"It's The Vaccines Stupid!"

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15074

"It's The Vaccines Stupid!"
Part I: Evidence Linking Autism Rise in Children to Vaccinations

by F. William Engdahl

The WHO and US Government CDC are escalating a public psychological
conditioning to create hysteria and panic among an uninformed public about
an alleged "virus" H1N1 Influenza A, aka Swine Flu, whose alleged effects to
date appear comparable with a common cold. Before people line up in the
streets demanding their vaccinations for their children and themselves, it
would be wise to remember, to paraphrase a 1992 campaign statement of Bill
Clinton to George H.W. Bush: "It's the vaccination, Stupid!"

By countless scientific accounts, far more dangerous to human health than
any reported incidences of Swine Flu are the dangers of severe health issues
including paralysis, brain damage and even death arising from what is added
to vaccines by virtually every major vaccine maker. Almost without
exception, all commercial vaccines today contain various substances known as
adjuvants designed to make the vaccine "work." These adjuvants are the
source of horrendous and sometimes deadly damage.

It has been speculated for some time that there might be a link in the
alarming rise in cases of autism among tiny infants and children and massive
multiple vaccinations today given routinely to infants and children from the
first hours of birth. There is clear and shocking evidence of the link
between the two. If you do not have a strong constitution, you are advised
not to read further.

A new study shows a direct link between standard childhood vaccination
series, MMR, and autism-like symptoms in monkeys. The principal scientist
involved in the study, Dr. Laura Hewitson of the University of Pittsburgh,
presented the alarming conclusions as an abstract pending publication at the
International Meeting for Autism Research. It has been presented at
scientific conferences in both London and Seattle, USA.

The study compared vaccinated macaque monkeys with non-vaccinated macaques.
No major flaws in the study have been revealed by any attending scientist.
The vaccines included the popular MMR series. The study found a marked
increase in "gastrointestinal tissue gene expression" and "inflammation
issues" with those monkeys which received vaccinations. They are a common
symptom of children with regressive autism.

The study also found marked behavior changes and development differences in
those monkeys given the vaccines versus those who were not. "Compared with
unexposed animals, significant neuro-developmental deficits were evident for
exposed animals in survival reflexes, tests of color discrimination and
reversal, and learning sets," the study`s authors reported. "Differences in
behaviors were observed between exposed and unexposed animals and within the
exposed group before and after MMR vaccination."

US Government-mandated research approved by Congress was to begin this year,
but the funds were rescinded in early January. Claiming "conflict of
interest" because of ongoing court cases, the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), a long-time supporter of infant vaccinations, withdrew
the research plans.

The most shocking of all is the recent and now common medical practice,
reinforced by an aggressive pharmaceutical industry, of giving multiple
vaccines, often virtually within hours of birth, to infants despite the fact
that no study including all of the vaccine series commonly given to children
in the US and UK, about 30 in all, has been conducted until now. The
practice of newborn multiple vaccinations has become widespread in Germany
and other EU countries over the past decade. Significantly there have
surfaced reports of dramatically increased instances of autism in newborn
and infants in various German hospitals over the past decade, precisely the
period multiple vaccinations of newborn and infants has become routine.

US Government coverup

Tragically, the US Government agency theoretically entrusted with guarding
public health, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as with the case of
health dangers of GMO foods, as well with the dramatic evidence of the link
between autism and adjuvants used in typical vaccines, is accepting the
argument of big and politically powerful Pharmaceutical companies.

The Food and Drug Administration considers vaccines safe but, just as with
GMO, they have done no studies into the effects of multiple vaccinations as
given in the common childhood series which started in the 1990s in the USA
and spread to the UK and now across the EU.

According to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., son of the late Attorney General and an
attorney active in campaigning to expose mercury (Thimerosal) and other
toxicity dangers in vaccines, recently stated, "as autism is a behavioral
affliction rather than a precisely defined biological injury --
epidemiological studies are critical to establishing its causation. But the
greatest source of epidemiological data is the Vaccine Safety Datalink
(VSD) -- the government maintained medical records of hundreds of thousands
of vaccinated children -- which Health and Human Services Department has
gone to great lengths to keep out of the hands of plaintiffs' attorneys and
independent scientists.The raw data collected in the VSD would undoubtedly
provide the epidemiological evidence needed to understand the relationship
between vaccines and autism. The absence of such studies makes it easy for
judges to say to plaintiffs they have not met their burden of proving
causation."

