MERCK'S GARDASIL VACCINE NOT PROVEN SAFE FOR LITTLE GIRLS

http://www.nvic.org/PressReleases/pr62706gardasil.htm

MERCK'S GARDASIL VACCINE NOT PROVEN SAFE FOR LITTLE GIRLS
National Vaccine Information Center Criticizes
FDA for Fast Tracking Licensure

Washington, D.C. - The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is
calling on the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
(ACIP) to just say "no" on June 29 to recommending "universal use" of
Merck's Gardasil vaccine in all pre-adolescent girls. NVIC maintains
that Merck's clinical trials did not prove the human papillomavirus
(HPV) vaccine designed to prevent cervical cancer and genital warts is
safe to give to young girls.

"Merck and the FDA have not been completely honest with the people
about the pre-licensure clinical trials," said NVIC president Barbara
Loe Fisher. "Merck's pre and post-licensure marketing strategy has
positioned mass use of this vaccine by pre-teens as a morality play in
order to avoid talking about the flawed science they used to get it
licensed. This is not just about teenagers having sex, it is also
about whether Gardasil has been proven safe and effective for little
girls."

The FDA allowed Merck to use a potentially reactive aluminum
containing placebo as a control for most trial participants, rather
than a non-reactive saline solution placebo.[1] A reactive placebo can
artificially increase the appearance of safety of an experimental drug
or vaccine in a clinical trial. Gardasil contains 225 mcg of aluminum
and, although aluminum adjuvants have been used in vaccines for
decades, they were never tested for safety in clinical trials. Merck
and the FDA did not disclose how much aluminum was in the placebo.[2]

Animal and human studies have shown that aluminum can cause nerve cell
death [3] and that vaccine aluminum adjuvants can allow aluminum to
enter the brain, [4 5] as well as cause inflammation at the injection
site leading to chronic joint and muscle pain and fatigue. [6 7]
Nearly 90 percent of Gardasil recipients and 85 percent of aluminum
placebo recipients followed-up for safety reported one or more adverse
events within 15 days of vaccination, particularly at the injection
site.[8] Pain and swelling at injection site occurred in approximately
83 percent of Gardasil and 73 percent of aluminum placebo recipients.
About 60 percent of those who got Gardasil or the aluminum placebo had
systemic adverse events including headache, fever, nausea, dizziness,
vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia. [9 10] Gardasil recipients had more
serious adverse events such as headache, gastroenteritis,
appendicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, asthma, bronchospasm and
arthritis.

"Merck and the FDA do not reveal in public documents exactly how many
9 to 15 year old girls were in the clinical trials, how many of them
received hepatitis B vaccine and Gardasil simultaneously, and how many
of them had serious adverse events after being injected with Gardasil
or the aluminum placebo. For example, if there were less than 1,000
little girls actually injected with three doses of Gardasil, it is
important to know how many had serious adverse events and how long
they were followed for chronic health problems, such as juvenile
arthritis."

According to the Merck product manufacturer insert, there was 1 case
of juvenile arthritis, 2 cases of rheumatoid arthritis, 5 cases of
arthritis, and 1 case of reactive arthritis out of 11,813 Gardasil
recipients plus 1 case of lupus and 2 cases of arthritis out of 9,701
participants primarily receiving an aluminum containing placebo.
Clinical trial investigators dismissed most of the 102 Gardasil and
placebo associated serious adverse events, including 17 deaths, that
occurred in the clinical trials as unrelated.

"There is too little long term safety and efficacy data, especially in
young girls, and too little labeling information on contraindications
for the CDC to recommend Gardasil for universal use, which is a signal
for states to mandate it," said Fisher. "Nobody at Merck, the CDC or
FDA know if the injection of Gardasil into all pre-teen girls -
especially simultaneously with hepatitis B vaccine - will make some of
them more likely to develop arthritis or other inflammatory autoimmune
and brain disorders as teenagers and adults. With cervical cancer
causing about one percent of all cancer deaths in American women due
to routine pap screening, it was inappropriate for the FDA to fast
track Gardasil. It is way too early to direct all young girls to get
three doses of a vaccine that has not been proven safe or effective in
their age group."

