Teenagers faced with spankings

On 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:
Hahaha! But you claimed that she is me. So you sent it to me?

If the address supplied to me was one you created, then yes. That would
explain a lot, now wouldn't it? 0:-

Which address is that, Kane?

The one Alina gave me.

Which is?


You planning on dodging this again, Doan:

And you are lying again. ;-)

Gee, now if I am, how would you know that?

Because that is you M.O! You are PATHOLOGICAL liar! ;-)

Doan

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On 9 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Nathan A. Barclay wrote:
"Doan" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Nathan A. Barclay wrote:
The Safe Playing program has little to do with spanking/non-spanking. It's
about using rewards and punishment. Kane claimed that there was no
punishment is FALSE! Here is an earlier admission on the issue of
punishment:
"One of the conversations between Doan and I concerns his claim that my
comments on Dr. Embry's use of the word "punishment" in regards to a
technique he calls "sit and watch," has to do with my disagreeing that
having the child sit and watch other children at "safe play" for a few
minutes is "punishment," not just that Dr. Embry never mentions the
word. "

Oh, what a tangled web we weaved... ;-)
Really? How so?

I've noticed that Kane has an interesting habit of pretending that
punishments are not punishments when it suits his purposes. If "sit and
watch" is what it sounds like - a child who goes out in the street having to
sit and watch other children play instead of being allowed to play - that is
very definitely a punishment.
I presume you haven't read the study report, so Doan can more easily
con you.

Hahaha! Why don't you provide with the PDF copy you claimed to have.
Or you are the one that trying to con him?
You said I had a PDF copy, I didn't.

I recall trying to make one and having it fail to render well. My copy
from Embry is a copy of a copy and not even straight pages, with
considerable fading in some sections.

Show where I said I had a PDF copy, Doan the liar.

Hahaha! Here is your words on Jan 23, 2006:

Doan:
Oops! The last time you said it's a PDF file. Want me to look in the
"archives" for you? ;-)
Well, Doan? Where is the proof from those "archives" you offered to look
in for me? Go ahead.

Or are you going to choke and dodge again?

Here it is:

"I already had it from direct contact with Dr. Embry. I have it in a PDF
file"

Remember that, Kane?
Yep. I put it into a PDF file myself for ease of searching. It didn't
work well. I didn't say I got it in a PDF file. Can't you read english?

Hahaha. Oh, what a tangled web we weave... Here is your words:

"Show where I said I had a PDF copy, Doan the liar."

Once again, the PROVEN LIAR IS YOU! Q.E.D ;-)
The question, Doan, was whether or not I had gotten it from Embry in
PDF format. And I never said I did. I said, in fact, on more than one
occasion, that I had gotten it in hard copy.

Hahaha! Which part of "I have it in a PDF file" don't you understand,
Kane?

Which part of "And I never said I did. I said, in fact, on more than one
occasion, that I had gotten it in hard copy," don't you understand?

So you never said that???

Why don't you send it to Nathan?

Because I chose not to. And you?

I don't have a PDF file.

You wouldn't be trying to claim I don't have a copy, now would you?

Just like you claiming you sent it to Alina, who is me? ;-)

You are such a STUPID liar!

Then you don't believe you are a liar, do you, Doan?

I do believe that you are a STUPID liar! Even Chris Dugan thinks that you
are STUPID! Remembered? ;-)

Doan

Doan wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On 9 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Nathan A. Barclay wrote:
"Doan" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Nathan A. Barclay wrote:
The Safe Playing program has little to do with spanking/non-spanking. It's
about using rewards and punishment. Kane claimed that there was no
punishment is FALSE! Here is an earlier admission on the issue of
punishment:
"One of the conversations between Doan and I concerns his claim that my
comments on Dr. Embry's use of the word "punishment" in regards to a
technique he calls "sit and watch," has to do with my disagreeing that
having the child sit and watch other children at "safe play" for a few
minutes is "punishment," not just that Dr. Embry never mentions the
word. "

Oh, what a tangled web we weaved... ;-)
Really? How so?

I've noticed that Kane has an interesting habit of pretending that
punishments are not punishments when it suits his purposes. If "sit and
watch" is what it sounds like - a child who goes out in the street having to
sit and watch other children play instead of being allowed to play - that is
very definitely a punishment.
I presume you haven't read the study report, so Doan can more easily
con you.

Hahaha! Why don't you provide with the PDF copy you claimed to have.
Or you are the one that trying to con him?
You said I had a PDF copy, I didn't.

I recall trying to make one and having it fail to render well. My copy
from Embry is a copy of a copy and not even straight pages, with
considerable fading in some sections.

Show where I said I had a PDF copy, Doan the liar.

Hahaha! Here is your words on Jan 23, 2006:

Doan:
Oops! The last time you said it's a PDF file. Want me to look in the
"archives" for you? ;-)
Well, Doan? Where is the proof from those "archives" you offered to look
in for me? Go ahead.

Or are you going to choke and dodge again?

Here it is:

"I already had it from direct contact with Dr. Embry. I have it in a PDF
file"

Remember that, Kane?
Yep. I put it into a PDF file myself for ease of searching. It didn't
work well. I didn't say I got it in a PDF file. Can't you read english?

Hahaha. Oh, what a tangled web we weave... Here is your words:

"Show where I said I had a PDF copy, Doan the liar."

Once again, the PROVEN LIAR IS YOU! Q.E.D ;-)
The question, Doan, was whether or not I had gotten it from Embry in
PDF format. And I never said I did. I said, in fact, on more than one
occasion, that I had gotten it in hard copy.

Hahaha! Which part of "I have it in a PDF file" don't you understand,
Kane?

Which part of "And I never said I did. I said, in fact, on more than one
occasion, that I had gotten it in hard copy," don't you understand?

