If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
getting my head round car seat rules
I'm confused by the car seat laws here, this is what it says:
Children under the age of three must be properly secured in an approved child car seat. Children should be secured in the rear seat. Never secure a child in the front passenger side, especially if your vehicle has an air bag. If you are in a crash and the bag opens, your child could be injured or killed. Washington state requires proper restraint of children: .. one year and under, or 20 pounds and under, in a rear-facing child car seat, .. one to four years and from 20 to 40 pounds in a forward-facing child car seat, .. four to six years and between 40 and 60 pounds in a booster seat, and .. six years and older or over 60 pounds with seat belts or a booster seat. Firstly, in the initial paragraph, it says 3, then further down says 4. But also it doesn't distinguish whether they have to reach both height and age, or one. Finally, I can't find out for sure anywhere if a booster with a back would be considered a forward facing car seat, or whether it would have to be one with a 5 point harness? If I could figure that out, then I might at least be some way on the way to working out out particular situation, we are still a few months off, but Nathanael will be 4 in May, but there is absolutely no way he will be 40 pounds, but he will get too tall for his seat at some point, possibly before then, possibly after, but unless something very odd happens, well before he is 40 pounds. So ideally we'd get him a booster with a back that will last through his car seat using days, but that will only work, if either a booster with a back counts as a car seat, or he gets into the 4-6 category by age (in which case, he apparently wouldn't need one with a back, but I think that would be better as whilst he's not as short as his is skinny, he is still on the short side). I also can't get a clear answer for Washington school bus laws, I have a friend who's twins still aren't 40 pounds, or only one of them is, at age 7, they rode the school bus from the start of kindergarten and have never been asked about weight, which seems the opposite to what I've heard people in other states say, but I wonder if it's one of those things that is in the law, but the onus is on the parents to figure it out, when I asked my friend, she didn't know what the law was and had assumed that because no one had asked it was fine. I'd also be interested to know if there is actually any research that supports the weight as being the cut off for changes, it partially makes sense due to the tension on the seat belt in an accident, but when it comes to the change between seats and boosters, it would seem height was also important? Cheers Anne |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
getting my head round car seat rules
"Anne Rogers" wrote in message ... I'm confused by the car seat laws here, this is what it says: I also can't get a clear answer for Washington school bus laws, I have a friend who's twins still aren't 40 pounds, or only one of them is, at age 7, they rode the school bus from the start of kindergarten and have never been asked about weight, which seems the opposite to what I've heard people in other states say, but I wonder if it's one of those things that is in the law, but the onus is on the parents to figure it out, when I asked my friend, she didn't know what the law was and had assumed that because no one had asked it was fine. I'd assume that the busses don't require any carseats. At least here in CT, they don't, simply because there are no seat belts on the busses (and therefore no way to install a carseat). Also here in CT, the children that attend the 'pre-K' and head start programs are required to be in a carseat on the bus if they are under 4....but they only use mini busses for these programs as far as I have seen, and the seats are permanently installed in the minibusses. At least that is how it worked when I was a teacher in Head Start. According to what I understand about the safety of the seat belts and booster seats, height is the overriding factor more than anything deciding if the child should be in a booster seat since auto seat belts are not designed to be safe for anyone under something like 4'9". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
getting my head round car seat rules
Anne Rogers wrote:
I'm confused by the car seat laws here, this is what it says: Children under the age of three must be properly secured in an approved child car seat. Children should be secured in the rear seat. Never secure a child in the front passenger side, especially if your vehicle has an air bag. If you are in a crash and the bag opens, your child could be injured or killed. Washington state requires proper restraint of children: . one year and under, or 20 pounds and under, in a rear-facing child car seat, . one to four years and from 20 to 40 pounds in a forward-facing child car seat, . four to six years and between 40 and 60 pounds in a booster seat, and . six years and older or over 60 pounds with seat belts or a booster seat. Firstly, in the initial paragraph, it says 3, then further down says 4. But also it doesn't distinguish whether they have to reach both height and age, or one. Finally, I can't find out for sure anywhere if a booster with a back would be considered a forward facing car seat, or whether it would have to be one with a 5 point harness? If I could figure that out, then I might at least be some way on the way to working out out particular situation, we are still a few months off, but Nathanael will be 4 in May, but there is absolutely no way he will be 40 pounds, but he will get too tall for his seat at some point, possibly before then, possibly after, but unless something very odd happens, well before he is 40 pounds. So ideally we'd get him a booster with a back that will last through his car seat using days, but that will only work, if either a booster with a back counts as a car seat, or he gets into the 4-6 category by age (in which case, he apparently wouldn't need one with a back, but I think that would be better as whilst he's not as short as his is skinny, he is still on the short side). The way I read the laws for your son is if he is four but not yet 40 lbs then he should be in a forward facing carseat (not a booster seat). When he hits 40 lbs and if he's under the age of six, then he needs to be in a booster seat. Once he hits 60 lbs and if he's 6 or older then he can either be in a booster seat (they go up to 80 lbs now!) or just be seat-belted. I wouldn't count a high-back booster as a car seat. A car seat has its own straps while a booster uses the car seat belts to hold the child in place. A booster's main function is to raise the child (to boost) so the shoulder is at the right level. FWIW, one friend had her kids in boosters until 4th grade. According to your laws, DD still needs to be in a booster (56 lbs) although she is 9 years old, in 4th grade and about 4'8". I also can't get a clear answer for Washington school bus laws, I have a friend who's twins still aren't 40 pounds, or only one of them is, at age 7, they rode the school bus from the start of kindergarten and have never been asked about weight, which seems the opposite to what I've heard people in other states say, but I wonder if it's one of those things that is in the law, but the onus is on the parents to figure it out, when I asked my friend, she didn't know what the law was and had assumed that because no one had asked it was fine. I don't think children need to be belted on school buses. I'd also be interested to know if there is actually any research that supports the weight as being the cut off for changes, it partially makes sense due to the tension on the seat belt in an accident, but when it comes to the change between seats and boosters, it would seem height was also important? I have the same question. Although my daughter doesn't meet the weight requirement, she is tall enough so the shoulder belt is properly placed (e.g., not rubbing against her neck). I had her sitting in a booster until this past summer. I also had several of her friends sitting in a booster - they all hated it and claimed they didn't have to sit in one in their own car. I told them that was the rule in my car. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
getting my head round car seat rules
The way I read the laws for your son is if he is four but not yet 40 lbs
then he should be in a forward facing carseat (not a booster seat). When he hits 40 lbs and if he's under the age of six, then he needs to be in a booster seat. Once he hits 60 lbs and if he's 6 or older then he can either be in a booster seat (they go up to 80 lbs now!) or just be seat-belted. I wouldn't count a high-back booster as a car seat. A car seat has its own straps while a booster uses the car seat belts to hold the child in place. A booster's main function is to raise the child (to boost) so the shoulder is at the right level. if that really is the case, that the lower bounds are AND and a booster with a back is not a car seat, there will come a point when we are completely stuck, his weight is below 0.4th centile, but his height is 10th-25th centile, so he will be too tall for his car seat and any other car seat, but not 40 pounds! If I thought it was a safety issue, I'd be lobbying car seat manufacturers to make a suitable seat, but it seems to me that once he has grown out of his seat height wise, he's going to be fine in a booster with a back. Cheers Anne |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
getting my head round car seat rules
Anne Rogers wrote:
