A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.parenting » Spanking
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

An uncertain fate for some in DCYF care



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 11th 07, 04:55 AM posted to alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.support.foster-parents,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,alt.parenting.spanking
fx
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,848
Default An uncertain fate for some in DCYF care

An uncertain fate for some in DCYF care

01:00 AM EDT on Wednesday, July 11, 2007

By Steve Peoples

Journal State House Bureau

MARTINEZ

http://www.projo.com/news/content/dc...J.343655d.html

PROVIDENCE — Shantaine Hall has less than a month to find a new home.

And the 20-year-old single mother is not alone.

There are an estimated 600 young adults who may lose state-subsidized
housing and other services in the coming weeks as the Department of
Children, Youth and Families struggles with a limited budget to help
young people raised in state care.

The young adults of Rhode Island’s child welfare system have depended on
the state for housing, health care and education. Raised in foster
homes, institutions and group homes, state law affords them benefits
they do not receive from the families they were taken away from.

But the system as it has existed for nearly three decades is about to
change because of the state’s new budget.

State law as outlined in the budget requires Rhode Island to provide
services such as housing and health care to children who turn 18 while
in state custody until their 21st birthday. But legislators cut DCYF’s
$25-million budget for such services in half.

“What we know so far is that we were given $12 million less to service
18 to 21 year olds,” DCYF Director Patricia Martinez said. “We need to
figure out what sort of supports we are going to put into place to
continue providing services to this population in a way that is
equitable. While we do that, we need to make sure that we tell the kids
that they’re not going to be homeless.”

Hall recently learned from her social worker that as of Aug. 1, the
state will stop paying for the one-bedroom apartment she shares with her
2-year-old daughter, Ariana.

“I guess I’m going to stay with my mom,” said Hall, who spent most of
her teenage years in state care. “If she says I can’t stay there, I’ll
go to a shelter.”

While Martinez promised that no one will be forced onto the street, Hall
isn’t so sure.

“Well that’s what they say,” Hall said. “I don’t believe it because
where am I going to be in less than a month? Homeless. Me and my child
are being left behind.”

The truth is that neither Martinez, nor Hall, nor social service
advocates know exactly what will become of the hundreds of 18 to 21 year
olds currently living in foster homes, group homes and state-subsidized
apartments.

The state must enact cost-cutting measures immediately to live within
the new budget, which went into effect July 1. And social workers have
already notified young adults across the state that their services will
be changed or eliminated.

But Hall and her daughter don’t know what services, if any, they will
receive.

DCYF this week began the legal process of removing the 18- to
21-year-olds from Family Court jurisdiction, as outlined in the budget.
It is the first step toward reducing or changing state services offered
to the young adults, moves that had required court permission until July 1.

Social service advocates, who were initially grateful that the Assembly
had financed 18- to 21- year-olds at all (the governor had proposed
cutting virtually all money), are asking state leaders to postpone the
legal action.

“Youth in state care are guaranteed the right to a timely, appropriate
and thorough transition process that cannot be preempted by the sudden
enactment of a policy change or budgetary reduction,” reads a letter
sent to Governor Carcieri, Martinez and a host of state officials late
last month from the Rhode Island Children’s Policy Coalition.

Advocates fear that the rush to save money may put the young people —
many of whom were removed from homes because of neglect or abuse — at
further risk.

“The public has a right to know that the victims in all of this are
going to be the kids. It’s a false assurance to say these kids are going
to be fine, because in reality, no one really seems to know,” said Lisa
Guillette, executive director of the Rhode Island Foster Parents
Association.

Soniya Bhogal doesn’t expect a happy 18th birthday.

The teenager becomes an adult on July 24 and has until early next month
to be out of her state-subsidized one-bedroom apartment.

“I’m one of those who are so-called getting sent back to my parents,”
she said. “They take you out of your house, now they’re telling us to go
back? I can’t go back — my mom doesn’t have any room for me… . She
doesn’t want me to go back, let’s put it that way.”

Martinez sent a memo to DCYF staff dated July 2 outlining several ways
DCYF can “assist” children who turn 18, given the new state budget.

The first option is to cut all state involvement: “All youth who can
remain safely with their parents or relatives, who can go to a parent or
a relative or who otherwise have a viable transition plan will close to
DCYF ... .” The young adult would retain state-subsidized health care,
but nothing else.

Another option outlined in the memo would refer the 18- to 21- year-olds
to an “aftercare services program” that “may include housing, access to
… post secondary educational funding, medical coverage and limited case
management.”

Martinez said her department is developing transition plans for each
young person, but that there’s no clear plan. Most will receive health
care and reduced housing benefits, but “there’s no question” that
benefits will be reduced, she said. State services for young adults with
developmental disabilities or those who are “seriously emotionally
disturbed” are not expected to change.

Martinez acknowledged the magnitude of the looming changes: “It’s
pressure I don’t think the system’s ever felt,” she said. “We were told
to reform the system in two weeks.”



CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A
DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL
SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....

CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.

every parent should read this .pdf from
connecticut dcf watch...

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com

Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS

*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*

Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13
Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12
Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5

Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse
and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the
citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold
parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY
government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and
death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more
human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which
they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that
they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when
children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a
bunch of social workers.

BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF
REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES
TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Family's future uncertain (the Hill's #4) Melody Foster Parents 1 June 8th 05 01:59 PM
NM: Jail time for Dad? Ritalin stopped DCYF intrudes Fern5827 Kids Health 11 June 12th 04 01:19 PM
New Hampshire site families and DCYF Fern5827 Spanking 0 June 8th 04 11:13 PM
Joshua’s story: DCYF lets another child slip away wexwimpy Foster Parents 0 February 1st 04 08:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.