deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)

Illiana via FamilyKB.com wrote:
Sarah Gray wrote:
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread
when
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
had purchased the slaves. They don't want black people here, but they did
bring them here.
Um, according to the originally drafted Constitution, a black person was
counted as three-fifths of any free person when calculating population
for the purpose of determining how many House representatives each state
sent to Washington.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-fifths_compromise

Only you and your dumb ass is talking about the constitution! The point is,
the bitch made reference as if it were the law as it is, not as it was. JESUS!



um, she was making a point that what is *law* is not always what is
*ethical*.

--

Sarah Gray

"Sarah Gray" wrote in

Only you and your dumb ass is talking about the constitution! The point
is,
the bitch made reference as if it were the law as it is, not as it was.
JESUS!

um, she was making a point that what is *law* is not always what is
*ethical*.

Lets see if she can comprehend this concept?

Ethics is not one of this governments strong points!

It's *legal* for a woman to abandon a newborn
It's *legal* to kill a human life in it's beginning stages
It's *legal* to sell tobacco substances that are proven to be addictive and
lethal
It's *legal* to sell alcoholic substances that are proven to be addictive
and lethal.
It's *legal* to impose a debt on a citizen
It's *legal* to imprison a citizen that can't pay a government imposed debt
It's *legal* to ignore the constitution for the purpose of self serving
government agendas

Sarah Gray wrote:
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread
when
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
Only you and your dumb ass is talking about the constitution! The point is,
the bitch made reference as if it were the law as it is, not as it was. JESUS!

um, she was making a point that what is *law* is not always what is
*ethical*.

That's not how the statement was written! If thet's what she meant, then she
should have used something different, or at least relevant to the child
support situation. I don't see how the terrible treatment of black people
down south is relevant to child support. Do you?
Only this small group feels that way. Let's go ask someone from down south.
Should I post a thread quoting her on a newsite in the town of Jena, Money,
or Montgomery? Do you think the black people down there would praise her for
comparing the hardships they had faced down south to child support?

--
Message posted via http://www.familykb.com

DB wrote:
"Sarah Gray" wrote in

Only you and your dumb ass is talking about the constitution! The point
is,
the bitch made reference as if it were the law as it is, not as it was.
JESUS!

um, she was making a point that what is *law* is not always what is
*ethical*.

Lets see if she can comprehend this concept?

Ethics is not one of this governments strong points!

It's *legal* for a woman to abandon a newborn
It's *legal* to kill a human life in it's beginning stages
It's *legal* to sell tobacco substances that are proven to be addictive and
lethal
It's *legal* to sell alcoholic substances that are proven to be addictive
and lethal.
It's *legal* to impose a debt on a citizen
It's *legal* to imprison a citizen that can't pay a government imposed debt
It's *legal* to ignore the constitution for the purpose of self serving
government agendas
You're a conspirecy nut, so of course you would come up with something such
as this.

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1

Illiana via FamilyKB.com wrote:

Sarah Gray wrote:

Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread
when

[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]

Only you and your dumb ass is talking about the constitution! The point is,
the bitch made reference as if it were the law as it is, not as it was. JESUS!

um, she was making a point that what is *law* is not always what is
*ethical*.


That's not how the statement was written!

Anybody with an IQ above single digits understood the intent.


If thet's what she meant, then she
should have used something different, or at least relevant to the child
support situation.

Obviously you are such a dumb**** that everything must be spelled out
for you.

I don't see how the terrible treatment of black people
down south is relevant to child support.

Because you are a cluless moron

Do you?
Only this small group feels that way.

A lie

Let's go ask someone from down south.
Should I post a thread quoting her on a newsite in the town of Jena, Money,
or Montgomery? Do you think the black people down there would praise her for
comparing the hardships they had faced down south to child support?

snicker You really aren't that bright are you?