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), founded in 1982 by
parents of vaccine injured children, has been a leading critic of
one-size-fits-all mass vaccination policies and the lack of basic
science research into biological mechanisms and high risk factors for
vaccine-induced brain and immune system dysfunction. As a member of
the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee
(VRBPAC), Barbara Loe Fisher urged trials include adequate safety data
on pre-adolescent children and warned against fast tracking Gardasil
at the November 28-29, 2001 VRBPAC meeting .[11]

Full 2001 FDA Transcript:
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/cber01.htm#Vaccines & Related
Biological

For more information go to www.NVIC.org.

-end-

1. Merck & Co., Inc. 2006. Gardasil [Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus
Types 6,11,16,18) Recombinant Vaccine] product insert. Table 6.

2. Food and Drug Administration. May 18, 2006. FDA Background Document
for Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee:
Gardasil HPV Quadrivalent Vaccine.

3. Kawahara M et al. 2001. Effects of aluminum on the neurotoxicty of
primary cultured neurons and on the aggregation of betamyloid protein.
Brain Res. Bull. 55, 211-217.

4. Redhead K. et al. 1992. Aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines transiently
increase aluminum levels in murine brain tissue. Pharmacol. Toxico.
70, 278-280.

5. Sahin G. et al. 1994. Determination of aluminum levels in the
kidney, liver and brain of mice treated with aluminum hydroxide. Biol.
Trace. Elem. Res. 1194 Apr-May;41 (1-2):129-35.

6. Gherardi M et al. 2001. Macrophagaic myofastitis lesions assess
long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminum hydroxide in muscle.
Brain, Vol 124, No. 9, 1821-1831.

7. Shingde M eta la. 2005. Macrophagic myofastitis associated with
vaccine derived aluminum. MJA, 183 (03):145-146.

8. Merck & Co. May 18, 2006. Merck briefing document for Vaccines and
Related Biological Products Advisory Committee: Gardasil. Table 24.

9. Merck & Co., Inc. 2006. Gardasil product insert: Serious Adverse
Experiences.

10. Food and Drug Administration. May 18, 2006. FDA Background
Document for Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory
Committee.: Gardasil. Table 32.

11. Food and Drug Administration. November 29, 2001. Vaccines and
Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. Excerpt from
transcript.

Ilena Rose wrote:
http://www.nvic.org/PressReleases/pr62706gardasil.htm

MERCK'S GARDASIL VACCINE NOT PROVEN SAFE FOR LITTLE GIRLS
National Vaccine Information Center Criticizes
FDA for Fast Tracking Licensure

The NVIC should be renamed "the National Antivaccine Disinformation
Center" IMHO.

I have seen this garbage before. Reposting does not make it true.

Jeff

Copyrighted material deleted.

"Jeff" wrote in message
news:XgDAi.13014$OM1.7133@trnddc07...

The NVIC should be renamed "the National Antivaccine Disinformation
Center" IMHO.


See yourself in others pharma boy.


http://www.vaccineawakening.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, August 15, 2007
NVIC Analysis Shows Greater Risk of GBS Reports

NVIC Analysis Shows Greater Risk of GBS Reports When
HPV Vaccine Is Given with Meningococcal and Other Vaccines

Washington, August 15, 2007 - The National Vaccine Information Center
(NVIC) today issued a new report on HPV vaccine (Gardasil®) safety
analyzing adverse event reports to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System (VAERS). The analysis gives evidence for a reported
association in VAERS between Gardasil and Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS),
with a statistically significant increased risk of GBS and other serious
adverse event reports when Gardasil is co-administered with other vaccines,
especially meningococcal vaccine (Menactra®).

