If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Bad mommy or cultural difference?
In article , Donna Metler says...
"Ericka Kammerer" wrote in message ... Nikki wrote: I think the OP should not be so hard on herself. She had a toddler visiting a non-child proofed place for 10 days. It is no surprise at all that she went a little crazy at the store and I think the OP handled it perfectly fine. The other thing that occurs to me is that those of us who are really trying to be mannerly and who never want to be one of "those" parents that all the other people tell stories about when they're bemoaning the state of parenting today *sometimes* take that whole thing too much to heart and overreact trying to keep our kids from offering even the slightest imagined offense. I went to an early childhood music conference earlier this year, and one suggestion was to have our parents recite: In this class, I will not judge any other parent's parenting skills by the behavior of the child, lest they judge my parenting by the behavior of mine! Because invariably, even if your child has been a perfect angel, there will come a day-and often a semester, when your child just is NOT cooperating, and about all you can do is ride with the flow for awhile, and trust that your child will become sweet again. That's great. IF (as I think you said you do, different rooms or somehing...) as the person in charge of the music school has some kind of setup or set of seriously-taken rules where misbehaviors, normal or not, don't get in the way of music lessons for other children. Or even make it difficult to wait for one's own child's lessons. Being tolerant is all fine and good until it gets to the point that what's actually going on is an *in*tolerance for others' needs. Banty (Two sides of the same coin.) |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Bad mommy or cultural difference?
In article ,
cjra says... On Jan 12, 5:52=A0pm, toypup wrote: On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:21:34 -0500, Ericka Kammerer wrote: Nikki wrote: I think the OP should not be so hard on herself. =A0 She had a toddler visiting a non-child proofed place for 10 days. =A0It is no surprise at= all that she went a little crazy at the store and I think the OP handled it= perfectly fine. tiny thing that doesn't go perfectly. =A0We'd all cut others some slack if they were clearly trying to do the right thing, especially in a place where it's not inappropriate to bring a child. =A0(I.e., if you're somewhere the child doesn't belong in the first place, then even a minor issue is a real problem, but it's reasonable to expect the occasional minor disturbance in a public place where young children *are* expected to be around.) It's the people who don't cut others slack that are the most hypersensitiv= e to what others think. I'm not so sure about that. Personally, I'm probably hypersensitive because I've heard others complain about other kids,but I'm the first one to offer a sympathetic hand to a parent struggling. Sometimes it's just a sympathetic smile, sometimes it's actually helping (as I've often done on planes with a mom travelling alone with kids). =A0 I agree. If you're very considerate as you are, you would also be very tolerant of others (in other words, very considerate of their struggles and needs). Two sides of the same coin. Cheers, Banty |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Bad mommy or cultural difference?
In article , Donna Metler says...
"Banty" wrote in message ... In article , Donna Metler says... "Ericka Kammerer" wrote in message ... Nikki wrote: I think the OP should not be so hard on herself. She had a toddler visiting a non-child proofed place for 10 days. It is no surprise at all that she went a little crazy at the store and I think the OP handled it perfectly fine. The other thing that occurs to me is that those of us who are really trying to be mannerly and who never want to be one of "those" parents that all the other people tell stories about when they're bemoaning the state of parenting today *sometimes* take that whole thing too much to heart and overreact trying to keep our kids from offering even the slightest imagined offense. I went to an early childhood music conference earlier this year, and one suggestion was to have our parents recite: In this class, I will not judge any other parent's parenting skills by the behavior of the child, lest they judge my parenting by the behavior of mine! Because invariably, even if your child has been a perfect angel, there will come a day-and often a semester, when your child just is NOT cooperating, and about all you can do is ride with the flow for awhile, and trust that your child will become sweet again. That's great. IF (as I think you said you do, different rooms or somehing...) as the person in charge of the music school has some kind of setup or set of seriously-taken rules where misbehaviors, normal or not, don't get in the way of music lessons for other children. Or even make it difficult to wait for one's own child's lessons. Being tolerant is all fine and good until it gets to the point that what's actually going on is an *in*tolerance for others' needs. Banty (Two sides of the same coin.) We have a waiting room, and an observation room, so if a child starts acting out, we can immediately send them out of the room to their parents, or, in a parent/child class, have the parent take the child out, to the waiting room, which, for at least the first 30 minutes or so won't have anyone in it (the last 10-15 minutes you might have parents coming in for the next class-but usually if a child melts down that close to the end, you just take them home). And I know that I'm not shy about telling a parent that their child needs time out of the room. I've also had