If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
parental interest in solids
What are some of the reasons you guys have wanted your babies on solids?
-- Dagny Mom to Meg, 10/03 I'm really not sure what you're asking. Are you suggesting that a baby never get solid food and is just sustained on breastmilk? If that is what your asking, then no at some point a baby/child is going to need food. If your asking why we started solids when we did, well at the time when my babies were small (I have a 11, 8 and 7-year old), the recommendation then was to start solids at four months. I was as religous about that recommendation as many of you are today at waiting six months. I looked at the signs of the baby really than the date on the calendar. At some point, babies are just going to want other things other than breastmilk. When you see that the baby isn't satisfied on breastmilk alone, then you will have to add solids for vitamins and minerals that end up being decreased in bm as the child gets older (like iron). -- Sue (mom to three girls) I'm Just a Raggedy Ann in a Barbie Doll World... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
parental interest in solids
Dagny wrote:
What are some of the reasons you guys have wanted your babies on solids? As the parent of two voracious nurslings who would NEVER take a bottle of EBM, one of the reasons I had for wanting my munchkins to take solids was that so I could get away for a couple of hours without the baby. In both cases, they started solids at about 5 1/2 months. I would have waited longer, but by that time they were both literally grabbing food off of my plate. Tracey in CT |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
parental interest in solids
"Dagny" wrote in message hlink.net...
But I know it is a very common desire of parents on this board and IRL to have their babies on solid food at around 6 months or shortly thereafter. What are some of the reasons you guys have wanted your babies on solids? -- Dagny Mom to Meg, 10/03 I felt the exact same way you do until around three months or so the Bug started watching every bite of food I ate on its path from the plate to my mouth. Then at 5 months she was eating paper and literally lunging at food. We started solids a week and a half shy of 6 months because it was clear that she was very, very interested and had the needed motor skills. She took to it well from the start. Before she was interested I was all for waiting as long as I possibly could, but once she started acting like there was nothing in the world that she wanted as bad as food (well, except for one thing :-) I became very excited about giving it to her. It's a lot of work (aside from the feeding there's the mess), but it's also a lot of fun. Kate and the Bug, June 8 2003 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
parental interest in solids
"Dagny" wrote in message hlink.net...
As the mother of a two and a half month old, I can't yet imagine wanting to give her food until she insists upon it (unless there was a health need). My typical response to "When will she start eating food?" is "When she can pry it from my clenched fist, or sneak it like the dogs." I will be happy to have a big girl which I know will happen soon enough. But when she does start eating, I know I will have to deal with -- am I providing the best nutrition I can? Is she getting enough water? Should I have introduced that food? Gosh that poo smells. Etc. Well, that seems weird to me. It wasn't exactly convenient to have my child learn to walk either - I had to worry about him hitting his head, suddenly he was able to reach dangers that had previously been safely far away, I had to figure out what shoes to get him, etc. However, I still encouraged him to walk and thought it was great when he learned (which is not to say that I pushed him into it, either). Obviously, pumping rice cereal into a one-month-old is a bad idea, but I think 'pry it from my clenched fist' is pretty far in the other direction. When the baby's ready for food, that's when to offer it. Beth |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
parental interest in solids
"Dagny"
But I know it is a very common desire of parents on this board and IRL to have their babies on solid food at around 6 months or shortly thereafter. What are some of the reasons you guys have wanted your babies on solids? Here is a list of some of my reasons: Get proprer amounts of iron which is a concern if you do not use formula. For #1, he wouldn't take a bottle so I wanted him to have something to eat when I was at work. He refused even solids till 10 months though. For #2 he was hollering and grabbing at food at every meal. I hoped it would space out the nursing a little bit as mine were both nursing every 1.5-3hrs around the clock still at 6 months. I hoped it would help them stay full and nurse less at night...NOT, lol. #1 was never into solids but with #2 it was a riot introducing him to new foods and watching him enjoy meal times. I can't really think of a good reason not to introduce them at 6 months for your typical healthy baby. Not all babies (like my #1) want them that early which is fine and should be respected but that is different then not introducing them I think. -- Nikki |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
parental interest in solids
Obviously, pumping rice cereal into a one-month-old is a bad
idea, but I think 'pry it from my clenched fist' is pretty far in the other direction. When the baby's ready for food, that's when to offer it. My feelings exactly.... I think it's just as bad to get into the 'the later the baby takes solids the better mother I must be' mindset than to have the older 'MY baby was eating applesauce at 2 weeks, so she's obviously far superior to YOUR baby who only started it at 4 weeks!' I started Shaina on solids at 5 months. This was 12 years ago, when the standard recommondation was still 4-6 months. It seemed a convenient time. She had never been willing to take EBM from a bottle. I was happy enough to see her take the step, so I tried offering her some cereal. She liked it just fine. I never had to force her to eat it, or spend hours scraping cereal off her chin or the out of the carpet. Would it have been 'better' if I'd waited another 3 weeks? Or if I'd waited for her to grab food off my plate? I don't know. What constitutes 'better?' She liked the solid foods I gave her. Now, at 12 (and, way back at much younger ages) she is an excellent eater, enjoying a wide range of foods. I still find it interesting that many of the foods she still doesn't eat are raw veggies, which are foods that I COULDN"T give her until quite late, since she got teeth late and so couldn't eat them. Naomi CAPPA Certified Lactation Educator (either remove spamblock or change address to to e-mail reply.) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
parental interest in solids
"Dagny" wrote in message hlink.net...
