If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
SMALLPOX VACCINATION
On 12/3/10 9:43 AM, carole wrote:
wrote in message ... If you actually read some of the articles it says epidemics were caused by the smallpox vaccination. I know what it says. They could say the sky is green, but that doesn't make it so. But they're injecting live virus into people. Why wouldn't it cause the disease its supposed to cure? Because it is not the smallpox virus. It was cowpox, a different virus. There has been a little inventive white washing it seems by the pharma cartel in order to promote their vaccines as safe and efficacious. OK, how many people got small pox last year? Throughout the world? Zero. The disease was on the decline before vaccination apparently. Apparently? Well yes if you read the historical research. No, you say "apparently." That means that's the way it looked, not the way it was. Well yes, that is the way it looks and that is the story the the anti-vaxers are telling. And when I say story, this is not to mean it is fiction, but that is it the version they are selling. Whereas the vaxer story is that they stopped it. Story means version of accounts. Vaccination caused more cases of the disease than occurred naturally in many instances. No, it didn't. You seem pretty sure of it. Yes, I am. From what I read, I wouldn't be so certain - the jury is still out on that one. But not only was vaccination responsible for certain outbreaks, http://whale.to/a/smallpox77.htm#Epi...vaccinati on: The whale to site is a horrible site when it comes to accurate info. but in whole populations of vaccinated people smallpox would occur and kill more people than in populations that weren't vaccinated. http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.c...l-pox-big-lie/ You need to do a little unbiased research though - because the official story as is a lot of history, created for public consumption, a cover story. Go tell that to the people in the hospitals in NYC, Boston, Philly and other big cities who are in iron lungs because of polio. You can't? Oh, gee, that disease was eliminated in the US by vaccines, too. We're talking about smallpox. Try and stick to the subject. I was making another comparison that shows vaccines are effective. You can prove it just as easy using smallpox as an example. No, I can't. At least not scientifically. In science, data are always open to new conclusions. That is a telling comment surely. I have done my research. I have seen my share of infectious disease. I am glad that people are vaccinated against these dreadful diseases so that they don't get them anymore, or, in the case of smallpox, don't need to be vaccinated anymore. The orthopaths and homeopaths could treat these diseases so that people didn't end up with permanent disabilities. Do, they can't. Treatment with distilled water doesn't work. As you have had it pointed out many times, homeopathy is more than distilled water. No, it isn't. It has no basis in science, no good evidence to support it and no mechanism that can explain it. But its long history of cures speaks for itself. Yeap - no history at all of properly documented cures. jeff |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
SMALLPOX VACCINATION
"dr_jeff" wrote in message ... On 12/3/10 9:43 AM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... If you actually read some of the articles it says epidemics were caused by the smallpox vaccination. I know what it says. They could say the sky is green, but that doesn't make it so. But they're injecting live virus into people. Why wouldn't it cause the disease its supposed to cure? Because it is not the smallpox virus. It was cowpox, a different virus. There has been a little inventive white washing it seems by the pharma cartel in order to promote their vaccines as safe and efficacious. OK, how many people got small pox last year? Throughout the world? Zero. The disease was on the decline before vaccination apparently. Apparently? Well yes if you read the historical research. No, you say "apparently." That means that's the way it looked, not the way it was. Well yes, that is the way it looks and that is the story the the anti-vaxers are telling. And when I say story, this is not to mean it is fiction, but that is it the version they are selling. Whereas the vaxer story is that they stopped it. Story means version of accounts. Vaccination caused more cases of the disease than occurred naturally in many instances. No, it didn't. You seem pretty sure of it. Yes, I am. From what I read, I wouldn't be so certain - the jury is still out on that one. But not only was vaccination responsible for certain outbreaks, http://whale.to/a/smallpox77.htm#Epi...vaccinati on: The whale to site is a horrible site when it comes to accurate info. Its not inaccurate so much as alternative. And not so much alternative as containing truth, some truth. What you're not figuring into the equation is the fact that a lost of what passes for truth that is bandied about, comes from big corporations or vested interests. When the whole of a subject is looked into, in an unbiased way, you can often find that what passes for truth is in fact nothing more than propaganda. You need to keep an open mind, and do unbiased research. -- carole www.conspiracee.com "Its pretty hard to keep in touch with reality when you see so little of it." |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
SMALLPOX VACCINATION
On 12/4/10 8:16 PM, carole wrote:
wrote in message ... On 12/3/10 9:43 AM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... If you actually read some of the articles it says epidemics were caused by the smallpox vaccination. I know what it says. They could say the sky is green, but that doesn't make it so. But they're injecting live virus into people. Why wouldn't it cause the disease its supposed to cure? Because it is not the smallpox virus. It was cowpox, a different virus. There has been a little inventive white washing it seems by the pharma cartel in order to promote their vaccines as safe and efficacious. OK, how many people got small pox last year? Throughout the world? Zero. The disease was on the decline before vaccination apparently. Apparently? Well yes if you read the historical research. No, you say "apparently." That means that's the way it looked, not the way it was. Well yes, that is the way it looks and that is the story the the anti-vaxers are telling. And when I say story, this is not to mean it is fiction, but that is it the version they are selling. Whereas the vaxer story is that they stopped it. Story means version of accounts. Vaccination caused more cases of the disease than occurred naturally in many instances. No, it didn't. You seem pretty sure of it. Yes, I am. From what I read, I wouldn't be so certain - the jury is still out on that one. But not only was vaccination responsible for certain outbreaks, http://whale.to/a/smallpox77.htm#Epi...vaccinati on: The whale to site is a horrible site when it comes to accurate info. Its not inaccurate so much as alternative. It's inaccurate because the quality of the information is poor. Period. And not so much alternative as containing truth, some truth. Some truth. As in very little truth. What you're not figuring into the equation is the fact that a lost of what passes for truth that is bandied about, comes from big corporations or vested interests. You mean like the people who sell unproven treatments as if they really work? That's alternative medicine. When the whole of a subject is looked into, in an unbiased way, you can often find that what passes for truth is in fact nothing more than propaganda. Yeap, you described alternative medicine (aka conjecture-based medicine or con-med) perfectly. You need to keep an open mind, and do unbiased research. I have. Thanks. So me the good evidence that alternative medicine works. jeff |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
SMALLPOX VACCINATION
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:49:10 -0000, "john" wrote:
http://wha There is a much better site: http://www.pharmamafia.com Real tough facts about vaccination. All the things you really should know. .. -- Krebsforum Lazarus Das Forum für alternative Krebstherapie http://www.krebsforum-lazarus.ch |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
SMALLPOX VACCINATION
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:51:50 -0500, dr_jeff wrote:
On 12/1/10 10:49 AM, john wrote: http://whale.to/vaccines/smallpox.html The cool thing is that smallpox vaccination is no longer needed thanks to fact that vaccination wiped the disease from the face of the planet! Really? Who says so ? -- Krebsforum Lazarus Das Forum für alternative Krebstherapie http://www.krebsforum-lazarus.ch |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
SMALLPOX VACCINATION
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 07:15:38 -0500, dr_jeff wrote:
Have a good and vaccine-preventable disease free day! In Germany and Austria we have people who hail diseases. Really: They claim that is is good to be ill. -- Krebsforum Lazarus Das Forum für alternative Krebstherapie http://www.krebsforum-lazarus.ch |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
SMALLPOX VACCINATION
"dr_jeff" wrote in message ... On 12/4/10 8:16 PM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/3/10 9:43 AM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... If you actually read some of the articles it says epidemics were caused by the smallpox vaccination. I know what it says. They could say the sky is green, but that doesn't make it so. But they're injecting live virus into people. Why wouldn't it cause the disease its supposed to cure? Because it is not the smallpox virus. It was cowpox, a different virus. There has been a little inventive white washing it seems by the pharma cartel in order to promote their vaccines as safe and efficacious. OK, how many people got small pox last year? Throughout the world? Zero. The disease was on the decline before vaccination apparently. Apparently? Well yes if you read the historical research. No, you say "apparently." That means that's the way it looked, not the way it was. Well yes, that is the way it looks and that is the story the the anti-vaxers are telling. And when I say story, this is not to mean it is fiction, but that is it the version they are selling. Whereas the vaxer story is that they stopped it. Story means version of accounts. Vaccination caused more cases of the disease than occurred naturally in many instances. No, it didn't. You seem pretty sure of it. Yes, I am. From what I read, I wouldn't be so certain - the jury is still out on that one. But not only was vaccination responsible for certain outbreaks, http://whale.to/a/smallpox77.htm#Epi...vaccinati on: The whale to site is a horrible site when it comes to accurate info. Its not inaccurate so much as alternative. It's inaccurate because the quality of the information is poor. Period. He has some