If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Parent Trap? Litigation Explodes Over Paternity Fraud
"Peter J Ross" wrote in message ... On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:10:33 GMT, krp wrote in soc.men: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Learn how to post, n00b. And keep your spew out of alt.support.* Oh Petey please don't hit me with your purse. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Parent Trap? Litigation Explodes Over Paternity Fraud
krp:
Oh Petey please don't hit me with your purse. You might scuff Kennykins' pumps, Pete, or break his string of KMart pearls. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Parent Trap? Litigation Explodes Over Paternity Fraud
teachrmama wrote: "Andre Lieven" wrote in message ... http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1144414531354 snip Another new wrinkle in paternity disputes is men seeking reimbursement for child support payments. That's at the heart of a recent case in New Jersey, where a man recently won the right to sue the biological father for nearly $110,000, the cost of raising the child. RAC v. PJS, 380 N.J. Super. 94 (N.J. App. Div. Aug. 31, 2005). The case involved a man who found out 30 years after his youngest child's birth that he was not the father. An appeals court ruled in September that the man could sue for reimbursement because he had been duped. But Scott Bocker, attorney for the biological father, said the mother should be held accountable because she duped the biological father, too. "His position has been it should be the mother, who lied to everybody, who pays," said Bocker of the Law Offices of Herman Osofsky in Clifton, N.J. I absolutely agree!! Let the one who perpetrated the fraud pay the price for the fraud!! That poor bio dad missed out on his child's entire childhood--he deserves to be compensated for that loss--not sued! The lying tramp of a woman deserves the lawsuit. Let *her* pay back what she stole from the non-dad! And from the bio-dad, too! He added that what is unusual about the case is that the plaintiff filed suit using the state's Parentage Act, which historically was designed to let children and mothers go after deadbeat dads for nonpayment. The case has been appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court. "This is the first time the law has been used in this way by a third party," Bocker said. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth The biofather should sue her for the money! A perfect circle. I wonder what the argument for indemnifying her will be. The "child" surely won't suffer. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Parent Trap? Litigation Explodes Over Paternity Fraud
wrote in message oups.com... teachrmama wrote: "Andre Lieven" wrote in message ... http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1144414531354 snip Another new wrinkle in paternity disputes is men seeking reimbursement for child support payments. That's at the heart of a recent case in New Jersey, where a man recently won the right to sue the biological father for nearly $110,000, the cost of raising the child. RAC v. PJS, 380 N.J. Super. 94 (N.J. App. Div. Aug. 31, 2005). The case involved a man who found out 30 years after his youngest child's birth that he was not the father. An appeals court ruled in September that the man could sue for reimbursement because he had been duped. But Scott Bocker, attorney for the biological father, said the mother should be held accountable because she duped the biological father, too. "His position has been it should be the mother, who lied to everybody, who pays," said Bocker of the Law Offices of Herman Osofsky in Clifton, N.J. I absolutely agree!! Let the one who perpetrated the fraud pay the price for the fraud!! That poor bio dad missed out on his child's entire childhood--he deserves to be compensated for that loss--not sued! The lying tramp of a woman deserves the lawsuit. Let *her* pay back what she stole from the non-dad! And from the bio-dad, too! The biofather should sue her for the money! A perfect circle. I wonder what the argument for indemnifying her will be. The "child" surely won't suffer. Personally, I think BOTH men should sue the mother. One for the money he had to pay for a child that wan't his. SHE took the money and used it. And the bio dad because he missed out on his child's growing-up years. -- NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Deadbeat Dad--record lien on home | teachrmama | Child Support | 41 | October 6th 04 03:48 AM |
CA Court Overturns Paternity Fraud- Finally | Andre Lieven | Child Support | 3 | July 21st 04 01:54 PM |
Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 12 | June 4th 04 02:19 AM |
Mother's Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court Case | TrashBBRT | Child Support | 8 | May 21st 04 05:52 PM |
Sample Supreme Court Petition | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 0 | January 16th 04 03:47 AM |