Vaccines' Dark Inferno: What is not on insert labels?

Vaccines' Dark Inferno: What is not on insert labels?

Richard Gale and Dr. Gary Null

Progressive Radio Network, September 28, 2009



The vast majority of scientists, physicians, nurses and public health
educators' trust that the ingredients in a vaccine have been individually
and synergistically proven safe and effective. The public believes these
vaccines, aside from their specified virus(es), are sterile solutions, free
from undesirable contaminants not listed on the manufacturer's package
inserts. When the pediatrician injects a vaccine into the muscle of a
child, the parents unquestioning faith that this is the case. In other
words, we want to believe that vaccines have been generated under perfect
conditions for the safety of children and ourselves.

Our investigation shows that most people do not know what is actually in a
vaccine: the active ingredients listed on product labels, inert ingredients,
and, most important, the hidden ingredients. Even more remote is taking the
time to actually study the subject matter, review the scientific literature
and discover the truth for oneself. To our amazement, that truth was easy
to find. But it is a truth that will scare the hell out of you.

Similar to eating veal parmesan, what would happen if a video were placed
on your table and used as a living reality recipe instead of the actual
meal. This video unfolds before your eyes every step in that little creature's
life, from the veal's birth to the parmesan on your plate. You witness how
this veal was starved of its natural nutrients, kept in a tiny stall,
grossly malnourished and deformed, filled with drugs-antibiotics-diseased
and suffering complete privations until finally slaughtered, sliced, cooked
and served on your plate. Would your appetite be the same? Would you still
desire the parmesan? Conveniently we rarely ask the questions, where does
our food come from? How and where was it grown? What was sprayed on it prior
to our consumption? Therefore, we are going to re-record something that even
most top health educators and opinion leaders on vaccines are unaware of.
That is, what goes into the making of vaccines and what is hidden from you
that should give you a moment's of pause? Then ask yourself, do you want
vaccines in your body?

To give us the most in depth, honest, scholarly and objective examination
about the methods by which vaccines and their hidden ingredients are
prepared we turn to the award-winning British investigative medical
journalist, Janine Roberts, who paints an entirely different picture about
the darker inferno in vaccines that do not appear on product labels. This is
the same Janine Roberts who brought to the world's attention blood diamonds,
genocide in the Congo and the destruction of aboriginal cultures by the
Australian government.

Roberts' account of conversations between high level members from the World
Health Organizatioin (WHO), federal health agencies, and expert vaccine
scientists, who determine whether or not a certain vaccine will be approved
or not, is horrid. Her investigations are based on official meeting
documents and her attendance at emergency vaccine meetings, and confirm that
our world's vaccine and health experts agree there is no solution in sight
to resolve the potential and uncertain threats posed by these hidden
ingredients.(1)

The story begins with the vaccine industrial complex's attempt to reduce
vaccine manufacturing costs by seeking government approval to use cancerous
cell lines in the development of vaccines. Vaccine industry's rationale is
that cancerous cells are "immortal." Current vaccine methodology relies on
animal cells, such as fertilized hen embryos and monkey kidneys, that die
quickly in culture. Using cancerous cell lines are also much cheaper than
relying on the purchase of animals, especially monkeys, that need to be
sacrificed for vaccine substrates.

Roberts records two separate meetings-a meeting of the Vaccine and Related
Biological Products Advisory Committee on November 9, 1998, and a subsequent
gathering of the Evolving Scientific and Regulatory Perspective Workshop
less than a year later. The conversations were conducted at a scientific
level between top officials and expert scientists from the FDA, Centers for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the National Institute of
Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the WHO and others, each
providing evidence and/or confirmation that all vaccines are dangerously
contaminated.

