MERCK'S GARDASIL VACCINE NOT PROVEN SAFE FOR LITTLE GIRLS

"Peter Bowditch" wrote:

snip al insults

"Jan Drew" wrote:


"Bryan Heit" wrote in message
...
Peter Bowditch wrote:
Bryan Heit wrote:


Peter Bowditch wrote:
Altcorp is run by Saint Boyd of Haley, the man who says that

ethylmercury and methylmercury can be considered to be equivalent
chemicals because one is dangerous and who also says that the chemical
properties of elements are unchanged when those elements are part of
compounds. How could you possibly not believe him?

Because I've yet to die of chlorine poisoning, or disappear in a giant
ball-o-flame (patent pending) after eating table salt ;-)

Bryan


Members of the Church of Haley reject the table salt story and claim
that it is a diversion from the real situation of chemicals containing
mercury.


I'm well aware of that. But it's an idiotic argument; mercury is just
another element. It's not magical or anything. Hard to believe he's a
chemist...


I tried going the other way with Saint Boyd himself by asking
how three harmless chemicals (carbon, nitrogen and hydrogen) can
become dangerous when combined and he told me that this is different
because nitrogen is not mercury. Did I mention that saint Boyd
somehow
managed to hold down a professorship in chemistry and was actually
head of the department at his university?


Probably became a quack after he got the professorship. It is
remarkably
hard to get rid of someone once they get into the tenure track. Last I
heard he'd left his uni (by force?) and is now running a company selling
stuff to people silly enough to listen to him...

Bryan

All been discussed previously.

It is noted..not only do you choose to believe Peter Bowditch...YOU also
join him in LYING.

What are those lies, Jan?

All over the place..where YOU write them.


Was Dr Haley a professor of chemistry? Did
he write to me saying that the elements making up the hydrogen cyanide
had no bearing on the compound's chemistry?

Peter Bowditch Owes DR Boyd Haley A HUGE Apology

Not as big an apology as Dr Haley owes to the children who have been
damaged because their parents took his advice.


http://www.altcorp.com/DentalI***nfo...n/exposure.htm


III. MECHANISMS, SOURCES & EPIDEMIOLOGY OF EXPOSURE


Sallie Bernard*, Albert Enayati, B.S., Ch.E., M.S.M.E., Heidi Roger,
Teresa Binstock, Lyn Redwood, R.N., M.S.N., C.R.N.P., Woody McGinnis,
M.D.

Binstock? Redwood?

No need to read any further, as there have now been two very big
bull**** flags in the form of names of well-known anti-vaccination
liars.

You ARE the liar.

They ARE not.

http://www.whale.to/a/bernard.html

http://www.whale.to/a/autism7.html

http://www.safeminds.org/home/executive_board.html

http://www.safeminds.org/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe_Minds

http://www.slc.edu/index.php?pageID=3024

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/redwood.html

http://www.altcorp.com/DentalInformation/autismhg.htm

http://www.patsullivan.com/blog/2005...dwood_fro.html

http://www.vaccinationnews.com/Recom...sm&Mercury.htm

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/binstock1.htm

http://groups.msn.com/TheAutismHomeP...nological.msnw

[for starters]



Given that ethylmercury is equally neurotoxic as methylmercury

I'm sorry, I did read a bit further, but this lie really made me stop.

Good. Your LIES don't need to be heard again.
--
Peter Bowditch

http://tinyurl.com/gwkcp

http://tinyurl.com/ojc4e

http://www.altcorp.com/dentalinformation/exposure.htm

http://www.whale.to/a/bernard.html

http://www.whale.to/a/autism7.html

http://www.safeminds.org/home/executive_board.html

http://www.safeminds.org/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe_Minds

http://www.slc.edu/index.php?pageID=3024

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/redwood.html

http://www.altcorp.com/DentalInformation/autismhg.htm

http://www.patsullivan.com/blog/2005...dwood_fro.html

http://www.vaccinationnews.com/Recom...sm&Mercury.htm

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/binstock1.htm

http://groups.msn.com/TheAutismHomeP...nological.msnw

"Mark Probert" wrote:

snipped

That would be Altcorp. He is also a hired gun expert witness in the
Omnibus Autism Proceeding:

This accusation has been repeated.

Do prove it.

http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/OSM/Au...L%20EXPERT.pdf

EXPERTS!

along with Geier (rhymes with LIAR) and Wakefield.

Btw, in regard to your UDP.....

http://groups.google.com/group/misc....70e5e5d?hl=en&

Jul 19 2005

Richar H Jacobson [proven liar] wrote:
I have repeatedly suggested what I believe to be an excellent strategy in
dealing with Jan Drew. Talk *at* or *about* but not with her. Change the
subject when appropriate. If everyone followed this suggestion it would
lead to a much better situation in this newsgroup. It is really too bad
that many of the posters in this group don't take my very reasonable
suggestion.



Agreed. I wil lbe adjusting my style.

[btw, cathyb,Susan Dores, Nana Weedliller and Vashti all agreed]. Ha!


http://groups.google.com/group/misc....694656a?hl=en&

Jul 23 2005

LadyLollipop wrote:
*Agreed. I wil lbe adjusting my style.*


yes, I am adjusting it..fine tuning it...I do not need much to get iot
better...

That WAS a proven lie!

In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a
Suspended Attorney, Respondent.
Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

92-02731

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT

183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747

November 9, 1992, Decided

PRIOR HISTORY: [***1]

Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the
Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on
February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme
Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S.
Probert.

DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline
upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is
granted; and it is further,

HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings

Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to
cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance
Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred.

COUNSEL:

Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for
petitioner.

JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ.,
concur.

Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the
respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and
it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately,
the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken
from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's
rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned
attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law § 90, the respondent,
Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from
practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or
employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or
counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission
or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to
the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4)
from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and
counselor-at-law.

OPINIONBY: Per Curiam.

OPINION: [*282]

[**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29,
1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the
further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with
the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4,
1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and
prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent
and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee.

[**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon
the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The
petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The
motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992.
The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the
default motion.

The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate
with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of
professional misconduct.

The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a
disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has
chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must
be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent
in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly,
the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of
attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately

Source:

NY UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, ATTORNEY REGIST. UNIT

Currency Status:

ARCHIVE RECORD

NAME & PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION

Name:

MARK PROBERT

Date Of Birth:

11/XX/1946

Gender:

MALE

Address:

1698 WEBSTER AVE

MERRICK, NY 11566

County:

NASSAU

Phone:

516-968-5572

EMPLOYER INFORMATION

Employer:

MARK S PROBERT ESQ

Organization:

PERSON

LICENSING INFORMATION

Licensing Agency:

NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION

License/Certification Type:

ATTORNEY

License Number:

1253889

Issue Date:

00/00/1978

License Status:

DISBARRED

License State:

NY

"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
...


Not as big an apology as Dr Haley owes to the children who have been
damaged because their parents took his advice.


you do talk a load of ******** http://www.whale.to/v/haley.html