If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SSI ?
MY MENTALLY RETARDED 10 YEAR OLD SON RECEIVES SSI AND JUST THIS MONTH I
GOT A LETTER FROM SOCIAL SECURITY THAT HIS PAYMENT FOR DECEMBER WOULD BE REDUCED 80 DOLLARS DUE TO AN ADVANCED CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT I RECEIVED FROM HIS DAD A MONTH EARLY BECAUSE HIS DAD WAS GOING ON VACATION. MY QUESTION? WILL MY SONS FUTURE PAYMENTS GO BACK TO THE NORMAL PAYMENT? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
SSI ?
"Carmen D" wrote in message ... MY MENTALLY RETARDED 10 YEAR OLD SON RECEIVES SSI AND JUST THIS MONTH I GOT A LETTER FROM SOCIAL SECURITY THAT HIS PAYMENT FOR DECEMBER WOULD BE REDUCED 80 DOLLARS DUE TO AN ADVANCED CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT I RECEIVED FROM HIS DAD A MONTH EARLY BECAUSE HIS DAD WAS GOING ON VACATION. MY QUESTION? WILL MY SONS FUTURE PAYMENTS GO BACK TO THE NORMAL PAYMENT? Why don't you ask THEM? Anyway, it really shouldn't matter because regardless of how much money you get, either way it's all FREE! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
SSI ?
"Chris" wrote in message ... "Carmen D" wrote in message ... MY MENTALLY RETARDED 10 YEAR OLD SON RECEIVES SSI AND JUST THIS MONTH I GOT A LETTER FROM SOCIAL SECURITY THAT HIS PAYMENT FOR DECEMBER WOULD BE REDUCED 80 DOLLARS DUE TO AN ADVANCED CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT I RECEIVED FROM HIS DAD A MONTH EARLY BECAUSE HIS DAD WAS GOING ON VACATION. MY QUESTION? WILL MY SONS FUTURE PAYMENTS GO BACK TO THE NORMAL PAYMENT? Why don't you ask THEM? Anyway, it really shouldn't matter because regardless of how much money you get, either way it's all FREE! Chris, if you had any notion of how much money, time and energy it takes to look after a handicapped child, you wouldn't be so quick to criticize her. This country needs a decent health care program so that $80 is not a major concern for struggling families! How about daycare support for working parents too that a can't afford the staggering costs of private daycare centers? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
SSI ?
"DB" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... "Carmen D" wrote in message ... MY MENTALLY RETARDED 10 YEAR OLD SON RECEIVES SSI AND JUST THIS MONTH I GOT A LETTER FROM SOCIAL SECURITY THAT HIS PAYMENT FOR DECEMBER WOULD BE REDUCED 80 DOLLARS DUE TO AN ADVANCED CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT I RECEIVED FROM HIS DAD A MONTH EARLY BECAUSE HIS DAD WAS GOING ON VACATION. MY QUESTION? WILL MY SONS FUTURE PAYMENTS GO BACK TO THE NORMAL PAYMENT? Why don't you ask THEM? Anyway, it really shouldn't matter because regardless of how much money you get, either way it's all FREE! Chris, if you had any notion of how much money, time and energy it takes to look after a handicapped child, you wouldn't be so quick to criticize her. We all have our sob stories, me included. But you will NEVER hear me complain about some expense to me caused by no one else. I fork out plenty of FREE money to others almost always by the force of others, usually the government people. To that I WILL complain. Why? Because it amounts to nothing less than THEFT. No one gives me anything for free, NO one. I have always earned everything I have, and none of it has come easy. Slice it any way you want, but the bottom line is stealing is wrong! Always has been, is now, and always will be....... This country needs a decent health care program so that $80 is not a major concern for struggling families! Health care is a PERSONAL decision. Government has no business being in the health care business. How about daycare support for working parents too that a can't afford the staggering costs of private daycare centers? How about not. The care of someone else's child rests solely with them. If they made a poor choice which resulted in their predicament I am unwilling to pay their tab. Likewise, I don't expect them to pay for any choice of mine that has the same outcome; and believe me, I have had many bad outcomes through the years. No one is forced to pay my tab; and that is exactly how it ought to remain! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
SSI ?
