If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#281
|
|||
|
|||
Why Did "Aids Baby" Eliza Jane Really Die?
"Mark" wrote in message ups.com... Peter: "Jan, I have an incurable disease." (referencing Peter's Type II diabetes) Do show us where he said that. Jan: "NO, you DO NOT." Do show us where I said that. I'll wait. Now don't forget to answer. [snip] Mark, MD |
#282
|
|||
|
|||
HCN Exposes Himself As A Liar
"JanD" wrote:
It is NOTED NO reply from HCN. Caught at his own DISHONEST game. Jan, Debbbeeeeee complained to an ISP when Kuruna said that Debbbeeeeee was male. You complained when Ariebert Votewer kept calling you "he". I think you might find that Laetrile Person is female. -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com |
#283
|
|||
|
|||
HCN Exposes Himself As A Liar
Peter Bowditch wrote: "JanD" wrote: It is NOTED NO reply from HCN. Caught at his own DISHONEST game. Jan, Debbbeeeeee complained to an ISP when Kuruna said that Debbbeeeeee was male. You complained when Ariebert Votewer kept calling you "he". I think you might find that Laetrile Person is female. Once Jan has an idea in her little head, it's immovable. No doubt she'll continue to claim that HCN is male, although she's been told before that she's not, in much the same way she continues to refer to me as Rosalind (?!), to your sites as full of lies... Of course, she's never actually produced any evidence for any of these things. BTW, sorry to hear about your diabetes, although I'm sure you're not worried now that Jan's told you it's curable Cheers, Cathy -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com |
#284
|
|||
|
|||
HCN Exposes Himself As A Liar
cathyb wrote:
Peter Bowditch wrote: "JanD" wrote: It is NOTED NO reply from HCN. Caught at his own DISHONEST game. Jan, Debbbeeeeee complained to an ISP when Kuruna said that Debbbeeeeee was male. You complained when Ariebert Votewer kept calling you "he". I think you might find that Laetrile Person is female. Once Jan has an idea in her little head, it's immovable. No doubt she'll continue to claim that HCN is male, although she's been told before that she's not, in much the same way she continues to refer to me as Rosalind (?!), to your sites as full of lies... Of course, she's never actually produced any evidence for any of these things. BTW, sorry to hear about your diabetes, although I'm sure you're not worried now that Jan's told you it's curable Well, it may very well be in the very near future. Look at this: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?cha...A583414B7F0000 Of course, all coming from eeeevil organized medicine, not from nice, friendly, altruistic, good christian alt-med, but hey, somehow I don't think that would bother Peter (Bowditch that is, not the delusional other Peter). Cheers, Cathy |
#285
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Probert Proves Himself A Repeated Liar Again
JanD wrote:
"Mark Probert" wrote in message ... JanD wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote [snip] Snipping does not remove the truth: Dumber than a box of rocks shows he is a liar again. You mean that snipping removes the truth? snip of the rest |
#286
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Probert Proves Himself A Repeated Liar Again
JanD wrote:
"Rich" wrote in message ... "JanD" wrote in message news:fUnnf.622634$_o.125740@attbi_s71... "Mark Probert" wrote in message ... JanD wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote [snip] Snipping does not remove the truth: Dumber than a box of rocks shows he is a liar again. ROTFL! If YOU were smarter than a box of rocks, you would realize that you just made the argument that snipping DOES remove the truth. Poor Rich. Actually, Mark posting again shows his repeated lies. Actually, my posting, and YOUR RESPONDING, shows that you are incapable of understanding the written word, and, further, that you are obsessed with stalking, harassing and abusing me. Anything to say about those lies huh, Rich? Edited for focus Remember, last year Hulda's Henchmen agreed that they could not prove her claims. I see Mark is repeating this LIE. He can NOT show where they did any such thing. But I did show it then, and I showed it recently. The fact that the logic was beyond your limited ability to understand does not mean I lied, just that you are not intellectually equipped to