But I know it is a very common desire of parents on this board and IRL to have their babies on solid food at around 6 months or shortly thereafter. What are some of the reasons you guys have wanted your babies on solids? So that my daughter would begin pooping more often than once every two weeks! Don't get me wrong, not changing poopy diapers was great, but 14-15 days was a little wierd. Even my doctor, who admitted that it was the exteme long end of "normal" was a bit concerned (but conceeded it was probably just normal for Kivi). Cathy Weeks Mommy to Kivi Alexis 12/01 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
parental interest in solids
"Dagny" wrote in message hlink.net...
As the mother of a two and a half month old, I can't yet imagine wanting to give her food until she insists upon it (unless there was a health need). My typical response to "When will she start eating food?" is "When she can pry it from my clenched fist, or sneak it like the dogs." I will be happy to have a big girl which I know will happen soon enough. But when she does start eating, I know I will have to deal with -- am I providing the best nutrition I can? Is she getting enough water? Should I have introduced that food? Gosh that poo smells. Etc. But I know it is a very common desire of parents on this board and IRL to have their babies on solid food at around 6 months or shortly thereafter. What are some of the reasons you guys have wanted your babies on solids? I think it will be really interesting to know what your reasons are when you get to solids. I am just wondering if you will feel differently about it in 4 months time. I can't remember even thinking about solids when Moo was younger, its only when it became an issue becuase he was grabbing our food etc that I started to research it, although I knew he wasnt going to get solids until he was ready, and definatly not before 6 months. teapot and almost 7 month old Moo |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
parental interest in solids
But I know it is a very common desire of parents on this board and IRL to
have their babies on solid food at around 6 months or shortly thereafter. What are some of the reasons you guys have wanted your babies on solids? -- Dagny Mom to Meg, 10/03 Emma was never very good at putting on weight. She started off at 37 weeks gestation and weighing 7lb 7.5oz. By the time she was 6 mths she was only about 13lb 12oz. She was acting hungry and hadn't put on weight for around 3 weeks. So I offered potato blended with some of my EBM. Which I only use for blending food as she still won't drink from anything but me. Her weight gain has become more stable and she is so happy. When she had her first taste of solids she spent the next hour singing. Just as if she was saying thankyou Mum that's just what I needed. The only thing you can do is be guided by your child and not your peers. Yours Mitch |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
parental interest in solids
But I know it is a very common desire of parents on this board and IRL to have their babies on solid food at around 6 months or shortly thereafter. What are some of the reasons you guys have wanted your babies on solids? Because she was almost a year and a half, almost entirely breastfed, I couldn't eat enough to keep weight on, and was getting tired from the every-two-hours nursing pattern around the clock! I know that's not quite what you meant. You're in good company here. I was happy to exclusively breastfeed for the first year, and I would have been sad to start solids early. We started offering at 9 months and she finally got interested at about 16-18 months. Some babies love nursing, and some babies are ready for solids at six months or even earlier, and it's fine to follow your baby's cues either way. You definitely shouldn't feel like a failure, or like your baby is delayed, if you don't start rice cereal at 4 months of age. There is a definite air of mom-competition wrt starting solids early, especially in the older generations. Sproutkin still prefers nursing to eating, and it's only by getting more regimented with mealtimes that we've gotten her down to nursing 5-6 times a day and 2-3 times at night. Mary S. mom to the still-avidly-nursing Sproutkin, 22 months |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Not offering solids yet?! | Andrea | Breastfeeding | 8 | December 5th 03 07:57 PM |
We stopped solids! | Andrea | Breastfeeding | 15 | October 27th 03 10:34 PM |
Medical Abstracts re Intro of Solids? | Belphoebe | Breastfeeding | 3 | August 25th 03 02:13 PM |
poop, solids vent.. | ted | Breastfeeding | 3 | August 14th 03 04:44 PM |
solids and a 6 month old | DavesFatChick | Breastfeeding | 4 | July 28th 03 08:21 PM |