"DB" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... "Carmen D" wrote in message ... MY MENTALLY RETARDED 10 YEAR OLD SON RECEIVES SSI AND JUST THIS MONTH I GOT A LETTER FROM SOCIAL SECURITY THAT HIS PAYMENT FOR DECEMBER WOULD BE REDUCED 80 DOLLARS DUE TO AN ADVANCED CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT I RECEIVED FROM HIS DAD A MONTH EARLY BECAUSE HIS DAD WAS GOING ON VACATION. MY QUESTION? WILL MY SONS FUTURE PAYMENTS GO BACK TO THE NORMAL PAYMENT? Why don't you ask THEM? Anyway, it really shouldn't matter because regardless of how much money you get, either way it's all FREE! Chris, if you had any notion of how much money, time and energy it takes to look after a handicapped child, you wouldn't be so quick to criticize her. This country needs a decent health care program so that $80 is not a major concern for struggling families! How about daycare support for working parents too that a can't afford the staggering costs of private daycare centers? There needs to be some form of assistance for parents of severely handicapped children but NOT from social security. This actually should be handled by a local agency instead of the bureaucratic nightmare of the federal government. The larger the government gets, the worse of a job it does. Taxing those who chose to remain childless to pay for things like daycare for those who chose to breed is unfair. Only those who chose to bring children into the world should be paying the costs of children. Thirdly, the government is the best place to screw up anything. If anyone thinks the health care in the US is bad now, just let the government have control of it for a few years. $300 hammers will be nothing compared to the cost of medical supplies and equipment after the government gets through with it plus the idea is that if the gov't is paying for your medical treatment, it'll also demand you endure their choices of lifestyle, treatment, physicians and medications, perhaps even where one lives and/or works, etc., or no health benefit for failing to follow the gov't's mandate... "for your own good", of course. Phil #3 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
SSI ?
"Phil" wrote in There needs to be some form of assistance for parents of severely handicapped children but NOT from social security. This actually should be handled by a local agency instead of the bureaucratic nightmare of the federal government. The larger the government gets, the worse of a job it does. I agree, nothing worse than letting the bean counters run the show! Taxing those who chose to remain childless to pay for things like daycare for those who chose to breed is unfair. Only those who chose to bring children into the world should be paying the costs of children. Breeding future tax payers is what the country needs, else you have to bring in bodies to replenish the population from 3rd world countries and we know that's not a good idea. Who is going to pay taxes, clean your clothes and clean your **** when you're too old to take care of yourself? Thirdly, the government is the best place to screw up anything. Yes, we can all see that thru the present Child Support system, Veterans Administration anda host of other government services that nobody wants to bother about. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
SSI ?
"Phil" wrote in message m... "DB" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... "Carmen D" wrote in message ... MY MENTALLY RETARDED 10 YEAR OLD SON RECEIVES SSI AND JUST THIS MONTH I GOT A LETTER FROM SOCIAL SECURITY THAT HIS PAYMENT FOR DECEMBER WOULD BE REDUCED 80 DOLLARS DUE TO AN ADVANCED CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT I RECEIVED FROM HIS DAD A MONTH EARLY BECAUSE HIS DAD WAS GOING ON VACATION. MY QUESTION? WILL MY SONS FUTURE PAYMENTS GO BACK TO THE NORMAL PAYMENT? Why don't you ask THEM? Anyway, it really shouldn't matter because regardless of how much money you get, either way it's all FREE! Chris, if you had any notion of how much money, time and energy it takes to look after a handicapped child, you wouldn't be so quick to criticize her. This country needs a decent health care program so that $80 is not a major concern for struggling families! How about daycare support for working parents too that a can't afford the staggering costs of private daycare centers? There needs to be some form of assistance for parents of severely handicapped children but NOT from social security. This actually should be handled by a local agency instead of the bureaucratic nightmare of the federal government. The larger the government gets, the worse of a job it does. No problem with such government agency so long as it operates on a voluntary basis. Anyone who wants to participate can do so, and those who don't will have the right to not do so. Not unlike any other insurance operation. Taxing those who chose to remain childless to pay for things like daycare for those who chose to breed is unfair. Only those who chose to bring children into the world should be paying the costs of children. Thirdly, the government is the best place to screw up anything. If anyone thinks the health care in the US is bad now, just let the government have control of it for a few years. $300 hammers will be nothing compared to the cost of medical supplies and equipment after the government gets through with it plus the idea is that if the gov't is paying for your medical treatment, it'll also demand you endure their choices of lifestyle, treatment, physicians and medications, perhaps even where one lives and/or works, etc., or no health benefit for failing to follow the gov't's mandate... "for your own good", of course. Phil #3 You forgot one thing, the government people also have to get THEIR cut for managing your personal medical care. I don't know about anyone else, but I prefer to eliminate paying some middle man when it comes to my healthcare. Believe it or not, it's actually cheaper. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
SSI ?