Conversations focused primarily on the influenza, MMR and yellow fever
vaccines, which rely on fertilized chicken eggs for their culturing viruses.
Fertilized chicken eggs, while ideally suited for culturing certain viruses
for vaccines, such as the influenza and MMR vaccines, are also living
incubators for large numbers of known and unknown viruses in the animal
kingdom. While these do not transmit from their animal host to humans
naturally, they nevertheless are sequential genetic codes, which when
injected into the human body, have the potential for any number of
unpredictable adverse effects by interfering or merging with the codes of
human cells. Vaccine research is at best a primitive science because it is
injecting into the blood stream foreign substances, chemical and genetic,
that would otherwise not enter the body naturally. When we include into the
equation the enormous amount of known and unknown genetic material and
foreign proteins that vaccines introduce into the body, and then consider
the rapid increase in epidemics raging across the American population-adult
diabetes in children, large numbers of various inflammatory and immune
deficiency diseases, asthma and new allergies, severe gastro-intestinal
disorders (eg., leaky gut syndrome and Crohn's Disease), chronic fatigue
syndrome, and many different neurological disorders (eg., autism, ADD and
ADHD, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, etc.)-we must step back and reconsider their
causes. We should avoid the kind of faith the vaccine industrial complex has
in its determinist, reductionist perspective of genetic materialism to find
these answers without taking into account the bombardment of toxic chemicals
such as vaccine adjuvants and preservatives, extraneous genetic material,
and pathogenic organisms and foreign genetic fragments that we assault our
bodies from shortly after birth into old age.

For some time, it was known that the enzyme reverse transcriptase (RT) was
present in final vaccine solutions. RT has been used to this day as an
indicator that there is a presence of a retrovirus. During the meeting's
proceedings, the WHO decided to withhold public announcement of such genetic
contamination, in this case concerning the MMR vaccine, and made the
decision to not remove it from the market and, in the meantime, continue
safety studies at various laboratories.

Roberts reports that Dr. Arifa Khan from the FDA confirmed:

The RT activity in the vaccine was associated with retrovirus particles from
two separate viral strains: Avian Leuokosis Virus (ALV) and Equine Arteritis
Virus (EAV). The former was especially disturbing because ALV is a leukemia
cancer, and Dr. Khan stated: "There was a theoretical possibility that the
virus [ALV] could. infect the [human] cell." In summary, this means the ALV
genetic code could integrate with human DNA, hence causing some kind of
cancer.

The FDA's reassurance that the ALV RT activity was safe is based on
laboratory observations that there was no viral-human DNA merger activity
for "a full 48 hours'. This kind of assurance is almost nonsensical and
flies in the face of scientific reasoning since cancers can take years to
develop!

As a side note, reverse transcriptase activity is one of the stalwarts of
the HIV/AIDS hypothesis. An article, "Serious Questions Regarding the Safety
and Efficacy of the Influenza Vaccine" published by Canada's Vaccine Risk
Awareness Network reports that some studies, and even some vaccine package
inserts, "indicate that vaccinations increase HIV viral replication."(2)
This means all vaccines stimulate a strong suppressive effect on the immune
system. Under stress conditions, viruses turn hyperactive and increase their
ability to replicate.

The other risk stated by the FDA official was the possibility of the ALV
sequence merging with the measles virus, hence creating a completely new,
mutant and dangerous virus. (This could also apply equally to the H1N1 swine
flu and any other flu vaccines). As an aside, the world renown British
geneticist Dr. Mae-Wan Ho from the Institute of Science in Society wrote
that, "Vaccines themselves can be dangerous, especially live, attenuated
viral vaccines or the new recombinant nucleic acid vaccines, they have the
potential to generate virulent viruses by recombination and the recombinant
nucleic acids could cause autoimmune disease."(3)

During the meeting, Dr. Andrew Lewis, then head of the DNA Virus Laboratory
in the Division of Viral Products confirmed that "All the egg-based vaccines
are contaminated.. These fertilized chicken eggs are susceptible to a wide
variety of viruses." The participants also realized that only a very small
fraction of these small contaminants have been identified and there are
likely hundreds more to be discovered.