NVIC is calling on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to issue an
Advisory and amend its March 12 policy by alerting the public that Gardasil
has been associated with 15 cases of GBS and an increased risk of GBS and
other serious adverse event reports made to VAERS when the vaccine is
administered simultaneously with Menactra and other vaccines. "The
precautionary principle dictates that good science should precede CDC
vaccine policy recommendations," said Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC co-founder
and president. "Parents have a right to expect proof of safety and not
assumption of safety before new vaccines, like Gardasil, are given
simultaneously with other vaccines to their children.

GBS is a disorder in which the body's immune system attacks part of the
peripheral nervous system, and can cause total paralysis. "Our analysis of
Gardasil reports to VAERS indicates there was a two to 12 times greater
likelihood that serious adverse events, such as GBS, were reported when
Gardasil was given in combination with Menactra rather than given alone,"
said Vicky Debold, PhD, RN, NVIC director of patient safety. "Accepted
scientific standards indicate that these findings are statistically
significant and cannot be dismissed as coincidence. In particular, the
available VAERS data show there was a more than 1,000 percent increased
risk of GBS reports following Gardasil administration when Menactra was
given at the same time."

Reported GBS and Other Serious Adverse Events

NVIC found that, as of May 31, there have been 2,227 Gardasil adverse
events filed with VAERS, including 13 suspected or confirmed cases of GBS
(two more GBS reports were made in June for a total of 15) and 239 cases of
syncope (fainting with temporary loss of consciousness), many of which
resulted in head injuries and fractures. Seven deaths have been reported
after receipt of Gardasil. Nearly 10 percent of all Gardasil adverse event
reports to VAERS involved avoidable medical errors.

A total of 1,930 reported Gardasil adverse events involved administration
of Gardasil alone, and 135 adverse events involved co-administration of
Gardasil with Menactra. NVIC's comparative analysis of those two categories
of VAERS reports indicates that when Gardasil was given simultaneously with
Menactra rather than alone, there was a statistically significant increased
risk of reported adverse events:

*respiratory problem reports increased by 114 percent;
*cardiac problems reports increased by 118 percent;
*neuromuscular and coordination problem reports increased by 234 percent;
*convulsions and central nervous system problem reports increased by 301
percent;
*reports of injuries from falls after unconsciousness increased by 674
percent; and
*GBS reports increased by 1,130 percent.

On February 21, NVIC expressed concern about the safety of administering
Gardasil simultaneously with other vaccines because the manufacturer
(Merck), the FDA and the CDC had not provided evidence to the public that
co-administration was safe. (1) On March 12, the CDC published
recommendations for Gardasil use in MMWR that acknowledged there is a lack
of evidence that Gardasil can be safely administered with other vaccines,
while encouraging physicians to co-administer Menactra and other vaccines
with Gardasil based on assumption of safety. (2)

Adverse Event Reports to NVIC: Shannon Nelson

Nineteen Gardasil adverse event reports from 12 states have been made to
NVIC's Vaccine Reaction Registry involving unconsciousness and injury,
convulsions, numbness, weakness and other neuromuscular and coordination
problems and GBS.

Shannon Nelson, 18, a Chicago area athlete, musician and artist entering
college reported to NVIC that she received HPV vaccine (Gardasil),
meningococcal vaccine (Menactra) and chicken pox vaccine (Varivax ®)
simultaneously on June 21. Symptoms of tingling, numbness and muscle
weakness began within a week and progressively got worse. By July 3 she
could barely walk or raise her arms. She was hospitalized, paralyzed with
GBS on July 5, and spent 22 days in the hospital.

"Before the shots, I ran six miles a day," said Nelson. "The doctors told
me that I might have been put on a respirator if I hadn't been in such good
shape," she said. "I am out of the hospital now and getting a lot of
physical therapy. I just want to go to college and do the things I did
before, like play the guitar and draw or even just be able to smile. My Mom
and I wish we had known about HPV vaccine risks, especially what could
happen if I got other vaccines at the same time."


