Ken Pangborn reneges on word

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:52:36 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:28:03 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, freedom wrote:

Precisely Ken's tactic.

A while back, I was kicking his ass on some issue (difficult to recall
which, there have been so many of them.) To divert attention away from
this, Ken changed the subject, and began falsely alleging that I had been
making telephone calls to his home from a pay phone (400 miles from where I
live, go figure). Then he began screaming that he had "WON" based upon the
fact that I was no longer making the phone calls (which I'd never made in
the first place.)

Well, Empty Kane still alleging

Alleging?

Alleging is putting is mildly, Kane! False accusation, baseless claim,
defamation.... I could go on. Hihihi!

Exploring the possibility. Asking you questions. Pointing out the
longest and more telling of coincidences I've ever seen in aps.

Wondering, with you, little buddy, about those odd lapses, like you
refering to 'Alina' as "Aline," the name of a retired teaching Nun who
resides in USC owned Property, Mahonia Mansion, who is featured on a
USC webpage, and who taught Spanish for decades at USC, a language you
write in.

A language I write in? Come on, Kane! Hihihi!

Why would Alina use expressions that you commonly use, like Hohoho
(that you changed to Hihihi) and a little smiley face in precisely the
kind of position you use your smiley in?

Hihihi! ;-) Come on, Kane. You can do better than that!

that I posted as Alina from MEXICO (more
than 400 miles from where I live, go figure).

You are so dumb as to presume that others are so dumb they don't know
what an anonymous proxy is, Doan?

You tell me, Kane. What is anonymous proxy?

And I posted a link to a search on the ISP that a lookup produces off
Alina's IP number and it's well known as an anon proxy provider.

And I put in your IP address and got the same result. Go ahead, Kane

http://www.atomintersoft.com/product...r/default.aspx

Unh...Doan? Doan? Is that you lying again?

I myself said you would get an ISP by using that source.

I also said you would with Whois.

What I said that YOU are running from, is that at SenderWatch all of
us but Alina's IP got ISP information.

Try putting anyone's IP addy there, AND ALINA'S and see what you get.

You get the same thing I've shown you about three times now, that
block of ISP info in the lower left hand corner....THAT YOU LEFT OUT
EACH TIME YOU REFERRED TO SenderWatch, Doan...that block, had NO ISP
info for Alina's ISP.

But it had everyone else's that we know are not using a proxy.





Doan


I personally post from a lot more than 400 miles away from my ISP,
Doan.

I don't use a proxy, but there is another way.

And commonly known.

Tell us how folks from all over the country post from an AOL posting
host number, Doan.

They join AOL? Hihihi!

Yep. And can you tell where in the US they reside?


Doan

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:52:36 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:28:03 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, freedom wrote:

Precisely Ken's tactic.

A while back, I was kicking his ass on some issue (difficult to recall
which, there have been so many of them.) To divert attention away from
this, Ken changed the subject, and began falsely alleging that I had been
making telephone calls to his home from a pay phone (400 miles from where I
live, go figure). Then he began screaming that he had "WON" based upon the
fact that I was no longer making the phone calls (which I'd never made in
the first place.)

Well, Empty Kane still alleging

Alleging?

Alleging is putting is mildly, Kane! False accusation, baseless claim,
defamation.... I could go on. Hihihi!


Won't dare to touch that, Kane? Are you proud of yourself?

Exploring the possibility. Asking you questions. Pointing out the
longest and more telling of coincidences I've ever seen in aps.

Wondering, with you, little buddy, about those odd lapses, like you
refering to 'Alina' as "Aline," the name of a retired teaching Nun who
resides in USC owned Property, Mahonia Mansion, who is featured on a
USC webpage, and who taught Spanish for decades at USC, a language you
write in.

A language I write in? Come on, Kane! Hihihi!

Why would Alina use expressions that you commonly use, like Hohoho
(that you changed to Hihihi) and a little smiley face in precisely the
kind of position you use your smiley in?

Hihihi! ;-) Come on, Kane. You can do better than that!

that I posted as Alina from MEXICO (more
than 400 miles from where I live, go figure).