Roberts found a 2001 CDC report showing that RT investigative studies for
both the ALV and EAV retroviruses were conducted in 100 patients receiving
the MMR vaccine. They found undesirable "RT activity in all measles vaccine
lots from different manufacturers tested." Their conclusion is that "this
occurrence is not sporadic and that vaccine recipients may be universally
exposed to these [chicken] retroviral particles." In a separate National
Institutes of Health transcript of a meeting, Dr. Conroy of the World Health
Organization stated that EAV viruses are found in all fertilized chicken
eggs. There appears to be little change in the scientific protocol for
making the influenza, MMR and yellow fever vaccines. The current release of
intramuscular H1N1 vaccines for the global market relies on the use of
fertilized chicken embryos. These include each of the approved vaccines by
CSL, Medimmune, Novartis and Sanofi-Pasteur, as well as GlaxoSmithKlines if
and when it is approved in the US.

A later meeting of the FDA's Scientific and Regulatory Perspective Workshop,
without the press, was convened on September 7, 1999 in Washington DC, and
attended by "representatives from all the largest public health institutions
in the West." The following are summaries of key points and statements
raised during this meeting as recorded in Janine Roberts invaluable book
Fear of the Invisible.

· It was reconfirmed that vaccines are "widely contaminated by viral
and DNA genetic code fragments, many viruses and proteins. There was
expressed concern that these may also contain prions (tiny proteins
responsible for incurable diseases and neurological disorders in both humans
and animals) and oncogenes (a gene that turns normal cells into cancerous
ones). One attendee, Dr. Goldberg, stated, "There are countless thousands
of undiscovered viruses, proteins and similar particles. We have only
identified a very small part of the microbial world-and we can only test for
those we have identified. Thus the vaccine cultures could contain many
unknown particles."

· Dr. Andrew Lewis of the FDA said that a brand-new monkey-human
mutant virus was created during the course of creating an adenovirus vaccine
with adenvovirus-SV40 hybrid viruses. Dr. Lewis also worried that "foreign
cellular DNA" common in childhood vaccines could include "viral oncogenes"
capable of causing cancer.

· The scientists presented a question to themselves as to whether or
not an attenuated vaccine strain could revert into a variant virus capable
of replicating so fast that it would cause AIDS. They agreed that they were
unable to answer this question.

· On the question whether or not mutation events could occur in
children after vaccination, the answer was that "Recombination among a
variety of viruses [contaminant viruses] and cells co-infected in tissue
culture is not uncommon." What this basically means is that because it is
"not uncommon" for genetic codes of both contaminant viruses and living
cells to recombine and create mutations in laboratory cultures, it can
certainly occur in a child's body after vaccination.

· Dr. Hana Golding, Chief of CBER's Laboratory of Retrovirus
Research, raised the fear that although DNA fragment contaminants in
vaccines may be thought to be dead, they could remain active and dangerous.
This meant that the codes of these contaminants could combine in vaccines
and create new mutant strains of pathogens.

· Dr. Leonard Hayflick, a virologist at both Stanford and the
University of California at San Francisco raised a concern that the common
primary culture used for making vaccines with animals and bird embryos has
created a situation where it is "apparent that these cells contained many
unwanted viruses, some of which were lethal to humans." This was especially
worrisome of those vaccines, such as polio, which still rely on monkey
kidney cells that have contributed to widespread death and illness.

· One of the UK's leading vaccine expert, Dr. Phil Minor from the
National Institute of Biological Standards and Control, noted that some
cases of polio vaccine are polluted with more monkey virus, SV40, than
actual poliovirus. Although the uninitiated who are not informed
about-closed door vaccine science have been led to assume that SV40 was no
longer in polio vaccines at the time of this meeting, the conversations
confirmed that it was still in use. This is another example of deception at
high levels within the vaccine industrial complex and high government health
officials to withhold information that directly impacts the health and well
being of citizens.

· Dr. Rebecca Sheets from the CBER's laboratory responsible for
monitoring vaccine safety stated the national health organizations had no
control over how vaccines were made. In short, they could make
recommendations but the vaccine industrial complex was free to act as it
chooses.

