If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Bizarre Food Allergy Study
Andrea Phillips wrote:
Did anyone else catch this? http://www.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/06/08...eut/index.html This article bugs me on so many counts I can hardly articulate. First there's this: "At three months of age, according to parental reports, 14.2 percent of infants had adverse reactions to food, while 7.2 percent did by one year of age." Could it be that's because a three-month-old just might have adverse reactions to *any* food due to immaturity of the digestive tract, rather than because of an IgE-mediated food allergy?! According to the link Liz gave, the 'food' to which those three-month-olds were reported as having adverse reactions was cow's milk - which, of course, lots of three-month-olds are getting in the form of formula. So I presume that's what was meant. I'd say the other points made about the study in this thread still stand, though. All the best, Sarah -- http://www.goodenoughmummy.typepad.com "That which can be destroyed by the truth, should be" - P. C. Hodgell |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Bizarre Food Allergy Study
Engram wrote: [...] Notice that 7.2% of parents were reporting allergies by 1 year of age and the study showed around 6% actually had an allergy according to the double blind eating challenge. Not such a great difference at all. While none of the 14.2% of 3 month olds with reported reactions were tested at that time, but 9 months later. I know I'm going by the experience of a sample of 1, but is it not possible that reactions noticed in younger babies may disappear with time? Right - I've now found the abstract on PubMed. http://tinyurl.com/pkzla This actually gives a figure for 3.2% having food allergies proven on the double-blind test by 1 year - and they say it's a cumulative figure, which I'm guessing means it includes babies who've come up positive on the earlier test as well as the ones who are still coming up positive at 12 months (which would fit better with the figures given earlier in the abstract). Only 2.5% were positive on the double-blind challenges _at_ 1 year. That means that almost two-thirds of the one-year-olds who were thought by their parents to have allergies actually didn't according to the testing. Now, obviously, as you and others have pointed out, the figure on a single food challenge probably is going to be an underestimate because there may be babies who are only bothered by large amounts of a certain foodstuff. But this does still suggest that there are a lot of parents restricting their children's diets when it isn't necessary, which I think is really the primary point of the study. I don't see that 'chastisement' necessarily comes into it at all. Right - enough lollygagging - I'm going to have to go & do paperwork now. ;-( All the best, Sarah |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Bizarre Food Allergy Study
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Bizarre Food Allergy Study
FlowerGirl wrote:
"arachne" wrote in message ... Engram wrote: This gives me hope that my own sample #2 (ie. DS) will grow out of his allergy by one of those milestone ages. Even though egg allergy isn't life threatening, it's hard to stop kids swapping snacks on the playground once they go to school. but egg allergy *can* be life-threatening to some people. my DS1 has life-threatening (anaphylaxis) allergies to egg as well as nuts. and a little lesser allergies to many, many, many other foods. Very scary indeed. ...and on another note ... we're still waiting for that promised update Elizabeth ... even if it means I have to go to mkb and not af to read it How are the boys? How are *you*? Amanda ok ok! i PROMISE to make an update before this week is up (on a.f.)! miss ya by the way. -- elizabeth (in australia) mum to DS1 (3.75 yrs) & DS2 "gorgey" (8.5 mths) "In raising my children, I have lost my mind but found my soul." --Lisa T. Shepherd |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Bizarre Food Allergy Study
Engram wrote:
"arachne" wrote in message ... but egg allergy *can* be life-threatening to some people. my DS1 has life-threatening (anaphylaxis) allergies to egg as well as nuts. and a little lesser allergies to many, many, many other foods. I'm sorry to hear that, Elizabeth... From what I had read anaphylaxis in egg allergy is rare, so I wasn't thinking of that particular allergy as being in quite the same league as peanut, which is almost always associated with anaphylaxis. it is more rare. but *any* food allergy can be anaphylactic unfortunately. it's just as you say more uncommon. milk allergy is alot more common for an ana reaction. but my DS1 has pretty severe allergies. he is allergic to *most* foods. even things like pumpkin & parsley etc as well as the more traditional allergies so he is not classed in the majority of allergic kids i guess. i guess i just wanted to let other people who might read this thread know. i come across alot of blank looks when i try to explain to some people IRL that food can kill my child (or other children). and that even "innocent" food can make him very sick just from touching it. very frustrating. -- elizabeth (in australia) mum to DS1 (3.75 yrs) & DS2 "gorgey" (8.5 mths) "In raising my children, I have lost my mind but found my soul." --Lisa T. Shepherd |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Bizarre Food Allergy Study