good links. And not so much alternative as containing truth, some truth. Some truth. As in very little truth. The biggest conspiracy from your viewpoint would be how John D Rockefeller started the pharmaceutical business and gave massive donations to medical schools. Big business doesn't give money without wanting something in return. What you're not figuring into the equation is the fact that a lost of what passes for truth that is bandied about, comes from big corporations or vested interests. You mean like the people who sell unproven treatments as if they really work? That's alternative medicine. There maybe some dubious alternative remedies, but they pale into comparison to the massive fraud of allopathic medicine. When the whole of a subject is looked into, in an unbiased way, you can often find that what passes for truth is in fact nothing more than propaganda. Yeap, you described alternative medicine (aka conjecture-based medicine or con-med) perfectly. And I'm talking about allopathic medicine. Its time you did some unbiased research. You need to keep an open mind, and do unbiased research. I have. Thanks. So me the good evidence that alternative medicine works. I don't thnk you have. -- Carole www.conspiracee.com "Exploiting workers was always the way the capitalists primarily amassed their fortunes. Several years ago, a member of Dennis Lee's organization had lunch with a Rockefeller heir. The heir said that he knew of no rich American family (at the level of dynastic wealth) that made its fortune honestly. In America at least, behind every great fortune is a great crime." --http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
SMALLPOX VACCINATION
On 12/6/10 8:06 AM, carole wrote:
wrote in message ... On 12/4/10 8:16 PM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/3/10 9:43 AM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... If you actually read some of the articles it says epidemics were caused by the smallpox vaccination. I know what it says. They could say the sky is green, but that doesn't make it so. But they're injecting live virus into people. Why wouldn't it cause the disease its supposed to cure? Because it is not the smallpox virus. It was cowpox, a different virus. There has been a little inventive white washing it seems by the pharma cartel in order to promote their vaccines as safe and efficacious. OK, how many people got small pox last year? Throughout the world? Zero. The disease was on the decline before vaccination apparently. Apparently? Well yes if you read the historical research. No, you say "apparently." That means that's the way it looked, not the way it was. Well yes, that is the way it looks and that is the story the the anti-vaxers are telling. And when I say story, this is not to mean it is fiction, but that is it the version they are selling. Whereas the vaxer story is that they stopped it. Story means version of accounts. Vaccination caused more cases of the disease than occurred naturally in many instances. No, it didn't. You seem pretty sure of it. Yes, I am. From what I read, I wouldn't be so certain - the jury is still out on that one. But not only was vaccination responsible for certain outbreaks, http://whale.to/a/smallpox77.htm#Epi...vaccinati on: The whale to site is a horrible site when it comes to accurate info. Its not inaccurate so much as alternative. It's inaccurate because the quality of the information is poor. Period. He has some good links. Yeah? And some what? Poor info with some good links - that's a bad site. And not so much alternative as containing truth, some truth. Some truth. As in very little truth. The biggest conspiracy from your viewpoint would be how John D Rockefeller started the pharmaceutical business and gave massive donations to medical schools. That's not a conspiracy from my viewpoint. Rich people gave away money. Big deal. It still happens. Big business doesn't give money without wanting something in return. That was his personal business. The person who used to be the richest man in the world (Bill Gates) is giving away money for vaccines, health and education. What do you think he wants in return? What you're not figuring into the equation is the fact that a lost of what passes for truth that is bandied about, comes from big corporations or vested interests. You mean like the people who sell unproven treatments as if they really work? That's alternative medicine. There maybe some dubious alternative remedies, but they pale into comparison to the massive fraud of allopathic medicine. Gee, over 50% of cancer victims have their lives saved vs. about 0% by alternative medicine. While some pharmaceutical companies have horrible advertising practices and should be held accountable for providing all research results of their drugs, I don't see any evidence of massive fraud. When the whole of a subject is looked into, in an unbiased way, you can often find that what passes for truth is in fact nothing more than propaganda. Yeap, you described alternative medicine (aka conjecture-based medicine or con-med) perfectly. And I'm talking about allopathic medicine. Its time you did some unbiased research. I have. You have or anyone else has yet to show alternative medicine does any good. You need to keep an open mind, and do unbiased research. I have. Thanks. So me the good evidence that alternative medicine works. I don't thnk you have. That's because you don't think. Jeff |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
SMALLPOX VACCINATION