So you never said that???

"that????"

Of course I said I had a PDF file. I made one. I just didn't say that
Embry had sent me one. I siad repeatedly that I had a hard copy from
him. Are you hard of seeing, as in hard of hearing?

Or just a simple dick liar?


Why don't you send it to Nathan?

Because I chose not to. And you?

I don't have a PDF file.

You can't mail a hard copy?

Odd, you offered to.


You wouldn't be trying to claim I don't have a copy, now would you?

Just like you claiming you sent it to Alina, who is me? ;-)

At time I didn't know you were Alina.

You finally admit you lied and created a sock then?

You are such a STUPID liar!

Then you don't believe you are a liar, do you, Doan?

I do believe that you are a STUPID liar!

That's not an answer, weasel, to my question.

Even Chris Dugan thinks that you
are STUPID! Remembered? ;-)

Interesting he never made any such claim when I was discussing spanking
issues, only foreign policy, eh?

So you are still lying about that, deliberately misleading any reader
that's not up on Chris' coversation with me, eh?

Look at how unethical that is, Doan. Your family, all of them, would be
so ashamed if they knew what you do here.

Doan

Do yu believe you are a liar, Doan? I asked you first.

I double dare R R R R you to answer that question and nothing else.
Kane

On 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On 9 Dec 2006, 0:- wrote:

Nathan A. Barclay wrote:
"Doan" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Nathan A. Barclay wrote:
The Safe Playing program has little to do with spanking/non-spanking. It's
about using rewards and punishment. Kane claimed that there was no
punishment is FALSE! Here is an earlier admission on the issue of
punishment:
"One of the conversations between Doan and I concerns his claim that my
comments on Dr. Embry's use of the word "punishment" in regards to a
technique he calls "sit and watch," has to do with my disagreeing that
having the child sit and watch other children at "safe play" for a few
minutes is "punishment," not just that Dr. Embry never mentions the
word. "

Oh, what a tangled web we weaved... ;-)
Really? How so?

I've noticed that Kane has an interesting habit of pretending that
punishments are not punishments when it suits his purposes. If "sit and
watch" is what it sounds like - a child who goes out in the street having to
sit and watch other children play instead of being allowed to play - that is
very definitely a punishment.
I presume you haven't read the study report, so Doan can more easily
con you.

Hahaha! Why don't you provide with the PDF copy you claimed to have.
Or you are the one that trying to con him?
You said I had a PDF copy, I didn't.

I recall trying to make one and having it fail to render well. My copy
from Embry is a copy of a copy and not even straight pages, with
considerable fading in some sections.

Show where I said I had a PDF copy, Doan the liar.

Hahaha! Here is your words on Jan 23, 2006:

Doan:
Oops! The last time you said it's a PDF file. Want me to look in the
"archives" for you? ;-)
Well, Doan? Where is the proof from those "archives" you offered to look
in for me? Go ahead.

Or are you going to choke and dodge again?

Here it is:

"I already had it from direct contact with Dr. Embry. I have it in a PDF
file"

Remember that, Kane?
Yep. I put it into a PDF file myself for ease of searching. It didn't
work well. I didn't say I got it in a PDF file. Can't you read english?

Hahaha. Oh, what a tangled web we weave... Here is your words:

"Show where I said I had a PDF copy, Doan the liar."

Once again, the PROVEN LIAR IS YOU! Q.E.D ;-)
The question, Doan, was whether or not I had gotten it from Embry in
PDF format. And I never said I did. I said, in fact, on more than one
occasion, that I had gotten it in hard copy.

Hahaha! Which part of "I have it in a PDF file" don't you understand,
Kane?

Which part of "And I never said I did. I said, in fact, on more than one
occasion, that I had gotten it in hard copy," don't you understand?

So you never said that???

"that????"

Of course I said I had a PDF file. I made one. I just didn't say that
Embry had sent me one. I siad repeatedly that I had a hard copy from
him. Are you hard of seeing, as in hard of hearing?

"Show where I said I had a PDF copy, Doan the liar." is your exact words!
LIAR! LIAR! PANTS ON FIRE! ;-)

Or just a simple dick liar?

So now dick is coming out of your mouth? ;-)


Why don't you send it to Nathan?

Because I chose not to. And you?

I don't have a PDF file.

You can't mail a hard copy?

Odd, you offered to.

He didn't ask me, STUPID! ;-)


You wouldn't be trying to claim I don't have a copy, now would you?

Just like you claiming you sent it to Alina, who is me? ;-)

At time I didn't know you were Alina.

So what is the address that you sent it to, LIAR?

You finally admit you lied and created a sock then?

You are the proven liar here! And a STUPID one at that! ;-)


You are such a STUPID liar!

Then you don't believe you are a liar, do you, Doan?

I do believe that you are a STUPID liar!

That's not an answer, weasel, to my question.

That's is an answer to a STUPID liar like you! ;-)

Even Chris Dugan thinks that you
are STUPID! Remembered? ;-)

Interesting he never made any such claim when I was discussing spanking
issues, only foreign policy, eh?

Care to provide proof? I DARE YOU! I DOUBLE DARE YOU! LIAR! LIAR! ;-)

So you are still lying about that, deliberately misleading any reader
that's not up on Chris' coversation with me, eh?

Proof please? ;-)

Look at how unethical that is, Doan. Your family, all of them, would be
so ashamed if they knew what you do here.

And mother is proud of you when you call other women "smelly-****", right?
;-)


Doan

Do yu believe you are a liar, Doan? I asked you first.

I do believe that you are a liar! I have proven so MANY TIMES!

I double dare R R R R you to answer that question and nothing else.
Kane

I just did, STUPID! ;-)

Doan