A lesson for Democrats

"I'm a person of faith, and here's who I am, and you're entitled to
know who I am because you ought to know about me, what's important to
me."

-- Timothy M. Kaine
Catholic, Democrat & future Governor of Virginia
Washington Post, Page A1
October 31, 2005

Opinions wrote:
"I'm a person of faith, and here's who I am, and you're entitled to
know who I am because you ought to know about me, what's important to
me."

As a Catholic I doubt he's a conservative right wing Christian. In
fact, I'd bet he's disgusted with you folks, and wouldn't trust you to
mind a dog, let alone a child.

-- Timothy M. Kaine
Catholic, Democrat & future Governor of Virginia
Washington Post, Page A1
October 31, 2005

I don't mind Christians being, like all others in this country, invited
to the seats of power.

I do though recognize the danger in extremists making their way to
those power positions.

And you don't really last all that long in power.

Notice?

Spanking's days are numbered. Trust me. I'll shed a tear for you. Then
laugh my ass off at your stupidity and silliness, just as we recognize
now how ugly and inhumane and devastating slavery, and the suppression
and exploitation of women and children was to humankind.

0:-

On 9 Nov 2005 wrote:


Opinions wrote:
"I'm a person of faith, and here's who I am, and you're entitled to
know who I am because you ought to know about me, what's important to
me."

As a Catholic I doubt he's a conservative right wing Christian. In
fact, I'd bet he's disgusted with you folks, and wouldn't trust you to
mind a dog, let alone a child.


I don't think he minds you at all, Kane9 -9 = Kane0! ;-)

Doan

As a spin-off of feminist Marxism, proponents of no-spank are
frequently either atheist or have quasi-Marxist-atheist training such
as that found in the typical college of education at a state
university. It often flies under the radar as a radical demand for
separation of church and state.

Except for a few mouthpieces, most committed no-spanks are white
females with some trappings of higher education. In fact, blacks often
refer to no-spank as a *white-lady thing*!

In truth, white matriarchal no-spank needs white patriarchal
fundamentalism in order for their agenda to survive. The two extremes
are actually locked in a type of cold war battle of the sexes in which
they feed off of each other.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union, lily-white socialist Sweden has
become the new Valhalla for mostly white feminist ideology. It is the
Promised Land. Meanwhile, if present demographic trends continue,
liberal white females will be a definite minority in the United States
shortly after 2050 rolls around. Their freedom from children and men
in the wake of the 1960's sexual revolution is going to cost their
precious agenda dearly.


Doan wrote:
On 9 Nov 2005 wrote:


Opinions wrote:
"I'm a person of faith, and here's who I am, and you're entitled to
know who I am because you ought to know about me, what's important to
me."

As a Catholic I doubt he's a conservative right wing Christian. In
fact, I'd bet he's disgusted with you folks, and wouldn't trust you to
mind a dog, let alone a child.


I don't think he minds you at all, Kane9 -9 = Kane0! ;-)

Doan

Opinions wrote:
As a spin-off of feminist Marxism, proponents of no-spank are
frequently either atheist or have quasi-Marxist-atheist training such
as that found in the typical college of education at a state
university. It often flies under the radar as a radical demand for
separation of church and state.

Please show your proof that those that are against spanking of children
derive from Marxist or even feminist principles or teachings.

Except for a few mouthpieces, most committed no-spanks are white
females with some trappings of higher education. In fact, blacks often
refer to no-spank as a *white-lady thing*!

No they don't.

And many blacks do not spank their children. The belief they do is
derived from the public statements, not from research. More and more
blacks have given it up as time passes. They see it for what it is,
having been historically so close to it as adults.

In truth, white matriarchal no-spank needs white patriarchal
fundamentalism in order for their agenda to survive.

Those that are against spanking would welcome with open arms the chance
to lay down the battle and never have to speak of it again. Hence they
don't "need" any such thing.

The two extremes
are actually locked in a type of cold war battle of the sexes in which
they feed off of each other.

The extremes might, but those with good sense do not.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union, lily-white socialist Sweden has
become the new Valhalla for mostly white feminist ideology.

Lily white? They have the highest incident of immigrants of any of the
nordic countries. 10% or more of their population are immigrants. You
thrive on ignorance, don't you?

It is the
Promised Land.

I presume for children, and their delighted parents who have seen the
results of more humane parenting methods, yes, I'd say that's a fair
description.

Meanwhile, if present demographic trends continue,
liberal white females will be a definite minority in the United States
shortly after 2050 rolls around.

All whites will be a minority. I presume any demographic that is
labeled "white something" will go right along, because the minority
non-white population, especially hispanic mixed, is growing at such a
fast rate.

Their freedom from children and men
in the wake of the 1960's sexual revolution is going to cost their
precious agenda dearly.

Odd, women are still having babies, presumably using men for the
process, at an astounding rate. Many wait until later, but that doesn't
change the total numbers over time. And marriage is still around in my
part of the country, as the preferred vehicle for having and raising
children.

You are pretty scared, aren't you? Not gettin' laid, I presume.

It's fun to watch you break down from your baiting to out and out
blathering propaganda ranting though. Keep it up. Nothing helps those
of us that want an end to child assualts in the name of "discipline"
than examples such as yourself.

0:-




Doan wrote:
On 9 Nov 2005 wrote:


Opinions wrote:
"I'm a person of faith, and here's who I am, and you're entitled to
know who I am because you ought to know about me, what's important to
me."

As a Catholic I doubt he's a conservative right wing Christian. In
fact, I'd bet he's disgusted with you folks, and wouldn't trust you to
mind a dog, let alone a child.


I don't think he minds you at all, Kane9 -9 = Kane0! ;-)

Doan