Penalty for being single

Legally, a man married to the mother of his biological children doesn't have
to give her one red cent. Yet, as soon as she divorces him, he suddenly owes
her heaping sums of cash. Why?

What are you smoking again? You off in your own little world or what?

Do you get these laws from your own planet or what?

"Chris" wrote in message
news:iKkrb.10321$0K6.1443@fed1read06...
Legally, a man married to the mother of his biological children doesn't
have
to give her one red cent. Yet, as soon as she divorces him, he suddenly
owes
her heaping sums of cash. Why?

"Fighting for kids" adf wrote in message
...
What are you smoking again? You off in your own little world or what?

Do you get these laws from your own planet or what?

No, no, and no. Next.


"Chris" wrote in message
news:iKkrb.10321$0K6.1443@fed1read06...
Legally, a man married to the mother of his biological children doesn't
have
to give her one red cent. Yet, as soon as she divorces him, he suddenly
owes
her heaping sums of cash. Why?

Because it's been established by fascist feminists groups that women are
weak and can't do anything for themselves. They've been granted victim
status by the government and therefore can do no wrong. It's a form of
entitlement.

Divorce your husband and you're instantly entitled to anything you want,
while he has to pay for it.

"Chris" wrote in message
news:iKkrb.10321$0K6.1443@fed1read06...
Legally, a man married to the mother of his biological children doesn't
have
to give her one red cent. Yet, as soon as she divorces him, he suddenly
owes
her heaping sums of cash. Why?

Divorce you husband because he's an idiot.

"Dusty" wrote in message ...
Because it's been established by fascist feminists groups that women are
weak and can't do anything for themselves. They've been granted victim
status by the government and therefore can do no wrong. It's a form of
entitlement.

Divorce your husband and you're instantly entitled to anything you want,
while he has to pay for it.

"Chris" wrote in message
news:iKkrb.10321$0K6.1443@fed1read06...
Legally, a man married to the mother of his biological children doesn't
have
to give her one red cent. Yet, as soon as she divorces him, he suddenly
owes
her heaping sums of cash. Why?

"Chris" wrote in message
news:iKkrb.10321$0K6.1443@fed1read06...
Legally, a man married to the mother of his biological children doesn't
have
to give her one red cent. Yet, as soon as she divorces him, he suddenly
owes
her heaping sums of cash. Why?

It's simple Chris, you know it. There's a need to provide support for those
weaker than the big bad man.

The thing that really needs to be considered is that while money goes to the
woman after a divorce there are two reasons which really need to be
separated. The woman who received Alimony because she's become accustomed to
a "way of life" is not much more than a leech. I can accept the idea that a
woman, removed from the work force may need time and support to re-adjust to
being employed, but long-term/permanent support is a joke.

The other sort of support is child support and while there's a real need to
ensure children are cared for, financially and otherwise, the dollar value
that is awarded is often higher than the true costs of child rearing. Sure,
many men feel that this responsibility is thrust upon them without choice
they seem to accept the risk of getting laid. Yes, there are methods to
prevent (reduce the probability of) pregnancy but these do not always work.
The risk lies on the man because he can obstain as easily as the woman. I
realize that there are women that deceive their partner, claiming sterility,
use of birth control, etc. but geez we (the guys) make a choice when we
"stick it in".

She should NOT receive "heaping sums of cash."

Judges that support claims for unrealistic sums of cash need to be brought
up to date.

Cameron

"Cameron Stevens" wrote in message
...

"Chris" wrote in message
news:iKkrb.10321$0K6.1443@fed1read06...
Legally, a man married to the mother of his biological children doesn't
have
to give her one red cent. Yet, as soon as she divorces him, he suddenly
owes
her heaping sums of cash. Why?

It's simple Chris, you know it. There's a need to provide support for
those
weaker than the big bad man.

There is a need to provide support for those weaker, called children.

The thing that really needs to be considered is that while money goes to
the
woman after a divorce there are two reasons which really need to be
separated. The woman who received Alimony because she's become accustomed
to
a "way of life" is not much more than a leech. I can accept the idea that
a
woman, removed from the work force may need time and support to re-adjust
to
being employed, but long-term/permanent support is a joke.

Alimony is a different NG. This one, if im not mistaken is called Child
Support.

The other sort of support is child support and while there's a real need
to
ensure children are cared for, financially and otherwise, the dollar value
that is awarded is often higher than the true costs of child rearing.

As ive asked this questions many many many many times, what does it cost to
raise a child? I have YET to see anything from the cronies in this group.
I have posted what the govt says it costs only to have it shot down with
"opinions" no hard facts.

Sure,
many men feel that this responsibility is thrust upon them without choice
they seem to accept the risk of getting laid. Yes, there are methods to
prevent (reduce the probability of) pregnancy but these do not always
work.
The risk lies on the man because he can obstain as easily as the woman. I
realize that there are women that deceive their partner, claiming
sterility,
use of birth control, etc. but geez we (the guys) make a choice when we
"stick it in".

