If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The "I have a dream" Organization Teaches Chivalry
"Bob" wrote in message
... jitney wrote: Did you forget to take your meds today, Fair? Feminist definition: "taking meds" -- adj. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism. See "sick." Usually used as an ad-hominem attack. Translation: "You're right on, but I won't admit it." The repetition here tells me that you're not quite on the ball. But what you repeat tells me also that you haven't quite seen behind the "curtain". There is actually nothing wrong with "seeking professional help", although it's seen as a sign of weakness. Let's face it, I wouldn't want a surgeon to represent me in court, any more than I'd want a lawyer to operate on me. Both professionals, although the surgeon may be marginally cheaper. Kapisch? D. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
The "I have a dream" Organization Teaches Chivalry
Diogenes wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message ... Apart from that, on the face of it, it's you who appears to be in need of help. Please amplify. Another classic femroid post. Whose post? Mine or his? If mine, you have no cue on my stance on feminism, or anything else. If his, I would say that it speaks largely for itself, in that it lacks focus and articularcy as to the core of his argument. As to seeking professional help, I do provide that on a daily basis, although not usually in Usenet. And I don't judge "difference" as "sick", as you seem to imply. Can you clarify, please? D. From the list of classic feminist responses. "In need of help" is equal to "seek professional help." Also "sick." "taking meds," "consult a psychiatrist," etc. Yep, your previous post was a classic feminist ad-hominem attack. Here on soc.men we keep a list of the more commmon old tired femnist hate tactics. That is one of them. Feminist definition: "seek professional help" -- adj. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism. Also "consult a psychiatrist." Usually used as an ad-hominem attack. Translation: "You're right on, but I won't admit it." See "sick." Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The "I have a dream" Organization Teaches Chivalry
dragonlady wrote:
In article , Bob wrote: jitney wrote: Did you forget to take your meds today, Fair? Feminist definition: "taking meds" -- adj. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism. See "sick." Usually used as an ad-hominem attack. Translation: "You're right on, but I won't admit it." Seriously, you need professional help. I don't think your post is a joke because it isn't funny. The longer you put off getting help, the more miserable is the life you are going to live.-Jitney Feminist definition: "seek professional help" -- adj. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism. Also "consult a psychiatrist." Usually used as an ad-hominem attack. Translation: "You're right on, but I won't admit it." See "sick." Sometimes, I think you must have some sort of robot responder thing going one; do you have this stuff in a quick file that allows you to just post by hitting, say, "response 1-A"? It would be nice to see SOMETHING original from you. meh Yep, responding to the same old tired femroid hate that they have been spewing for the past 50 years does get old. You'd think the femroids of today would realize that it hasn't worked since their bigot mom was shunned for trying it. Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The "I have a dream" Organization Teaches Chivalry
Diogenes wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message ... jitney wrote: Did you forget to take your meds today, Fair? Feminist definition: "taking meds" -- adj. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism. See "sick." Usually used as an ad-hominem attack. Translation: "You're right on, but I won't admit it." The repetition here tells me that you're not quite on the ball. But what you repeat tells me also that you haven't quite seen behind the "curtain". There is actually nothing wrong with "seeking professional help", although it's seen as a sign of weakness. Let's face it, I wouldn't want a surgeon to represent me in court, any more than I'd want a lawyer to operate on me. Both professionals, although the surgeon may be marginally cheaper. Kapisch? D. There is a LOT wrong with the common feminist hate tactics of attacking the person because he won't kowtow to their anti-men hate program. "Not quite on the ball" is another way to say the same old tired hate. Shame on you and the horse you rode in on. Whatever newsgroup you're from, we have the common ones listed her on soc.men, and generally ignore them except for pointing out the classic hate dogma you post. Those old lies don't fly any more. Your repetition of 50 year old hate propaganda insults shows you and your femroid friends haven't learned a single thing in 50 years. It may have worked for your mother, but it's so old and so dusty that it's now in our list of standard femroid hate tactics. That same old hate doesn't fly here. We've heard it all so many times before. Go pound sand, toots. Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ [Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
The "I have a dream" Organization Teaches Chivalry
"Bob" wrote in message