You are so dumb as to presume that others are so dumb they don't know
what an anonymous proxy is, Doan?

You tell me, Kane. What is anonymous proxy?

Why don't you give an answer, Kane?


And I posted a link to a search on the ISP that a lookup produces off
Alina's IP number and it's well known as an anon proxy provider.

And I put in your IP address and got the same result. Go ahead, Kane

http://www.atomintersoft.com/product...r/default.aspx

Unh...Doan? Doan? Is that you lying again?

Well, that was the proxy checker's you used, and invited me to use, is it
not? Who is lying now, Kane?

I myself said you would get an ISP by using that source.

I also said you would with Whois.

So? What so anonymous about that?

What I said that YOU are running from, is that at SenderWatch all of
us but Alina's IP got ISP information.

So? What does that have anything to do with anonymous proxies?

Try putting anyone's IP addy there, AND ALINA'S and see what you get.

You get the same thing I've shown you about three times now, that
block of ISP info in the lower left hand corner....THAT YOU LEFT OUT
EACH TIME YOU REFERRED TO SenderWatch, Doan...that block, had NO ISP
info for Alina's ISP.

But it had everyone else's that we know are not using a proxy.

Why don't you put yours ip in the proxy checker you gave us?





Doan


I personally post from a lot more than 400 miles away from my ISP,
Doan.

I don't use a proxy, but there is another way.

And commonly known.

Tell us how folks from all over the country post from an AOL posting
host number, Doan.

They join AOL? Hihihi!

Yep. And can you tell where in the US they reside?

Not precisely but the region. Just like from your ip address, I can tell
the region you reside. Remember "Irvine Lake"??? Hihihi!


Doan

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Non scrivetemi wrote:

This just in, Ken Pangborn has just reneged on excel and powerpoint as
well.

Did you send this, Kane?

Doan

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:

This just in, Ken Pangborn has just reneged on excel and powerpoint as
well.

Is this from you also, Kane?

Doan

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:53:15 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:

This just in, Ken Pangborn has just reneged on excel and powerpoint as
well.

Is this from you also, Kane?

You know that's not my style, Doan.

A quick check of Pangborn's usenet history shows that there are those
that have been following him for a very long time...long before you
brought the fool here and embarrassed yourself tryhing to defend and
help him.



Go on, check and see.

Doan

And stop with your dodges.

Yer just a common liar.

And I'm not insane and there is no mental illness called, "insanity."

So you are lying again.

Go look at your own posting history and see how many times you've
dodge, unethically, demanded what you won't yourself won't provide.

Lied and lied and lied again.

You are a time waster.

A little twit full himself and empty as a gourd.

Any one that has to call in someone like Pangborn for help is
obviously weak and stupid. That's YOU.

0:]

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:52:36 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Non scrivetemi wrote:

This just in, Ken Pangborn has just reneged on excel and powerpoint as
well.

Did you send this, Kane?

Those that don't like Ken, for good reasons apparently, only run under
a nym for their safety from his bs.

That particular troll, or sock, is probably Ken himself doing the
black bag trick of attacking himself to gain sympathy and build a raft
of "enemies" to screen his other bull****.

There's a whole series of posts from that host source that crop up
like clockwork when he's had his ass kicked, like I just did for him.

Stop pretending you didn't know that.

It's not like it isn't obvious. He never changes his timing.

During exchanges he's likely busy forging racist attacks. Someone 0:]
forged a "I hate Jews" post under my sig.

Right during the time I was putting heavy pressure on him to stop his
Doan-dodging bull**** and discuss the actual study.

Then when he ran, suddenly HE's the one being attacked.

I don't forge, Doan, and you know it.

I've even admonished people that have done it to my opponents here.
Greg for one, then he had the temerity to suggest the same thing you
just did. That I was posting attacks on him under a nym.

I figure those that forge are only one step lower than you.

And I wouldn't use your tactics for any amount of money.

Doan

So you can hardly expect me to stoop even lower than you.

So you can shove your question right up along side your head in your
asshole. There's room for all of you, Ken, Greg, and your lying
crappola.