children for whom the policy was that when they start acting out, they go outside with an adult and run around the building, before coming back in. Please note that our oldest students are 5-6 yrs old, so really, we're talking about babies, toddlers, and preschoolers. We also have a set policy on the books on breastfeeding (basically, if your baby needs it, go for it, and don't feel self conscious, but after age 2, we don't allow food or drink in the classrooms, but the waiting room is available), which isn't something most studio policies address. Most ECED music programs have at least a 2 room setup-it's just not rational to expect that you won't have crying babies, tantrumming toddlers, and preschoolers who just plain need to be away from an audience for awhile, and the 3 room setup that we have is de rigeur for lab-school type programs that regularly have observers other than parents. Yes, that's the kind of thing I'm talking about, and it's all good. Yes, of course crying and tantrumming happens; the problem isn't that it happens, or even that it happens in public - the problem comes in when nothing is being done about it. Others may say it all costs money yadda yadda, but even in a bare-bones environment, it takes a little bit of aware management and enough self-security not to think the whole enterprise will go down the tubes because asking for a child to be taken to another place PO's some parent who can't see past his or her nose. Banty |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Bad mommy or cultural difference?
"cjra" wrote in message ... Nikki wrote: It is also my second boy that is going to do us in. Extremely persistent and intense. My littles are a mess mostly. All over the place. I think the OP should not be so hard on herself. She had a toddler visiting a non-child proofed place for 10 days. It is no surprise at all that she went a little crazy at the store and I think the OP handled it perfectly fine. Ah, thank you for saying that. It makes me feel better it was a stressful time anyway compounded by some personal health issues (posted on mkp) which had me on edge. That said dh says I am always too sensitive and worried about such things, which may be true. Your welcome. I'm glad the health issues were resolved - how scary. Honestly, I thought this thread was a little bit silly. I'm surprise that anyone really thinks that 10 minutes of trying to deal with a slightly hyper toddler in a store like that is to much especially given the weather. A screaming tantruming toddler I would say yes but not what you describe. In church or a restaurant - perhaps but not in a store like that. I have a hard time thinking her behavior actually bothered anyone or interfered with what they were trying to do there. There may have been people there that would say they were put out but honestly I think that is just self-righteousness because your kid wasn't perched quietly on your hip, not because what the child was doing was actually affecting them any. JMO. It is probably a good thing I don't travel abroad . I find it so interesting. I used to come in contact with tour buses of people from other countries all the time and they were anything but quiet and reserved. -- Nikki, mama to Hunter 4/99 Luke 4/01 Brock 4/06 Ben 4/06 |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Bad mommy or cultural difference?
"Chookie" wrote in message news:ehrebeniuk-42B2CB.21494115012008@news... In article , Banty wrote: Or the music school administrators or teachers and she had a discussion in private, and she didn't sign up to the changes they required. Quite possibly. For the last two lessons, she sat OUTSIDE with the daughter (remember that parents are supposed to be present for this class). I suggested quietly to the teacher that she's better put a stop to that, and to ask the advice of the boss. For one thing, I thought that there might be an insurance requirement for the parent's presence, and for another, I could see her gradually coming to think that this was fine, and ultimately, that dumping the kids and running would be fine too. OTOH as she was sitting outside 'supervising' her daughter with her eyes closed, I still think nervous breakdown was on the cards :-( Well, personally, I don't allow children in my parent-participation classes to attend without a parent, and if they have a sibling who is out of the age range, the sibling can only attend if they're a) so young that they can be happy in a carseat, stroller, or sling most of the time (usually below 6 months) or b) old enough that they can sit in the back of the room and amuse themselves without problem (usually school aged kids, mostly homeschooled) We have a divided off section specificially for this purpose, since I don't want unattended children in my waiting room, and if they're in my room I have much more direct control of their behavior. While we will have occasional days with more siblings (days that many preschools or kindergartens are closed for some reason, but the University isn't), usually the only siblings we have in class are older, homeschooled children who are very well behaved (although I suspect very little of the workbooks that they bring with them get done-usually they're more interested in watching the class) If a parent has two children in the 0-5 age range, we offer a family class designed for siblings of different ages to come together, and a parent who tries to come into a baby class with her 3 yr old will be referred to that class. And one benefit of having a waiting list-we have no problem whatsoever with telling a parent that our program cannot meet their needs at this time-which is what a parent who's child was dismantling the room would be told. |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
Bad mommy or cultural difference?