Autism was virtually unknown in the United States until 1943 when it was
diagnosed and identified eleven months after Thimerosal, a mercury-based
vaccine "adjuvant" was first added to baby vaccines along with various
aluminium compounds in the United States. Thimerosal is often used to stem
fungi and bacterial growth in vaccines despite massive evidence of its
severe effects as a potent neurotoxin. Following independent studies,
Russia, Japan, Austria, Denmark, Sweden and Britain have banned Thimersol
from childrens' vaccines. Germany to date has no such ban. The toxin was
developed in 1930 by Eli Lilly. Tragically in 1991, despite overwhelming
evidence to the contrary the US Government's Center for Disease Control
(CDC), the same agency fuelling the current hysteria over the non-proven
H1N1 Swine Flu virus danger, recommended that infants be injected with a
series of mercury-containing vaccines in some cases within 24 hours of birth
for Hepatitis B and two months for diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis.

Before 1989 US pre-school children received eleven vaccinations-polio,
diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, measles-mumps-rubella (MMR). By 1999, because
of the various CDC recommendations, the number of vaccinations was twenty
two before first grade of school. Parallel with this explosive rise in
vaccinations of the very young in the United States, according to Kennedy,
the rate of autism among children. The state of Iowa reported a 700%
increase in autism in children beginning in the 1990's and along with
California has banned mercury in vaccines. Despite evidence, however the US
FDA continues to allow drug makers to include Thimerosal in numerous
over-the-counter non-prescription medications as well as steroids and
injected collagen. The US Government ships vaccines preserved with
Thimerosal to numerous developing countries as well, where some are
reporting sudden explosion of autism rates as well. In China, where autism
was unknown before introduction of Thimerosal by US drug makers in 1999,
press reports indicate there are almost two million autistic children.

Instances of autism in the US exploded as some 40 million children were
injected during the 1990's with Thimersol-based vaccines, giving them
unprecedented accumulations of mercury poison. The level of ethylmercury in
a vaccine routinely given then to children of two months age was 99 times
greater than the US Government's daily limit for exposure. As with the
current WHO pandemic declaration around H1N1 Swine Flu, the CDC Vaccine
Advisory Committee is filled with scientists with close ties to the
pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Sam Katz, chairman of the committee was a paid
consultant to most companies producing the vaccines he "recommended."

The aluminium danger remains

While vaccines available in the US today exist with no Thimerosal (50%
mercury), virtually all vaccines still contain aluminum, which has been
linked to impaired neurological development in children. Aluminum has not
replaced thimerosal as a vaccine preservative; it has always been used in
vaccines.

In the recent past, most US chioldren got exposed to both thimerosal and
aluminum simultaneously with the hepatitis B, Hib, DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus
and pertussis) and pneumococcal vaccines. Combining mercury with aluminum
increases the likelihood that the mercury will damage human tissue.

According to a recent report by Michael Wagnitz, an American chemist,
"Currently eight childhood vaccines that contain aluminum ranging from 125
to 850 micrograms (mcg). These vaccines are administered 17 times in the
first 18 months of life, an almost six-fold increase compared to the vaccine
schedule of the 1980s."

Wagnitz adds, "According to the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral
Nutrition, based on IV feeding solutions, a child should not exceed a
maximum daily dose of 5 mcg of aluminum per kilogram of weight per day. That
means if a child weighs 11 pounds, the child should not exceed 25 mcg in a
day. This level was determined to be the maximum safety limit based on a
study published in the New England Journal of Medicine titled "Aluminum
Neurotoxicity in Preterm Infants Receiving Intravenous Feeding Solutions."

The hepatitis B vaccine, administered at birth, contains 250 mcg.

In a 1996 policy statement, "Aluminum Toxicity in Infants and Children," the
American Academy of Pediatrics states, "Aluminum can cause neurological
harm. People with kidney disease who build up bloodstream levels of aluminum
greater than 100 mcg per liter are at risk of toxicity. The toxic threshold
of aluminum in the bloodstream may be lower than 100 mcg per liter." What
level of aluminium toxicity is contained in vaccines routinely given German,
French and other children n the EU is not known. It might be time for a
public demand for such information to be disclosed, and before governments
launch mass vaccination campaigns for untested vaccines against a non-proven
H1N1 Swine Flu threat.