Coffee's For Closers wrote:
In article , says... "Phil" wrote in Taxing those who chose to remain childless to pay for things like daycare for those who chose to breed is unfair. Only those who chose to bring children into the world should be paying the costs of children. Breeding future tax payers is what the country needs, else you have to bring in bodies to replenish the population from 3rd world countries and we know that's not a good idea. Who is going to pay taxes, clean your clothes and clean your **** when you're too old to take care of yourself? Yeah-But... There is the issue of multi-generational welfare dependence. When my hard-earned tax dollars are extorted on behalf of a welfare mother, who is paid more for more kids... That does NOT necessarily mean more future workers to care for me in my old age. It may just mean more welfare recipients, bleeding me for more taxes to support them and their children. Personally, I don't plan to ever "retire" in the sense of becoming dependent upon the gubmint for a handout. I would jump off of a bridge before I would allow myself to be parked in front of a TeeVee by some thug in a rest home, to vegetate. By refusing to become a parasite, I am forever subject to being drafted as a host. Paying and paying and paying to deadbeat breeders. Even though I don't even have any children at all. I don't have any "skin in the game" on the child support issue. But, I was raised by a woman who viewed her kids (me and my siblings) as her personal meal-ticket. I didn't respect a deadbeat then, and I don't respect a deadbeat now, either. How about this instead.. If you apply for welfare, of any kind, at any time in your life, you only get to collect for a maximum of five (5) years. After that, you can't ever collect again. Ever. That's how they do it in Germany. You can collect for a while, find a job, stop collecting. If you've stopped before reaching the maximum five years, and something should happen later in life and you need a hand up, then you can continue to collect your five years of welfare from the point that you last left off until such time as it's all used up. Or not. Point is, once you've used it up, that's it, no more freebies. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
SSI ?
"Dusty" wrote in message ... Coffee's For Closers wrote: In article , says... "Phil" wrote in Taxing those who chose to remain childless to pay for things like daycare for those who chose to breed is unfair. Only those who chose to bring children into the world should be paying the costs of children. Breeding future tax payers is what the country needs, else you have to bring in bodies to replenish the population from 3rd world countries and we know that's not a good idea. Who is going to pay taxes, clean your clothes and clean your **** when you're too old to take care of yourself? Yeah-But... There is the issue of multi-generational welfare dependence. When my hard-earned tax dollars are extorted on behalf of a welfare mother, who is paid more for more kids... That does NOT necessarily mean more future workers to care for me in my old age. It may just mean more welfare recipients, bleeding me for more taxes to support them and their children. Personally, I don't plan to ever "retire" in the sense of becoming dependent upon the gubmint for a handout. I would jump off of a bridge before I would allow myself to be parked in front of a TeeVee by some thug in a rest home, to vegetate. By refusing to become a parasite, I am forever subject to being drafted as a host. Paying and paying and paying to deadbeat breeders. Even though I don't even have any children at all. I don't have any "skin in the game" on the child support issue. But, I was raised by a woman who viewed her kids (me and my siblings) as her personal meal-ticket. I didn't respect a deadbeat then, and I don't respect a deadbeat now, either. How about this instead.. If you apply for welfare, of any kind, at any time in your life, you only get to collect for a maximum of five (5) years. After that, you can't ever collect again. Ever. That's how they do it in Germany. You can collect for a while, find a job, stop collecting. If you've stopped before reaching the maximum five years, and something should happen later in life and you need a hand up, then you can continue to collect your five years of welfare from the point that you last left off until such time as it's all used up. Or not. Point is, once you've used it up, that's it, no more freebies. No problem so long as those who have not used such amount can opt for THEIR fair share in a lump sum after a predetermined period of time; just as employers do with sick leave/vacation pay. Or better yet, how about just giving EVERYONE a lump sum, then they can manage it however they like. Thus the taxpayers will be saddled with significantly reduced administration costs because it's always cheaper to make a single payment as opposed to monthly payments. Actually, why bother with such an arrangement at all? If there was no government involvement, the people could manage their finances on their own thus eliminating ALL administration costs. Gee, what a novel concept. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|