If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Doan's original bet
Doan and I have this exchange in an earlier post:
" I didn't get an answer to my question, Kane. Why is that? You dind't read the study in full, did you, Kane? Hihihi! Of course not. I can't buy every study out there, Doan. So I read the abstracts, and trust honest little monkey's to run over to the USC library and pick up a copy of the full study and tell us all the nice things in it the support their pet theories about black children flourishing on CP. ...... I followed up with the remarks you see attributed in his posted "bet," to me, below. His reply and his "bet." http://groups.google.com/group/alt.d...2abd3c8?hl=en& Doan View profile More options Mar 5, 9:56 am Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking, alt.support.foster-parents From: Doan Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:56:41 -0800 Local: Mon, Mar 5 2007 9:56 am Subject: What do you think, Doan? /// 4-Year-Old Shoots 3-Year-Old Brother On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote: On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:10:46 -0800, Doan wrote: On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote: 0:- wrote: Feel free to send me an electronic copy of the Duke study, Doan. Or give me an address and I'll send you an envelope and postage. 0:] Glad to. Send me a SASE to: Doan 1010 W. Jefferson Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90089 You forgot the postage amount. For you, I'll make it special, just a $.39 stamp. With the intelligent you have shown on this newsgroup, I'll doubt if you can understand the study. My bet is I won't see the request from you. You are as transparent as a jelly-fish, Kane. Hihihi! Doan ........ There is nothing contextually or within his bet, that supports any conditions for his providing that study to me. Nor even supports his claim that I have not and will not allow him to see my request. He started adding conditions, some impossible to respond to without him being able to reject them as not meeting his requirement...like envelop size, for instance. Just get send the biggest possible one I can find, or something similar. More dodges. Now he wishes to start setting MORE conditions. Now there is a time limit. Well, if I fail to send him the envelope...which of course I'm not going to send until I know the size he requires for the report, he can claim he didn't he didn't "see" my "request," though he most certainly has HERE. That he'll try to bury with time and density by number of posts, or argue with some stupid lying tricks, as usual. You haven't proven a thing, Doan. And you haven't answered my question. Are you dishonorable? Kane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
If you think Doan's recent... | 0:-> | Spanking | 2 | March 8th 07 03:18 AM |
Doan's a pathologial liar. | Greegor | Spanking | 2 | January 19th 07 08:10 PM |
Doan's Way | 0:-> | Spanking | 9 | May 27th 06 12:37 AM |
Doan's a liar | 0:-> | Spanking | 13 | February 1st 06 02:15 AM |
Original Sin No 467 | Chookie | General | 2 | August 30th 05 10:36 PM |