... Diogenes wrote: "Bob" wrote in message ... Apart from that, on the face of it, it's you who appears to be in need of help. Please amplify. Another classic femroid post. Whose post? Mine or his? If mine, you have no cue on my stance on feminism, or anything else. If his, I would say that it speaks largely for itself, in that it lacks focus and articularcy as to the core of his argument. As to seeking professional help, I do provide that on a daily basis, although not usually in Usenet. And I don't judge "difference" as "sick", as you seem to imply. Can you clarify, please? D. From the list of classic feminist responses. "In need of help" is equal to "seek professional help." Also "sick." "taking meds," "consult a psychiatrist," etc. Yep, your previous post was a classic feminist ad-hominem attack. Here on soc.men we keep a list of the more commmon old tired femnist hate tactics. That is one of them. I am not a feminist. Neither am I an hominist. I help people, as they are, not as they are labelled. I do not attack, unless attack is justified. For example, I challenge racism, sexism, etc., but I do so not by meaningless insults, but by pointing up the logical and cultural fallacies in such points of view. Do you have a problem with that? D. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The "I have a dream" Organization Teaches Chivalry
"Bob" wrote in message
... Diogenes wrote: "Bob" wrote in message ... jitney wrote: Did you forget to take your meds today, Fair? Feminist definition: "taking meds" -- adj. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism. See "sick." Usually used as an ad-hominem attack. Translation: "You're right on, but I won't admit it." The repetition here tells me that you're not quite on the ball. But what you repeat tells me also that you haven't quite seen behind the "curtain". There is actually nothing wrong with "seeking professional help", although it's seen as a sign of weakness. Let's face it, I wouldn't want a surgeon to represent me in court, any more than I'd want a lawyer to operate on me. Both professionals, although the surgeon may be marginally cheaper. Kapisch? D. There is a LOT wrong with the common feminist hate tactics of attacking the person because he won't kowtow to their anti-men hate program. I don't think you have a clue about what "feminist hate tactics" are about; in fact, I think you are still stuck in the Dworkin axis of the mid-1990s. Feminism has moved forwards a lot since then, and although I don't fully subscribe to the Camille Paglia POV, neither do I accept the Naomi Wolf POV either. "Not quite on the ball" is another way to say the same old tired hate. Shame on you and the horse you rode in on. Not at all. Cite your sources, or be damned into the ignorance you display so eloquently. Whatever newsgroup you're from, we have the common ones listed her on soc.men, and generally ignore them except for pointing out the classic hate dogma you post. Those old lies don't fly any more. The rest of us have moved on since the 1970s. You're out of time, old boy. I'm not as much into hate as much as you seem to be. Time to grow up, perhaps? When you're up to date with current thinking, either feminist, humanist, or realist, please feel free to contribute. Until then, please stay in your blind alley. The rest of us have moved forward. D. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The "I have a dream" Organization Teaches Chivalry
Diogenes wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message ... Diogenes wrote: "Bob" wrote in message ... Apart from that, on the face of it, it's you who appears to be in need of help. Please amplify. Another classic femroid post. Whose post? Mine or his? If mine, you have no cue on my stance on feminism, or anything else. If his, I would say that it speaks largely for itself, in that it lacks focus and articularcy as to the core of his argument. As to seeking professional help, I do provide that on a daily basis, although not usually in Usenet. And I don't judge "difference" as "sick", as you seem to imply. Can you clarify, please? D. From the list of classic feminist responses. "In need of help" is equal to "seek professional help." Also "sick." "taking meds," "consult a psychiatrist," etc. Yep, your previous post was a classic feminist ad-hominem attack. Here on soc.men we keep a list of the more commmon old tired femnist hate tactics. That is one of them. I am not a feminist. Neither am I an hominist. I help people, as they are, not as they are labelled. Hint: If it flies like a duck, and looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably not a zebra. Whether you call yourself a "feminist" or not, you use the classic feminist anti-men hate tactics on-line. I do not attack, You just did, toots. Twice in the last hour. That LIE don't fly here. unless attack is justified. For Femroids always try to justify their hate by claiming that it's "justified." If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck... "I'm not prejudice. Anyone can plainly see those people really are ******s." They change the group they hate, but the bigots still always say the same things. example, I challenge racism, sexism, etc., Babem, you ARE sexism. You have done nothing but post sexist hate since you came in here. That lie don't fly here either. Tell it to your bigot sista's in hate training (women's studies). but I do so not by meaningless insults, You have done that more than once already. You post classic feminsit hate propaganda insults. but by pointing up the logical and cultural fallacies in such points of view. Do you have a problem with that? D. "Anyone can clearly see those people really are ******s." You biggots never change. [Hint: if you want to converse, drop the feminist hate dogma and anti-men insults and say something about the topic.] Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
