On vaccine dangers from a vaccine damage victim.

Dear Group,

Some of you all seem as biased towards vaccines as we anti-vaccine
activists seem biased against them. I am a different sort of
anti-vaccine activist, I suffer from vaccine damage. Therefore I need
not leaf through voluminous literature to know that vaccines can be
highly dangerous.

I question the very concept of vaccines. Vaccines do not strengthen our
immune system, they simply compromise it by introducing another disease
state. This fact was well brought out by Dr Burnett in his book, "Thuja
as a cure for vaccinosis". A healthy person, he argued, cannot be made
more healthy with a vaccine. Rather the chemical composition of the
body is changed by introducing diseased puss.

Dr Burnett said this sometime in the late 40's. At that time it was not
generally known that there is much more to vaccines than diseased puss.
Today Dr Burnett would have probably said, you cannot make a healthy
person more healthy by introducing in him diseased puss, animal serum,
animal tissues, heavy metals, carcinogens and proven toxins. I hope all
sane and educated people in this forum will agree to this.

Instead of pooh poohing the claims of the anti-vaccine lobby why does
not the medical establishment carry out the required long term tests?
What are they afraid of? The tests required are;

1. Long term tests (over 20/25 years) on a large subject base composing
of components from all constitution types, all races, all countries.

2. Tests comparing a vaccinated population with a non vaccinated
population.

3. Individual long term test on the total quantity of each vaccine
ingredient injected during the vaccination procedure.

4. Testing how the vaccine ingredients (in their total quantity
injected) interact with each other within the body.

5. Testing the effect of multiple vaccinations.

While thimerosal is largely being banned in US and European countries,
the vaccine manufacturers regularly push vaccines heavily laced with
thimerosal into third world countries. This itself proves that the
medical industry is more concerned about the marketing and profit
aspect of vaccines then any concern for the welfare of the worlds
children.

While the US and European countries largely operate on informed
consent, the population of third world countries, and sometimes even
the doctors, do not have an inkling about probable vaccine dangers.
Again a case of business acumen ruling over profits. Spreading
awareness about vaccine dangers would lead to increased profits,
falling sales and increased legal costs. These factors would definitely
affect profits.

As per vaccination protocol, sick children, malnourished children,
underweight children, children of parents with autoimmune disorders,
children suffering from autoimmune disorders, children or adults with
serious skin problems should not be vaccinated. Again vaccines should
be resorted to when there is a REAL threat of an epidemic. Are these
rules followed? Certainly not in third world countries where all
children would fall under one or more of the above categories. So, is
the vaccine industry and the medical industry acting responsibly?

In India a person is free to choose his method of treatment as per the
law. However the entire population is forcibly vaccinated. We all know
that vaccines introduce a permanent and unstudied disease state. This
changed condition of the body makes it difficult for alternative
practitioners to treat their patients. Therefore vaccination ensures
that people are forced to fall back upon the system of suppressive
medication which has ruined their health in the first instance. This is
a grave infrindgement of human rights.

According to me whoever insists that the medical industry is interested
in improving the health of the population is either a fool or a blatant
lier.

Regards,
Jagannath.