If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnancy vs Childbirth
Pregnancy vs Childbirth
The man (and woman equally) is responsible for the PREGNANCY. It is the direct result of the actions of the man and woman in sex that produced the pregnancy. Beyond that, the decision to have a child and keep the child (as opposed to adoption) is the result of the unilateral choice of the woman. That is the way that the women want it, so that is the way that it should be, the woman's body the woman's choice. What that means is the man should be obligated to be responsible for the costs associated with the pregnancy, those responsibilities being the cost of either the abortion or the cost of prenatal care, but not child support. Furthermore, the man probably should be responsible for the FULL cost of it, considering that the woman has to actually go through the abortion or childbirth. If a woman wants to exercise her right to have a child and keep a child, the woman should be willing and able to support the child. The same situation would apply to men. The man could choose to raise the child (with the consent of the woman to have the child), and the man should be equally ineligible for child support. Otherwise the child should be put up for adoption. It is definately in the child's best interest to be adopted into a family that IS willing and able to support the child. I do not have any children, and I intend to keep it that way. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnancy vs Childbirth
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnancy vs Childbirth
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnancy vs Childbirth
"Fighting For Kids" wrote in message ... Not this garbage again. On 13 Nov 2003 12:15:57 -0800, (Matt D) wrote: Pregnancy vs Childbirth The man (and woman equally) is responsible for the PREGNANCY. It is the direct result of the actions of the man and woman in sex that produced the pregnancy. Beyond that, the decision to have a child and keep the child (as opposed to adoption) is the result of the unilateral choice of the woman. This would be abortion that you are referring to and for some women abortion is just not an option. Sorry. It is an OPTION. It may not be a choice they prefer. They still have two other choices, ADOPTION and SELF-SUPPORT. That is the way that the women want it, so that is the way that it should be, the woman's body the woman's choice. What that means is the man should be obligated to be responsible for the costs associated with the pregnancy, those responsibilities being the cost of either the abortion or the cost of prenatal care, but not child support. That would mean men would NEVER be held accountable for any child that was ever born. They could simply walk away, even in marriages. No. It means that men would have as much CHOICE to walk away as women. Cameron |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnancy vs Childbirth
"Fighting For Kids" wrote in message ... Not this garbage again. On 13 Nov 2003 12:15:57 -0800, (Matt D) wrote: Pregnancy vs Childbirth The man (and woman equally) is responsible for the PREGNANCY. It is the direct result of the actions of the man and woman in sex that produced the pregnancy. Beyond that, the decision to have a child and keep the child (as opposed to adoption) is the result of the unilateral choice of the woman. This would be abortion that you are referring to and for some women abortion is just not an option. Sorry. It is an OPTION. It may not be a choice they prefer. They still have two other choices, ADOPTION and SELF-SUPPORT. That is the way that the women want it, so that is the way that it should be, the woman's body the woman's choice. What that means is the man should be obligated to be responsible for the costs associated with the pregnancy, those responsibilities being the cost of either the abortion or the cost of prenatal care, but not child support. That would mean men would NEVER be held accountable for any child that was ever born. They could simply walk away, even in marriages. No. It means that men would have as much CHOICE to walk away as women. Cameron |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnancy vs Childbirth
Not this garbage again.
This "garbage" is what the whole inequality of men's and woman's choice is about. Pregnancy vs Childbirth The man (and woman equally) is responsible for the PREGNANCY. It is the direct result of the actions of the man and woman in sex that produced the pregnancy. Beyond that, the decision to have a child and keep the child (as opposed to adoption) is the result of the unilateral choice of the woman. This would be abortion that you are referring to and for some women abortion is just not an option. This view does also give consideration to the pro-life alternative of adoption. So I am also referring to adoption in the cases where abortion is not an option. That is the way that the women want it, so that is the way that it should be, the woman's body the woman's choice. What that means is the man should be obligated to be responsible for the costs associated with the pregnancy, those responsibilities being the cost of either the abortion or the cost of prenatal care, but not child support. That would mean men would NEVER be held accountable for any child that was ever born. They could simply walk away, even in marriages. They could walk away only very early in the pregnancy. The proposed time-limit is 30 days after conception. After that time, the man is making the deliberate choice to remain in the relationship and thus would be held accountable to the child. Furthermore, the man probably should be responsible for the FULL cost of it, considering that the woman has to actually go through the abortion or childbirth. Actually they should be held responsible for their share of the costs in having a child and supporting a child. They should be held responsible for their share of the costs of HAVING a child. If a woman wants to exercise her right to have a child and keep a child, the woman should be willing and able to support the child. The same situation would apply to men. The man could choose to raise the child (with the consent of the woman to have the child), and the man should be equally ineligible for child support. Otherwise the child should be put up for adoption. It is definately in the child's best interest to be adopted into a family that IS willing and able to support the child. I do not have any children, and I intend to keep it that way. Good !!!! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnancy vs Childbirth
Not this garbage again.