The "I have a dream" Organization Teaches Chivalry
Diogenes wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message ... Diogenes wrote: "Bob" wrote in message ... jitney wrote: Did you forget to take your meds today, Fair? Feminist definition: "taking meds" -- adj. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism. See "sick." Usually used as an ad-hominem attack. Translation: "You're right on, but I won't admit it." The repetition here tells me that you're not quite on the ball. But what you repeat tells me also that you haven't quite seen behind the "curtain". There is actually nothing wrong with "seeking professional help", although it's seen as a sign of weakness. Let's face it, I wouldn't want a surgeon to represent me in court, any more than I'd want a lawyer to operate on me. Both professionals, although the surgeon may be marginally cheaper. Kapisch? D. There is a LOT wrong with the common feminist hate tactics of attacking the person because he won't kowtow to their anti-men hate program. I don't think you have a clue about what "feminist hate tactics" are about; in fact, I think you are still stuck in the Dworkin axis of the mid-1990s. Feminism has moved forwards a lot since then, and although I don't fully subscribe to the Camille Paglia POV, neither do I accept the Naomi Wolf POV either. ROFLMAO!!! Your hate training (women's studies) hasn't progressed past the 1960s. You're still trying to use the same old tired tactics that didn't work for your mom. But Men have learned since the 1990s. Hate breeds and invites resentment. Your war on men is inviting counter attacks. Men from Canada to Australia, and everywhere inbetween, now celebrate Marc LePine day every year, for example. "Not quite on the ball" is another way to say the same old tired hate. Shame on you and the horse you rode in on. Not at all. Cite your sources, or be damned into the ignorance you display so eloquently. LOL. More stupid femroid nonsense. Does that work in hate class? Pound sand, toots. Whatever newsgroup you're from, we have the common ones listed her on soc.men, and generally ignore them except for pointing out the classic hate dogma you post. Those old lies don't fly any more. The rest of us have moved on since the 1970s. You're out of time, old boy. I'm not as much into hate as much as you seem to be. Time to grow up, perhaps? You haven't moved an inch. You still are posting the same ineffective hate that didn't work in the 1970s. It's as old as the hills. That's why we have it listed. Keep lying if you like. It's all published for the world to see. When you're up to date with current thinking, either feminist, humanist, or realist, please feel free to contribute. Until then, please stay in your blind alley. The rest of us have moved forward. D. LOL. The only "movement" you have done is sitting down. We get a new crop of hate training grads every year. Same old hate crap. Feminism is still hate and female domination. That's all that it has ever been, and all that it is. We don't buy your lies any more. A good feminist is a dead feminist. Bob -- When did we divide into sides? "As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/ |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
The "I have a dream" Organization Teaches Chivalry
"Bob" wrote in message
... ROFLMAO!!! Your hate training (women's studies) hasn't progressed past the 1960s. You're still trying to use the same old tired tactics that didn't work for your mom. Sorry, but every post you make shows you're a troll, and a particularaly moronic troll to boot. You don't respond argument with argument, merely more insult. In short, you're no longer worth my time. Fool! D. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
The "I have a dream" Organization Teaches Chivalry
"Diogenes" wrote in message ...
"Fair For All" wrote in message om... (jitney) wrote in message . com... Did you forget to take your meds today, Fair? Seriously, you need professional help. I don't think your post is a joke because it isn't funny. The longer you put off getting help, the more miserable is the life you are going to live.-Jitney The problem is there is no ****ing way to get help. I live in a ****ed-up society. It is the society of humans. Agreed on all three counts. Your problem is that you have trouble dealing with reality and perhaps on a day-to-day basis, if you are being serious. It is too scary to be true that the society of humans always - and in all cultures - treats [and treated] their girl children better than their boy children and that humans are the only species that do this. Yet it is true. These facts put me in a disassociative state whenever reinforced. Problem is that although I believe you have something serious to say, the way you put it isn't helping your case, which is why people might see you as a fruitcake. The society of humans always labels men/boys who express themselves "fruitcake". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chivalry = Abuse of Boy Children | Fair For All | General | 2 | May 2nd 04 02:58 AM |
| The Galloping Geranium strikes again....was.....Spanking parents get help from organization, family | Kane | General | 0 | January 2nd 04 06:37 PM |