She should NOT receive "heaping sums of cash."

Most women dont receive "heaping sums of cash"


Judges that support claims for unrealistic sums of cash need to be brought
up to date.

as do the cronies in this group.. what does it cost to raise a child? Not
one of the cronies have give a figure so how can they claim that the amount
of support is too high??

Cameron

"Fighting for kids" adf wrote in message
...
Divorce you husband because he's an idiot.

Non sequitur.


"Dusty" wrote in message
...
Because it's been established by fascist feminists groups that women are
weak and can't do anything for themselves. They've been granted victim
status by the government and therefore can do no wrong. It's a form of
entitlement.

Divorce your husband and you're instantly entitled to anything you want,
while he has to pay for it.

"Chris" wrote in message
news:iKkrb.10321$0K6.1443@fed1read06...
Legally, a man married to the mother of his biological children
doesn't
have
to give her one red cent. Yet, as soon as she divorces him, he
suddenly
owes
her heaping sums of cash. Why?

"Fighting for kids" adf wrote in message
...
The other sort of support is child support and while there's a real need
to
ensure children are cared for, financially and otherwise, the dollar
value
that is awarded is often higher than the true costs of child rearing.

As ive asked this questions many many many many times, what does it cost
to
raise a child? I have YET to see anything from the cronies in this group.
I have posted what the govt says it costs only to have it shot down with
"opinions" no hard facts.

Good Question. In Canada the Foster Parent system pays $15-26/day
(~$456-790/month). Not all NCPs can afford this but we can presume to some
extent that these amounts (the range) that this would be a fair amount of
support to "cover costs". I'm paying a reasonable amount right now, plus a
portion of daycare that was.

Sure,
many men feel that this responsibility is thrust upon them without
choice
they seem to accept the risk of getting laid. Yes, there are methods to
prevent (reduce the probability of) pregnancy but these do not always
work.
The risk lies on the man because he can obstain as easily as the woman.
I
realize that there are women that deceive their partner, claiming
sterility,
use of birth control, etc. but geez we (the guys) make a choice when we
"stick it in".

She should NOT receive "heaping sums of cash."

Most women dont receive "heaping sums of cash"

Never suggested most DID. I don't know quantifiably how many were given a
huge chunk of money. The division of assets is not what I consider a huge
sum, it's the division of assets.

Judges that support claims for unrealistic sums of cash need to be
brought
up to date.

as do the cronies in this group.. what does it cost to raise a child? Not
one of the cronies have give a figure so how can they claim that the
amount
of support is too high??

In all fairness the people in this group, on either side of the arguement,
are as much a part of the problem as they are the victims. Sure there's
radicals and exceptions but these people have been trampled by the system
and the system, doesn't give a hoot about anyone. These cronies are reacting
to an opressive, guilty no matter how innocent, process. Due process does
not exist and the lawyers and judges live the good life while those that can
still afford it try to fight the system's tidal wave of punishments.

Cameron

"Fighting for kids" adf wrote in message
...

"Cameron Stevens" wrote in message
...

"Chris" wrote in message
news:iKkrb.10321$0K6.1443@fed1read06...
Legally, a man married to the mother of his biological children
doesn't
have
to give her one red cent. Yet, as soon as she divorces him, he
suddenly
owes
her heaping sums of cash. Why?

It's simple Chris, you know it. There's a need to provide support for
those
weaker than the big bad man.

There is a need to provide support for those weaker, called children.

The thing that really needs to be considered is that while money goes to
the
woman after a divorce there are two reasons which really need to be
separated. The woman who received Alimony because she's become
accustomed
to
a "way of life" is not much more than a leech. I can accept the idea
that
a
woman, removed from the work force may need time and support to
re-adjust
to
being employed, but long-term/permanent support is a joke.

Alimony is a different NG. This one, if im not mistaken is called Child
Support.

Also known as backdoor alimony.


The other sort of support is child support and while there's a real need
to
ensure children are cared for, financially and otherwise, the dollar
value
that is awarded is often higher than the true costs of child rearing.

As ive asked this questions many many many many times, what does it cost
to
raise a child?

What does it cost to buy a car?

I have YET to see anything from the cronies in this group.
I have posted what the govt says it costs only to have it shot down with
"opinions" no hard facts.

Sure,
many men feel that this responsibility is thrust upon them without
choice
they seem to accept the risk of getting laid. Yes, there are methods to
prevent (reduce the probability of) pregnancy but these do not always
work.
The risk lies on the man because he can obstain as easily as the woman.
I
realize that there are women that deceive their partner, claiming
sterility,
use of birth control, etc. but geez we (the guys) make a choice when we
"stick it in".

She should NOT receive "heaping sums of cash."

Most women dont receive "heaping sums of cash"

Irrelevant.



Judges that support claims for unrealistic sums of cash need to be
brought
up to date.

as do the cronies in this group.. what does it cost to raise a child? Not
one of the cronies have give a figure so how can they claim that the
amount
of support is too high??

Cameron