I'm confused by the car seat laws here, this is what it says: Children under the age of three must be properly secured in an approved child car seat. Children should be secured in the rear seat. Never secure a child in the front passenger side, especially if your vehicle has an air bag. If you are in a crash and the bag opens, your child could be injured or killed. Washington state requires proper restraint of children: . one year and under, or 20 pounds and under, in a rear-facing child car seat, . one to four years and from 20 to 40 pounds in a forward-facing child car seat, . four to six years and between 40 and 60 pounds in a booster seat, and . six years and older or over 60 pounds with seat belts or a booster seat. Firstly, in the initial paragraph, it says 3, then further down says 4. My interpretation is that the law requires those under 3 to be in a carseat. Those older than 3 are not required to be in a carseat by law, but if they are (and they should be) the proper seat is as described. I'm surprised they only require child restraints up until 3 years old, though. It seems like most places are up to 6 or 8 years old. But also it doesn't distinguish whether they have to reach both height and age, or one. I think it does. For the first bullet, a child has to be *both* over a year *and* over 20 pounds to go forward facing. For the second bullet, the child has to be 1-4 years old and 20-40 pounds to be in a forward facing carseat. Between 4 and 6 years and 40 and 60 pounds, a booster is appropriate. Over 60 pounds, they should be in a booster or seatbelt, as dictated by other relevant factors (like their height). Really, though, the bulleted items are trying to convey current safety standards. It looks like the law is that you child must be appropriately restrained up to 3 years old. Finally, I can't find out for sure anywhere if a booster with a back would be considered a forward facing car seat, or whether it would have to be one with a 5 point harness? A booster is not a car seat. You'd need the 5-point harness for it to act as a car seat. If I could figure that out, then I might at least be some way on the way to working out out particular situation, we are still a few months off, but Nathanael will be 4 in May, but there is absolutely no way he will be 40 pounds, but he will get too tall for his seat at some point, possibly before then, possibly after, but unless something very odd happens, well before he is 40 pounds. So ideally we'd get him a booster with a back that will last through his car seat using days, but that will only work, if either a booster with a back counts as a car seat, or he gets into the 4-6 category by age (in which case, he apparently wouldn't need one with a back, but I think that would be better as whilst he's not as short as his is skinny, he is still on the short side). You should keep him in a five point harness until he's at least 40 pounds. I also can't get a clear answer for Washington school bus laws, I have a friend who's twins still aren't 40 pounds, or only one of them is, at age 7, they rode the school bus from the start of kindergarten and have never been asked about weight, which seems the opposite to what I've heard people in other states say, but I wonder if it's one of those things that is in the law, but the onus is on the parents to figure it out, when I asked my friend, she didn't know what the law was and had assumed that because no one had asked it was fine. Typically, school busses are exempt from these things. I'd also be interested to know if there is actually any research that supports the weight as being the cut off for changes, it partially makes sense due to the tension on the seat belt in an accident, but when it comes to the change between seats and boosters, it would seem height was also important? Height and weight are both important from a safety perspective. Not everything that is safest is legally required, however. Best wishes, Ericka |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
getting my head round car seat rules
Jeanne wrote:
Anne Rogers wrote: I'm confused by the car seat laws here, this is what it says: Children under the age of three must be properly secured in an approved child car seat. Children should be secured in the rear seat. Never secure a child in the front passenger side, especially if your vehicle has an air bag. If you are in a crash and the bag opens, your child could be injured or killed. Washington state requires proper restraint of children: . one year and under, or 20 pounds and under, in a rear-facing child car seat, . one to four years and from 20 to 40 pounds in a forward-facing child car seat, . four to six years and between 40 and 60 pounds in a booster seat, and . six years and older or over 60 pounds with seat belts or a booster seat. FWIW, one friend had her kids in boosters until 4th grade. According to your laws, DD still needs to be in a booster (56 lbs) although she is 9 years old, in 4th grade and about 4'8". No, that's where the last bullet comes in. If they're six years old or older, they can be in a seatbelt or a booster. Current understanding of what's safest might say something different, but the bullets specified above say 6yos can be in a seat belt. What the above are unclear on is what to do with kids who fall completely outside their categories, like a 5yo who weighs 70 pounds. Best wishes, Ericka |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
getting my head round car seat rules
Anne, Monkey Boy is also very slender. His height required that we move him from a rear facing infant seat to a front facing one, to a child seat, and to a larger child seat, long before his weight reached the minimum for each larger seat. The objective is to ensure the child is secured, in a seat that fits properly (to the extent that proper fit can be achieved). I think 5-point harnesses are vastly safer than shoulder-lap belts, so I will keep my kids as long as possible in a "shell" car seat that includes an over-the-seat-back anchor. And skip the backless booster stage altogether. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
