Child Support - When Does Child Support End?

"Chris" wrote
"Very Determined!" wrote
...............................

I understand what you are saying. I personally do not see a father any
less a parent than a mother, by any means. But how do men consider
themselves "equal" to women if they do not carry or birth a child?

I sense a SLIGHT contradiction in the above statements.
====
Yeah, I ain't takin' her on my team. You can have her.

On Dec 10, 8:44 pm, "Chris" wrote:
--
[Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have
custody of such child]"Very Determined!" wrote in message

... On Dec 7, 8:52 pm, "teachrmama" wrote:
"Gini" wrote in

messagenews:xXo6j.301$xd.83@trndny03...







"teachrmama" wrote

"DB" wrote

"teachrmama" wrote in

BTW, you never answered my question: When a man cannot be forced
to
pay child support by the system, and the woman is incapable of
supporting her own child(ren), do you think the taxpayers should
pick
up the tab?

Sorry Teach, but that's the exact mentality that this system feeds
on!

Oh, I know. The system costs a ridiculous amount of money to run,
and
the amount they collect that would not be paid anyway probably does
not
cover the amount the system costs. I am just curious, since she
thinks
that men should be financially responsible for children that they
help
create, whether she thinks wo,en should be held to any sort of
financial
standard also.
=====
EEEK! Women? Shouldn't have kids they can't afford?? I thought women
birthing babies was
right up there with Divine Right..It's only *men* who should keep it
in
their pants if they can't afford kids.
Very Determined! said so. (I guess you must have missed that :-)

Oh, no, I saw it all right. I do not understand why women have a right
to
birth a child and expect only money from a man--because the taxpayers
certainly should not have to pay for the man's child!! But expecting a
woman to either support her own child or give it up for adoption is
depriving the woman of her rights. It just makes no sense to me. So,
maybe, if neither man nor woman is capable of supporting the child, the
child should be put into foster care, and BOTH man and woman should be
forced to pay via wage garnishment, or be sentenced to jail. Then both
are
being treated exactly the same!! Right?

- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I understand what you are saying. I personally do not see a father any
less a parent than a mother, by any means. But how do men consider
themselves "equal" to women if they do not carry or birth a child?

I sense a SLIGHT contradiction in the above statements.



- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

One statement one question....