If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Would you shoot to protect your family?
Situation-Question:
You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, a dangerous looking man with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, raises the knife, and charges. You are carrying a Glock .40 and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family. What do you do? Liberal Answer: "Well, that's not enough information to answer the question!" "Does the man look poor or oppressed? Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to attack?" "Could we run away? What does my wife think?" "Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the knife out of his hand?" "What does the law say about this situation?" "Does the Glock have an appropriate safety built into it?" "Why am I carrying a loaded gun and what kind of message does this send to society and my child!" "Is it possible he'd be happy with just killing me?" "Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he just be content to wound me?" "If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get away while he was stabbing me?" "This is all so confusing! I need to debate this with some friends for a few days to try to come to a conclusion." Conservative Answer: BANG! Texan's Answer: BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! click... (sounds of reloading). Wife: "Sweetheart, he looks like he's still moving, what do you kids think?" Son: "Mom's right Dad, I saw it too..." BANG! BANG! BANG! ! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! click. Daughter: "Nice group, Daddy! Were those the Winchester Silver Tips?" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Would you shoot to protect your family?
Chris Duvall wrote:
Situation-Question: You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, a dangerous looking man with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, raises the knife, and charges. You are carrying a Glock .40 and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family. What do you do? Liberal Answer: "Well, that's not enough information to answer the question!" ------------- Lie. [] Conservative Answer: BANG! -------------- Everyone's answer. The only differencce is whether they'd shoot him if he surrendered. Steve |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Would you shoot to protect your family?
In article , "R. Steve Walz"
wrote: Chris Duvall wrote: Situation-Question: You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, a dangerous looking man with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, raises the knife, and charges. You are carrying a Glock .40 and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family. What do you do? Liberal Answer: "Well, that's not enough information to answer the question!" ------------- Lie. [] Conservative Answer: BANG! -------------- Everyone's answer. The only differencce is whether they'd shoot him if he surrendered. Steve Humor just goes right over your head, doesn't it? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Would you shoot to protect your family?
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 00:39:10 -0500, Chris Duvall
wrote: ==Situation-Question: == ==You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and two ==small children. Suddenly, a dangerous looking man with a huge ==knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams ==obscenities, raises the knife, and charges. You are carrying a ==Glock .40 and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds ==before he reaches you and your family. What do you do? == ==Liberal Answer: == =="Well, that's not enough information to answer the question!" == =="Does the man look poor or oppressed? Have I ever done ==anything to him that would inspire him to attack?" == =="Could we run away? What does my wife think?" == =="Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the ==knife out of his hand?" == =="What does the law say about this situation?" == =="Does the Glock have an appropriate safety built into it?" == =="Why am I carrying a loaded gun and what kind of message does ==this send to society and my child!" == =="Is it possible he'd be happy with just killing me?" == =="Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he just be ==content to wound me?" == =="If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get ==away while he was stabbing me?" == =="This is all so confusing! I need to debate this with some ==friends for a few days to try to come to a conclusion." == ==Conservative Answer: ==BANG! == ==Texan's Answer: ==BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! click... ==(sounds of reloading). == ==Wife: "Sweetheart, he looks like he's still moving, what do ==you kids think?" == ==Son: "Mom's right Dad, I saw it too..." == ==BANG! BANG! BANG! ! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! click. ==Daughter: "Nice group, Daddy! Were those the Winchester ==Silver Tips?" It's telling that what you are fantasizing about here is not self-defence, but murder. If the person under attack is, as you say, an "expert shot," then he ought to be able to disable the assailant with one, or perhaps two, well-placed rounds, which might be survivable. Formal police training, in fact, teaches that the proper procedure is to discharge two quick rounds, aimed at the area of largest body mass. With a Glock 40, that should be sufficient. If not, then subsequent shots are, of course, permissible. Your little adolescent fantasy about firing repeatedly, reloading if necessary, until the assailant is dead, would generally be seen as unacceptable to anyone but a member of the New York City Police Department and would probably get you charged with murder. -- THE RULES NEVER tell the police anything. NEVER consent to a search. NEVER confess. NEVER discuss your case with others. NEVER plea bargain. ALWAYS demand a lawyer. ALWAYS plead not guilty. ALWAYS demand a full jury trial. ALWAYS appeal, if you are convicted. ALWAYS pass on these rules. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Would you shoot to protect your family?
In article , Ivan Gowch
wrote: On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 00:39:10 -0500, Chris Duvall wrote: ==Situation-Question: == ==You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and two ==small children. Suddenly, a dangerous looking man with a huge ==knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams ==obscenities, raises the knife, and charges. You are carrying a ==Glock .40 and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds ==before he reaches you and your family. What do you do? == ==Liberal Answer: == =="Well, that's not enough information to answer the question!" == =="Does the man look poor or oppressed? Have I ever done ==anything to him that would inspire him to attack?" == =="Could we run away? What does my wife think?" == =="Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the ==knife out of his hand?" == =="What does the law say about this situation?" == =="Does the Glock have an appropriate safety built into it?" == =="Why am I carrying a loaded gun and what kind of message does ==this send to society and my child!" == =="Is it possible he'd be happy with just killing me?" == =="Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he just be ==content to wound me?" == =="If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get ==away while he was stabbing me?" == =="This is all so confusing! I need to debate this with some ==friends for a few days to try to come to a conclusion." == ==Conservative Answer: ==BANG! == ==Texan's Answer: ==BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! click... ==(sounds of reloading). == ==Wife: "Sweetheart, he looks like he's still moving, what do ==you kids think?" == ==Son: "Mom's right Dad, I saw it too..." == ==BANG! BANG! BANG! ! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! click. ==Daughter: "Nice group, Daddy! Were those the Winchester ==Silver Tips?" It's telling that what you are fantasizing about here is not self-defence, but murder. Who said it's a fantasy? It's just a joke. Goddamn, some people have no sense of humor. Lighten up. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Would you shoot to protect your family?