To view a copy of NVIC's report on HPV vaccine (Gardasil) safety, go to
http://www.nvic.org/Diseases/HPV/HPVHOME.htm. To report a vaccine reaction,
go to https://www.nvic.org/report/reaction.htm

Naturopath and Iridologist Michael Blake, of Natures Cure Pty Ltd in
Dandenong, Melbourne (web site
http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/6025) is very concerned at
what he has seen in the irises of four girls recently and his conscience
will not allow him to stay silent.

In the area of the iris that corresponds to the uterus, in three of the
girls he saw tissue damage, and in the fourth he saw drug residue. In each
of the four cases, on reporting back to the patient what he was observing,
he was informed that the girl had recently received the cervical cancer
vaccine. All were virgins.

Tissue damage in the uterus is what he sees in women who have had such
things as abortions and prolapses, and can be a precursor to cancer. It can
also cause infertility - as it can prevent the embryo from being able to
hold on to the uterus wall. It also often results in lack of sensitivity
with sexual intercourse, pain, discomfort and/or frequent discharges.

Note that it has already been observed that one of the ingredients in the
vaccine, polysorbate 80, has been observed to cause infertility in mice.
Add to that borax, which is used to kill ants, add neurotoxic immune system
sensitiser aluminium hydroxyphosphate, and directly inject all of that and
any viral material (which is not proven to be in a harmless form) past the
very important natural lines of defence in the immune system, then what do
you think we are asking for, trouble or protection? I can't tell you what
to do - you must figure it out for yourself.

Note also that the primary owners of the main pharmaceutical companies,
including the manufacturer of this vaccine, are the extremely wealthy and
powerful Rockefeller family. It is well documented that this family prefers
to work behind the scenes, and they have also expressed a strong belief in
population control. David Icke in his book entitled, "... and the truth
shall set you free", wrote:


'In 1952, after decades of funding and supporting eugenics, John D.
Rockefeller III established his Population Council, which still exists
today. This Elite front has been calling for zero population growth in the
United States and, in the words of its 1979 annual report: ... "the spread
of the zero population movement... in the developed countries." '

In the population control agenda there does seem to be a particular
interest in reducing the population of those of what is considered "lesser
stock" (see http://www.thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm), yet all sections of
the community are encouraged to receive the vaccine, but do you know which
schools and localities are getting which batches of vaccine? Something to
think about.

By the way, as all other vaccines, no proper placebo-controlled studies
have been done with this vaccine. The so-called placebo group receives an
injection of aluminium hydroxyphosphate "and everything else present in the
adjuvant", according to the contact researcher for the major trials. Why
don't they receive an inactive substance, which is what a placebo is
defined to be? Apparently because, in the understanding of this researcher,
"In vaccine trials,... (it) is usual, good clinical practice, to give
adjuvant to the placebo arm." So what are these researchers
(manufacturer-funded, of course) so afraid of, that they will not give a
proper placebo to the placebo group?

JOHN wrote:
Naturopath and Iridologist Michael Blake, of Natures Cure Pty Ltd in
Dandenong, Melbourne (web site
http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/6025) is very concerned at
what he has seen in the irises of four girls recently and his conscience
will not allow him to stay silent.

The problem with this is that iridology and naturopathy are totally
worthless and not backed by any science.

Therefore, Blake's comments are useless, as well.

Jeff

Rest of crap deleted.

"Jeff" wrote in message
news:xmDBi.8806$CO5.7708@trndny01...

worthless and not backed by any science.

Therefore, Blake's comments are useless, as well.

You mean it isn't Allopathic medicine.

Too right, would be useless if it was

http://www.whale.to/a/iridology_h.html

"JOHN" wrote:

Naturopath and Iridologist Michael Blake, of Natures Cure Pty Ltd in
Dandenong, Melbourne (web site
http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/6025) is very concerned at
what he has seen in the irises of four girls recently and his conscience
will not allow him to stay silent.

