If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#481
|
|||
|
|||
Don't Spawn 'Em If You're Gonna Pawn 'Em
* US * wrote in message ... ...can't... Since you can't think, you shouldn't reproduce anyway. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:32:52 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Do you always tell others what to do? No, but if you can't learn how to use contraception, don't have sex. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:32:52 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Do you always tell others what to do? No, but if you can't learn how to use contraception, don't have sex. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:32:52 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Do you always tell others what to do? No, but if you can't learn how to use contraception, don't have sex. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:32:52 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Do you always tell others what to do? No, but if you can't learn how to use contraception, don't have sex. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. |
#482
|
|||
|
|||
Don't Spawn 'Em If You're Gonna Pawn 'Em
* US * wrote in message ... ...stupidity. Describes you. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:42:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... do the ... We know you'd **** an alcoholic woman without using any contraception, then attempt to claim that she alone would be responsible for the pregnancy. Would you **** her while she's passed out? It's already obvious you don't have self-control. Just how far would you take that? On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:33 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...Should a woman provide financially for children she brings into the world. [sic] Should she get a job and earn money to accomplish this goal? If she's an alcoholic your temporary lay knocked up because he was too stupid to use contraception? If going out to work would mean abandoning the baby alone? Why do you consider childrearing to not be work? Do you believe the child doesn't need someone to perform that work? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:15:26 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Oh, so you DO believe that a woman should be able to take responsibility for a child before she brings one into the world! No less than the man. Why did you find it so very difficult to get this? I made it quite plain. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:42:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... do the ... We know you'd **** an alcoholic woman without using any contraception, then attempt to claim that she alone would be responsible for the pregnancy. Would you **** her while she's passed out? It's already obvious you don't have self-control. Just how far would you take that? On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:33 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...Should a woman provide financially for children she brings into the world. [sic] Should she get a job and earn money to accomplish this goal? If she's an alcoholic your temporary lay knocked up because he was too stupid to use contraception? If going out to work would mean abandoning the baby alone? Why do you consider childrearing to not be work? Do you believe the child doesn't need someone to perform that work? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:15:26 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Oh, so you DO believe that a woman should be able to take responsibility for a child before she brings one into the world! No less than the man. Why did you find it so very difficult to get this? I made it quite plain. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:42:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... do the ... We know you'd **** an alcoholic woman without using any contraception, then attempt to claim that she alone would be responsible for the pregnancy. Would you **** her while she's passed out? It's already obvious you don't have self-control. Just how far would you take that? On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:33 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...Should a woman provide financially for children she brings into the world. [sic] Should she get a job and earn money to accomplish this goal? If she's an alcoholic your temporary lay knocked up because he was too stupid to use contraception? If going out to work would mean abandoning the baby alone? Why do you consider childrearing to not be work? Do you believe the child doesn't need someone to perform that work? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:15:26 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Oh, so you DO believe that a woman should be able to take responsibility for a child before she brings one into the world! No less than the man. Why did you find it so very difficult to get this? I made it quite plain. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:42:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... do the ... We know you'd **** an alcoholic woman without using any contraception, then attempt to claim that she alone would be responsible for the pregnancy. Would you **** her while she's passed out? It's already obvious you don't have self-control. Just how far would you take that? On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:33 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...Should a woman provide financially for children she brings into the world. [sic] Should she get a job and earn m oney to accomplish this goal? If she's an alcoholic your temporary lay knocked up because he was too stupid to use contraception? If going out to work would mean abandoning the baby alone? Why do you consider childrearing to not be work? Do you believe the child doesn't need someone to perform that work? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:15:26 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Oh, so you DO believe that a woman should be able to take responsibility for a child before she brings one into the world! No less than the man. Why did you find it so very difficult to get this? I made it quite plain. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. |
#483
|
|||
|
|||
Don't Spawn 'Em If You're Gonna Pawn 'Em
* US * wrote in message ... Men don't give birth. === Correct. Only women can choose whether to have a baby. === |
