A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Parent Trap? Litigation Explodes Over Paternity Fraud



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 15th 06, 11:16 AM posted to alt.mens-rights,alt.child-support,soc.men
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Parent Trap? Litigation Explodes Over Paternity Fraud


"Peter J Ross" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:10:33 GMT, krp wrote in
soc.men:

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.


Learn how to post, n00b.

And keep your spew out of alt.support.*


Oh Petey please don't hit me with your purse.


  #12  
Old April 15th 06, 08:36 PM posted to alt.mens-rights,alt.child-support,soc.men
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Parent Trap? Litigation Explodes Over Paternity Fraud

krp:
Oh Petey please don't hit me with your purse.

You might scuff Kennykins' pumps, Pete, or break his string of
KMart pearls.

  #13  
Old April 23rd 06, 08:16 AM posted to alt.mens-rights,alt.child-support,alt.support.divorce,alt.support.marriage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Parent Trap? Litigation Explodes Over Paternity Fraud


teachrmama wrote:
"Andre Lieven" wrote in message
...
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1144414531354

snip

Another new wrinkle in paternity disputes is men seeking reimbursement for
child
support payments.

That's at the heart of a recent case in New Jersey, where a man recently
won the
right to sue the biological father for nearly $110,000, the cost of
raising the
child. RAC v. PJS, 380 N.J. Super. 94 (N.J. App. Div. Aug. 31, 2005).

The case involved a man who found out 30 years after his youngest child's
birth
that he was not the father.

An appeals court ruled in September that the man could sue for
reimbursement
because he had been duped. But Scott Bocker, attorney for the biological
father,
said the mother should be held accountable because she duped the
biological
father, too.

"His position has been it should be the mother, who lied to everybody, who
pays," said Bocker of the Law Offices of Herman Osofsky in Clifton, N.J.


I absolutely agree!! Let the one who perpetrated the fraud pay the price
for the fraud!! That poor bio dad missed out on his child's entire
childhood--he deserves to be compensated for that loss--not sued! The lying
tramp of a woman deserves the lawsuit. Let *her* pay back what she stole
from the non-dad! And from the bio-dad, too!



He added that what is unusual about the case is that the plaintiff filed
suit
using the state's Parentage Act, which historically was designed to let
children
and mothers go after deadbeat dads for nonpayment.

The case has been appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court.

"This is the first time the law has been used in this way by a third
party,"
Bocker said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------





--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth


The biofather should sue her for the money! A perfect circle. I wonder
what the argument for indemnifying her will be. The "child" surely
won't suffer.

  #14  
Old April 24th 06, 01:31 AM posted to alt.mens-rights,alt.child-support,alt.support.divorce,alt.support.marriage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Parent Trap? Litigation Explodes Over Paternity Fraud


wrote in message
oups.com...

teachrmama wrote:
"Andre Lieven" wrote in message
...
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1144414531354

snip

Another new wrinkle in paternity disputes is men seeking reimbursement
for
child
support payments.

That's at the heart of a recent case in New Jersey, where a man
recently
won the
right to sue the biological father for nearly $110,000, the cost of
raising the
child. RAC v. PJS, 380 N.J. Super. 94 (N.J. App. Div. Aug. 31, 2005).

The case involved a man who found out 30 years after his youngest
child's
birth
that he was not the father.

An appeals court ruled in September that the man could sue for
reimbursement
because he had been duped. But Scott Bocker, attorney for the
biological
father,
said the mother should be held accountable because she duped the
biological
father, too.

"His position has been it should be the mother, who lied to everybody,
who
pays," said Bocker of the Law Offices of Herman Osofsky in Clifton,
N.J.


I absolutely agree!! Let the one who perpetrated the fraud pay the price
for the fraud!! That poor bio dad missed out on his child's entire
childhood--he deserves to be compensated for that loss--not sued! The
lying
tramp of a woman deserves the lawsuit. Let *her* pay back what she stole
from the non-dad! And from the bio-dad, too!



The biofather should sue her for the money! A perfect circle. I wonder
what the argument for indemnifying her will be. The "child" surely
won't suffer.


Personally, I think BOTH men should sue the mother. One for the money he
had to pay for a child that wan't his. SHE took the money and used it. And
the bio dad because he missed out on his child's growing-up years.



--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Deadbeat Dad--record lien on home teachrmama Child Support 41 October 6th 04 03:48 AM
CA Court Overturns Paternity Fraud- Finally Andre Lieven Child Support 3 July 21st 04 01:54 PM
Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court Wizardlaw Child Support 12 June 4th 04 02:19 AM
Mother's Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court Case TrashBBRT Child Support 8 May 21st 04 05:52 PM
Sample Supreme Court Petition Wizardlaw Child Support 0 January 16th 04 03:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.