An imagined 'peculiarity' of the female Mexican pelvis

PREGNANT WOMEN: To allow your birth canal to open an "extra" up to 30% at
delivery...

See THE SOLUTION below.


AN IMAGINED "PECULIARITY" OF THE FEMALE MEXICAN PELVIS

Dr. Laura Cházaro writes:

"[In 1890, Dr. Florencio Flores] spoke of the narrowed (obstructed) pelvis
characteristic of Mexican women as a 'peculiarity' that, having been
identified as a 'common national trait, could thus be considered
'normal'...Why then had women's pelves come under suspicion of being
defective?...[T]he narrowness of Mexican women's pelves reflected...the
still unfinished mixing of the white and Indian races...[In the end though -
TDG] no conclusive proof of narrowing was ever found..."
--Dr. Laura Cházaro. Feminist Review 79 2005 100-115 (trans. by Paul Kersey)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/cgi...letype=pdfOPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com)Dr. Laura CházaroProfessorCenter for Historical StudiesMichoacán @yaho o.comLaura,MD-obstetricians are narrowing pelves.MD-obstetricians are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinelykeeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck.MD-obstetricians are lying to cover-up conclusive proof of this narrowing.See the Four OB Lies in the postscript.ToddDr. GastaldoHillsboro, HE FOUR OB LIESOB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter wasclinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957,the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvicdiamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery.OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DOchange - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming thattheir most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet.OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so doessemisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correctbiomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the sameparagraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention totheir text...OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies getstuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal openmaximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum birthsare performed with the mother in lithotomy.)See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS...http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou.../message/2983I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago...http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.htmlRELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS...."[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage infraud or deception.""[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which arecontrary to the best interests of the patient.""[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients,colleagues, and the public..."http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/ethics/ethics_opinions53101*.cfmAMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned.MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERYRetired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOGindicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley:"ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediatecord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioningsource of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% ofits natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungsfunction, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts itsextra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993.Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and everychild born with a neonatal team inthe delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate thepanicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediatecord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers,it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebralpalsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard ofmedico-legal care..."http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htmIn cases where the baby MUST beresuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have tosever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room toresuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so thatmother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's naturaloxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered thisquestion.My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention tothe immediate cord clamping mass child abuse.A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's onlymedical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping andbirth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery onlineafter I complained.OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routedtowww.ohsuwomenshealth.com...See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU)http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/group/chiro-list/message/2986(If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cordclamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to knowabout it.)PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closingbirth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP womensemisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: Byimmediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies androbbing them of up to 50%of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above.THE SOLUTION:1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%,simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBswill let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will rollthem back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB.2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do notlet the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stoppedpulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need ofresuscitation.NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will notprevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs haveno business closingbirth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place.NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but theyare indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinelyrobbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today.I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medicalstudents MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimeskills.Thanks for reading everyone.ToddDr. GastaldoHillsboro, his Open Letter to Dr. Laura Cházaro will be archived for global access inthe Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "An imagined'peculiarity' of the female Mexican pelvis."

PREGNANT WOMEN: To allow your birth canal to open an "extra" up to 30% at
delivery...

See THE SOLUTION below.


AN IMAGINED "PECULIARITY" OF THE FEMALE MEXICAN PELVIS

Dr. Laura Cházaro writes:

"[In 1890, Dr. Florencio Flores] spoke of the narrowed (obstructed) pelvis
characteristic of Mexican women as a 'peculiarity' that, having been
identified as a 'common national trait, could thus be considered
'normal'...Why then had women's pelves come under suspicion of being
defective?...[T]he narrowness of Mexican women's pelves reflected...the
still unfinished mixing of the white and Indian races...[In the end though -
TDG] no conclusive proof of narrowing was ever found..."
--Dr. Laura Cházaro. Feminist Review 79 2005 100-115 (trans. by Paul Kersey)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/cgi...letype=pdfOPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com)Dr. Laura CházaroProfessorCenter for Historical StudiesMichoacán @yaho o.comLaura,MD-obstetricians are narrowing pelves.MD-obstetricians are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinelykeeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck.MD-obstetricians are lying to cover-up conclusive proof of this narrowing.See the Four OB Lies in the postscript.ToddDr. GastaldoHillsboro, S THE FOUR OB LIESOB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter wasclinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957,the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvicdiamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery.OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DOchange - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming thattheir most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet.OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so doessemisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correctbiomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the sameparagraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention totheir text...OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies getstuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal openmaximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum birthsare performed with the mother in lithotomy.)See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS...http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou.../message/2983I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago...http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.htmlRELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS...."[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage infraud or deception.""[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which arecontrary to the best interests of the patient.""[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients,colleagues, and the public..."http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/ethics/ethics_opinions53101*.cfmAMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned.MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERYRetired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOGindicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley:"ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediatecord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioningsource of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% ofits natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungsfunction, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts itsextra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993.Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and everychild born with a neonatal team inthe delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate thepanicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediatecord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers,it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebralpalsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard ofmedico-legal care..."http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htmIn cases where the baby MUST beresuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have tosever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room toresuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so thatmother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's naturaloxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered thisquestion.My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention tothe immediate cord clamping mass child abuse.A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's onlymedical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping andbirth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery onlineafter I complained.OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routedtowww.ohsuwomenshealth.com...See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU)http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/group/chiro-list/message/2986(If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cordclamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to knowabout it.)PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closingbirth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP womensemisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: Byimmediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies androbbing them of up to 50%of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above.THE SOLUTION:1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%,simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBswill let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will rollthem back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB.2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do notlet the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stoppedpulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need ofresuscitation.NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will notprevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs haveno business closingbirth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place.NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but theyare indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinelyrobbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today.I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medicalstudents MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimeskills.Thanks for reading everyone.ToddDr. GastaldoHillsboro, his Open Letter to Dr. Laura Cházaro will be archived for globalaccess in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for"An imagined 'peculiarity' of the female Mexican pelvis"