A quack with a conscience. What a concept!


In the area of the iris that corresponds to the uterus, in three of the
girls he saw tissue damage, and in the fourth he saw drug residue. In each
of the four cases, on reporting back to the patient what he was observing,
he was informed that the girl had recently received the cervical cancer
vaccine. All were virgins.

How did he determine that they were virgins? Did he do a physical
examination, did he just ask them (in front of their mothers), or did
he look for the presence of a hymen spot on the iris and note that it
was missing or showing evidence of "tissue damage"?

Of course, to a thinking person it is good that those who are given
most protection by the vaccine are getting it.


Tissue damage in the uterus is what he sees in women who have had such
things as abortions and prolapses, and can be a precursor to cancer. It can
also cause infertility - as it can prevent the embryo from being able to
hold on to the uterus wall. It also often results in lack of sensitivity
with sexual intercourse, pain, discomfort and/or frequent discharges.

Does he do iridological Pap smears as well?


Note that it has already been observed that one of the ingredients in the
vaccine, polysorbate 80, has been observed to cause infertility in mice.
Add to that borax, which is used to kill ants, add neurotoxic immune system
sensitiser aluminium hydroxyphosphate, and directly inject all of that and
any viral material (which is not proven to be in a harmless form) past the
very important natural lines of defence in the immune system, then what do
you think we are asking for, trouble or protection? I can't tell you what
to do - you must figure it out for yourself.

In this case, you get protection against a disease which kills a
quarter of a million women each year.


Note also that the primary owners of the main pharmaceutical companies,
including the manufacturer of this vaccine, are the extremely wealthy and
powerful Rockefeller family.

Both Merck and CSL are public companies. In the case of CSL (the
developer of the original vaccine), the share register is publicly
available. How many Rockefellers are on the list?

It is well documented that this family prefers
to work behind the scenes, and they have also expressed a strong belief in
population control. David Icke in his book entitled, "... and the truth
shall set you free", wrote:

BWAWAWAWAHAHAHAHA!!! David Icke!!! The man who thinks that Prince
Charles is a lizard.

snip remaining drivel

Disclaimer: I own a genuine Jensen iridology wall chart. This almost
makes me an iridologist.
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
...
"JOHN" wrote:

Naturopath and Iridologist Michael Blake, of Natures Cure Pty Ltd in
Dandenong, Melbourne (web site
http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/6025) is very concerned at
what he has seen in the irises of four girls recently and his conscience
will not allow him to stay silent.

A quack with a conscience. What a concept!


In the area of the iris that corresponds to the uterus, in three of the
girls he saw tissue damage, and in the fourth he saw drug residue. In each
of the four cases, on reporting back to the patient what he was observing,
he was informed that the girl had recently received the cervical cancer
vaccine. All were virgins.

How did he determine that they were virgins? Did he do a physical
examination, did he just ask them (in front of their mothers), or did
he look for the presence of a hymen spot on the iris and note that it
was missing or showing evidence of "tissue damage"?

Of course, to a thinking person it is good that those who are given
most protection by the vaccine are getting it.


Tissue damage in the uterus is what he sees in women who have had such
things as abortions and prolapses, and can be a precursor to cancer. It
can
also cause infertility - as it can prevent the embryo from being able to
hold on to the uterus wall. It also often results in lack of sensitivity
with sexual intercourse, pain, discomfort and/or frequent discharges.

Does he do iridological Pap smears as well?


Note that it has already been observed that one of the ingredients in the
vaccine, polysorbate 80, has been observed to cause infertility in mice.
Add to that borax, which is used to kill ants, add neurotoxic immune
system
sensitiser aluminium hydroxyphosphate, and directly inject all of that and
any viral material (which is not proven to be in a harmless form) past the
very important natural lines of defence in the immune system, then what do
you think we are asking for, trouble or protection? I can't tell you what
to do - you must figure it out for yourself.

