A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Childless Men Jailed for Non-payment of Child Support

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 23rd 09, 02:30 PM posted to alt.child-support
external usenet poster
Posts: 340
Default Childless Men Jailed for Non-payment of Child Support

Here's something I bet you won't find at www.nyt.com..


Childless Men Jailed for Non-payment of Child Support
By Jeffery M. Leving | Jul 22, 2009
Frank Hatley spent the past year in Cook County jail in South Georgia for
falling behind in child support payments. However, as the court was aware,
he had no children according to court documents. A DNA test even confirmed
that there was no chance he was the father.

Walter Sharpe, from Philadelphia, was forced to pay more than $12,000 in
child support for another man's daughter. He spent two years in jail for
falling behind in child support payments. Sharpe's Petitions filed for DNA
testing were denied by the judge. However, the paternity order against him
was finally overturned after the girl's mother failed to show up to a court

Paternity Fraud victims need justice. Our system is broken.

A report issued by the American Association of Blood Banks found that nearly
30 percent of paternity tests conducted in the U.S. reveal that the man
being tested is not the biological father. Partially as a result of the
availability of DNA paternity testing, thousands of fathers are discovering
that "their" child is someone else's. But, many of these "duped dads"
continue to be responsible for the payment of child support or suffer the
consequences of jail.

Too many states adhere to an archaic 500-year-old English common-law
doctrine that a married man is always legally presumed the father of a child
born of the marriage, even if he is not the biological father. Unmarried men
can be court ordered to pay child support for children they did not father
through default paternity and child support judgments. Such judgments can be
court ordered without the alleged father's knowledge.

Ignoring paternity fraud is not different than ignoring DNA testing showing
a convicted murderer wasn't guilty. It's time to correct this injustice.
Paternity fraud is just as reprehensible as any other kind of fraud from
which the public needs protection.

Tony Jackson is a California father who had to work two jobs to pay back
approximately $13,000 in back child support for a child proven by DNA
testing not to be his. It's time to release men like Jackson from this
blatant injustice.

Opponents of paternity fraud legislation needed to correct this problem say
we must prevent "duped dads" from abandoning children that are not theirs
biologically. In many cases I've seen, the "duped dad" does not want to
abandon the child he has come to love as his own. It was the system that
drove him off as well as the biological father. For example, in one
outrageous case in Texas, the judge ordered a man to pay child support for
another man's three children and cut off his visitation with all of the

Who is really hurting the children in cases such as this?

To those who say children will be left unsupported if men are not forced to
pay support, I say that the men who should support the children should be
the biological fathers. Making men pay child support for children proven by
DNA testing not to be theirs is not in the best interests of children and
families. It can also deprive children of ever knowing their true biological

The real fear underlying the arguments of many of the dwindling number of
opponents of this legislation is losing a cash cow for agencies and
institutions that benefit financially by preserving the status quo. In
reality, it has little to do with protecting the interests of children.

States benefit by collecting financial incentive payments from the federal
government for child support collected. It is easier for child support
agencies to financially squeeze the "duped dad" than to find the biological
dad, who may not even know he has a child and would welcome the opportunity
to step up to the plate and be Dad.

I encourage all state legislatures to pass fair paternity fraud bills
requiring courts to order DNA testing when requested. I also encourage the
U.S. Supreme Court to hear the next Paternity Fraud case that comes before
it. A correct ruling by the high court would speed justice along for
everyone. This is clearly what is right.

Jeffery M. Leving is one of America's leading family law attorneys. He is
the founder of dadsrights.com.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Child Support Payment Question Tracy Child Support 0 November 4th 05 09:34 PM
Child Support Payment Question Tracy Child Support 0 November 4th 05 06:09 PM
Child Support Payment Question [email protected] Child Support 27 November 4th 05 05:26 PM
Child Support Payment Question Tracy Child Support 0 October 30th 05 05:27 PM
over payment of child support. Jon Child Support 3 May 22nd 04 04:03 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.