If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
SPLENDA
On Jul 9, 5:37 am, Peter Bowditch wrote:
"Jan Drew" wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote in message news:bRhki.570$CJ4.567@trndny08... The One True Zhen Jue wrote: On Jul 8, 5:45 am, (Richard Schultz) wrote: In misc.health.alternative bigvince wrote: : On Jul 5, 12:35 pm, (Richard Schultz) wrote: : In misc.health.alternative JOHN wrote: : : "By this process chlorocarbons such as sucralose deliver chlorine directly : : into our cells through normal metabolization. This makes them effective : : insecticides and preservatives. Preservatives must kill anything alive to : : prevent bacterial decomposition." : Someone should ask Dr. Bowen how he reconciles his belief that sugar : and salt are acceptable dietary components with their historical : use as food preservatives. : As you know aspartame another chlorocarbon. . . Try again, but this time (a) answer the point that was raised and (b) without incorrectly referring to aspartame as a "chlorocarbon" (it isn't; it's a methyl ester of a dipeptide) Credulous Vince has Aspartame confused with Splenda. Don't expect him to understand his mistake or any other aspect of chemistry. When will all those horrific side effects of Aspartame finally manifest? Ten years ago, Not-A-Doctor Betty Martini claimed that aspartame would make you blind. Where are all those blind people? http://www.answers.com/topic/blindness?cat=health In November 2004 article Magnitude and causes of visual impairment, the WHO estimated that in 2002 there were 161 million (about 2.6% of the world population) visually impaired people in the world, of whom 124 million (about 2%) had low vision and 37 million (about 0.6%) were blind. [9] ==== How would anyone know if anyone's blindness was caused by aspartame? After all the health effects are denied... For ONE reason, it's called M O N E Y. BTW, what were you doing 30 years ago? How about 15 years ago? Hmmmm. Jan, the leading cause of blindness in children around the world is measles. Please remember that the next time you feel the need to support some anti-vaccination liar. -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Projecthttp://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Leading cause of childhood blindness "Causes of Blindness Causes of Childhood Blindness: Worldwide Vitamin A Deficiency (Xerophthalmia) A recent analysis of data indicates that vitamin A deficiency is the leading cause of childhood blindness. It was estimated that 70% of the 500,000 children who become blind annually do so because of xerophthalmia. This corresponds to a prevalence of roughly 1 million in view of the high mortality among affected children. (Thylefors, et al.', source Lighthouse International link http://www.lighthouse.org/medical/causes-of-blindness/ |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
SPLENDA
bigvince wrote:
On Jul 9, 5:37 am, Peter Bowditch wrote: "" wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote in message news:bRhki.570$CJ4.567@trndny08... The One True Zhen Jue wrote: On Jul 8, 5:45 am, (Richard Schultz) wrote: In misc.health.alternative bigvince wrote: : On Jul 5, 12:35 pm, (Richard Schultz) wrote: : In misc.health.alternative JOHN wrote: : : "By this process chlorocarbons such as sucralose deliver chlorine directly : : into our cells through normal metabolization. This makes them effective : : insecticides and preservatives. Preservatives must kill anything alive to : : prevent bacterial decomposition." : Someone should ask Dr. Bowen how he reconciles his belief that sugar : and salt are acceptable dietary components with their historical : use as food preservatives. : As you know aspartame another chlorocarbon. . . Try again, but this time (a) answer the point that was raised and (b) without incorrectly referring to aspartame as a "chlorocarbon" (it isn't; it's a methyl ester of a dipeptide) Credulous Vince has Aspartame confused with Splenda. Don't expect him to understand his mistake or any other aspect of chemistry. When will all those horrific side effects of Aspartame finally manifest? Ten years ago, Not-A-Doctor Betty Martini claimed that aspartame would make you blind. Where are all those blind people? http://www.answers.com/topic/blindness?cat=health In November 2004 article Magnitude and causes of visual impairment, the WHO estimated that in 2002 there were 161 million (about 2.6% of the world population) visually impaired people in the world, of whom 124 million (about 2%) had low vision and 37 million (about 0.6%) were blind. [9] ==== How would anyone know if anyone's blindness was caused by aspartame? After all the health