If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DOJ and Chicago Crime Commission report on JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN FAMILY COURTS
http://talkback.lancasteronline.com/...0&#entry229925
Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald of the Department of Justice working with the Chicago Crime Commission will submit the first part of their preliminary report on September 8, 2006. This first part of their report will be titled "JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN FAMILY COURTS" You heard it right. After any initial action taken by the Feds., the Chicago Crime Commission will follow up and will provide a 1-800 number to call in complaints apart from the J.I.B. Please feel free to call or write any complaints to the http://www.chicagocrimecommission.org/index.html Now is a good time..... A press conference and further press releases are planned. They are very hopeful of Attorneys coming forward to support the hundreds of victims that have already been interviewed. Let us hope they won't stop in Chicago, we need to do something to make sure they don't. Start an effort to inform the Special Counsel about the abuses in family law happening in your community today. Chicago Crime Commission 79 W. Monroe, Suite 80 Chicago, IL 60603 USA PHONE: (312) 372-0101 FAX: (312) 372-6286 Patrick J. Fitzgerald Special Counsel DOJ Chicago Office: Dirksen Federal Building 219 South Dearborn Street Fifth Floor Chicago, Illinois 60604 Washington Office: Bond Federal Building 1400 New York Avenue, NW, Ninth Floor Washington D.C. 20530 Please address all correspondence to the Washington Office |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
DOJ and Chicago Crime Commission report on JUDICIAL CORRUPTIONIN FAMILY COURTS
Greegor wrote:
http://talkback.lancasteronline.com/...0&#entry229925 Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald of the Department of Justice working with the Chicago Crime Commission will submit the first part of their preliminary report on September 8, 2006. This first part of their report will be titled "JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN FAMILY COURTS" You heard it right. After any initial action taken by the Feds., the Chicago Crime Commission will follow up and will provide a 1-800 number to call in complaints apart from the J.I.B. Please feel free to call or write any complaints to the http://www.chicagocrimecommission.org/index.html Now is a good time..... A press conference and further press releases are planned. They are very hopeful of Attorneys coming forward to support the hundreds of victims that have already been interviewed. Let us hope they won't stop in Chicago, we need to do something to make sure they don't. Start an effort to inform the Special Counsel about the abuses in family law happening in your community today. Chicago Crime Commission 79 W. Monroe, Suite 80 Chicago, IL 60603 USA PHONE: (312) 372-0101 FAX: (312) 372-6286 Patrick J. Fitzgerald Special Counsel DOJ Chicago Office: Dirksen Federal Building 219 South Dearborn Street Fifth Floor Chicago, Illinois 60604 Washington Office: Bond Federal Building 1400 New York Avenue, NW, Ninth Floor Washington D.C. 20530 Please address all correspondence to the Washington Office Prediction: They'll be flooded with calls from yahoos and crackpots just like you, Greg, and of course with abusive parents in deep denial. You'll claim there is a HUGE corruption going on without waiting for the results of the investigation, as you ****ants always do. But you are worth a chuckle. So, chuckle, 0:- 0:- -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
DOJ and Chicago Crime Commission report on JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN FAMILY COURTS
Kane wrote
Prediction: They'll be flooded with calls from yahoos and crackpots just like you, Greg, and of course with abusive parents in deep denial. You'll claim there is a HUGE corruption going on without waiting for the results of the investigation, as you ****ants always do. But you are worth a chuckle. So, chuckle, Tell it to US Judge Pallmeyer. Maybe she'll retract her DUPUY ruling that Illinois Child Protection is unconstitutional. chuckle |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
DOJ and Chicago Crime Commission report on JUDICIAL CORRUPTIONIN FAMILY COURTS
Greegor wrote:
Kane wrote Prediction: They'll be flooded with calls from yahoos and crackpots just like you, Greg, and of course with abusive parents in deep denial. You'll claim there is a HUGE corruption going on without waiting for the results of the investigation, as you ****ants always do. But you are worth a chuckle. So, chuckle, Tell it to US Judge Pallmeyer. Maybe she'll retract her DUPUY ruling that Illinois Child Protection is unconstitutional. chuckle chuckle That's not what Judge Pallmeyer ruled, Greg. The judge ruled on a single issue being unconstitutional and in fact did NOT fault CPS in general except for that one area. But then that's what judicial rulings are about. Judges, and other relatively honest people, unlike you, tend to NOT try to generalize a single failing in one area to be totally inclusive making the subject out to be villains. AS YOU DO. "The court's initial decision on March 30, 2001 found several aspects of the DCFS investigative processes unconstitutional." That would be their investigative process, not DCFS itself, as you claim. Why, Greg, would you lie like that? Most of us here are very familiar with the Pallmeyer ruling. You cite it yet you don't understand it, as usual. Here, I'll educate you again, sigh: "Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer held that DCFS guilt determinations were based on a "practically nominal" standard of "credible evidence" that did not require investigators to gather evidence that might prove a child care professional was innocent of abuse or neglect allegations against him or her." The above is the issue, Greg, not DCFS in general. YOU, of course must maintain your fiction "pretending to claim" the this agency in Illinois is totally corrupt and unconstitutional on its very existence. Why would you lie like that, other than you are stupid dip**** with delusions of grandeur and a belief that YOU are important in some way you are not? All the ruling did was make it possible for (and I've said repeatedly that I support citizens RIGHTS, so your chuckle is rather stupid) for an accused person to appeal the registry entry. AND stupid, they can lose that appeal based on evidence and the judges ruling in their specific case. All Pallmeyer has done is reiterate the Constitution. It's nice, but it's not a blanket indictment of ALL OF ILLINOIS DCFS. But you have to have your delusions. My bet is you have not even read the Pallmeyer decision, Greg. Here, enlighten yourself: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/JUDGE/P...OPIN/dupuy.pdf Note: Among things you tend to overlook when you get all woodie, boy: "Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction is therefore granted in part and denied in part." Do you understand that statement by the judge? It means that not even the claims by the "litigant" plaintiff were agreed with in full. And for a judge that YOU claim held DCFS to be "unconstitutional" (you silly exaggerating twit) she certainly let them off lightly: "The court will not, however, dictate a remedy or draft revisions to the regulatory structure. Instead, it directs the parties themselves to develop a workable solution , and present it to the court, within 60 days." It has been noted also that DCFS had already instituted one of the solutions some two years previously and was being judged by Pallmeyer on actions corrected over two years ago. You really should read more, Greg. "3. Effective March 1, 1996, DCFS promulgated regulations which directed ALJs to apply a “preponderance of the evidence” standard in administrative hearing recommendations. The new regulations direct the Director of DCFS to apply this same “preponderance of the evidence” standard when reviewing the ALJ’s recommended decision. (ILL. ADMIN. CODE tit . 89, §§ 336.120(h), 336.150(a).)" This memorandum and order (not a judicial "finding" at all) was dated 2001, and the regulations cited above, 1996. The corrections on this issue had already been instituted. You babble a lot, study not at all. In fact, if I were the mean sort you are, I'd point out that if you read the entire document carefully you'll find clearly where a crony of yours has lied, or spread his ignorant kant in this newsgroup. It's about what child abuse investigators are, and their duties, stupid. Learn to think for yourself and gather your OWN information not let someone else interpret for you. I keep giving you the chance, and you keep running back to spin artists and those with sick agendas to tell you what to think, while patting your little pointy head and reassuring you that you are "thinking for yourself." Why is that, I wonder. In the judges order, Greg, do you know what else she said? She requires that DCFS do BETTER INVESTIGATION because she recognizes the child's rights to be free of harm. She mentions that the real perps may escape being uncovered and the children exposed to them unsafely. A constant balancing act for CPS, Greg. Do you know what that takes, Greg? More better trained investigators. Do you know what THAT takes, Greg? Yet another judge that agrees with me. 0:- -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
DOJ and Chicago Crime Commission report on JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN FAMILY COURTS
Kane wrote
"Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer held that DCFS guilt determinations were based on a "practically nominal" standard of "credible evidence" that did not require investigators to gather evidence that might prove a child care professional was innocent of abuse or neglect allegations against him or her." You say this is just one issue. Is there any other issue which doesn't hinge on this issue? A shabby, unjust finding would be at the core of everything else! Kane, this is at the very CENTER of what the agency does! That is why she put a Consent Decree on them, only to find they already had one from ten years prior, that they never satisfied. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
DOJ and Chicago Crime Commission report on JUDICIAL CORRUPTIONIN FAMILY COURTS
Greegor wrote:
Kane wrote "Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer held that DCFS guilt determinations were based on a "practically nominal" standard of "credible evidence" that did not require investigators to gather evidence that might prove a child care professional was innocent of abuse or neglect allegations against him or her." You say this is just one issue. Is there any other issue which doesn't hinge on this issue? Good boy, Greg! Good boy! You may one day learn to consistently debate honestly. You made a solid point there. Celebrate it. It's not exactly to the point YOU tried to make that I responded to but it's SOOOO much better than you usually do. Yes, you are right, it IS at the core, but it does NOT make the other actions of CPS unconstitutional by default. 0:- Your claims was she declared DCFS "unconstitutional." Now if you want to CORRECT your statement, feel free. It would allow us to debate with a much clearer subject and exchange. A shabby, unjust finding would be at the core of everything else! No, actually it would not. Because YOU generalized to ALL DCFS, Greg. Most cases would not be unconsitutional. Nor shabby. You did not see a flurry of them, you saw ONE. Your are right for that ONE case. And any others you can come up with. Kane, this is at the very CENTER of what the agency does! That is why she put a Consent Decree on them, only to find they already had one from ten years prior, that they never satisfied. What was the consent decree, and if it pertained, then there was this ONE case that did not meet the criteria. And you ARE aware this was about a day care provider, right? Did you actually read it? Judge Pallmeyer took the liberty that judges have, to babble on, if you'll notice. I appreciate that she did indeed babble about the actual operations as they are supposed to be performed. I doubt Doug would care to discuss where these differ from his long time misleading bull**** about what "workers" do, but hey, we are accustomed to the spin master. I appreciate that she made the point, here and there, that more training and staff are needed to do investigations properly. Do YOU appreciate that? Do you honestly believe that the good judge said CPS investigators are evil and with evil intent, as YOU claim so often, or that possibly they were not resourced adequately to do their jobs up to the standards she wishes set? Think about it. It is, Greg, about money, staffing, the takes money, training, that takes money, experience that takes money to hire. Learn to leave with reality. Stop screaming about a crippled CPS being crippled. We all KNOW that, Greg. From every study done on and of CPS. The question is, can you whip a broken legged horse into winning a race? You, your cronies, and a few assholes with power think so, so they keep doing it, all the while screaming the CPS isn't doing it's job and it's got to be evil workers, foster parents, supervisors, and "Kevin Concannon," etc. You and they share the same crockery. 0:- -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
DOJ and Chicago Crime Commission report on JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN FAMILY COURTS
Kane wrote
Because YOU generalized to ALL DCFS, The Judge sure did! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
DOJ and Chicago Crime Commission report on JUDICIAL CORRUPTIONIN FAMILY COURTS
Greegor wrote:
Kane wrote Because YOU generalized to ALL DCFS, The Judge sure did! Citation -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
DOJ and Chicago Crime Commission report on JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN FAMILY COURTS
Kane wrote
Citation US Dupuy v Illinois DCYF Got Pacer? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
DOJ and Chicago Crime Commission report on JUDICIAL CORRUPTIONIN FAMILY COURTS
Greegor wrote:
Kane wrote Citation US Dupuy v Illinois DCYF Provide either a complete quote (it's not copyrighted) or a link to a site that is carrying the finding. Got Pacer? I've never worked with Trotters for racing, thanks for asking. Mostly Thoroughbreds or Quarter Horses in their kinds of racing. A lot of stadium jumping (Olympic training) cross country, and cutting horses. Now what's your point, except to dodge providing what we all know, "Citation" means. Link or quote or both, dummy. The behavior of a narcissist does not become you, ****ant. 0:- -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|