· It is impossible to remove DNA contaminants from vaccines.
Although weight limits for contaminating DNA were set by the FDA as far back
as 1986, vaccine makers have never been able to reach that goal. The CDC
decided to limit their weight recommendation to cancerous cell lines and
then increase the other DNA contamination allowance one hundred-fold.
However, these limits are only "recommendations" and, therefore, the FDA is
unable to enforce them. Vaccine manufacturers continue to have the freedom
to take scientific measures to reduce contaminants only if they wish.

Remember, this level of contamination (10 nanograms) only applies to a
single vaccine. Children today are inoculated with many vaccines before
entering school, each with unique DNA and viral contaminants due to the
specific cell substrates used for a given vaccine. This toxic genetic soup
is what then flows through a vaccinated person's body.

· One government health official stated, "I chaired the committee
that licensed the chickenpox vaccine, and it [residual DNA] was actually an
issue that we considered at that time. We looked among recipients of the
vaccine for evidence of an autoimmune response associated with the DNA
included in that vaccine.. Actually, we didn't look, we asked the company to
look and they did not find one." Well, of course, only such assurances can
be convincing if in fact the company conducted the study, for which there
was no compulsory reason to. Clearly, what the official is saying is that
health authorities may not possess any study documents that such a study
actually exists.

· Can vaccine DNA contamination cause cancer or autoimmune disease?
A meeting participant responded, "when you consider that almost every one of
these vaccines is injected right into the tissue. I think you couldn't do
much more to get the DNA expressed [to get contaminating DNA taken up by
human cells] than to inject it into a muscle in the way it's being done."

· Again CBER's Dr. Rebecca Sheets: "I think that the vast majority
of licensed vaccines, US licensed vaccines, have not been tested for
residual DNA."

· A more frightening question was raised as to whether it was known
if there has been any presence of foamy virus. Foamy virus (HFV in human
form and its more widespread parent SFV from monkeys), although not
infectious, is a deadly carcinogen. To the participants' knowledge, they did
not know whether any laboratory has ever searched for it in vaccine
preparations.

· The meeting confirmed that a particular cell, "which under many
conditions is neoplastic [tumor causing]" has been licensed for the
production of both injectible and oral polio vaccines in the US, Thailand,
Belgium and France. Therefore, these vaccines carry the high risk of
containing cancer-causing oncogenes.

In order to appreciate the magnitude of the contamination problem in vaccine
products, it is important to understand that vaccine filtration needs to
allow the targeted virus's passage to remain for vaccine use. Other
particles and pathogens-DNA and RNA fragments from other organisms (and
pathogens) in the manufacturing process, cellular substrates, and viral
proteins--smaller than the vaccine's virus will remain in the vaccine.

What the content of these meetings tells us is best expressed by one of the
leading attendants at the meeting, Dr. Minor stated, "So even today then you
have to bear in mind that a large amount of vaccine that's made is made on
really quite crude materials, from an adventitious agent point of view. It's
not a trivial usage. In fact, when considering what vaccines are actually
made on these days, they are quite primitive in some respects." Janine
Roberts summarizes her investigations succinctly,

"In other words, the vaccines we give our children are liquids filled with a
host of unknown particles, most of which came from the cells of non-humans:
from chickens, monkeys and even from cancer cells. Truly we do not know what
we are doing or what are the long-term consequences. All that is known for
sure is that vaccines are a very cheap form of public medicine often
provided by governments to assure the public that they really do care for
the safety of our children."

The conclusion that can be drawn from these meetings convened by our
national and international health officials in vaccine science and safety is
that vaccines are virtually genetic experiments, capable of causing mass
cellular destruction, being injected into the world's population, especially
children. There remain so many unanswered questions about vaccine science.
This includes the forthcoming swine flu vaccines that will include the
contaminants mentioned above, if we take any of these meeting attendees'
words to heart.