"BTR1701" wrote in message ... It's telling that what you are fantasizing about here is not self-defence, but murder. Who said it's a fantasy? It's just a joke. Goddamn, some people have no sense of humor. Lighten up. No, it's not a joke, stupid. If you think it's a joke, then it's an obvious indication of how badly you have been ****ed up and your mind is totally warped. In fact, its far beyond the borders of perversion. Your capitalist police state have created those who'd offer a dick to other people's child by calling an "orphan". An if he'd say "I'm not an orphan", the man will pull out a gun and make him an orphan by shooting his parents. Than, after adopting him as own child, he'd pull out a dick and say "hey, son, take my dick"... That was an old, anti-capitalist-ameri**** joke... Do you see the difference now? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Would you shoot to protect your family?
(snip)
It's telling that what you are fantasizing about here is not self-defence, but murder. If the person under attack is, as you say, an "expert shot," then he ought to be able to disable the assailant with one, or perhaps two, well-placed rounds, which might be survivable. Formal police training, in fact, teaches that the proper procedure is to discharge two quick rounds, aimed at the area of largest body mass. With a Glock 40, that should be sufficient. If not, then subsequent shots are, of course, permissible. Your little adolescent fantasy about firing repeatedly, reloading if necessary, until the assailant is dead, would generally be seen as unacceptable to anyone but a member of the New York City Police Department and would probably get you charged with murder. First of all, I believe the message was a JOKE. That's HUMOR or FUNNY if you don't comprende. Talk about ANAL. Second of all, since you want to make it serious, you're dead wrong about shooting to "disable" someone. If you are in fear for your life or the life of another, then deadly force is justified. Being an "expert shot" is great, but not necessary, to land a couple of slugs in the assailant's center mass (middle of his chest). If you're really in FEAR, then you're not going to take the time to line up the sights and try to hit his moving leg which is running at you (and you probably won't hit anyway). You're much better off to use (for example) the Israeli technique, wherin you basically point and shoot without utilizing the sights. If you practice with this technique you'd be amazed how accurate you can be without even looking at your sights. As far as you little "dig" about the NYPD being murderers, well, you can stick it up your ass. Pin on a shield and do what we (cops) do for a day and then get back to me about shooting to disable people and other related subjects. Until you KNOW what you are talking about, don't make statements - ask questions - you'll look like less of an assclown. -- -= swatcop =- "If it wasn't for stupid people I'd be unemployed." -- -= swatcop =- "If it wasn't for stupid people I'd be unemployed." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Would you shoot to protect your family?
"_ G O D _" wrote in message news:JL8Db.704257$6C4.331515@pd7tw1no... To protect my family, I'd rip a man to pieces with my bare hands, feed the remains to wild dogs, and watch as they nourish themselves with the marrow. What do you think about that? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Would you shoot to protect your family?
In article JL8Db.704257$6C4.331515@pd7tw1no, "_ G O D _"
wrote: "BTR1701" wrote in message ... It's telling that what you are fantasizing about here is not self-defence, but murder. Who said it's a fantasy? It's just a joke. Goddamn, some people have no sense of humor. Lighten up. No, it's not a joke, stupid. If you think it's a joke, then it's an obvious indication of how badly you have been ****ed up and your mind is totally warped. In fact, its far beyond the borders of perversion. Well, we've already established that you're insane so no big surprise that you can't take a joke. Your capitalist police state have created those who'd offer a dick to other people's child by calling an "orphan". An if he'd say "I'm not an orphan", the man will pull out a gun and make him an orphan by shooting his parents. Than, after adopting him as own child, he'd pull out a dick and say "hey, son, take my dick"... See what I mean? You're just a loon. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Would you shoot to protect your family?
"_ G O D _" wrote in message news:JL8Db.704257$6C4.331515@pd7tw1no... "BTR1701" wrote in message ... It's telling that what you are fantasizing about here is not self-defence, but murder. Who said it's a fantasy? It's just a joke. Goddamn, some people have no sense of humor. Lighten up. No, it's not a joke, stupid. If you think it's a joke, then it's an obvious indication of how badly you have been ****ed up and your mind is totally warped. In fact, its far beyond the borders of perversion. Your capitalist police state have created those who'd offer a dick to other people's child by calling an "orphan". An if he'd say "I'm not an orphan", the man will pull out a gun and make him an orphan by shooting his parents. Than, after adopting him as own child, he'd pull out a dick and say "hey, son, take my dick"... That was an old, anti-capitalist-ameri**** joke... Do you see the difference now? Gee Vadiot, another who disagrees with you? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NO state PASSES CPS Federal audit-no family does, either | Fern5827 | General | 0 | September 26th 03 01:27 AM |
| Law Firm joins pro bono effort to reform foster care | Kane | General | 0 | September 25th 03 04:04 PM |
CO, Colorado DHS tries to label homeschool family neglectful | Fern5827 | General | 0 | August 22nd 03 08:18 AM |
easy part songs for family singing? | H Schinske | General | 4 | July 25th 03 09:44 PM |
Nanny needs a wonderful family in MA. | It's always something | General | 0 | July 9th 03 03:58 PM |