effects are denied... For ONE reason, it's called M O N E Y. BTW, what were you doing 30 years ago? How about 15 years ago? Hmmmm. , the leading cause of blindness in children around the world is measles. Please remember that the next time you feel the need to support some anti-vaccination liar. -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Projecthttp://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Leading cause of childhood blindness "Causes of Blindness Causes of Childhood Blindness: Worldwide Vitamin A Deficiency (Xerophthalmia) A recent analysis of data indicates that vitamin A deficiency is the leading cause of childhood blindness. It was estimated that 70% of the 500,000 children who become blind annually do so because of xerophthalmia. This corresponds to a prevalence of roughly 1 million in view of the high mortality among affected children. (Thylefors, et al.', source Lighthouse International link http://www.lighthouse.org/medical/causes-of-blindness/ Vinnie, you are right on the money. Home run! Grand slam! Unlike claimed by Not-A-Doctor Betty Martini, aspartame plays no part in worldwide blindness. Your website conclusively proves it, as it lists the causes of blindness. Good job, and thanks for covering my six. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
SPLENDA
Mark Probert wrote:
bigvince wrote: On Jul 9, 5:37 am, Peter Bowditch wrote: "" wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote in message news:bRhki.570$CJ4.567@trndny08... The One True Zhen Jue wrote: On Jul 8, 5:45 am, (Richard Schultz) wrote: In misc.health.alternative bigvince wrote: : On Jul 5, 12:35 pm, (Richard Schultz) wrote: : In misc.health.alternative JOHN wrote: : : "By this process chlorocarbons such as sucralose deliver chlorine directly : : into our cells through normal metabolization. This makes them effective : : insecticides and preservatives. Preservatives must kill anything alive to : : prevent bacterial decomposition." : Someone should ask Dr. Bowen how he reconciles his belief that sugar : and salt are acceptable dietary components with their historical : use as food preservatives. : As you know aspartame another chlorocarbon. . . Try again, but this time (a) answer the point that was raised and (b) without incorrectly referring to aspartame as a "chlorocarbon" (it isn't; it's a methyl ester of a dipeptide) Credulous Vince has Aspartame confused with Splenda. Don't expect him to understand his mistake or any other aspect of chemistry. When will all those horrific side effects of Aspartame finally manifest? Ten years ago, Not-A-Doctor Betty Martini claimed that aspartame would make you blind. Where are all those blind people? http://www.answers.com/topic/blindness?cat=health In November 2004 article Magnitude and causes of visual impairment, the WHO estimated that in 2002 there were 161 million (about 2.6% of the world population) visually impaired people in the world, of whom 124 million (about 2%) had low vision and 37 million (about 0.6%) were blind. [9] ==== How would anyone know if anyone's blindness was caused by aspartame? After all the health effects are denied... For ONE reason, it's called M O N E Y. BTW, what were you doing 30 years ago? How about 15 years ago? Hmmmm. , the leading cause of blindness in children around the world is measles. Please remember that the next time you feel the need to support some anti-vaccination liar. -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Projecthttp://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Leading cause of childhood blindness "Causes of Blindness Causes of Childhood Blindness: Worldwide Vitamin A Deficiency (Xerophthalmia) A recent analysis of data indicates that vitamin A deficiency is the leading cause of childhood blindness. It was estimated that 70% of the 500,000 children who become blind annually do so because of xerophthalmia. This corresponds to a prevalence of roughly 1 million in view of the high mortality among affected children. (Thylefors, et al.', source Lighthouse International link http://www.lighthouse.org/medical/causes-of-blindness/ Vinnie, you are right on the money. Home run! Grand slam! Unlike claimed by Not-A-Doctor Betty Martini, aspartame plays no part in worldwide blindness. Your website conclusively proves it, as it lists the causes of blindness. Good job, and thanks for covering my six. The web site talks about 1995, and spends most of its time referring to the US. I was talking about world-wide. http://www.who.int/blindness/causes/...en/index4.html " In high-income countries, lesions of the optic nerve and higher visual pathways predominate as the cause of blindness, while corneal scarring from measles, vitamin A deficiency, the use of harmful traditional eye remedies, ophthalmia neonatorum, and rubella cataract are the major causes in low-income countries". Note that two of the list can be prevented by MMR vaccine. Measles depletes Vitamin A and reduced Vitamin A makes measles worse. Nasty cycle.. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/en/ http://www.searo.who.int/LinkFiles/G...sles100105.pdf -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