0:}

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:53:15 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:

This just in, Ken Pangborn has just reneged on excel and powerpoint as
well.

Is this from you also, Kane?

You know that's not my style, Doan.

That is your style, Kane, hiding behind a nym.

A quick check of Pangborn's usenet history shows that there are those
that have been following him for a very long time...long before you
brought the fool here and embarrassed yourself tryhing to defend and
help him.

I don't know him any more than the debate between you and him, which
I am privy to. I saw him WHUPPED YOUR ASS and you CONCEDED!



Go on, check and see.

It's used by anonymous remailers. It is funny that when you just talked
about it, these posting come up.

Doan

And stop with your dodges.

The one who is doing the dodging is YOU!

Yer just a common liar.

The PROVEN LIAR here is YOU!

And I'm not insane and there is no mental illness called, "insanity."

Ok. You are nost insane. YOU ARE JUST STUPID! Happy?

So you are lying again.

The PROVEN STUPID LIAR here is you. Prove that I am Alina. Can you?

Go look at your own posting history and see how many times you've
dodge, unethically, demanded what you won't yourself won't provide.

Lied and lied and lied again.

The PROVEN LIAR, times and times again, IS YOU!

You are a time waster.

And having fun doing it at your expense too, Empty Kane! ;-)

A little twit full himself and empty as a gourd.

Empty as a....Kane! Make more noise for me, Kane. Hihihi!

Any one that has to call in someone like Pangborn for help is
obviously weak and stupid. That's YOU.

Another lie, I have never called Pangborn, whoever he is. All
I know is that he and you had a debate and HE WHUPPED YOUR ASS!

Doan

0:]

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:52:36 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Non scrivetemi wrote:

This just in, Ken Pangborn has just reneged on excel and powerpoint as
well.

Did you send this, Kane?

Those that don't like Ken, for good reasons apparently, only run under
a nym for their safety from his bs.

Like you?

Doan

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:30:33 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:53:15 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:

This just in, Ken Pangborn has just reneged on excel and powerpoint as
well.

Is this from you also, Kane?

You know that's not my style, Doan.

That is your style, Kane, hiding behind a nym.

Would you like a list of your buddies who post under nyms?

Shall we presume then that Fern is Borked Pseudo Mailed?

I don't post this kind of drivel and you know it.



A quick check of Pangborn's usenet history shows that there are those
that have been following him for a very long time...long before you
brought the fool here and embarrassed yourself tryhing to defend and
help him.

I don't know him any more than the debate between you and him, which
I am privy to. I saw him WHUPPED YOUR ASS and you CONCEDED!

He did not, nor did I concede anything that I hadn't already argued.
My concession was to my own argument. You are a liar.






Go on, check and see.

It's used by anonymous remailers. It is funny that when you just talked
about it, these posting come up.

Doan

And stop with your dodges.

The one who is doing the dodging is YOU!

Yer just a common liar.

The PROVEN LIAR here is YOU!

And I'm not insane and there is no mental illness called, "insanity."

Ok. You are nost insane. YOU ARE JUST STUPID! Happy?

So you are lying again.

The PROVEN STUPID LIAR here is you. Prove that I am Alina. Can you?

Go look at your own posting history and see how many times you've
dodge, unethically, demanded what you won't yourself won't provide.

Lied and lied and lied again.

The PROVEN LIAR, times and times again, IS YOU!

You are a time waster.

And having fun doing it at your expense too, Empty Kane! ;-)

A little twit full himself and empty as a gourd.

Empty as a....Kane! Make more noise for me, Kane. Hihihi!

Any one that has to call in someone like Pangborn for help is
obviously weak and stupid. That's YOU.

Another lie, I have never called Pangborn, whoever he is. All
I know is that he and you had a debate and HE WHUPPED YOUR ASS!

Doan

0:]

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:31:14 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:52:36 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Non scrivetemi wrote:

This just in, Ken Pangborn has just reneged on excel and powerpoint as
well.

Did you send this, Kane?

Those that don't like Ken, for good reasons apparently, only run under
a nym for their safety from his bs.

Like you?

Nope. You know why I use a nym.

You are now lying again, Doan.


Doan