A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Kids Health
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The BIG Lie II - British Medical Journal "Clams Up" - Basic Medical Terms Unknown To Brian Deer



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 16th 11, 07:45 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med
john[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 822
Default The BIG Lie II - British Medical Journal "Clams Up" - Basic Medical Terms Unknown To Brian Deer

http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.c...he-big-lie-ii/


  #2  
Old January 16th 11, 10:19 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med
dr_jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 293
Default The BIG Lie II - British Medical Journal "Clams Up" - Basic MedicalTerms Unknown To Brian Deer

On 1/16/11 1:45 PM, john wrote:
http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.c...he-big-lie-ii/


This is clearly a blog with an axe to grind.

Does the blog mention that the Deer Report was carefully reviewed and
all the records of the kids reviewed by the journal?

Jeff

  #3  
Old January 16th 11, 11:49 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med
Peter Parry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 176
Default The BIG Lie II - British Medical Journal "Clams Up" - Basic Medical Terms Unknown To Brian Deer

On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:45:38 -0000, "john" wrote:

http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.c...he-big-lie-ii/


I notice it makes no attempt to explain Wakefield's business plan to
earn himself a few million dollars out of his enterprise? Why not?

They also seem to have omitted to explain that the "red book" is
filled in in part by the parents - who were involved in the
litigation Wakefield was being paid to help.

"No reasonable journal invites litigation. This suggests the BMJ is
“running scared”. "

Ah, right. Inviting someone to sue you if they think you have got it
wrong instead of wasting endless hours answering a stream of
increasingly inane questions from opponents with quasi religious
inability to see facts is "running scared"?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL PUBLISHES FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT MMR DOCTOR john[_5_] Kids Health 13 May 3rd 10 05:36 PM
Toddler's death at center of lawsuit over R.I. foster ca "T.J.is the worst that can happen in terms of a child dying," she said. "But thereare still little horrors happening." fx Spanking 1 July 13th 07 12:07 PM
Toddler's death at center of lawsuit over R.I. foster ca "T.J.is the worst that can happen in terms of a child dying," she said. "But thereare still little horrors happening." fx Foster Parents 1 July 13th 07 12:07 PM
No more free lunches!!!!!!!!! British Medical Journal Kevysmom Kids Health 1 June 17th 06 03:07 AM
British Medical Journal Retracts Part of Its Prozac Story Mark Probert Kids Health 2 January 31st 05 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.