If we are to express any awe and wonder it should be towards our body's
natural immune system and its ability to defend itself from the onslaught of
vaccine brews. It is not vaccination that is a miracle of science, as the
vaccine industrial complex, government health authorities and their
congregations of believers are too eager to proclaim. In fact, the real
miracle is the body's ability to protect itself, in most cases, from the
invasion of vaccines. Yet, even this statement is now turning suspect given
the dramatic rise in multiple illnesses and inflammatory conditions across
the age spectrum.

As with all living systems, whether it be a natural habitat in the wild, the
planet's climate system to support life, or the body's immune system, a
tipping point is eventually reached. Today, with the majority of the public
still buying into the false promises of vaccination's efficacy and safety,
the vaccine industrial complex remains an extraordinarily lucrative
business. More and more vaccines are now being developed for a wide variety
of diseases and infections- Chlamydia, herpes simplex type 2, West Nile
virus, Epstein-Barr virus, and others-that will only add to the overload of
vaccines already recommended, especially to children who are officially
recommended to receive 36 separate vaccinations by the time they reach 18
months of age. As these new genetic poisons are added to the national health
agencies' recommended vaccination schedule, a tipping point may be reached
that will result in a more serious pandemic, a pandemic of Vaccine Disease,
manifesting in myriad illnesses dependent upon each vaccinated person's
genetic predisposition and the robustness of the immune system, than any
epidemic threat posed by wild infectious pathogens, including the H1N1 swine
flu, that could unfold in our so-called developed, hygienic society.



Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and
a former Senior Research Analyst in the genomic industry. Dr. Gary Null is
the host of the nation's longest running public radio program on nutrition
and natural health and a multi-award-winning director of progressive
documentary films, including Vaccine Nation and Autism: Made in the USA..



(1) The following quotes and events were taken from Roberts, Janine. Fear of
the Invisible: How Scared Should We Be of Viruses and Vaccines, HIV and AIDS
Impact Investigative Media Productions: Bristol UK, 2009; and from an
interview with Janine Roberts. The Gary Null Show. The Progressive Radio
Network and WNYE-New York on August 19, 2009.

(2) "Serious Questions Regarding the Safety and Efficacy of the Influenza
Vaccine" Vaccine Risk Awareness Network.
http://vran.org/about-vaccines/speci...g-home-deaths/

(3) Ho, Mae-Wan, Cummins, Joe. "The vaccines are far more deadly than the
swine flu". Global Research. August 21, 2009.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...=o&oq=&aqi=g10

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:19:40 +0100, "john" wrote:

Vaccines' Dark Inferno: What is not on insert labels?

This video unfolds before your eyes every step in that little creature's
life, from the veal's birth to the parmesan on your plate.

A cow turns into cheese? Wow.

You witness how
this veal was starved of its natural nutrients, kept in a tiny stall,
grossly malnourished and deformed, filled with drugs-antibiotics-diseased
and suffering complete privations until finally slaughtered, sliced, cooked
and served on your plate. Would your appetite be the same? Would you still
desire the parmesan?

Why would sight of a cow being mistreated put me off cheese? Is this
cows milk used for cheese?

Conveniently we rarely ask the questions, where does
our food come from?

Parmesan is a protected name and only comes from a defined area within
Italy. If it is made anywhere else it cannot be called Parmesan.

How and where was it grown? What was sprayed on it prior
to our consumption?

Nothing is sprayed on Parmesan, why would it be?

Therefore, we are going to re-record something that even
most top health educators and opinion leaders on vaccines are unaware of.

The manufacture of Parmesan? I've no doubt they are indeed largely
unaware of the exact process used.

To give us the most in depth, honest, scholarly and objective examination
about the methods by which vaccines and their hidden ingredients are
prepared we turn to the award-winning British investigative medical
journalist, Janine Roberts,

Oh come on. Mr/Miss Roberts whatever she/he is today is many things
including a new age witch (or warlock) but really doesn't amount to
anything else. Published on her own website is about the limit.