understand it. Because he made up this LIE. http://tinyurl.com/cxbh5 http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/02230...tip0223051.pdf Hulda's Henchmen have agreed that she is practicing quackery and that they cannot legally sell her crap in the United States. The word *quackery* is NOT used. True. That was my interpretation of what happened. To briefly review, they agreed that their claims could not be proven, that they would stop making them, and that they would refund the money people paid. That sure does sound like quackery to me. LIE #1. Jan uses her fingers to count. In the US. is NOT listed. LIE #2. This is most unclear. There was NO agreement that anyone could not prove any claim There was, but, alas, Jan is dumber than a dumpster full of rocks and does not understand what the stipulation was about. LIE #3. I don't suppose, you can see any lies there? Rational, intelligent people cannot. That leaves you. --Rich |
#287
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Probert Proves Himself A Repeated Liar Again
Mark Probert wrote: JanD wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote in message ... JanD wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote [snip] Snipping does not remove the truth: Dumber than a box of rocks shows he is a liar again. You mean that snipping removes the truth? Jan would have to virtually stop posting did she not believe that snipping removes the truth. Doing so and lying about other posters are the only things she does here. Cathy snip of the rest |
#288
|
|||
|
|||
HCN Exposes Himself As A Liar
JanD wrote:
It is NOTED NO reply from HCN. So what? You have not replied to this question: Jan, have you ever contacted anyone outside of usenet about Mark Lowry? You have been asked that a million times, and you snip it. You are afraid of the truth. Caught at his own DISHONEST game. "Mark Probert" wrote in message ... JanD wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote in message ... JanD(ishonest) wrote: "HCN" wrote in message news:XpednePbmomLkQDenZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@comcast .com... "cathyb" wrote in message oglegroups.com... JanD wrote: ...snip.... Since testing positive in 1992, Christine has lived without illness or AIDS medications and is the mother of two exceptionally healthy children, both born with no medical interventions. Poor Rosalind. Gee... why does this look familiar? Oh, wait.. I know! I posted it a almost a week ago! Check it out: http://groups.google.com/group/misc....e1e2810972d8c7 Obviously JanD dismissed it as a "lie", only to post it HERSELF!!!!!! (is that enough exclamation marks?) But when I posted I was called a "liar"... OOOPPPPSSSS. Now, how do you suppose HCN would know that, since he claims to have me killfiled?!?! Maybe because HCN reads others posts who quote you. NOT. OPEN MOUTH INSET FOOT snip As a matter of FACT, *I* did NOT call YOU a liar, HCN!!!!!! (is that enough exclamation marks?) NOW, who is lying?!?! (is that enough question marks + exclamation marks?) until SHE posts it on Usenet... calling herself one of the of only two who tell the truth.... Now, now, HCN, do tell the *whole* truth* http://tinyurl.com/cxbh5 THE ONLY TWO HONEST PEOPLE IN THE THREAD WERE IIENA AND MYSELF. Ain't hypocrisy grand? Ain't it awful when LIARS are caught!!!! [snip Rosalind crap] Perhaps HCN isn't aware, I don't read her crap. One of the reasons I killfiled Jan Drew (2222 funny, he claims too, and then claims, I called him a liar, of course that was a made up LIE) and Ilena Rose is because of this. Ho hum. For some reason Jan thinks that a child who is dead is "exceptionally healthy". What a load of crap. [snip more of same] |
#289
|
|||
|
|||
Why Did "Aids Baby" Eliza Jane Really Die?
It's in this very thread, you git! (At present, it's two posts below
the one I'm typing right now.) Are you *that* dense? Mark, MD |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jane has three ways to get her baby back | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 0 | October 30th 05 04:19 PM |
Odent on forceps (also: midwives 'prisoners of protocol') | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | March 1st 04 05:59 AM |
Confusing vaccination and immunization (Jane Orient, MD; also: 'PF Riley, MD') | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 7 | September 11th 03 02:52 AM |