In this case, you get protection against a disease which kills a
quarter of a million women each year.


Note also that the primary owners of the main pharmaceutical companies,
including the manufacturer of this vaccine, are the extremely wealthy and
powerful Rockefeller family.

Both Merck and CSL are public companies. In the case of CSL (the
developer of the original vaccine), the share register is publicly
available. How many Rockefellers are on the list?

It is well documented that this family prefers
to work behind the scenes, and they have also expressed a strong belief in
population control. David Icke in his book entitled, "... and the truth
shall set you free", wrote:

BWAWAWAWAHAHAHAHA!!! David Icke!!! The man who thinks that Prince
Charles is a lizard.

snip remaining drivel

Disclaimer: I own a genuine Jensen iridology wall chart. This almost
makes me an iridologist.
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
IDIOT!

"t" wrote in message
...

"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
...
"JOHN" wrote:

Naturopath and Iridologist Michael Blake, of Natures Cure Pty Ltd in
Dandenong, Melbourne (web site
http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/6025) is very concerned
at
what he has seen in the irises of four girls recently and his conscience
will not allow him to stay silent.

A quack with a conscience. What a concept!


In the area of the iris that corresponds to the uterus, in three of the
girls he saw tissue damage, and in the fourth he saw drug residue. In
each
of the four cases, on reporting back to the patient what he was
observing,
he was informed that the girl had recently received the cervical cancer
vaccine. All were virgins.

How did he determine that they were virgins? Did he do a physical
examination, did he just ask them (in front of their mothers), or did
he look for the presence of a hymen spot on the iris and note that it
was missing or showing evidence of "tissue damage"?

Of course, to a thinking person it is good that those who are given
most protection by the vaccine are getting it.


Tissue damage in the uterus is what he sees in women who have had such
things as abortions and prolapses, and can be a precursor to cancer. It
can
also cause infertility - as it can prevent the embryo from being able to
hold on to the uterus wall. It also often results in lack of sensitivity
with sexual intercourse, pain, discomfort and/or frequent discharges.

Does he do iridological Pap smears as well?


Note that it has already been observed that one of the ingredients in the
vaccine, polysorbate 80, has been observed to cause infertility in mice.
Add to that borax, which is used to kill ants, add neurotoxic immune
system
sensitiser aluminium hydroxyphosphate, and directly inject all of that
and
any viral material (which is not proven to be in a harmless form) past
the
very important natural lines of defence in the immune system, then what
do
you think we are asking for, trouble or protection? I can't tell you what
to do - you must figure it out for yourself.

In this case, you get protection against a disease which kills a
quarter of a million women each year.


Note also that the primary owners of the main pharmaceutical companies,
including the manufacturer of this vaccine, are the extremely wealthy and
powerful Rockefeller family.

Both Merck and CSL are public companies. In the case of CSL (the
developer of the original vaccine), the share register is publicly
available. How many Rockefellers are on the list?

It is well documented that this family prefers
to work behind the scenes, and they have also expressed a strong belief
in
population control. David Icke in his book entitled, "... and the truth
shall set you free", wrote:

BWAWAWAWAHAHAHAHA!!! David Icke!!! The man who thinks that Prince
Charles is a lizard.

snip remaining drivel

Disclaimer: I own a genuine Jensen iridology wall chart. This almost
makes me an iridologist.
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com IDIOT!

IDIOT!

Jeff wrote:
JOHN wrote:
Naturopath and Iridologist Michael Blake, of Natures Cure Pty Ltd in
Dandenong, Melbourne (web site
http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/6025) is very
concerned at
what he has seen in the irises of four girls recently and his conscience
will not allow him to stay silent.

The problem with this is that iridology and naturopathy are totally
worthless and not backed by any science.

Therefore, Blake's comments are useless, as well.

Jeff

Rest of crap deleted.


If iridology were valid, then iris scans for security purposes would be
worthless.