SPLENDA
"Peter Bowditch" wrotr: [but....he could not answer my question]. * How would anyone know if anyone's blindness was caused by aspartame?* After all the health effects are denied... "Jan Drew" wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote in message news:bRhki.570$CJ4.567@trndny08... The One True Zhen Jue wrote: On Jul 8, 5:45 am, (Richard Schultz) wrote: In misc.health.alternative bigvince wrote: : On Jul 5, 12:35 pm, (Richard Schultz) wrote: : In misc.health.alternative JOHN wrote: : : "By this process chlorocarbons such as sucralose deliver chlorine directly : : into our cells through normal metabolization. This makes them effective : : insecticides and preservatives. Preservatives must kill anything alive to : : prevent bacterial decomposition." : Someone should ask Dr. Bowen how he reconciles his belief that sugar : and salt are acceptable dietary components with their historical : use as food preservatives. : As you know aspartame another chlorocarbon. . . Try again, but this time (a) answer the point that was raised and (b) without incorrectly referring to aspartame as a "chlorocarbon" (it isn't; it's a methyl ester of a dipeptide) Credulous Vince has Aspartame confused with Splenda. Don't expect him to understand his mistake or any other aspect of chemistry. When will all those horrific side effects of Aspartame finally manifest? Ten years ago, Not-A-Doctor Betty Martini claimed that aspartame would make you blind. Where are all those blind people? http://www.answers.com/topic/blindness?cat=health In November 2004 article Magnitude and causes of visual impairment, the WHO estimated that in 2002 there were 161 million (about 2.6% of the world population) visually impaired people in the world, of whom 124 million (about 2%) had low vision and 37 million (about 0.6%) were blind. [9] ==== How would anyone know if anyone's blindness was caused by aspartame? After all the health effects are denied... For ONE reason, it's called M O N E Y. BTW, what were you doing 30 years ago? How about 15 years ago? Hmmmm. snip. same ole,same ole,same ole -- Peter Bowditch |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
SPLENDA
"Jan Drew" wrote:
"Peter Bowditch" wrotr: [but....he could not answer my question]. * How would anyone know if anyone's blindness was caused by aspartame?* After all the health effects are denied... What in God's name are you talking about? I have given you a list of the major causes of blindness, and aspartame is not one of them. Just think for a moment - there are literally millions of doses of aspartame consumed in the US alone every day. Where are the blind people? "Jan Drew" wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote in message news:bRhki.570$CJ4.567@trndny08... The One True Zhen Jue wrote: On Jul 8, 5:45 am, (Richard Schultz) wrote: In misc.health.alternative bigvince wrote: : On Jul 5, 12:35 pm, (Richard Schultz) wrote: : In misc.health.alternative JOHN wrote: : : "By this process chlorocarbons such as sucralose deliver chlorine directly : : into our cells through normal metabolization. This makes them effective : : insecticides and preservatives. Preservatives must kill anything alive to : : prevent bacterial decomposition." : Someone should ask Dr. Bowen how he reconciles his belief that sugar : and salt are acceptable dietary components with their historical : use as food preservatives. : As you know aspartame another chlorocarbon. . . Try again, but this time (a) answer the point that was raised and (b) without incorrectly referring to aspartame as a "chlorocarbon" (it isn't; it's a methyl ester of a dipeptide) Credulous Vince has Aspartame confused with Splenda. Don't expect him to understand his mistake or any other aspect of chemistry. When will all those horrific side effects of Aspartame finally manifest? Ten years ago, Not-A-Doctor Betty Martini claimed that aspartame would make you blind. Where are all those blind people? http://www.answers.com/topic/blindness?cat=health In November 2004 article Magnitude and causes of visual impairment, the WHO estimated that in 2002 there were 161 million (about 2.6% of the world population) visually impaired people in the world, of whom 124 million (about 2%) had low vision and 37 million (about 0.6%) were blind. [9] ==== How would anyone know if anyone's blindness was caused by aspartame? After all the health effects are denied... For ONE reason, it's called M O N E Y. BTW, what were you doing 30 years ago? How about 15 years ago? Hmmmm. snip. same ole,same ole,same ole -- Peter Bowditch -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