This is
the same Janine Roberts who brought to the world's attention blood diamonds,
genocide in the Congo and the destruction of aboriginal cultures by the
Australian government.

Would that be the one fired from the production because of her/his
aberrant behaviour?

Roberts' account of conversations between high level members from the World
Health Organizatioin (WHO), federal health agencies, and expert vaccine
scientists, who determine whether or not a certain vaccine will be approved
or not, is horrid.

It would be. She has no understanding of science for a start. As for
having the privileged access she claims - only in her/his dreams.

The conversations were conducted at a scientific
level between top officials and expert scientists from the FDA, Centers for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the National Institute of
Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the WHO and others,

That alone would ensure Roberts had no idea what was being discussed.

As an aside, the world renown British geneticist Dr. Mae-Wan Ho

She isn't renowned anywhere, much less world wide. She is also a
retired _plant_ geneticist, much of her work on plants is the subject
of ridicule and she trained in Hong Kong.

from the Institute of Science in Society

A private company she part owns.

Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and
a former Senior Research Analyst in the genomic industry.

That's funny, he describes himself as a "scholar in Chinese languages,
religion and culture" who has devoted himself to spiritual activism
and globalization issues. He is Editor in Chief of Elixir Magazine, a
publication addressing cultural, scientific and environmental issues
from a wide range of spiritual and esoteric perspectives. Obviously
something of a polymath.

Dr. Gary Null is the host of the nation's longest running public radio program on nutrition
and natural health

A pill peddler selling "Food Mood Connection DVD", "Respirator Masks
w/ 1 Mini-Ionic" and the "Gary Null Wave Shield Gold" which "may
reduce strength of EMR from cell phone ear pieces ". That's supposed
to give us confidence in the sources?

(1) The following quotes and events were taken from Roberts, Janine. Fear of
the Invisible

I'm suitably impressed.

"Peter Parry" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:19:40 +0100, "john" wrote:

Vaccines' Dark Inferno: What is not on insert labels?

This video unfolds before your eyes every step in that little creature's
life, from the veal's birth to the parmesan on your plate.


You witness how
this veal was starved of its natural nutrients, kept in a tiny stall,
grossly malnourished and deformed, filled with drugs-antibiotics-diseased
and suffering complete privations until finally slaughtered, sliced,
cooked
and served on your plate. Would your appetite be the same? Would you
still
desire the parmesan?


Conveniently we rarely ask the questions, where does
our food come from?



How and where was it grown? What was sprayed on it prior
to our consumption?


Therefore, we are going to re-record something that even
most top health educators and opinion leaders on vaccines are unaware of.



To give us the most in depth, honest, scholarly and objective examination
about the methods by which vaccines and their hidden ingredients are
prepared we turn to the award-winning British investigative medical
journalist, Janine Roberts,


This is
the same Janine Roberts who brought to the world's attention blood
diamonds,
genocide in the Congo and the destruction of aboriginal cultures by the
Australian government.

?

Roberts' account of conversations between high level members from the
World
Health Organizatioin (WHO), federal health agencies, and expert vaccine
scientists, who determine whether or not a certain vaccine will be
approved
or not, is horrid.



The conversations were conducted at a scientific
level between top officials and expert scientists from the FDA, Centers
for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the National Institute of
Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the WHO and others,

.

As an aside, the world renown British geneticist Dr. Mae-Wan Ho

.

from the Institute of Science in Society


Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network
and
a former Senior Research Analyst in the genomic industry.

.

Dr. Gary Null is the host of the nation's longest running public radio
program on nutrition
and natural health

?

(1) The following quotes and events were taken from Roberts, Janine. Fear
of
the Invisible

Peter Parry, I cleaned this up for you.

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:42:33 -0500, "Smarter Than You"
wrote:

Peter Parry, I cleaned this up for you.

Fine, then read http://www.pharmamafia.com

THERE you get the full package...
--

Interview mit dem Autor der "Reimbibel"

http://www.nrhz.de/flyer/beitrag.php?id=14183