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:39:58 +0100, "john" wrote:


Part I: Evidence Linking Autism Rise in Children to Vaccinations

by F. William Engdahl

A political journalist with a degree in engineering and law from 1966
and a belief that petroleum is produced underground by unknown
materials conditions and forces deep down in the Earth's core

A new study shows a direct link between standard childhood vaccination
series, MMR, and autism-like symptoms in monkeys. The principal scientist
involved in the study, Dr. Laura Hewitson of the University of Pittsburgh,
presented the alarming conclusions

Wouldn't it have been relevant to point out that Dr Hewitson is also a
litigant in a vaccine-injury suit? That she is a listed "DAN!
Doctor"? In case this gives a reader slight sense of deja vu it would
probably also have been relevant to point out she is married to Dan
Hollenbeck, a regular contributor to the Age of Autism website and
she and her husband are listed as litigants in the Autism Omnibus
proceedings?

Her husband also works for Wakefield at Thoughtful House as Director
of Information Technology and that Hollenbeck's website
FightingAutism.org is also owned by and part of Thoughtful House?

It might have also been worth mentioning that her "paper" is
co-authored by the prolific Wakefield and despite much publicity has
yet to appear in a peer-reviewed publication. It is actually merely a
poster presentation.

The study compared vaccinated macaque monkeys with non-vaccinated macaques.
No major flaws in the study have been revealed by any attending scientist.

Now that is definitely a bit of woo. I'm sure none of the "attending
scientists, given their close fiscal links, saw any flaws, others
might disagree. With 13 monkeys in the vaccine group, only three in
the control group, no mention of randomisation or whether the
experimenters were blinded to group or treatment and no mention of age
or weight matching the only thing which is certain is that any
"result" will be statistically irrelevant. How this translates to "no
major flaws" requires the imagination of a journalist.

Thirteen infant monkeys were killed for a worthless experiment. One
so badly constructed it could never prove a thing. No doubt it
improved a few bank balances a bit.

The vaccines included the popular MMR series. The study found a marked
increase in "gastrointestinal tissue gene expression" and "inflammation
issues" with those monkeys which received vaccinations.

For some reason almost half the results appear to have been "lost" and
do not appear in the presentation.

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:39:58 +0100, "john" wrote:

The study compared vaccinated macaque monkeys with non-vaccinated macaques.
No major flaws in the study have been revealed by any attending scientist.
The vaccines included the popular MMR series. The study found a marked
increase in "gastrointestinal tissue gene expression" and "inflammation
issues" with those monkeys which received vaccinations. They are a common
symptom of children with regressive autism.

That is insane crap.

The "study" took some few monkeys, and from those few monkey they want to
extrapolate to millions of children who ARE vaccinated.

IF the study were right, then an extremely high percentage of the children would
show symptoms. But it doesn't.

IF the great majority of the children are doing well (as they obviously do),
then the mojority of the monkey also should to well. So one could guess about

1. the whole study was faked

2. the results of the study were faked

3. the presentation iof the results of the study is faked

4. monkeys react totally different than man and cannot be used for such a study.


The last point is very important, because it is an ubiquitary problem with ALL
animal studies. As the majority of the children are doing well, and the
presentation of the monkey tells something different, case #4 tells us that at
least one group of persons lied, because it should have pointed out case #4.

So, to sum it up, Engdahl tells a real big pile of lies. If he is part of the
liars or only so stupid to parrot what the liars wrote, I do not know. But one
this is for su the whole complaint by Engdahl is crap.
--
"Toll auch der Trick mit dem Eisen,
um Gottes Macht zu beweisen.
Beileisen ließ Gott nun schwimmen,
um neue Fans zu gewinnen." http://www.reimbibel.de

"Bob Officer" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:39:58 +0100, in misc.health.alternative,
"john" wrote:


The reason why 50% of the people are alive today.

Why do you lie so much?
--
Bob Officer
Posting the truth
http://www.skeptics.com.au