If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Great news!
-- Any man that's good enough to pay child support is good enough to have custody of such child. "Chris" wrote in message news:... -- Any man that's good enough to pay child support is good enough to have custody of such child. wrote in message ... On Feb 10, 2:38 pm, "Chris" wrote: -- Any man that's good enough to pay child support is good enough to have custody of such wrote in message ... On Feb 8, 3:55 pm, "Chris" wrote: -- Any man that's good enough to pay child support is good enough to have custody of such child."Phil" wrote in message news Oh, they'll pay for it, they just won't get any benefit from it. It will remain both a part of child support guidelines and as an add-on to the final bill dads must pay. He also got smokers with this one; smokers are being targeted to pay excessive taxes that benefit only non-smokers. Phil #3 Something to the tune of 24 million new smokers will be required to foot the bill. Just what the government people are hoping for, because they will make more money. Through the years, they have been consistently increasing their profits in the tobacco business. They know a good thing when they see it! "Chris" wrote in message ... -- Any man that's good enough to pay child support is good enough to have custody of such child. Now that President Obama signed the child healthcare bill, everyone who pays "child support" will no longer have to also pay additional for health insurance. Isn't that wonderful!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What they will do is instead of making it be medical support, they'll just add that amount to child support and increase it...period. Anyway, where is the link to this? **************** http://www.democrats.org/a/2009/02/p...nt_obama_4.php "But this bill is only a first step." Indeed it is! Stay tuned........ ***************** I need this...We have a horrible situation with our kiddo, where it costs us LESS money to get insurance with a 722USD deductible for our kiddo, because if we have a different plan, since we have to pay insurance for SD, the cost is MORE than the deductible of 722 per year just for her...And because our son is special needs, yes, we have ALREADY met the 722USD deductible for him in just ONE MONTH of simple speech therapy, not counting any other medical bills. By the way, no complaining about me not wanting to provide insurance for the witch's daughter...you see, the witch has insurance through her work for her, her husband and her 2 other children...adding SD didn't cost her a dime, since her insurance cost is the same for employee+family, whether it is ONE spouse or a spouse and 82 children...And no, the witch mandated he carry insurance on SD, the courts make him carry it, but in the last two years she has NOT used it ONCE because she does NOT want to have to pay any of the deductible...so she uses her insurance... ********************* Just another example of the "child support" system being NOTHING more than extorting money from men.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Chris, thanks for the link, but I don't see where it specifically says that if the courts have you paying CS AND insurance, that you no longer have to pay insurance and that CS is part of paying for it...In our case the CP has insurance through her work, so does the NCP, but I don't see where the NCP would no longer be required to pay for that insurance for his daughter...I might be a bit out of it...sorry... ************** You're not out of it at all. As you can see, my point has been made. Although it does not specifically state that NCPs would no longer have to pay, that is most definitely what it implies. The children of CPs are, afterall, ......... CHILDREN! Thus, they are included in the group of "children" covered by said insurance. Now if you apply liberal "logic" to their law, then the children of NCPs quickly become exempt. It certainly doesn't make sense to pay two insurance policies for one coverage, does it? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Great news! | Chris | Child Support | 4 | February 8th 09 09:55 PM |
Post lap appointment - great news | rangitotogirl | Pregnancy | 5 | February 5th 06 08:41 AM |
Some Great News | Seth Jackson | Twins & Triplets | 2 | September 28th 05 07:58 PM |
OT GREAT news | Dawn Lawson | Breastfeeding | 19 | February 15th 04 05:00 AM |
great news! | Vicky Bilaniuk | Pregnancy | 11 | January 29th 04 11:23 PM |