Who Is Fighting For Kids?

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?

nm

Axe to grind with any man who gets "significantly" behind in payments.

Lousy mother? Cant judge a person by their post about "what kind of
mother" they are.

I beleive earlier it was stated that "CP's should be held accountable
for their actions", that the "sytem is screwed up", that "all NCP's
are not bad", etc.

Which would support some of what you against CP's and CS have said.
It sounds to me that you are trying to attack and debunk using
personal tactics that frankly reflect directly on yourself not on the
character or parenting abilities of anyone else in this group.


On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:22:36 -0500 (EST), wrote:

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?

nm

In article ,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her here and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not change. She
can't. It is folly to attempt to counter her arguments. They are merely words
she furiously types for the sole purpose of getting a reaction--fuel for her
psyche, if you will. When someone here reacts to her in the way she hopes, it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It is an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.
===
===

nm

On 10 Nov 2003 10:29:28 -0800, Gini52 wrote:

In article ,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her here and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not change. She
can't.

This would imply that what comes out of your mouth is always right,
which ive obviously denomstrated before was wrong. I believe
anything that comes out of your mouth? Not.

It is folly to attempt to counter her arguments. They are merely words
she furiously types for the sole purpose of getting a reaction--fuel for her
psyche, if you will.

Which you seem to have the need to fullfill with you counter posts.
Hmm.. I think you just diagnosed yourself.

When someone here reacts to her in the way she hopes, it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It is an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.

Really? Then how in the world did I ever make it to my current age if
I cant survive without it.

Im telling you Gini you should really stop talking about yourself.

===
===

nm

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:08:49 -0800, "Paul Fritz"
wrote:


"Gini52" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that
prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her here
and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not change. She
can't. It is folly to attempt to counter her arguments. They are merely
words
she furiously types for the sole purpose of getting a reaction--fuel for
her
psyche, if you will. When someone here reacts to her in the way she hopes,
it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It is an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.

And when the reaction is not what she hopes, the attackes get even more
hysterical


Hmm.. and what exactly are you doing? Im not really attacking, its
called being attacked.

===
===

nm

"Gini52" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that
prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her here
and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not change. She
can't. It is folly to attempt to counter her arguments. They are merely
words
she furiously types for the sole purpose of getting a reaction--fuel for
her
psyche, if you will. When someone here reacts to her in the way she hopes,
it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It is an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.

And when the reaction is not what she hopes, the attackes get even more
hysterical

===
===

nm

and I would put you in jail, no problem


wrote in message
...
My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?

nm

Psycho

"Fighting For Kids" wrote in message
...
On 10 Nov 2003 10:29:28 -0800, Gini52 wrote:

In article ,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that
prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her
here and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not change.
She
can't.

This would imply that what comes out of your mouth is always right,
which ive obviously denomstrated before was wrong. I believe
anything that comes out of your mouth? Not.

It is folly to attempt to counter her arguments. They are merely words
she furiously types for the sole purpose of getting a reaction--fuel for
her
psyche, if you will.

Which you seem to have the need to fullfill with you counter posts.
Hmm.. I think you just diagnosed yourself.

When someone here reacts to her in the way she hopes, it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It is an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.

Really? Then how in the world did I ever make it to my current age if
I cant survive without it.

Im telling you Gini you should really stop talking about yourself.

===
===

nm

In article , Paul Fritz says...


"Gini52" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that
prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her here
and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not change. She
can't. It is folly to attempt to counter her arguments. They are merely
words
she furiously types for the sole purpose of getting a reaction--fuel for
her
psyche, if you will. When someone here reacts to her in the way she hopes,
it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It is an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.

And when the reaction is not what she hopes, the attackes get even more
hysterical
======
I wonder how many keyboards she's destroyed.
======
======

===
===

nm

In article , Fighting For Kids
says...

On 10 Nov 2003 10:29:28 -0800, Gini52 wrote:

In article ,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her here and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not change. She
can't.

This would imply that what comes out of your mouth is always right,
which ive obviously denomstrated before was wrong.
========
You are confusing your opinion with fact. Just because you say something does
not make it valid. I even posted the relevent federal statute that defines "home
state" and the quidelines for competing jurisdictions. You demonstrated nothing
except that you can't extrapolate meaning from written text and that you haven't
a clue about legal jurisdiction.
========
...........................................
When someone here reacts to her in the way she hopes, it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It is an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.

Really? Then how in the world did I ever make it to my current age if
I cant survive without it.
====
You were diagnosed as a child when you demonstrated the same qualities. You have
done this all your life. You have never been able to engage in normal social
interaction. You lash out at everyone and everything. You are incapable of
admitting error because your self-esteem is so low. You can only survive
psychologically by degrading others, giving you a false sense of perfection.
You've been in therapy all your life without progress. You have engaged in
similar escapades with other newsgroups for years necessitating frequent changes
in your user ID. Your illness is why your husband left you--not your child's
illness--and that is why he refuses to have any contact with you. You also knew
before you had children that there as a real risk of passing your illness on to
them but you chose to have them anyway. That was an unfortunate decision because
rather than give them a good role model to help them have a more stable and
productive life, you have given them nothing but your self-perpetuating anger
and incompetence. It is so sad for them that you have chosen to do this.
Hopefully they will thrive in spite of you (and hopefully they will never learn
how to search usenet archives).
===
===