#484
|
|||
|
|||
Don't Spawn 'Em If You're Gonna Pawn 'Em
* US * wrote in message ... On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:39:05 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: ...concepts ... They frighten you so much you avoid them, don't they. Why do you hate women so much? Can't you just date men and be happy? LOL On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:28:44 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: So you are saying that alcoholic women do not need to be held responsible for their choices If your temporary lay ****ed a drunk woman who was passed out, what choice did she make? On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:33 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...Should a woman provide financially for children she brings into the world. [sic] Should she get a job and earn money to accomplish this goal? If she's an alcoholic your temporary lay knocked up because he was too stupid to use contraception? If going out to work would mean abandoning the baby alone? Why do you consider childrearing to not be work? Do you believe the child doesn't need someone to perform that work? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:15:26 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Oh, so you DO believe that a woman should be able to take responsibility for a child before she brings one into the world! No less than the man. Why did you find it so very difficult to get this? I made it quite plain. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. |
#485
|
|||
|
|||
Don't Spawn 'Em If You're Gonna Pawn 'Em
* US * wrote in message ... On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:11:25 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Don't expect the concept to sink in. No..... Glad you agree. On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:56:30 GMT, "Phil #3" wrote: ... have lost ... Phil #3 Indeed you have. Your hatred for women is your hatred for your own mother, too. On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:33:34 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... a part of child rearing ... Somebody has to take care of the kid. Your temporary lay doesn't want to do it. He doesn't want to pay enough for daycare, either. He's too busy looking for the next passed-out-drunk woman to **** without contraception, no doubt. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:33 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...Should a woman provide financially for children she brings into the world. [sic] Should she get a job and earn money to accomplish this goal? If she's an alcoholic your temporary lay knocked up because he was too stupid to use contraception? If going out to work would mean abandoning the baby alone? Why do you consider childrearing to not be work? Do you believe the child doesn't need someone to perform that work? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:15:26 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Oh, so you DO believe that a woman should be able to take responsibility for a child before she brings one into the world! No less than the man. Why did you find it so very difficult to get this? I made it quite plain. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:56:30 GMT, "Phil #3" wrote: ... have lost ... Phil #3 Indeed you have. Your hatred for women is your hatred for your own mother, too. On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:33:34 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... a part of child rearing ... Somebody has to take care of the kid. Your temporary lay doesn't want to do it. He doesn't want to pay enough for daycare, either. He's too busy looking for the next passed-out-drunk woman to **** without contraception, no doubt. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:33 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...Should a woman provide financially for children she brings into the world. [sic] Should she get a job and earn money to accomplish this goal? If she's an alcoholic your temporary lay knocked up because he was too stupid to use contraception? If going out to work would mean abandoning the baby alone? Why do you consider childrearing to not be work? Do you believe the child doesn't need someone to perform that work? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:15:26 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Oh, so you DO believe that a woman should be able to take responsibility for a child before she brings one into the world! No less than the man. Why did you find it so very difficult to get this? I made it quite plain. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:56:30 GMT, "Phil #3" wrote: ... have lost ... Phil #3 Indeed you have. Your hatred for women is your hatred for your own mother, too. On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:33:34 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... a part of child rearing ... Somebody has to take care of the kid. Your temporary lay doesn't want to do it. He doesn't want to pay enough for daycare, either. He's too busy looking for the next passed-out-drunk woman to **** without contraception, no doubt. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:33 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...Should a woman provide financially for children she brings into the world. [sic] Should she get a job and earn money to accomplish this goal? If she's an alcoholic your temporary lay knocked up because he was too stupid to use contraception? If going out to work would mean abandoning the baby alone? Why do you consider childrearing to not be work? Do you believe the child doesn't need someone to perform that work? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:15:26 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Oh, so you DO believe that a woman should be able to take responsibility for a child before she brings one into the world! No less than the man. Why did you find it so very difficult to get this? I made it quite plain. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:56:30 GMT, "Phil #3" wrote: ... have lost ... Phil #3 Indeed you have. Your hatred for women is your hatred for your own mother, too. On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:33:34 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... a part of child rearing ... Somebody has to take care of the kid. Your temporary lay doesn't want to do it. He doesn't want to pay enough for daycare, either. He's too busy looking for the next passed-out-drunk woman to **** without contraception, no doubt. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:33 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...Should a woman provide financially for children she brings into the world. [sic] Should she get a job and earn money to accomplish this goal? If she's an alcoholic your temporary lay knocked up because he was too stupid to use contraception? If going out to work would mean abandoning the baby alone? Why do you consider childrearing to not be work? Do you believe the child doesn't need someone to perform that work? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:15:26 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Oh, so you DO believe that a woman should be able to take responsibility for a child before she brings one into the world! No less than the man. Why did you find it so very difficult to get this? I made it quite plain. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:56:30 GMT, "Phil #3" wrote: ... have lost ... Phil #3 Indeed you have. Your hatred for women is your hatred for your own mother, too. On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:33:34 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... a part of child rearing ... Somebody has to take care of the kid. Your temporary lay doesn't want to do it. He doesn't want to pay enough for daycare, either. He's too busy looking for the next passed-out-drunk woman to **** without contraception, no doubt. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:33 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...Should a woman provide financially for children she brings into the world. [sic] Should she get a job and earn money to accomplish this goal? If she's an alcoholic your temporary lay knocked up because he was too stupid to use contraception? If going out to work would mean abandoning the baby alone? Why do you consider childrearing to not be work? Do you believe the child doesn't need someone to perform that work? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:15:26 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Oh, so you DO believe that a woman should be able to take responsibility for a child before she brings one into the world! No less than the man. Why did you find it so very difficult to get this? I made it quite plain. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:17:02 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ...are you saying that if a man is involved, the woman doesn't have to be responsible ... No. Learn how to read. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:41:28 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... less capable than most women ... You sure are. Don't reproduce: the gene pool doesn't need the pollution. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:23:34 GMT, "Gini" wrote: ... women are doing it by the thousands ... Without any men? You reckon those'd be immaculate conceptions? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. |
#486
|
|||
|
|||
Don't Spawn 'Em If You're Gonna Pawn 'Em
* US * wrote in message ... ...still too stupid ... Then you should take some more smart pills. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:13:36 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Of course once the child is born, she will simply hand it over to the father saying "this child is yours because you wanted one"... Why do you believe such stupid things? On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:23:31 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Call me a dummy, You do that to yourself. but I have yet to understand how a man simply has a child because he wants one. What's the secret? He finds a mate who shares that desire. You must be really stupid not to know that. On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:21:44 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: The clueless ... cannot comprehend ... Of course you can't comprehend that responsible men decide whether or not to procreate. You flunked basic sex-ed, didn't you. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:19:30 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Are healthy adult women responsible for their own decisions to have or not have children? Why wouldn't they be so, just as men? Are you as stupid as you seem here? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:58:22 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager DOTnet wrote: ... another clueless supporter ... Actually, one doubts that you even support yourself. Healthy adult men are responsible for their own decisions to have or not have children. You should learn what that's like if you possibly can. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:13:36 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Of course once the child is born, she will simply hand it over to the father saying "this child is yours because you wanted one"... Why do you believe such stupid things? On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:23:31 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Call me a dummy, You do that to yourself. but I have yet to understand how a man simply has a child because he wants one. What's the secret? He finds a mate who shares that desire. You must be really stupid not to know that. On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:21:44 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: The clueless ... cannot comprehend ... Of course you can't comprehend that responsible men decide whether or not to procreate. You flunked basic sex-ed, didn't you. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:19:30 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Are healthy adult women responsible for their own decisions to have or not have children? Why wouldn't they be so, just as men? Are you as stupid as you seem here? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:58:22 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager DOTnet wrote: ... another clueless supporter ... Actually, one doubts that you even support yourself. Healthy adult men are responsible for their own decisions to have or not have children. You should learn what that's like if you possibly can. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:13:36 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Of course once the child is born, she will simply hand it over to the father saying "this child is yours because you wanted one"... Why do you believe such stupid things? On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:23:31 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Call me a dummy, You do that to yourself. but I have yet to understand how a man simply has a child because he wants one. What's the secret? He finds a mate who shares that desire. You must be really stupid not to know that. On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:21:44 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: The clueless ... cannot comprehend ... Of course you can't comprehend that responsible men decide whether or not to procreate. You flunked basic sex-ed, didn't you. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:19:30 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Are healthy adult women responsible for their own decisions to have or not have children? Why wouldn't they be so, just as men? Are you as stupid as you seem here? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:58:22 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager DOTnet wrote: ... another clueless supporter ... Actually, one doubts that you even support yourself. Healthy adult men are responsible for their own decisions to have or not have children. You should learn what that's like if you possibly can. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:13:36 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Of course once the child is born, she will simply hand it over to the father saying "this child is yours because you wanted one"... Why do you believe such stupid things? On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:23:31 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Call me a dummy, You do that to yourself. but I have yet to understand how a man simply has a child because he wants one. What's the secret? He finds a mate who shares that desire. You must be really stupid not to know that. On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:21:44 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: The clueless ... cannot comprehend ... Of course you can't comprehend that responsible men decide whether or not to procreate. You flunked basic sex-ed, didn't you. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:19:30 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Are healthy adult women responsible for their own decisions to have or not have children? Why wouldn't they be so, just as men? Are you as stupid as you seem here? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:58:22 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager DOTnet wrote: ... another clueless supporter ... Actually, one doubts that you even support yourself. Healthy adult men are responsible for their own decisions to have or not have children. You should learn what that's like if you possibly can. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:13:36 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Of course once the child is born, she will simply hand it over to the father saying "this child is yours because you wanted one"... Why do you believe such stupid things? On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:23:31 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Call me a dummy, You do that to yourself. but I have yet to understand how a man simply has a child because he wants one. What's the secret? He finds a mate who shares that desire. You must be really stupid not to know that. On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:21:44 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: The clueless ... cannot comprehend ... Of course you can't comprehend that responsible men decide whether or not to procreate. You flunked basic sex-ed, didn't you. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:19:30 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: Are healthy adult women responsible for their own decisions to have or not have children? Why wouldn't they be so, just as men? Are you as stupid as you seem here? On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:58:22 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager DOTnet wrote: ... another clueless supporter ... Actually, one doubts that you even support yourself. Healthy adult men are responsible for their own decisions to have or not have children. You should learn what that's like if you possibly can. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:03:39 -0800, "Chris" wrote: One must first conquer the challenge of clear thinking before they [sic] can ever have ANY chance of understanding the concept of responsibility. Those who are responsible don't have kids they don't want to parent. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:37:41 GMT, "DB" wrote: Responsibility? If you learn what it is, you will discern that avoiding unwanted paternities is definitely in that category. Your American Government wants to talk about Responsibility? LOLOLOLOL The Bush regime is merely the criminal usurpation of the American government. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:27 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... it might be nice if the mother took a stab at it... Are you claiming that she has abandoned the child? ... our children are irrelevant... To the matter of precedent responsibilities, they are. It's your own problem if you didn't determine that your temporary sexual liaison had a history of careless profligacy. Silly child--I You seem prone to abuse of those you believe to be children. I hope you are supervised with all due diligence in any interactions with them. that mean old alcohol Apparently you aren't well-enough educated to realize that alcoholism, as a drug addiction, is a health problem. It's quite inhumane, hate-filled, and spiteful of you to want to punish sick people. ...grumpy mood... I'm sorry you suffer such so severely that you project it where it is inapplicable. I pity you. I pity your poor children even more. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:16:58 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: I bet You shouldn't gamble. You can't calculate the odds well enough. You don't even dimly sense that when you attempt to insist that someone else should shoulder the sole responsibility for the actions of two people you should at least first do so yourself. overinflated ego ... So that's why you believe others would owe you compensation for your failures. Thanks for the confirmation. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "garbageteachr" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. |