=======================================
THIS MESSAGE NOT POSTED VIA FAMILYKB.
THEY ARE STEALING CONTENT FROM FROM USENET
=======================================
"animal05" wrote
Illiana via FamilyKB.com wrote:
..............................

Let's go ask someone from down south.
Should I post a thread quoting her on a newsite in the town of Jena,
Money,
or Montgomery? Do you think the black people down there would praise her
for
comparing the hardships they had faced down south to child support?

snicker You really aren't that bright are you?
==
Heh...And she obviously thinks all black people are as stupid as she is.
What a bigot.

Gini wrote:
=======================================
THIS MESSAGE NOT POSTED VIA FAMILYKB.
THEY ARE STEALING CONTENT FROM FROM USENET
=======================================
Illiana via FamilyKB.com wrote:
.............................

Let's go ask someone from down south.
Should I post a thread quoting her on a newsite in the town of Jena,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]

snicker You really aren't that bright are you?
==
Heh...And she obviously thinks all black people are as stupid as she is.
What a bigot.
That would be your opinion of me and black people. You're the stupid one, K
bitch!
I got a lot of responses from the bulitan I posted on you, and every answer
was pretty much the same,
"Where does she get off saying that for ANY reason at all!"
But I guess black people are too dumb to know what you are saying, even
though you should not have said it at all. Is that what you are trying to say?


--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1

animal05 wrote:
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread
when
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]

That's not how the statement was written!

Anybody with an IQ above single digits understood the intent.

If thet's what she meant, then she
should have used something different, or at least relevant to the child
support situation.

Obviously you are such a dumb**** that everything must be spelled out
for you.

I don't see how the terrible treatment of black people
down south is relevant to child support.

Because you are a cluless moron

Do you?
Only this small group feels that way.

A lie

Let's go ask someone from down south.
Should I post a thread quoting her on a newsite in the town of Jena, Money,
or Montgomery? Do you think the black people down there would praise her for
comparing the hardships they had faced down south to child support?

snicker You really aren't that bright are you?
I'm soo sorry that you are a racist **** bag. Do you deny that the plight of
those people was compared to child support as if the two had any connection
what so ever? How do you get off comapring the civil rights era of the south
to child support?
You need to check yourself!

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in *ethical*.

Lets see if she can comprehend this concept?

Ethics is not one of this governments strong points!

It's *legal* for a woman to abandon a newborn
It's *legal* to kill a human life in it's beginning stages
It's *legal* to sell tobacco substances that are proven to be addictive
and
lethal
It's *legal* to sell alcoholic substances that are proven to be addictive
and lethal.
It's *legal* to impose a debt on a citizen
It's *legal* to imprison a citizen that can't pay a government imposed
debt
It's *legal* to ignore the constitution for the purpose of self serving
government agendas
You're a conspirecy nut, so of course you would come up with something
such
as this.


OK, Sheep like you need tohave it spelled out!
Abortion legal, selling cigarets that kill people is legal, selling alcohol
to alcoholics is legal, does it make it right?

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message
news:7a1f57f1cf17b@uwe...
Gini wrote:
=======================================
THIS MESSAGE NOT POSTED VIA FAMILYKB.
THEY ARE STEALING CONTENT FROM FROM USENET
=======================================
Illiana via FamilyKB.com wrote:
.............................

Let's go ask someone from down south.
Should I post a thread quoting her on a newsite in the town of Jena,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]

snicker You really aren't that bright are you?
==
Heh...And she obviously thinks all black people are as stupid as she is.
What a bigot.
That would be your opinion of me and black people. You're the stupid one,
K
bitch!
I got a lot of responses from the bulitan I posted on you, and every
answer
was pretty much the same,
"Where does she get off saying that for ANY reason at all!"
But I guess black people are too dumb to know what you are saying, even
though you should not have said it at all. Is that what you are trying to
say?

Are you certain you posted the comments IN CONTEXT? Or did you just post
the parts you thought would stir things up?