This "garbage" is what the whole inequality of men's and woman's choice is about. Pregnancy vs Childbirth The man (and woman equally) is responsible for the PREGNANCY. It is the direct result of the actions of the man and woman in sex that produced the pregnancy. Beyond that, the decision to have a child and keep the child (as opposed to adoption) is the result of the unilateral choice of the woman. This would be abortion that you are referring to and for some women abortion is just not an option. This view does also give consideration to the pro-life alternative of adoption. So I am also referring to adoption in the cases where abortion is not an option. That is the way that the women want it, so that is the way that it should be, the woman's body the woman's choice. What that means is the man should be obligated to be responsible for the costs associated with the pregnancy, those responsibilities being the cost of either the abortion or the cost of prenatal care, but not child support. That would mean men would NEVER be held accountable for any child that was ever born. They could simply walk away, even in marriages. They could walk away only very early in the pregnancy. The proposed time-limit is 30 days after conception. After that time, the man is making the deliberate choice to remain in the relationship and thus would be held accountable to the child. Furthermore, the man probably should be responsible for the FULL cost of it, considering that the woman has to actually go through the abortion or childbirth. Actually they should be held responsible for their share of the costs in having a child and supporting a child. They should be held responsible for their share of the costs of HAVING a child. If a woman wants to exercise her right to have a child and keep a child, the woman should be willing and able to support the child. The same situation would apply to men. The man could choose to raise the child (with the consent of the woman to have the child), and the man should be equally ineligible for child support. Otherwise the child should be put up for adoption. It is definately in the child's best interest to be adopted into a family that IS willing and able to support the child. I do not have any children, and I intend to keep it that way. Good !!!! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnancy vs Childbirth
Matt wrote:
Pregnancy vs Childbirth The man (and woman equally) is responsible for the PREGNANCY. It is the direct result of the actions of the man and woman in sex that produced the pregnancy. Beyond that, the decision to have a child and keep the child (as opposed to adoption) is the result of the unilateral choice of the woman. That is the way that the women want it, so that is the way that it should be, the woman's body the woman's choice. What that means is the man should be obligated to be responsible for the costs associated with the pregnancy, those responsibilities being the cost of either the abortion or the cost of prenatal care, but not child support. Furthermore, the man probably should be responsible for the FULL cost of it, considering that the woman has to actually go through the abortion or childbirth. If a woman wants to exercise her right to have a child and keep a child, the woman should be willing and able to support the child. The same situation would apply to men. The man could choose to raise the child (with the consent of the woman to have the child), and the man should be equally ineligible for child support. Otherwise the child should be put up for adoption. It is definately in the child's best interest to be adopted into a family that IS willing and able to support the child. Look at it this way, Matt. Two people are driving down the street. The passenger tells the driver to pull over in front of a bank. The passenger tells the other person to wait a minute while he runs in to *do something*. The passenger puts a stocking over his head and pulls out a gun. He comes running out 5 minutes later with a bag of money. The driver speeds away. The car is stopped a few miles away. Should the driver only be given a speeding ticket or should they be charged with the robbery? I do not have any children, and I intend to keep it that way. That's probably a good choice for you. Mrs Indyguy |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnancy vs Childbirth
Matt wrote:
Pregnancy vs Childbirth The man (and woman equally) is responsible for the PREGNANCY. It is the direct result of the actions of the man and woman in sex that produced the pregnancy. Beyond that, the decision to have a child and keep the child (as opposed to adoption) is the result of the unilateral choice of the woman. That is the way that the women want it, so that is the way that it should be, the woman's body the woman's choice. What that means is the man should be obligated to be responsible for the costs associated with the pregnancy, those responsibilities being the cost of either the abortion or the cost of prenatal care, but not child support. Furthermore, the man probably should be responsible for the FULL cost of it, considering that the woman has to actually go through the abortion or childbirth. If a woman wants to exercise her right to have a child and keep a child, the woman should be willing and able to support the child. The same situation would apply to men. The man could choose to raise the child (with the consent of the woman to have the child), and the man should be equally ineligible for child support. Otherwise the child should be put up for adoption. It is definately in the child's best interest to be adopted into a family that IS willing and able to support the child. Look at it this way, Matt. Two people are driving down the street. The passenger tells the driver to pull over in front of a bank. The passenger tells the other person to wait a minute while he runs in to *do something*. The passenger puts a stocking over his head and pulls out a gun. He comes running out 5 minutes later with a bag of money. The driver speeds away. The car is stopped a few miles away. Should the driver only be given a speeding ticket or should they be charged with the robbery? I do not have any children, and I intend to keep it that way. That's probably a good choice for you. Mrs Indyguy |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnancy vs Childbirth
Besides which...
Cameron Stevens wrote: "Fighting For Kids" wrote in message ... Not this garbage again. On 13 Nov 2003 12:15:57 -0800, (Matt D) wrote: Pregnancy vs Childbirth The man (and woman equally) is responsible for the PREGNANCY. It is the direct result of the actions of the man and woman in sex that produced the pregnancy. Beyond that, the decision to have a child and keep the child (as opposed to adoption) is the result of the unilateral choice of the woman. This would be abortion that you are referring to and for some women abortion is just not an option. Sorry. It is an OPTION. It may not be a choice they prefer. They still have two other choices, ADOPTION and SELF-SUPPORT. ....the original poster specifically listed adoption as the option to keeping. Mel Gamble That is the way that the women want it, so that is the way that it should be, the woman's body the woman's choice. What that means is the man should be obligated to be responsible for the costs associated with the pregnancy, those responsibilities being the cost of either the abortion or the cost of prenatal care, but not child support. That would mean men would NEVER be held accountable for any child that was ever born. They could simply walk away, even in marriages. No. It means that men would have as much CHOICE to walk away as women. Cameron |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on the Pregnancy AFP Screen and the Triple Screen | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | June 28th 04 07:41 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on the Pregnancy AFP Screen and the Triple Screen | [email protected] | Pregnancy | 0 | April 17th 04 12:26 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on the Pregnancy AFP Screen and the Triple Screen | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | March 18th 04 09:11 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on the Pregnancy AFP Screen and the Triple Screen | [email protected] | Pregnancy | 0 | February 16th 04 09:58 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on the Pregnancy AFP Screen and the Triple Screen | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | February 16th 04 09:58 AM |