After 13 years, mom gets $66,000 in child support

Zimm wrote:


Bob wrote:

Editor -- Child Support News wrote:

See this article and others at http://childsupportnews.com .


Friday, June 11, 2004
By Ken Kolker
The Grand Rapids Press
For nearly 13 years, Nancy Rosema has fought for an increase in child
support for her two children -- a battle that reached the state Supreme
Court and led, in part, to the resignation of a Kent County judge.




For 13 years she had reneged on HER obligation to support HER child.
She ought to be told to get off her fat ass, get a job, and support
HER child.

Bob


You didn't read the article. She did have a job - and made a whopping
$20,000 a year. The article doesn't say anything about her having a fat
ass.

Zimm


Then she ought to get a 2nd job and support HER kids.

It's not anyone else's RESPONSIBILITY but hers.

Bob




--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Zimm wrote:


Bob wrote:

Editor -- Child Support News wrote:

See this article and others at http://childsupportnews.com .


Friday, June 11, 2004
By Ken Kolker
The Grand Rapids Press
For nearly 13 years, Nancy Rosema has fought for an increase in child
support for her two children -- a battle that reached the state Supreme
Court and led, in part, to the resignation of a Kent County judge.




For 13 years she had reneged on HER obligation to support HER child.
She ought to be told to get off her fat ass, get a job, and support
HER child.

Bob


You didn't read the article. She did have a job - and made a whopping
$20,000 a year. The article doesn't say anything about her having a fat
ass.

Zimm


Then she ought to get a 2nd job and support HER kids.

It's not anyone else's RESPONSIBILITY but hers.

Bob




--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Zimm wrote:


Bob wrote:

Editor -- Child Support News wrote:

See this article and others at http://childsupportnews.com .


Friday, June 11, 2004
By Ken Kolker
The Grand Rapids Press
For nearly 13 years, Nancy Rosema has fought for an increase in child
support for her two children -- a battle that reached the state Supreme
Court and led, in part, to the resignation of a Kent County judge.




For 13 years she had reneged on HER obligation to support HER child.
She ought to be told to get off her fat ass, get a job, and support
HER child.

Bob


You didn't read the article. She did have a job - and made a whopping
$20,000 a year. The article doesn't say anything about her having a fat
ass.

Zimm


Then she ought to get a 2nd job and support HER kids.

It's not anyone else's RESPONSIBILITY but hers.

Bob




--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Bob wrote:
Zimm wrote:



Bob wrote:

Editor -- Child Support News wrote:

See this article and others at http://childsupportnews.com .


Friday, June 11, 2004
By Ken Kolker
The Grand Rapids Press
For nearly 13 years, Nancy Rosema has fought for an increase in child
support for her two children -- a battle that reached the state Supreme
Court and led, in part, to the resignation of a Kent County judge.





For 13 years she had reneged on HER obligation to support HER child.
She ought to be told to get off her fat ass, get a job, and support
HER child.

Bob


You didn't read the article. She did have a job - and made a whopping
$20,000 a year. The article doesn't say anything about her having a
fat ass.

Zimm


Then she ought to get a 2nd job and support HER kids.

It's not anyone else's RESPONSIBILITY but hers.

Bob






Are you saying Daddy doesn't have any responsibility to support HIS
kids? That's dumb.

Zimm

Bob wrote:
Zimm wrote:



Bob wrote:

Editor -- Child Support News wrote:

See this article and others at http://childsupportnews.com .


Friday, June 11, 2004
By Ken Kolker
The Grand Rapids Press
For nearly 13 years, Nancy Rosema has fought for an increase in child
support for her two children -- a battle that reached the state Supreme
Court and led, in part, to the resignation of a Kent County judge.





For 13 years she had reneged on HER obligation to support HER child.
She ought to be told to get off her fat ass, get a job, and support
HER child.

Bob


You didn't read the article. She did have a job - and made a whopping
$20,000 a year. The article doesn't say anything about her having a
fat ass.

Zimm


Then she ought to get a 2nd job and support HER kids.

It's not anyone else's RESPONSIBILITY but hers.

Bob






Are you saying Daddy doesn't have any responsibility to support HIS
kids? That's dumb.

Zimm

Bob wrote:
Zimm wrote:



Bob wrote:

Editor -- Child Support News wrote:

See this article and others at http://childsupportnews.com .


Friday, June 11, 2004
By Ken Kolker
The Grand Rapids Press
For nearly 13 years, Nancy Rosema has fought for an increase in child
support for her two children -- a battle that reached the state Supreme
Court and led, in part, to the resignation of a Kent County judge.





For 13 years she had reneged on HER obligation to support HER child.
She ought to be told to get off her fat ass, get a job, and support
HER child.

Bob


You didn't read the article. She did have a job - and made a whopping
$20,000 a year. The article doesn't say anything about her having a
fat ass.

Zimm


Then she ought to get a 2nd job and support HER kids.

It's not anyone else's RESPONSIBILITY but hers.

Bob






Are you saying Daddy doesn't have any responsibility to support HIS
kids? That's dumb.