SPLENDA
"Jan Drew" wrote:
"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message .. . "Jan Drew" wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote in message . net... From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum By James Bowen, M.D. 5-8-5 "Doctor" Martini!!! Splooorrrfff!!! Please try to find a credible source when you are quoting fairy tales. Jan. resnip BettyBull****(tm) -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
SPLENDA
In misc.health.alternative Jan Drew wrote:
As usual, Ms. Drew reposts factually incorrect material. . . : "Sucralose is a molecule of sugar chemically manipulated to surrender three : hydroxyl groups (hydrogen + oxygen) and replace them with three chlorine : atoms. Natural sugar is a hydrocarbon built around 12 carbon atoms. There is no such thing as "natural sugar"; "sugar" refers to a family of many different compounds, which can contain any number of carbon atoms (well, usually one thinks of the family starting with three-carbon fragments, although Fischer's classic synthesis started with ethylene glycol, which contains only two). For example, sucrose, common table sugar, contains 12 carbon atoms, while fructose and glucose, sugars found in sweeteners such as honey and corn syrup, contain six. (Interesting digression: I have read of "natural foods" advocates objecting to the use of corn syrup because it's mostly the simple sugar fructose, the ingestion of which is supposed to be bad for the body, but I have never seen one object to the use of honey, which comprises mostly fructose and glucose.) In addition, "natural" sugar is not a hydrocarbon -- it contains oxygen and therefore cannot be a hydrocarbon by definition. Gasoline is an example of a hydrocarbon mixture. Sugars are "carbohydrates" in which the hydrogen to oxygen ratio is 2:1 just as it is in water: if you pour concentrated sulfuric acid on sugar, it will liberate the hydrogen and oxygen as water and leave behind a lump of carbon. Note also the inflammatory language "chemically manipulated." Sugar itself is "chemically manipulated" -- plants convert carbon dioxide and water into simple sugars (releasing the excess oxygen along the way), and from simple sugars into complex sugars and starches. When a person digests sugar, his body is chemically manipulating it through a series of well-known transformations. : When turned into Splenda it becomes a chlorocarbon, in the family of : Chlorodane, Lindane and DDT, It is *not* in the family of chlordane (note the spelling), Lindane, and DDT. All of those are chlorocarbons -- they contain carbon, chlorine, and hydrogen; sucralose also contains oxygen. A very big difference between chlorinated pesticides and sucralose is that the former are fat-soluble and hence accumulate in the body, while sucralose is not. : "It is logical to ask why table salt, which also contains chlorine, is safe : while Splenda/sucralose is toxic? Because salt isn't a chlorocarbon. When : molecular chemistry binds sodium to chlorine to make salt carbon isn't : included. Sucralose and salt are as different as oil and water. The difference has nothing to do with the lack of carbon in salt; in salt, chlorine is present as the chloride ion, while in chlorine-containing organic compounds, it is present as neutral chlorine. : "Unlike sodium chloride, chlorocarbons are never nutritionally compatible : with our metabolic processes and are wholly incompatible with normal human : metabolic functioning. If sodium chloride is "nutritionally compatible with our metabolic processes," why can't we drink seawater? : "By this process chlorocarbons such as sucralose deliver chlorine directly : into our cells through normal metabolization. This makes them effective : insecticides and preservatives. Preservatives must kill anything alive to : prevent bacterial decomposition." I've already asked this, and gotten no response: how do you reconcile the claims that preservatives "must kill anything alive" while natural salt and sugar are compatible with metabolic processes with the historical use of salt and sugar as food preservatives? : Dr. Bowen believes ingested chlorocarbon damage continues with the formation : of other toxins: "Any chlorocarbons not directly excreted from the body : intact can cause