Does anybody have any useful advice on how to collect a child support debt?

Gini wrote:
.......................................

Just comply with the law and there isn't a problem, because there are a
lot
worse things out there than child support. You are never going to change
your
opinion, just as I will not change mine. Why argue, and be nasty?
I will take the high road, and ignore your comments.
===
ROTFL. Damn, I need to take you of my killfile. You're just too much fun.
What does ROTFL stand for. I am not good with acronyms because,as my sister
put it, I am not web savy.

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1

teachrmama wrote:
"Paula" wrote
"Gini" wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
you
see fit, be a grown-up and extend that courtesy to others.

Perhaps if everyone extended that courtesy to others, includiong the people
from that that group that is snatching our posts, there would be fewer
problems. But being told to "stick to my topic, and only give answers *I*
consider to be positive" is way up there on the bossy scale.
I know it is, and I know I need to work on that, but look around, some of
these people do not recognize they have some issues as well with the
bossiness.

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message
news:79ae7caf7fa7b@uwe...
Bob Whiteside wrote:
"Bob Whiteside" wrote
...........................................
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
So...They either have written permission from Google, or they're doing
it
illegally.

Hey, FamilyKB webmaster! Which is it? Are you interested in a legal
challenge to your little henhouse chat room? Want to test the legality of
what you are doing? Do you have deep pockets? Why not just cease and
desist and leave us posters to alt.child-support alone?
I am not the webmaster. Since your postings are being crossed over to this
site, wouldn't it also be responsible?


No It wouldn't. This Is usenet. Your site Is deliberately posting, and
grabbing posts from this group.

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message
news:79ae7eec72c3d@uwe...
Shadow36 wrote:
It looks like there are a lot of deadbeat supporters, enablers,
and
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
you
are writing.

Not my fault you take things out of of context and try to twist them
around.
Not my fault you do not understand how you come accross.

lol I came across quite clearly. It's ok that you don't understand.

Shadow36 wrote:
"Bob Whiteside" wrote
...........................................
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
I am not the webmaster. Since your postings are being crossed over to this
site, wouldn't it also be responsible?

No It wouldn't. This Is usenet. Your site Is deliberately posting, and
grabbing posts from this group.
I am not the webmaster. Tell me how FKB is grabbing posts. I did not post to
your group, I posted here. Does that mean that usenet grabbed my post to
display on alt.child support?

--
Message posted via http://www.familykb.com

Illiana via FamilyKB.com wrote:
Gini wrote:

.......................................


Just comply with the law and there isn't a problem, because there are a
lot
worse things out there than child support. You are never going to change
your
opinion, just as I will not change mine. Why argue, and be nasty?
I will take the high road, and ignore your comments.

===
ROTFL. Damn, I need to take you of my killfile. You're just too much fun.

What does ROTFL stand for. I am not good with acronyms because,as my sister
put it, I am not web savy.


She was being polite, she should have just bluntly said.....you aren't
very bright

Shadow36 wrote:
It looks like there are a lot of deadbeat supporters, enablers,
and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
around.
Not my fault you do not understand how you come accross.

lol I came across quite clearly. It's ok that you don't understand.
You clearly stated that I have cohorts. You denied stating that, then said I
didn’t understand. When I pointed out that you don’t understand how you came
across you say I still don’t understand. What is there to understand, that I
am not getting, other than the fact you are attempting to not acknowledge
that that is what you stated?

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1

Illiana via FamilyKB.com wrote:

teachrmama wrote:

It looks like there are a lot of deadbeat supporters, enablers, and
deadbeats on this usenet group. This particular thread is not for

[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]

the
right to post an opposite view?

People posting opposing views have been told to leave this thread or post
only comments considered to be in line with the title of the thread. So if
you have a thread entitled "Does anybody here have any useful advice on how
to collect a child support debt," and you are posting to people who have
been unfairly damaged by excessive child support, do you really think they
should be told that they can only respond if they can give advice on how to
get other people damaged the same way they have been? Nobody here caused
our posts to be sent to this other group--the one you are apparently posting
from. And a lot of the regulars here have been blasted by people posting

from your group, have been told that they are deadbeats for even questioning

the amount of child support they are ordered to pay, and have been
condescended to by other menbers of your group--told that unfair judgements
are not made because the judge looks at all the fact--when some of us here
know that to be untrue. And, the fact of the matter is, the vast majority
of people here do and always have paid their child support. It really is no
wonder that several people here have grown short with those who issue
insults, then demand we stay on "their" subject on "their" terms.

What insults have I issued?

snicker you arn't very bright are you.

I was attached by your group’s people!

thanks for proving my point.

If the
vast majority of people have paid, or are paying their child support, they
are not deadbeats.

A lie, but money grubbers like yourself never let facts get in your way.

Is it those that do not, have not, and will not pay their
child support that are responding with negative remarks to the post?

It is peopel that realize that the child support system is a corrupt,
unconstitutional mess that supports money grubbers like yourself.

Illiana via FamilyKB.com wrote:

Gini wrote:

"Paula" wrote
"Gini" wrote:

[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]

mature
manner, instead of going all psycho about it.

====
LOL! The above explanation is immature and "going all psycho?" I think I
see why your ex dumped you.
===

My ex didn't dump me. He won't even leave my house. What are you talking
about?
And you did go all psycho. All I know is I posted a topic, and you came in
and jumped all in my a$$ for God knows what, and told me I had no right to be
here. You don't feel that you attached me?
I feel that you did, and that it was unprovoked. I wasn't rude, or nasty with
you, but your were to me, and that is what going psycho is.

Once again proving you aren't very bright.

animal05 wrote:
.......................................

[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
What does ROTFL stand for. I am not good with acronyms because,as my sister
put it, I am not web savy.

She was being polite, she should have just bluntly said.....you aren't
very bright
ROTFL stands for what?

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1