A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 23rd 07, 06:18 AM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling


"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the

U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability.


The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".

A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like
a Hyena.
A moral man requires no force to do right by his children.


What do you mean by "do right"?

A mother
****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children
has no morals.


False conclusion based upon a false premise.


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from
http://www.teranews.com



  #12  
Old April 23rd 07, 06:06 PM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Robert[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling

On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:15:48 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the

U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one

paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be

that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability.

The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".

A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like
a Hyena.
A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother
****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children
has no morals.


And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her own
children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of her
responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that a
woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital or

fire
station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to walk

away
from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right?


Correct, and a woman that has a child and abandons it and the father
to leave with another man is just as bad if not worse.
But none of these women are whining about being forced to pay the
daddy "free money" on this news group.
Actually the woman that has a child and leaves it at a Hospital or
other safe place in accordance with the "Baby Moses" law is morally
superior to either of the other being discussed.
No matter how bad the other parent of either sex treats a child, the
other parent is not justified in abusing the child. ''I am not as bad
as the other guy" is no excuse.
But that's............................................ ... different.






--
Posted via a free Usenet account from
http://www.teranews.com

  #13  
Old April 23rd 07, 08:42 PM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling


"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:15:48 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the

U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the

Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one

paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be

that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the

children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his

ability.

The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".

A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like
a Hyena.
A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother
****er like you that whines about being forced to support his

children
has no morals.

And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her

own
children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of her
responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that a
woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital or

fire
station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to walk

away
from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right?


Correct, and a woman that has a child and abandons it and the father
to leave with another man is just as bad if not worse.
But none of these women are whining about being forced to pay the
daddy "free money" on this news group.


Since "free" means "costing nothing", and the money that the woman receives
costs nothing, it follows that the money is FREE. I know there are many
definitions for the word "free", thus your confusion. But look it up
(
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/free), making special note of
definitions #11 and also #3 further down the page. There, you will learn
that the word "free" correctly describes the money these women are
receiving.

Actually the woman that has a child and leaves it at a Hospital or
other safe place in accordance with the "Baby Moses" law is morally
superior to either of the other being discussed.


What makes abandoning a child at a fire station morally superior to leaving
said child with their mother?

No matter how bad the other parent of either sex treats a child, the
other parent is not justified in abusing the child. ''I am not as bad
as the other guy" is no excuse.
But that's............................................ ... different.






--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com



  #14  
Old April 24th 07, 04:55 AM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
teachrmama
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,905
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling


"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:15:48 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the

U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one

paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be

that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the
children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his
ability.

The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".

A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like
a Hyena.
A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother
****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children
has no morals.

And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her
own
children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of her
responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that a
woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital or

fire
station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to walk

away
from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right?


Correct, and a woman that has a child and abandons it and the father
to leave with another man is just as bad if not worse.
But none of these women are whining about being forced to pay the
daddy "free money" on this news group.


Of course not. They are not required to do anything for the child they
brought into the world--not care for it--not support it---nothing. What is
there for them to complain about?

Actually the woman that has a child and leaves it at a Hospital or
other safe place in accordance with the "Baby Moses" law is morally
superior to either of the other being discussed.


So then you are saying that if the dad drops the baby off at a safe haven,
he is morally superior to the one that pays child support, but disagrees
with the amount? Hmmm.... interesting.......

No matter how bad the other parent of either sex treats a child, the
other parent is not justified in abusing the child. ''I am not as bad
as the other guy" is no excuse.



What has that to do with anything, Robert? I haven't heard anyone here say
"I get to abuse my child because the other parent does." Where do you come
up with some of this stuff?




  #15  
Old April 24th 07, 07:14 PM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling


"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:15:48 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris"

wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of

the
U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the

Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one
paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be
that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the
children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his
ability.

The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".

A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals.

Like
a Hyena.
A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother
****er like you that whines about being forced to support his

children
has no morals.

And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her
own
children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of

her
responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that

a
woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital

or
fire
station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to

walk
away
from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right?

Correct, and a woman that has a child and abandons it and the father
to leave with another man is just as bad if not worse.
But none of these women are whining about being forced to pay the
daddy "free money" on this news group.


Of course not. They are not required to do anything for the child they
brought into the world--not care for it--not support it---nothing. What

is
there for them to complain about?


That was my thought.


Actually the woman that has a child and leaves it at a Hospital or
other safe place in accordance with the "Baby Moses" law is morally
superior to either of the other being discussed.


So then you are saying that if the dad drops the baby off at a safe haven,
he is morally superior to the one that pays child support, but disagrees
with the amount? Hmmm.... interesting.......


He is also saying that a mother abandoning her baby is morally superior to
keeping said child.


No matter how bad the other parent of either sex treats a child, the
other parent is not justified in abusing the child. ''I am not as bad
as the other guy" is no excuse.



What has that to do with anything, Robert? I haven't heard anyone here

say
"I get to abuse my child because the other parent does." Where do you

come
up with some of this stuff?






