundal height
"Anne Rogers" wrote in message ... Really? I had it measured every time I visited my midwife here in NZ from about 20 weeks onwards. I've also corresponded with NZ midwives who use it regularly, I think that a tape measure that actually has a slightly more realistic scale than 1cm per week originated there, because that is actually not very accurate for many women, so there is some desire for a better way of figuring out when there is a real concern, rather than automatically worrying when it's a certain number of cm behind. (Incidently, I've had an IUGR baby who measured spot on until 32 weeks, then no increase, therefore wasn't at the worry point of 4cm behind until 36+ weeks, but there being a problem was clear at 34 weeks, whereas my non IUGR baby was consistently 4cm behind, emphasising that changes from week to week are probably more important than the absolute value). My sister's place up in Yorkshire has charts according to your height which gives you your expected fundal height. She was way over from early on (and got bigger)-and had a small (9%) baby. My fundal height ended up about 8cm too low, but she was about 50%. Debbie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
39w1d decrease in fundal height
"Me Myself and I" wrote in message
news:1170731834.726678@ftpsrv1... Well my experience was limited to my LMC midwife (useless bitch she was so she was probably lazy) and I was also under the care of a specialist at Waikato Hospital. She was the one that told me that they NZ hospitals don't do it as routine because there are so many variables to take into account, weight gain, babies position etc. It is interesting to me for something that is supposed to be so variable that I measured *exactly* the same centimeters as weeks from 14 weeks on until now. It can't be useless in all cases! Susan M Otis and Chester |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Measuring fundal height - tape vs 'guessing' | Cathy | Pregnancy | 5 | September 11th 04 06:42 AM |
Small fundal height (30cm) @ 35 weeks | criss72 | Pregnancy | 5 | April 24th 04 10:46 PM |
Fundal height measurement question | Jill | Pregnancy | 3 | March 25th 04 02:52 AM |
37 weeks Fundal height only 34cm | na | Pregnancy | 5 | November 2nd 03 03:38 AM |
Fundal Height 31 at 33 weeks | Kathy | Pregnancy | 8 | August 4th 03 09:15 PM |