If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny
Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny
http://www.fdlreporter.com/apps/pbcs...3/1289/FONnews By Sharon Roznik The Reporter sroznik2fdlreporter.com Fond du Lac County Department of Social Services and Children's Court Services are gearing up for state scrutiny of local child welfare practices. Reviewers will read 24 random case files and follow up with parents, family members, foster parents, teachers, the children, health care providers, as well as clergy, neighbors and friends. An orientation meeting held on June 18 provided an overview of Wisconsin's Continuous Quality Improvement Program, that has so far reviewed 24 counties in the state. The goal is to make sure families in the system are provided with clear goals that allow a way out, said state CQI Team Manager Harry Hobbs, who gave the presentation. "So far we have identified that counties do a good job engaging children in change, but to a lesser extent mothers," Hobb said. "And (they are) not doing a very good job locating and engaging fathers in the process." Other weaknesses found in child welfare systems, Hobbs noted, included a lack of adjusting case plans to make them more effective. Fond du Lac County Social Services Director Kim Mooney said the intensive review will take place the week of Sept. 17. Several focus groups will be created that include key players in the county child welfare system, including judges, district attorneys, case workers, foster parents, guardian ad litems, foster children and parents. "It's a fairly intense process," Mooney explained. "There are 17 people coming from the state and they will be working day and night to complete the review." Social Services has been tasked with finding 12 families in the county system willing to work with reviewers. A children's court initiative will follow a similar process. Written summaries of feedback will be given to caseworkers and a final report on Fond du Lac County will be posted by Dec. 20 on the Department of Health and Family Services Web site at http://dhfs.Wisconsin.gov/cqireview/index.htm. Mooney said she is looking forward to the experience. "I am excited any time we can find out good things we are doing as well as areas that need improvement," she said. Since 2005 Wisconsin has reviewed 10 counties each year to satisfy the federal Child and Family Services Review requirement that every state have a quality assurance system. Fond du Lac will be number 28 out of the 72 counties in Wisconsin participating in a CQI review. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny
On Jun 26, 9:09 pm, fx wrote:
Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny http://www.fdlreporter.com/apps/pbcs...0070626/FON010... By Sharon Roznik The Reporter sroznik2fdlreporter.com Fond du Lac County Department of Social Services and Children's Court Services are gearing up for state scrutiny of local child welfare practices. Reviewers will read 24 random case files and follow up with parents, family members, foster parents, teachers, the children, health care providers, as well as clergy, neighbors and friends. An orientation meeting held on June 18 provided an overview of Wisconsin's Continuous Quality Improvement Program, that has so far reviewed 24 counties in the state. The goal is to make sure families in the system are provided with clear goals that allow a way out, said state CQI Team Manager Harry Hobbs, who gave the presentation. "So far we have identified that counties do a good job engaging children in change, but to a lesser extent mothers," Hobb said. "And (they are) not doing a very good job locating and engaging fathers in the process." Other weaknesses found in child welfare systems, Hobbs noted, included a lack of adjusting case plans to make them more effective. Golly, isn't that a problem I've carped about Kane? Fond du Lac County Social Services Director Kim Mooney said the intensive review will take place the week of Sept. 17. Several focus groups will be created that include key players in the county child welfare system, including judges, district attorneys, case workers, foster parents, guardian ad litems, foster children and parents. "It's a fairly intense process," Mooney explained. "There are 17 people coming from the state and they will be working day and night to complete the review." Social Services has been tasked with finding 12 families in the county system willing to work with reviewers. Herein read "they're looking for 12 who will be stooges for them". Why not make 6 of them from families suing the agency? A children's court initiative will follow a similar process. Written summaries of feedback will be given to caseworkers and a final report on Fond du Lac County will be posted by Dec. 20 on the Department of Health and Family Services Web site athttp://dhfs.Wisconsin.gov/cqireview/index.htm. How do you ""summarize"" this feedback? Iowa did that when they opened up for input in various towns across the state. They had MOBS of angry families bitching about the abuses of the agencies. They had promised a detail report but then wrote up a "summary" which was so watered down as to be basically meaningless. CPS agencies STRONGLY resist improvement. Mooney said she is looking forward to the experience. "I am excited any time we can find out good things we are doing as well as areas that need improvement," she said. Since 2005 Wisconsin has reviewed 10 counties each year to satisfy the federal Child and Family Services Review requirement that every state have a quality assurance system. Fond du Lac will be number 28 out of the 72 counties in Wisconsin participating in a CQI review. They should not be allowed to ""synthesize"" a report and water down the **** and vinegar they got from angry families. They resist peaceful change, so fire them all. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny
On Jun 26, 11:20 pm, Greegor wrote:
On Jun 26, 9:09 pm, fx wrote: Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny http://www.fdlreporter.com/apps/pbcs...0070626/FON010... By Sharon Roznik The Reporter sroznik2fdlreporter.com Fond du Lac County Department of Social Services and Children's Court Services are gearing up for state scrutiny of local child welfare practices. Reviewers will read 24 random case files and follow up with parents, family members, foster parents, teachers, the children, health care providers, as well as clergy, neighbors and friends. An orientation meeting held on June 18 provided an overview of Wisconsin's Continuous Quality Improvement Program, that has so far reviewed 24 counties in the state. The goal is to make sure families in the system are provided with clear goals that allow a way out, said state CQI Team Manager Harry Hobbs, who gave the presentation. "So far we have identified that counties do a good job engaging children in change, but to a lesser extent mothers," Hobb said. "And (they are) not doing a very good job locating and engaging fathers in the process." Other weaknesses found in child welfare systems, Hobbs noted, included a lack of adjusting case plans to make them more effective. Golly, isn't that a problem I've carped about Kane? Yeah, for over six years. What has you "carping" accomplished? Is your former girlfriend's daughter going home any time soon? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny
I love how you guys (DanKane) say you are Family Rights advocates
but squeal so LOUDLY when CPS is getting their butts kicked. Kind of a strange response from Family Rights advocates! grin Most Family Rights advocates would be cheering when CPS is getting their butts kicked. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny
On Jun 27, 12:37 pm, Greegor wrote:
I love how you guys (DanKane) say you are Family Rights advocates but squeal so LOUDLY when CPS is getting their butts kicked. Kind of a strange response from Family Rights advocates! grin Most Family Rights advocates would be cheering when CPS is getting their butts kicked. I do cheer them for saving Lisa's little girl from you greg the showerer Firemonkey |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny
On Jun 27, 3:37 pm, Greegor wrote:
I love how you guys (DanKane) say you are Family Rights advocates but squeal so LOUDLY when CPS is getting their butts kicked. Show me where I squealed "SO loudly" when CPS was getting their butts kicked, Greg. Obviously I couldn't do that in your former girlfriend's case because CPS has been kicking her butt since February of 2001 due to your misadventures with her seven year old daughter. grin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny
Firemonkey: ""Please let Dan Sullivan back in, please oh please!""
Answer: Hell NO! ROFL You agency sucks crack me up. fx posts a story about how the agency is being scrutinized. I pointed out a flaw where the agency has a conflict of interest and has traditionally abused this situation. Dan launches into an attack on my family. The agency hyena stooges all come running! What parent do you think is going to miss this behavior Dan? When you attack me, do you really think that parents are going to miss that you are an agency suckup? Are they going to miss that you respond this way when I am criticizing the CPS INDUSTRY and their dismal failures? Your fixigo attacks on Bob and his constitutional defense were pretty obvious too. How come fixigo stopped posting so soon after that? That ""undercover"" stuff is just too complicated for you isn't it? You just had to give away your unique (agency) perspective didn't you? ROFL Where do you get these socks and stooges, at the CPS union hall? Have you ever considered actually finding some stooges that way Dan? 15 investigations and 5 foundeds, but you still dared to say "where there's smoke there's fire"? Want to deny you said it AGAIN? You did once before, and proof was posted. Is the original still there? Maybe you could take up posting with the no archive bit set like Kane? Is he afraid of his own words coming back to him, the way the dlfisher info did? Do you think it helps Donald that his messages go away now? Seriously dude, don't you think it's time for you to tell the truth about your personal connection with the CPS agencies? Did you ever sue them? Considering the experiences you described, WHY NOT?? It would seem reasonable after 15 investigations and 5 foundeds that you supposedly reversed. Don't you think that would be grounds for a big settlement? How could you be abused by them so much and not want to sue the tar out of them? On Jun 27, 4:05 pm, Dan Sullivan wrote: On Jun 27, 3:37 pm, Greegor wrote: I love how you guys (DanKane) say you are Family Rights advocates but squeal so LOUDLY when CPS is getting their butts kicked. Show me where I squealed "SO loudly" when CPS was getting their butts kicked, Greg. Obviously I couldn't do that in your former girlfriend's case because CPS has been kicking her butt since February of 2001 due to your misadventures with her seven year old daughter. grin |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny
On Jun 27, 6:12 pm, Greegor wrote:
Firemonkey: ""Please let Dan Sullivan back in, please oh please!"" Answer: Hell NO! ROFL Did firemonkey ask that on fightcps? You agency sucks crack me up. fx posts a story about how the agency is being scrutinized. I pointed out a flaw where the agency has a conflict of interest and has traditionally abused this situation. Dan launches into an attack on my family. Again as usual, it's NOT your family. And you wanted to know if there were questions that should have been asked to weed out the people who would harm children. All I did was raise the possibility that your former girlfriend might have used similar question. Considering the fact that she hasn't had custody of her daughter because of you for more than six years! The agency hyena stooges all come running! When a child is molested that's what the agency is supposed to do. What parent do you think is going to miss this behavior Dan? Lisa? When you attack me, do you really think that parents are going to miss that you are an agency suckup? If parents know what you did they'll understand that CPS does serve a purpose. Are they going to miss that you respond this way when I am criticizing the CPS INDUSTRY and their dismal failures? YOU are a dismal failure, Greg, as Lisa's boyfriend, supposed father figure and human being. Your fixigo attacks on Bob and his constitutional defense were pretty obvious too. ??? How come fixigo stopped posting so soon after that? Fixago? I have no idea what you're talking about. It's not possible someone else saw Boob and his Constitutional defense for what it is? A pathetic joke. That ""undercover"" stuff is just too complicated for you isn't it? You just had to give away your unique (agency) perspective didn't you? ROFL Where do you get these socks and stooges, at the CPS union hall? Have you ever considered actually finding some stooges that way Dan? 15 investigations and 5 foundeds, but you still dared to say "where there's smoke there's fire"? Want to deny you said it AGAIN? When did I deny saying that? You did once before, and proof was posted. Citations? Is the original still there? You tell me. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The quality and extent of Dan's advice
Old thread name was Local child welfare practices may come under
state scrutiny G Dan launches into an attack on my family. D Again as usual, it's NOT your family. Who gets to define a family, Dan? The members? You? CPS? In light of the caseworker PERJURY used to make a case, we rejected the malevolent agency's attempt to define our family to their advantage. Their attempt at the divide and conquer tactic was obvious. I have explained this before. D And you wanted to know if there were questions that should D have been asked to weed out the people who would harm children. D D All I did was raise the possibility that your former girlfriend might D have used similar question. D D Considering the fact that she hasn't had custody of her daughter D because of you for more than six years! The caseworker LIED to make a case. The agency counted on doubt to drive us apart. The paper proof that the caseworker LIED went way beyond dispelling any doubt. The system for years refused to correct glaring ERRORS. It is corrupt. What brave solution do you offer Dan? Run away? Surrender and HOPE these CASEWORKERS will do the right thing? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The quality and extent of Dan's advice
On Jun 27, 7:58 pm, Greegor wrote:
Old thread name was Local child welfare practices may come under state scrutiny G Dan launches into an attack on my family. D Again as usual, it's NOT your family. Who gets to define a family, Dan? The members? You? CPS? In light of the caseworker PERJURY used to make a case, we rejected the malevolent agency's attempt to define our family to their advantage. Their attempt at the divide and conquer tactic was obvious. I have explained this before. D And you wanted to know if there were questions that should D have been asked to weed out the people who would harm children. D D All I did was raise the possibility that your former girlfriend might D have used similar question. D D Considering the fact that she hasn't had custody of her daughter D because of you for more than six years! The caseworker LIED to make a case. FACTS you admitted to, Greg... 1 - you made it a habit to go into the bathroom every time the little girl was naked after she showered 2 - you physically grabbed the little girl to force her back into the shower 3 - you forced the little girl to take cold showers as punishment The agency counted on doubt to drive us apart. The paper proof that the caseworker LIED went way beyond dispelling any doubt. Do you deny facts 1,2 and, Greg? The system for years refused to correct glaring ERRORS. It is corrupt. What brave solution do you offer Dan? You are no longer with Lisa, so what's the difference? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Children's Defense Fund Releases State Fact Sheets on Foster Care and Other Child Welfare Programs | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 1 | February 18th 05 06:29 PM |
Local child welfare advocates to meet over assessments issue | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 1 | March 18th 04 07:29 PM |
The State of Latino Children in our National Child Welfare System | Wex Wimpy | Twins & Triplets | 0 | June 25th 03 04:54 PM |