If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Robert" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like a Hyena. A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. What do you mean by "do right"? A mother ****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children has no morals. False conclusion based upon a false premise. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:15:48 -0700, "Chris" wrote:
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Robert" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like a Hyena. A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother ****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children has no morals. And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her own children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of her responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that a woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital or fire station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to walk away from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right? Correct, and a woman that has a child and abandons it and the father to leave with another man is just as bad if not worse. But none of these women are whining about being forced to pay the daddy "free money" on this news group. Actually the woman that has a child and leaves it at a Hospital or other safe place in accordance with the "Baby Moses" law is morally superior to either of the other being discussed. No matter how bad the other parent of either sex treats a child, the other parent is not justified in abusing the child. ''I am not as bad as the other guy" is no excuse. But that's............................................ ... different. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:15:48 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Robert" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like a Hyena. A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother ****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children has no morals. And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her own children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of her responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that a woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital or fire station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to walk away from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right? Correct, and a woman that has a child and abandons it and the father to leave with another man is just as bad if not worse. But none of these women are whining about being forced to pay the daddy "free money" on this news group. Since "free" means "costing nothing", and the money that the woman receives costs nothing, it follows that the money is FREE. I know there are many definitions for the word "free", thus your confusion. But look it up (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/free), making special note of definitions #11 and also #3 further down the page. There, you will learn that the word "free" correctly describes the money these women are receiving. Actually the woman that has a child and leaves it at a Hospital or other safe place in accordance with the "Baby Moses" law is morally superior to either of the other being discussed. What makes abandoning a child at a fire station morally superior to leaving said child with their mother? No matter how bad the other parent of either sex treats a child, the other parent is not justified in abusing the child. ''I am not as bad as the other guy" is no excuse. But that's............................................ ... different. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:15:48 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Robert" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like a Hyena. A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother ****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children has no morals. And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her own children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of her responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that a woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital or fire station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to walk away from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right? Correct, and a woman that has a child and abandons it and the father to leave with another man is just as bad if not worse. But none of these women are whining about being forced to pay the daddy "free money" on this news group. Of course not. They are not required to do anything for the child they brought into the world--not care for it--not support it---nothing. What is there for them to complain about? Actually the woman that has a child and leaves it at a Hospital or other safe place in accordance with the "Baby Moses" law is morally superior to either of the other being discussed. So then you are saying that if the dad drops the baby off at a safe haven, he is morally superior to the one that pays child support, but disagrees with the amount? Hmmm.... interesting....... No matter how bad the other parent of either sex treats a child, the other parent is not justified in abusing the child. ''I am not as bad as the other guy" is no excuse. What has that to do with anything, Robert? I haven't heard anyone here say "I get to abuse my child because the other parent does." Where do you come up with some of this stuff? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Robert" wrote in message ... On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:15:48 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Robert" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Robert" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote: "Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message ... From: (Shawn Hirn) In article , (Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote: Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion. Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph at most. Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their responsibilities?? Hmmmm? "Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally. Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena. A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability. The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral". A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like a Hyena. A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother ****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children has no morals. And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her own children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of her responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that a woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital or fire station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to walk away from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right? Correct, and a woman that has a child and abandons it and the father to leave with another man is just as bad if not worse. But none of these women are whining about being forced to pay the daddy "free money" on this news group. Of course not. They are not required to do anything for the child they brought into the world--not care for it--not support it---nothing. What is there for them to complain about? That was my thought. Actually the woman that has a child and leaves it at a Hospital or other safe place in accordance with the "Baby Moses" law is morally superior to either of the other being discussed. So then you are saying that if the dad drops the baby off at a safe haven, he is morally superior to the one that pays child support, but disagrees with the amount? Hmmm.... interesting....... He is also saying that a mother abandoning her baby is morally superior to keeping said child. No matter how bad the other parent of either sex treats a child, the other parent is not justified in abusing the child. ''I am not as bad as the other guy" is no excuse. What has that to do with anything, Robert? I haven't heard anyone here say "I get to abuse my child because the other parent does." Where do you come up with some of this stuff? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"Animal05" wrote in An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert proves how stupid he is with his frothing Robert is the typical moron that thinks a government system will fix his personal problems. Morality only comes from one's soul, but how can you have morality with so many Godless souls in this country? Abortion is legal in this country, shows exactly where morality in America is at, in the toilet!!!! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"DB" wrote in
: "Animal05" wrote in An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert proves how stupid he is with his frothing Robert is the typical moron that thinks a government system will fix his personal problems. Morality only comes from one's soul, but how can you have morality with so many Godless souls in this country? Abortion is legal in this country, shows exactly where morality in America is at, in the toilet!!!! You don't like liberty and personal freedom in America? Then why don't you Taliban-Wannabees go live in one of the middle eastern countries where your type of anti-choice thinking and degenerate morality thrives? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:35 GMT, "DB" wrote:
"Animal05" wrote in What an appropriate nick? An animal that wants to breed without any regards to possible offspring's. Actually males of many animals take a active role in raising their off spring. An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert proves how stupid he is with his frothing True morality can not be legislated, however legislation can be used to punish the immoral for not acting in a moral manner. Like a sorry excuse for a man that ignores his offspring, because the woman will not serve as his punching bag. Or allow him to abuse the children he fathered. I think that the best way to deal with them is prison where he can be some ones bitch/punching bag. Robert is the typical moron that thinks a government system will fix his personal problems. Morality only comes from one's soul, but how can you have morality with so many Godless souls in this country? Why are so many religious nuts wife and child abusers. The godless do the right thing, because it's the right thing to do, the religious do as they please because God will forgive them. Abortion is legal in this country, shows exactly where morality in America is at, in the toilet!!!! Actually the toilet is forcing a woman and children to remain with a abusive Christian scum bag. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:35 GMT, "DB" wrote: "Animal05" wrote in What an appropriate nick? An animal that wants to breed without any regards to possible offspring's. Actually males of many animals take a active role in raising their off spring. An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert proves how stupid he is with his frothing True morality can not be legislated, however legislation can be used to punish the immoral for not acting in a moral manner. Like a sorry excuse for a man that ignores his offspring, because the woman will not serve as his punching bag. Then take that up with the woman and your government people because they are the ones FORCING the father to ignore his offspring. Or allow him to abuse the children he fathered. I think that the best way to deal with them is prison where he can be some ones bitch/punching bag. Never mind the fact that he was FORCED to ignore his offspring; toss him in a cage anyway! Robert is the typical moron that thinks a government system will fix his personal problems. Morality only comes from one's soul, but how can you have morality with so many Godless souls in this country? Why are so many religious nuts wife and child abusers. The godless do the right thing, because it's the right thing to do, the religious do as they please because God will forgive them. Abortion is legal in this country, shows exactly where morality in America is at, in the toilet!!!! Actually the toilet is forcing a woman and children to remain with a abusive Christian scum bag. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
Chris wrote:
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:35 GMT, "DB" wrote: "Animal05" wrote in What an appropriate nick? An animal that wants to breed without any regards to possible offspring's. Actually males of many animals take a active role in raising their off spring. An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert proves how stupid he is with his frothing True morality can not be legislated, however legislation can be used to punish the immoral for not acting in a moral manner. Like a sorry excuse for a man that ignores his offspring, because the woman will not serve as his punching bag. Then take that up with the woman and your government people because they are the ones FORCING the father to ignore his offspring. Robert didn't hear the loud whooshing sound passing over his head. Or allow him to abuse the children he fathered. I think that the best way to deal with them is prison where he can be some ones bitch/punching bag. Never mind the fact that he was FORCED to ignore his offspring; toss him in a cage anyway! Robert is the typical moron that thinks a government system will fix his personal problems. Morality only comes from one's soul, but how can you have morality with so many Godless souls in this country? Why are so many religious nuts wife and child abusers. The godless do the right thing, because it's the right thing to do, the religious do as they please because God will forgive them. Abortion is legal in this country, shows exactly where morality in America is at, in the toilet!!!! Actually the toilet is forcing a woman and children to remain with a abusive Christian scum bag. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bush: State won't appeal ruling allowing teen's abortion | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 0 | May 3rd 05 06:28 PM |
MICHIGAN: Attorney General Mike Cox Hails Passage of Child SupportBills | David Briggman | Child Support | 6 | December 22nd 04 04:46 AM |
Ex-Boyfriend Can't Stop Abortion A woman's right to have an abortion"is not subject to being vetoed by a woman's husband or partner," said Conahan, | Clisby | Pregnancy | 0 | January 19th 04 09:36 PM |
Abortion ruling | Ronni | Child Support | 12 | January 1st 04 05:51 PM |