Zimm

Hey Zimm:

He was meeting his obligation. He was paying 600 dollars a month plus
1600 in alimony. 2200 dollars a month in tax free income for her.
And she needed more?

Assuming this case is average, she wanted and received custody for the
children. If she wanted her kids to live the same lifestyle as her
ex-husband, then she should have gave the kids to him.

600 dollars is half of 1200. Is 1200 a month what the kids cost?
Sounds kind of high to me. So I guess 600 dollars a month is
exceedingly generous in splitting the cost of raising the kids.

As usual, another custodial mom does not want to take responsibility
for her desire to have custody of the children. And our wonderful CS
system is right on top of it, punishing the Dad.












Zimm wrote in message ...
Bob wrote:
Zimm wrote:



Bob wrote:

Editor -- Child Support News wrote:

See this article and others at http://childsupportnews.com .


Friday, June 11, 2004
By Ken Kolker
The Grand Rapids Press
For nearly 13 years, Nancy Rosema has fought for an increase in child
support for her two children -- a battle that reached the state Supreme
Court and led, in part, to the resignation of a Kent County judge.





For 13 years she had reneged on HER obligation to support HER child.
She ought to be told to get off her fat ass, get a job, and support
HER child.

Bob


You didn't read the article. She did have a job - and made a whopping
$20,000 a year. The article doesn't say anything about her having a
fat ass.

Zimm


Then she ought to get a 2nd job and support HER kids.

It's not anyone else's RESPONSIBILITY but hers.

Bob






Are you saying Daddy doesn't have any responsibility to support HIS
kids? That's dumb.

Zimm

Hey Zimm:

He was meeting his obligation. He was paying 600 dollars a month plus
1600 in alimony. 2200 dollars a month in tax free income for her.
And she needed more?

Assuming this case is average, she wanted and received custody for the
children. If she wanted her kids to live the same lifestyle as her
ex-husband, then she should have gave the kids to him.

600 dollars is half of 1200. Is 1200 a month what the kids cost?
Sounds kind of high to me. So I guess 600 dollars a month is
exceedingly generous in splitting the cost of raising the kids.

As usual, another custodial mom does not want to take responsibility
for her desire to have custody of the children. And our wonderful CS
system is right on top of it, punishing the Dad.












Zimm wrote in message ...
Bob wrote:
Zimm wrote:



Bob wrote:

Editor -- Child Support News wrote:

See this article and others at http://childsupportnews.com .


Friday, June 11, 2004
By Ken Kolker
The Grand Rapids Press
For nearly 13 years, Nancy Rosema has fought for an increase in child
support for her two children -- a battle that reached the state Supreme
Court and led, in part, to the resignation of a Kent County judge.





For 13 years she had reneged on HER obligation to support HER child.
She ought to be told to get off her fat ass, get a job, and support
HER child.

Bob


You didn't read the article. She did have a job - and made a whopping
$20,000 a year. The article doesn't say anything about her having a
fat ass.

Zimm


Then she ought to get a 2nd job and support HER kids.

It's not anyone else's RESPONSIBILITY but hers.

Bob






Are you saying Daddy doesn't have any responsibility to support HIS
kids? That's dumb.

Zimm

Hey Zimm:

He was meeting his obligation. He was paying 600 dollars a month plus
1600 in alimony. 2200 dollars a month in tax free income for her.
And she needed more?

Assuming this case is average, she wanted and received custody for the
children. If she wanted her kids to live the same lifestyle as her
ex-husband, then she should have gave the kids to him.

600 dollars is half of 1200. Is 1200 a month what the kids cost?
Sounds kind of high to me. So I guess 600 dollars a month is
exceedingly generous in splitting the cost of raising the kids.

As usual, another custodial mom does not want to take responsibility
for her desire to have custody of the children. And our wonderful CS
system is right on top of it, punishing the Dad.












Zimm wrote in message ...
Bob wrote:
Zimm wrote:



Bob wrote:

Editor -- Child Support News wrote:

See this article and others at http://childsupportnews.com .


Friday, June 11, 2004
By Ken Kolker
The Grand Rapids Press
For nearly 13 years, Nancy Rosema has fought for an increase in child
support for her two children -- a battle that reached the state Supreme
Court and led, in part, to the resignation of a Kent County judge.





For 13 years she had reneged on HER obligation to support HER child.
She ought to be told to get off her fat ass, get a job, and support
HER child.

Bob


You didn't read the article. She did have a job - and made a whopping
$20,000 a year. The article doesn't say anything about her having a
fat ass.

Zimm


Then she ought to get a 2nd job and support HER kids.

It's not anyone else's RESPONSIBILITY but hers.

Bob






Are you saying Daddy doesn't have any responsibility to support HIS
kids? That's dumb.

Zimm

"bleed-22" wrote in message
om...
Hey Zimm:

He was meeting his obligation. He was paying 600 dollars a month plus
1600 in alimony. 2200 dollars a month in tax free income for her.

Alimony is not tax free - the recipient pays the taxes on it.