If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Physical abuse in Canada miniscule-4% system wrongly structured
BOOKMARKS
» Popular health links » Provincial health insurance » Health ministries » Contact your health minister » Provincial medical associations CONTACT US » Health FAQ Child welfare system too geared to rapid intervention to stop physical harm HELEN BRANSWELL Canadian Press Monday, October 27, 2003 ADVERTISEMENT TORONTO (CP) - Child abuse involving severe physical harm makes up a small proportion - four per cent - of child abuse cases, yet intervention programs in Canada are primarily designed to respond to these types of incidents, a new study states. The authors suggest that by skewing child welfare programs so heavily towards rapid interventions aimed at preventing physical abuse, the programs may be failing to meet the needs of the much larger group of children who undergo intense emotional and psychological abuse on a regular basis. "There's a minority of cases where urgency is absolutely required," said lead author Nico Trocme, a professor of social work at the University of Toronto's centre of excellence for child welfare. "But we don't necessarily need to take all of the calls that go to the child welfare system through this protective investigation with very tight time lines. "For many of the other cases, the focus needs to be much more on a broader assessment of the child's well-being, of family functioning and then looking at strategies for intervention that are much more long term, that may or may not involve removal." Further, requiring rapid intervention in cases that don't need it may be clogging up the system, making it harder for case workers to deal expeditiously with children who are truly at risk of being battered or sexually abused in their homes, the authors said. The article, by Trocme and three colleagues from Health Canada, the University of Toronto and McMaster University in Hamilton, was published Tuesday in the Canadian Medical Association Journal. It analysed data compiled by Trocme and colleague Barbara Fallon in the landmark 1998 Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect. Some jurisdictions - Trocme pointed to Alberta - are moving away from this across-the-board rapid intervention model. But Trocme said so little evaluation has been done on any of the programs that he can't say which is best. The authors advocate more study. A commentary on the study also urged a cautious response, saying that while the findings are important, new courses cannot be charted based on one study alone. "As in most fields, it's difficult to draw final conclusions without looking at an issue from various perspectives," said Dr. Michelle Ward, a pediatrician from the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and one of two authors of the commentary. "We need information from a number of different fields to try and sort out what the true message is." Trocme and his colleagues reported that of a sample of nearly 3,800 cases of maltreatment reported to child welfare authorities, no physical harm was documented in 82 per cent of the cases. Of the 18 per cent of cases where physical harm was recorded, bruises, cuts and scrapes made up the bulk of the injuries. In four per cent of substantiated cases, the physical harm was severe enough to require medical attention; in less than one per cent of substantiated cases, broken bones or head trauma was recorded. Even Trocme was initially surprised by those numbers. "They were even lower than I had expected, given some of the other literature," he said in an interview. He believes most people - and most policy makers - have an entirely different picture of the nature of the abuse children face. "There's a perception I think . . . that the majority of cases of child abuse and neglect involve children who have been injured in some way. And if we look at our policies and procedures, they certainly reflect the assumption that the risk of physical harm is the primary consideration." While he is aware challenging that perception may provoke controversy, he believes it must be done. "We can't keep on working effectively in a situation where the public and policy makers misunderstand the nature of the work that we do," Trocme insisted. "Somewhere along the line we do need to have a reasonably honest discussion and a reasonably public one about the nature of this work." The authors do not suggest authorities should minimize the danger some children are in; the system must swing into action as rapidly as possible to protect those children when their cases come to light, they say. But by requiring most abuse investigations to be handled in this way, authorities are depriving the system of resources needed to fund effective interventions to deal with the problems faced by the larger group of children, victims of relentless emotional battering or neglect that leaves no physical marks but sets up a lifetime's worth of problems. "These are children who are living miserable, miserable lives. But the misery is not one that is only at the level of the risk of physical harm to them," Trocme said. "In fact, the risk to most of these children is with respect to their psychological and emotional development." Funding for the Canadian incidence study was provided by Health Canada and the governments of Quebec, Ontario, British Columbia and Newfoundland and by Bell Canada. Some of the individual researchers also had career funding from other agencies such as the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. © Copyright 2003 The Canadian Press |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Physical abuse in Canada miniscule-4% system wrongly structured
LaVonne! Did you notice the NUMBERS?
Thanks, Fern! And these numbers err IN YOUR FAVOR because author wants us to MICRO-MANAGE families to death, spending BILLIONS of dollars to check under every mattress, SEARCHING for those milder ongoing abuses. That 90 some percent chunk of CHILD REMOVALS where kids should not have been removed is the portion that Child Protection will likely lose their grip on. Violates US Constitution severely. And these REMOVALS HARM THE KIDS. That is known. Want a reference on that, LaVonne? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Babies gasping: Michigan sheriffs to do "child abuse raid" on hospitals? | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | June 18th 04 06:09 PM |
Various MD crimes (obvious ones) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | May 17th 04 04:48 PM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | General | 13 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
| Ex Giants player sentenced-DYFS wrkr no harm noticed | Kane | Spanking | 11 | September 16th 03 11:59 AM |