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:16:21 -0500, in misc.health.alternative,
dr_jeff wrote: On 12/6/10 8:06 AM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/4/10 8:16 PM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/3/10 9:43 AM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... If you actually read some of the articles it says epidemics were caused by the smallpox vaccination. I know what it says. They could say the sky is green, but that doesn't make it so. But they're injecting live virus into people. Why wouldn't it cause the disease its supposed to cure? Because it is not the smallpox virus. It was cowpox, a different virus. There has been a little inventive white washing it seems by the pharma cartel in order to promote their vaccines as safe and efficacious. OK, how many people got small pox last year? Throughout the world? Zero. The disease was on the decline before vaccination apparently. Apparently? Well yes if you read the historical research. No, you say "apparently." That means that's the way it looked, not the way it was. Well yes, that is the way it looks and that is the story the the anti-vaxers are telling. And when I say story, this is not to mean it is fiction, but that is it the version they are selling. Whereas the vaxer story is that they stopped it. Story means version of accounts. Vaccination caused more cases of the disease than occurred naturally in many instances. No, it didn't. You seem pretty sure of it. Yes, I am. From what I read, I wouldn't be so certain - the jury is still out on that one. But not only was vaccination responsible for certain outbreaks, http://whale.to/a/smallpox77.htm#Epi...vaccinati on: The whale to site is a horrible site when it comes to accurate info. Its not inaccurate so much as alternative. It's inaccurate because the quality of the information is poor. Period. He has some good links. Yeah? And some what? Poor info with some good links - that's a bad site. Agreed. And not so much alternative as containing truth, some truth. Some truth. As in very little truth. The biggest conspiracy from your viewpoint would be how John D Rockefeller started the pharmaceutical business and gave massive donations to medical schools. That's not a conspiracy from my viewpoint. Rich people gave away money. Big deal. It still happens. every day. Big business doesn't give money without wanting something in return. That was his personal business. The person who used to be the richest man in the world (Bill Gates) is giving away money for vaccines, health and education. What do you think he wants in return? Healthy computer users? sick people do not have money to buy computers or electronic gadgets. What you're not figuring into the equation is the fact that a lost of what passes for truth that is bandied about, comes from big corporations or vested interests. You mean like the people who sell unproven treatments as if they really work? That's alternative medicine. There maybe some dubious alternative remedies, but they pale into comparison to the massive fraud of allopathic medicine. Gee, over 50% of cancer victims have their lives saved vs. about 0% by alternative medicine. While some pharmaceutical companies have horrible advertising practices and should be held accountable for providing all research results of their drugs, I don't see any evidence of massive fraud. Not like the sales of homeopathic 'magic sugar' pills. When the whole of a subject is looked into, in an unbiased way, you can often find that what passes for truth is in fact nothing more than propaganda. Yeap, you described alternative medicine (aka conjecture-based medicine or con-med) perfectly. And I'm talking about allopathic medicine. Its time you did some unbiased research. I have. You have or anyone else has yet to show alternative medicine does any good. You need to keep an open mind, and do unbiased research. I have. Thanks. So me the good evidence that alternative medicine works. I don't thnk you have. That's because you don't think. Carole tries to use the words "believes" and "thinks" interchangeably. Doesn't understand the difference. -- Bob Officer "One of my pet hates is being made an idiot out of ...but you go right ahead" Carole Hubbard in Message-ID: . com |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
SMALLPOX VACCINATION
On 12/6/10 5:23 PM, Bob Officer wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:16:21 -0500, in misc.health.alternative, wrote: On 12/6/10 8:06 AM, carole wrote: ... Big business doesn't give money without wanting something in return. That was his personal business. The person who used to be the richest man in the world (Bill Gates) is giving away money for vaccines, health and education. What do you think he wants in return? Healthy computer users? sick people do not have money to buy computers or electronic gadgets. Yeah, but there are other ways to get a better return on the money. Besides, smart people buy Apple computers. ;-) Jeff ... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Smallpox Vaccination Hoax | JOHN | Kids Health | 0 | October 23rd 08 02:50 PM |
The Smallpox Hoax | john | Kids Health | 4 | July 6th 06 07:23 AM |
Vaccination: Any MDs/RNs reporting it as child abuse? (also: TAPPinto truth about vaccination) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 4 | November 18th 05 07:13 PM |
Autistic syndrome (Kanner) and vaccination against smallpox (author's transl) | john | Kids Health | 2 | March 19th 05 04:40 PM |