"arachne" wrote in message ... it is more rare. but *any* food allergy can be anaphylactic unfortunately. it's just as you say more uncommon. milk allergy is alot more common for an ana reaction. but my DS1 has pretty severe allergies. he is allergic to *most* foods. even things like pumpkin & parsley etc as well as the more traditional allergies so he is not classed in the majority of allergic kids i guess. i guess i just wanted to let other people who might read this thread know. i come across alot of blank looks when i try to explain to some people IRL that food can kill my child (or other children). and that even "innocent" food can make him very sick just from touching it. very frustrating. I know what you mean... When I told my sister that Matt is allergic to eggs, her reaction was "but surely he can have cake? there's not much egg in cake"! Hard to explain to people that an everyday foodstuffs can harm a child. Now I'm delaying the introduction of nuts until he's 2 years old because he's already shown a reaction to egg (a rash) plus he's got eczema, marking him as prone to allergies in general. My mum is going to look after him when I go back to work next week and every time I see her I keep telling her "now remember, no nutella, no peanut butter, no pancakes". And then she gives my sister's kids scrambled eggs or nutella sandwiches and I'm forever jumping in and saying "make sure they don't share their lunch with him". He's not walking yet so can't get himself to the table and grab their food, but that day will come. I've asked her not to give them egg or nut containing things on the day when he's there but I haven't got far on that front, unfortunately. Hopefully my warnings over and over will stick in the end. She just doesn't seem to realise that foods most people can eat can kill some, particularly a kid who can't tell the difference between a nutella and a vegemite sandwich as they're both covered in dark gooey stuff! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Bizarre Food Allergy Study
Hi -- The Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network (linked from my site, or google it) has a good video for educating teachers/daycare providers. I think it's called "Just One Bite". You might see if you can borrow a copy, or even purchase it. View it with your ... mother? The relative who'll be caring for your allergic baby. You also want to make sure she knows what to do in case of a serious reaction. Baby epi-pen, 9-1-1, etc. --Beth Kevles http://web.mit.edu/kevles/www/nomilk.html -- a page for the milk-allergic Disclaimer: Nothing in this message should be construed as medical advice. Please consult with your own medical practicioner. NOTE: No email is read at my MIT address. Use the AOL one if you would like me to reply. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Bizarre Food Allergy Study
"arachne" wrote in message ... FlowerGirl wrote: "arachne" wrote in message ... Engram wrote: This gives me hope that my own sample #2 (ie. DS) will grow out of his allergy by one of those milestone ages. Even though egg allergy isn't life threatening, it's hard to stop kids swapping snacks on the playground once they go to school. but egg allergy *can* be life-threatening to some people. my DS1 has life-threatening (anaphylaxis) allergies to egg as well as nuts. and a little lesser allergies to many, many, many other foods. Very scary indeed. ...and on another note ... we're still waiting for that promised update Elizabeth ... even if it means I have to go to mkb and not af to read it How are the boys? How are *you*? Amanda ok ok! i PROMISE to make an update before this week is up (on a.f.)! miss ya by the way. Not half as much as I miss you!!! I'll be waiting on that update you know A |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Allergies and Asthma (part 1/4) | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | December 19th 05 05:36 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Allergies and Asthma (part 1/4) | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | November 18th 05 05:36 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Allergies and Asthma (part 1/4) | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | June 30th 05 05:29 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Allergies and Asthma (part 1/4) | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | July 29th 04 05:17 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Allergies and Asthma (part 1/4) | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 1 | April 17th 04 12:27 PM |