immense damage to the processes of human metabolism and, : eventually, our internal organs. What evidence do you have that sucralose is *not* directly excreted from the body? : Dr. Bowen continues: "Just like aspartame, which achieved marketplace : approval by the Food and Drug Administration when animal studies clearly : demonstrated its toxicity, sucralose also failed in clinical trials with : animals. Aspartame created brain tumors in rats. Sucralose has been found to : shrink thymus glands (the biological seat of immunity) and produce liver : inflammation in rats and mice. This is the same argument that was used against saccharin, which certainly does cause cancer in laboratory animals. The issue is one of public policy involving two different questions: (1) Must we assume that if a chemical shows toxicity at high doses, it must necessarily show toxicity at *any* dose (i.e. we must assume that there is no threshold for toxicity)? (2) What is the acceptable level of risk for any new technology? In general, people have historically shown a willingness to tolerate a certain level of risk if the perceived benefits outweigh the perceived risks. Sometimes, this willingness is a bad thing (e.g. the large number of supposedly "healthful" products containing radium that were sold in the 1920's); sometimes it is not so obviously a bad thing (e.g. there is no question that if cars were banned and everyone were required to walk, there would be a lot fewer traffic fatalities, and a healthier populace; but no one seems to be willing to give up cars, even though doing so would save tens of thousands of lives per year in the U.S. alone, not to mention the long-term health and environmental benefits). These issues are not simple ones, and it could very well be that the risks of sucralose use will be found to outweigh the benefits. But for there to be any reasoned debate on the issue, people need to be informed of the truth -- not of distortions and half-truths. That goes, of course, for both the people who believe that sucralose is not dangerous as well as for the people such as whoever penned the screed to which I am replying who believe that it is. ----- Richard Schultz Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University ----- They do not think whom they souse with spray. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
SPLENDA
Peter Bowditch wrote:
Mark Probert wrote: bigvince wrote: On Jul 9, 5:37 am, Peter Bowditch wrote: "" wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote in message news:bRhki.570$CJ4.567@trndny08... The One True Zhen Jue wrote: On Jul 8, 5:45 am, (Richard Schultz) wrote: In misc.health.alternative bigvince wrote: : On Jul 5, 12:35 pm, (Richard Schultz) wrote: : In misc.health.alternative JOHN wrote: : : "By this process chlorocarbons such as sucralose deliver chlorine directly : : into our cells through normal metabolization. This makes them effective : : insecticides and preservatives. Preservatives must kill anything alive to : : prevent bacterial decomposition." : Someone should ask Dr. Bowen how he reconciles his belief that sugar : and salt are acceptable dietary components with their historical : use as food preservatives. : As you know aspartame another chlorocarbon. . . Try again, but this time (a) answer the point that was raised and (b) without incorrectly referring to aspartame as a "chlorocarbon" (it isn't; it's a methyl ester of a dipeptide) Credulous Vince has Aspartame confused with Splenda. Don't expect him to understand his mistake or any other aspect of chemistry. When will all those horrific side effects of Aspartame finally manifest? Ten years ago, Not-A-Doctor Betty Martini claimed that aspartame would make you blind. Where are all those blind people? http://www.answers.com/topic/blindness?cat=health In November 2004 article Magnitude and causes of visual impairment, the WHO estimated that in 2002 there were 161 million (about 2.6% of the world population) visually impaired people in the world, of whom 124 million (about 2%) had low vision and 37 million (about 0.6%) were blind. [9] ==== How would anyone know if anyone's blindness was caused by aspartame? After all the health effects are denied... For ONE reason, it's called M O N E Y. BTW, what were you doing 30 years ago? How about 15 years ago? Hmmmm. , the leading cause of blindness in children around the world is measles. Please remember that the next time you feel the need to support some anti-vaccination liar. -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Projecthttp://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Leading cause of childhood blindness "Causes of Blindness Causes of Childhood