#487
|
|||
|
|||
Don't Spawn 'Em If You're Gonna Pawn 'Em
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:54:14 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
...impairment ... That's your best excuse for flunking sex-ed, and your posts back it up. Go with it. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:32:14 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... difficulties ... It's a shame that your problems result in your impairment to the extent that you can't even comprehend personal responsibility. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:54:24 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager DOTnet wrote: ... it's post ... You babble "it is post" because your unfamiliarity with English puts you at a distinct disadvantage in terms of learning, including learning about such important concepts as personal responsibility. full of errors ... Yes, you are. Your belief that men must be helpless dupes unable to manage their affairs is in error, too. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:08:10 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ...a fictitious discussion. No one else is forcing you to lie. Take responsibility for yourself. On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:37:28 -0800, "Chris" wrote: Believe it ... Mere 'belief' is not a fitting substitute for reasoning. On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote: ... gone haywire ... All the more reason for you to avoid procreation. Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that you can have another try if you work up the guts: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote: Doubtful. ... You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when to use birth control. Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this: "Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation. In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life situation has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of life. Both of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided to have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to back out of your commitment to them." http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US. I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate. It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'. I'm not certain what it is that you think I am not controlling. Yourself. No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so with a man already proven unwilling to support them. I certainly had no control over ... You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by a 'father' who isn't suitable. Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own sequence of errors in having done that. ... her mother decided ... You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to pretend otherwise. How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not? Since he has been found to be this young ladies father You thus disprove your false claims about the mother. ... mother who has never worked a day in her life to support any of her children. You don't believe that raising children is work per se? What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces? We had two children--the number we knew we could afford. You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie. You're now complaining that you can't afford it. You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy. decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father. Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too. Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that create a monthly late payment Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting. You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding) with one well-timed advance payment. If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out, I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to learn well enough to become numerate. ...Any payment made outside the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos. He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing, but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him. On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "teachrmama" wrote: ... does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by their methods ... Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own children to suffer. You can't control yourself. ... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED as paid on time ... If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem' a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment. Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner' shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. |
#488
|
|||
|
|||
Don't Spawn 'Em If You're Gonna Pawn 'Em
* US * wrote in message ... On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:49:20 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager DOTnet wrote: Yet another clueless boob. can't even understand responsible adults True but if you keep trying, perhaps you can act as if... |
#489
|
|||
|
|||
Don't Spawn 'Em If You're Gonna Pawn 'Em
* US * wrote in message ... On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:56:22 -0500, "Pathetic Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager DOTnet wrote: So explain why women should not be responsible for their sole and unilateral choices. Men are responsible. |
#490
|
|||
|
|||
Don't Spawn 'Em If You're Gonna Pawn 'Em
* US * wrote in message ... On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:41:46 -0800, "Chris" wrote: He (she? whatever) ... If you ever learn about adult human heterosexuality, you may even be able to understand men are those who must manage. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Child Support Policy and the Welfare of Women and Children | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | May 13th 04 12:46 AM |
Sample US Supreme Court Petition | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 28 | January 21st 04 06:23 PM |
So much for the claims about Sweden | Kane | Foster Parents | 10 | November 5th 03 06:31 AM |
| Ex Giants player sentenced-DYFS wrkr no harm noticed | Kane | Spanking | 11 | September 16th 03 11:59 AM |
Helping Your Child Be Healthy and Fit sX3#;WA@'U | John Smith | Kids Health | 0 | July 20th 03 04:50 AM |