getting my head round car seat rules
Ericka Kammerer wrote:
Jeanne wrote: Anne Rogers wrote: I'm confused by the car seat laws here, this is what it says: Children under the age of three must be properly secured in an approved child car seat. Children should be secured in the rear seat. Never secure a child in the front passenger side, especially if your vehicle has an air bag. If you are in a crash and the bag opens, your child could be injured or killed. Washington state requires proper restraint of children: . one year and under, or 20 pounds and under, in a rear-facing child car seat, . one to four years and from 20 to 40 pounds in a forward-facing child car seat, . four to six years and between 40 and 60 pounds in a booster seat, and . six years and older or over 60 pounds with seat belts or a booster seat. FWIW, one friend had her kids in boosters until 4th grade. According to your laws, DD still needs to be in a booster (56 lbs) although she is 9 years old, in 4th grade and about 4'8". No, that's where the last bullet comes in. If they're six years old or older, they can be in a seatbelt or a booster. Current understanding of what's safest might say something different, but the bullets specified above say 6yos can be in a seat belt. What the above are unclear on is what to do with kids who fall completely outside their categories, like a 5yo who weighs 70 pounds. Got it. I always found the laws vaguely written as if the politicians use OR and AND interchangeably. Maybe freshman politicians should take a Logic course. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
getting my head round car seat rules
Finally, I can't find out for sure anywhere if a booster with a back
would be considered a forward facing car seat, or whether it would have to be one with a 5 point harness? A booster is not a car seat. You'd need the 5-point harness for it to act as a car seat. not even a booster with a back? there is a car seat available in the UK that uses the regular adult seat belt and is essentially a booster with a back, but meets all European safety standards for 9mths+ and 20lb+, I find that quite scary! Presuming you are correct in that these are guidelines and the law is actually quite lax in a seat just being required til age 3, at least whatever we do, we won't be breaking the law, but it will become impossible to follow those guidelines, I'm not sure how many notches there are left that we can rise the shoulder straps, will have to look next time the seat is out the car, but it's not many and definitely not enough to take him to 40lb, I realise I only specified his approx centile, not his current weight, he's 28lb and about the fastest he's gained weight for a while is a pound in 2mths, which will make him 31lb at 4yrs, but he seems to be shooting up in height at the moment, hence thinking he will need something new relatively soon. To confuse matters further, there is a poster that is up in preschools and daycares and so one which appears to come from the state, rather than a particular company that uses different guidelines! Cheers Anne |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
getting my head round car seat rules
http://depts.washington.edu/booster/...keen_bill.html
ah, looks like it is a law not a guideline, but this page uses the word or, but doesn't state which law take precedence when they are in two different categories by age and weight! However there is a link to a pdf at the bottom of the page that links to the actual law (which is what I couldn't find before) and that makes it clear that it's the lower of the two categories that is important and this also makes clear that a child seat is one with a 5 point harness (though it calls it a 4 point shoulder restraint system). It also states it doesn't apply to school buses, which is a relief, but it leaves me stumped as to what to do when he grows out of this seat. I think the 3 in the text I copied must be a typo, it's from the Washington state drivers guide, apparently these laws are one of the strictest, at least when they came in. So now we'll be on the hunt for a suitable seat xkatx mentioned a graco one that has an optional 5-point harness, I'll have to track it down! Heightwise I've just cornered him and measured him he's 3'1" now and I'd guess 3'3" is when he'll grow out of this seat. Cheers Anne |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Latch use in center position of rear seat | KeithD | General | 11 | September 4th 06 07:00 AM |
Tips on handling situations? | xkatx | General | 241 | May 11th 06 02:28 PM |
question about 6 year old in front seat | [email protected] | General | 63 | February 24th 06 07:53 PM |
Funds For 35,000 Head Start At-Risk Children Slots to Vanish Under 2% Cut | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 1 | November 2nd 05 05:14 PM |
Annoying car seat problem | M. Tettnanger | General | 4 | December 24th 03 04:44 PM |