|
#157
|
|||
|
|||
Bad mommy or cultural difference?
In article , Banty
wrote: Or the music school administrators or teachers and she had a discussion in private, and she didn't sign up to the changes they required. Quite possibly. For the last two lessons, she sat OUTSIDE with the daughter (remember that parents are supposed to be present for this class). I suggested quietly to the teacher that she's better put a stop to that, and to ask the advice of the boss. For one thing, I thought that there might be an insurance requirement for the parent's presence, and for another, I could see her gradually coming to think that this was fine, and ultimately, that dumping the kids and running would be fine too. OTOH as she was sitting outside 'supervising' her daughter with her eyes closed, I still think nervous breakdown was on the cards :-( -- Chookie -- Sydney, Australia (Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply) http://chookiesbackyard.blogspot.com/ |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
Bad mommy or cultural difference?
jos wrote: She sounds perfectly normal to me, perhaps even quieter than most if you survived ten days in a non-child proofed home! Anyway, I know plenty of active swiss toddlers, even had one of those myself. And there's no way I'd have taken my second daughter shopping in those conditions if I had any choice- MediaMarkt is a popular store for CDs, DVDs, computeurs, household appliances... that is, mostly non-essentials that you can plan for, no have-to-go-shopping-now-or-we-don't-eat situations here. Yeah I avoid taking her to the US equivalent, but when we're in CH we often have a tight schedule between visits and shopping for things we can't get in the US (we always have a big list), so leaving her behind is not always possible. That said DH also likes to do things "as a family" which is nice in theory but I have often had to argue that needn't apply to shopping! Most of the local toddlers you saw were definitly self-selected for quietness, or reliably asleep; all the more normal ones were probably in the park with the other parent or off-loaded on grandma (if you were at the MediaMarkt next to Geneva airport, there's a nice park less than two minutes away ). Now that makes me feel much better! It was the MediaMrkt that's on the highway near Luasanne -heading north to Yverdon. I can't tell you if the swiss would be stricter about public behaviour than americans, as most of my experience of american toddlers in america is through misc.kids . Over here I'd say the general attitude is that toddler behaviour is to be expected, but if it's very disruptive you'd be expected to do something about it even if did start a tantrum. For instance, I think in general it's the same in the US in your example you would't let a toddler pull all the CDs out of the display Well, she started doing this. She'd pull one off and hand it to me, then another, and another. That's why we split up and moved her out of the Cd section. or run around screeching, but it doesn't sound as if your daughter was doing anything particlarly obnoxious. No she wasn't running screeching. In fact she was reasonably quiet except when I tried to hold her still. She just wanted to touch every TV screen she saw... I've left puppet shows when my daughter was behaving the way you describe, because running around is disturbing to others watching the show. There's no way MediaMarkt in the after-Christmas sales can compare to that situation! Yeah I don't think she was disturbing to other patrons exactly but I doubt the staff appreciated her touching stuff, which is why I was trying to stop her. Jo (feeling a bit envious of your nice warm winters today) Well it's yucky rainy today |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless Of Cultural Norm | 0:-> | Spanking | 299 | January 24th 07 01:20 AM |
How to handle a cross-cultural parenting issue sensitively? | Cathy Weeks | General | 27 | January 18th 07 12:01 AM |
Spanking Leads To Child Aggression And Anxiety, Regardless Of Cultural Norm | Greegor | Foster Parents | 6 | January 16th 07 03:54 AM |
Difference between God and an MD? | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 5 | April 10th 04 12:07 PM |