Blindness: Worldwide Vitamin A Deficiency (Xerophthalmia) A recent analysis of data indicates that vitamin A deficiency is the leading cause of childhood blindness. It was estimated that 70% of the 500,000 children who become blind annually do so because of xerophthalmia. This corresponds to a prevalence of roughly 1 million in view of the high mortality among affected children. (Thylefors, et al.', source Lighthouse International link http://www.lighthouse.org/medical/causes-of-blindness/ Vinnie, you are right on the money. Home run! Grand slam! Unlike claimed by Not-A-Doctor Betty Martini, aspartame plays no part in worldwide blindness. Your website conclusively proves it, as it lists the causes of blindness. Good job, and thanks for covering my six. The web site talks about 1995, and spends most of its time referring to the US. I was talking about world-wide. http://www.who.int/blindness/causes/...en/index4.html " In high-income countries, lesions of the optic nerve and higher visual pathways predominate as the cause of blindness, while corneal scarring from measles, vitamin A deficiency, the use of harmful traditional eye remedies, ophthalmia neonatorum, and rubella cataract are the major causes in low-income countries". Note that two of the list can be prevented by MMR vaccine. Measles depletes Vitamin A and reduced Vitamin A makes measles worse. Nasty cycle.. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/en/ http://www.searo.who.int/LinkFiles/G...sles100105.pdf Between your references and those posted by Vince, it is now well documented that Not-A-Doctor Betty the Boob Martini was blowing smoke. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
SPLENDA
Peter Bowditch wrote:
"" wrote: "Peter Bowditch" wrotr: [but....he could not answer my question]. * How would anyone know if anyone's blindness was caused by aspartame?* After all the health effects are denied... What in God's name are you talking about? I have given you a list of the major causes of blindness, and aspartame is not one of them. Just think for a moment - there are literally millions of doses of aspartame consumed in the US alone every day. Where are the blind people? Precisely. The causes of blindness ARE~KNOWN, and aspartame is not one of them. If any of the websites listed "unknown cause" then there *may* be an argument that aspartame caused some of that blindness. Since there are no unknowns, no aspartame. "Jan Drew" wrote: "Mark Probert" wrote in message news:bRhki.570$CJ4.567@trndny08... The One True Zhen Jue wrote: On Jul 8, 5:45 am, (Richard Schultz) wrote: In misc.health.alternative bigvince wrote: : On Jul 5, 12:35 pm, (Richard Schultz) wrote: : In misc.health.alternative JOHN wrote: : : "By this process chlorocarbons such as sucralose deliver chlorine directly : : into our cells through normal metabolization. This makes them effective : : insecticides and preservatives. Preservatives must kill anything alive to : : prevent bacterial decomposition." : Someone should ask Dr. Bowen how he reconciles his belief that sugar : and salt are acceptable dietary components with their historical : use as food preservatives. : As you know aspartame another chlorocarbon. . . Try again, but this time (a) answer the point that was raised and (b) without incorrectly referring to aspartame as a "chlorocarbon" (it isn't; it's a methyl ester of a dipeptide) Credulous Vince has Aspartame confused with Splenda. Don't expect him to understand his mistake or any other aspect of chemistry. When will all those horrific side effects of Aspartame finally manifest? Ten years ago, Not-A-Doctor Betty Martini claimed that aspartame would make you blind. Where are all those blind people? http://www.answers.com/topic/blindness?cat=health In November 2004 article Magnitude and causes of visual impairment, the WHO estimated that in 2002 there were 161 million (about 2.6% of the world population) visually impaired people in the world, of whom 124 million (about 2%) had low vision and 37 million (about 0.6%) were blind. [9] ==== How would anyone know if anyone's blindness was caused by aspartame? After all the health effects are denied... For ONE reason, it's called M O N E Y. BTW, what were you doing 30 years ago? How about 15 years ago? Hmmmm. snip. same ole,same ole,same ole -- Peter Bowditch |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SPLENDA | bigvince | General | 42 | July 20th 07 07:59 PM |
SPLENDA | bigvince | Pregnancy | 42 | July 20th 07 07:59 PM |
SPLENDA | Mark Probert | Kids Health | 0 | July 5th 07 06:09 PM |
SPLENDA | Mark Probert | Breastfeeding | 0 | July 5th 07 06:09 PM |
SPLENDA | lilhornie | Breastfeeding | 0 | July 5th 07 05:11 PM |