  #16  
Old April 25th 07, 04:47 PM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
DB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 712
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling


"Animal05" wrote in

An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert
proves how stupid he is with his frothing


Robert is the typical moron that thinks a government system will fix his
personal problems.
Morality only comes from one's soul, but how can you have morality with so
many Godless souls in this country?

Abortion is legal in this country, shows exactly where morality in America
is at, in the toilet!!!!



  #17  
Old April 25th 07, 06:02 PM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
BOB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling

"DB" wrote in
:


"Animal05" wrote in

An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert
proves how stupid he is with his frothing


Robert is the typical moron that thinks a government system will fix
his personal problems.
Morality only comes from one's soul, but how can you have morality
with so many Godless souls in this country?

Abortion is legal in this country, shows exactly where morality in
America is at, in the toilet!!!!

You don't like liberty and personal freedom in America? Then why don't you
Taliban-Wannabees go live in one of the middle eastern countries where your
type of anti-choice thinking and degenerate morality thrives?






  #18  
Old April 25th 07, 09:00 PM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Robert[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:35 GMT, "DB" wrote:


"Animal05" wrote in

What an appropriate nick? An animal that wants to breed without any
regards to possible offspring's. Actually males of many animals take a
active role in raising their off spring.

An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert
proves how stupid he is with his frothing


True morality can not be legislated, however legislation can be used
to punish the immoral for not acting in a moral manner. Like a sorry
excuse for a man that ignores his offspring, because the woman will
not serve as his punching bag. Or allow him to abuse the children he
fathered. I think that the best way to deal with them is prison where
he can be some ones bitch/punching bag.

Robert is the typical moron that thinks a government system will fix his
personal problems.
Morality only comes from one's soul, but how can you have morality with so
many Godless souls in this country?

Why are so many religious nuts wife and child abusers. The godless
do the right thing, because it's the right thing to do, the religious
do as they please because God will forgive them.

Abortion is legal in this country, shows exactly where morality in America
is at, in the toilet!!!!

Actually the toilet is forcing a woman and children to remain with
a abusive Christian scum bag.


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #19  
Old April 26th 07, 12:54 AM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling


"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:35 GMT, "DB" wrote:


"Animal05" wrote in

What an appropriate nick? An animal that wants to breed without any
regards to possible offspring's. Actually males of many animals take a
active role in raising their off spring.

An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert
proves how stupid he is with his frothing


True morality can not be legislated, however legislation can be used
to punish the immoral for not acting in a moral manner. Like a sorry
excuse for a man that ignores his offspring, because the woman will
not serve as his punching bag.


Then take that up with the woman and your government people because they are
the ones FORCING the father to ignore his offspring.

Or allow him to abuse the children he
fathered. I think that the best way to deal with them is prison where
he can be some ones bitch/punching bag.


Never mind the fact that he was FORCED to ignore his offspring; toss him in
a cage anyway!


Robert is the typical moron that thinks a government system will fix his
personal problems.
Morality only comes from one's soul, but how can you have morality with

so
many Godless souls in this country?

Why are so many religious nuts wife and child abusers. The godless
do the right thing, because it's the right thing to do, the religious
do as they please because God will forgive them.

Abortion is legal in this country, shows exactly where morality in

America
is at, in the toilet!!!!

Actually the toilet is forcing a woman and children to remain with
a abusive Christian scum bag.


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com



  #20  
Old April 26th 07, 02:15 AM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Animal05[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling

Chris wrote:

"Robert" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:35 GMT, "DB" wrote:


"Animal05" wrote in


What an appropriate nick? An animal that wants to breed without any
regards to possible offspring's. Actually males of many animals take a
active role in raising their off spring.


An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert
proves how stupid he is with his frothing

True morality can not be legislated, however legislation can be used
to punish the immoral for not acting in a moral manner. Like a sorry
excuse for a man that ignores his offspring, because the woman will
not serve as his punching bag.



Then take that up with the woman and your government people because they are
the ones FORCING the father to ignore his offspring.


Robert didn't hear the loud whooshing sound passing over his head.

Or allow him to abuse the children he
fathered. I think that the best way to deal with them is prison where
he can be some ones bitch/punching bag.



Never mind the fact that he was FORCED to ignore his offspring; toss him in
a cage anyway!


Robert is the typical moron that thinks a government system will fix his
personal problems.
Morality only comes from one's soul, but how can you have morality with


so

many Godless souls in this country?


Why are so many religious nuts wife and child abusers. The godless
do the right thing, because it's the right thing to do, the religious
do as they please because God will forgive them.


Abortion is legal in this country, shows exactly where morality in


America

is at, in the toilet!!!!


Actually the toilet is forcing a woman and children to remain with
a abusive Christian scum bag.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bush: State won't appeal ruling allowing teen's abortion wexwimpy Foster Parents 0 May 3rd 05 06:28 PM
MICHIGAN: Attorney General Mike Cox Hails Passage of Child SupportBills David Briggman Child Support 6 December 22nd 04 04:46 AM
Ex-Boyfriend Can't Stop Abortion A woman's right to have an abortion"is not subject to being vetoed by a woman's husband or partner," said Conahan, Clisby Pregnancy 0 January 19th 04 09:36 PM
Abortion ruling Ronni Child Support 12 January 1st 04 05:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.