CHILD SLAVE TRADE PROJECT

CHILD SLAVE TRADE PROJECT
NEW MATERIAL POSTED JULY 7, 2005: EMERGENCY NATIONAL CHILD PROTECTION
SYSTEM ORGANIZED CRIME ALERT

Download PDF file of EMERGENCY NATIONAL CHILD PROTECTION SYSTEM

http://thesociologycenter.com/Eviden...yAlert2005.pdf

ORGANIZED CRIME ALERT
PRESS RELEASE
July 3, 2005
SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE JUVENILE AND FAMILY COURT DECISIONS ARE DRIVEN BY
THE GOAL OF MAXIMIZING CHILD PROTECTION SYSTEM FEDERAL FUND REVENUE

Parents nationwide have complained for decades that their families were
destroyed and children seized by corrupt child protection agencies for
no other reason than to obtain federal funds for State governments. They
have been telling the truth all along. Clear evidence has been
discovered documenting how organized crime methods and procedures are
integrated into juvenile and family courts. This documentation has been
assembled through the combined efforts of independent researchers in
California, Oklahoma, and Arkansas, researchers for the American Family
Rights Association, and document research conducted by THE SOCIOLOGY CENTER.

Instructions for shaping judicial child and family protection decisions
to maximize child protection system federal fund claims have been
documented in the CALIFORNIA JUDGES BENCHGUIDES: BENCHGUIDE 200:
Juvenile Dependency Initial or Detention Hearing (2004). The
instructions are scattered throughout the Benchguide emphasized by the
label "Judicial Tip." One example states:

Page 100-13
"JUDICIAL TIP: Failure to make this finding may cause permanent loss of
federal funding for foster care. See discussion of other required
findings in §100.36. The court may make this a temporary finding pending
the continued detention hearing."

The full text of CALIFORNIA JUDGES BENCHGUIDES: BENCHGUIDE 200: Juvenile
Dependency Initial or Detention Hearing is available at
http://thesociologycenter.com/Eviden...ile.pdf(35.1Mb)

http://thesociologycenter.com/Eviden...0SmallFile.pdf

A publication of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court
Judges titled RESOURCE GUIDELINES: Improving Court Practice in Child
Abuse & Neglect Cases provides additional evidence that this represents
national judicial policy and that strategies using juvenile and family
judicial decisions to maximize child protection system federal fund
revenue is a well known corrupting influence on the judicial system. Two
example state:

Appendix C, Page 158, Note 15
15. Two commentators summarize the barriers facing judicial oversight:
[T]he authority of judges in these matters is often limited; they do not
have the power to order the agency to provide services to an individual.
In some states, the courts will make a positive “reasonable efforts”
determination regardless of agency efforts in order to ensure federal
funding. Judges are not trained in matters over which the juvenile court
has jurisdiction and, because of rotation schedules, remain in the
assignment for a short period of time. Consequently, they do not acquire
the experience needed to handle these sensitive cases. While judges in
some localities make a good faith effort to determine whether adequate
services have been offered to the family, in many localities a positive
finding is merely a matter of checking a box on a preprinted form.
Susan Goodman and Joan Hurley, Reasonable Efforts: Who Decides What’ s
Reasonable? (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington,
D.C.) 1993, at 8.

Appendix C, Note 110, Page 162
110. In many jurisdictions the trial judge must merely check a box on a
preprinted court form to indicate that reasonable efforts were provided
in the case. Shotton, supra end. 3. In some other jurisdictions the
court order forms simply include a preprinted statement that reasonable
efforts were made, thus making the finding possible without the judge’s
even checking a box. Id., at 227. In some states, courts and agencies
have taken a cynical approach, seeking to assure receipt of federal
funding without the court taking a meaningful look at reasonable
efforts. In such states, words indicating the agency has made reasonable
efforts are preprinted into court order forms used when removal of a
child is authorized, and laws are structured so a judge cannot authorize
a foster placement without a positive finding of reasonable efforts.
Hardin, supra end. 7, at 54

The full text of RESOURCE GUIDELINES: Improving Court Practice in Child
Abuse & Neglect Cases is available at
http://thesociologycenter.com/Eviden...tPractices.pdf

(569.6Kb)

Six pages of examples cited from CALIFORNIA JUDGES BENCHGUIDES:
BENCHGUIDE 200: Juvenile Dependency Initial or Detention Hearing and
RESOURCE GUIDELINES: Improving Court Practice in Child Abuse & Neglect
Cases are available at
http://thesociologycenter.com/Eviden...ngGunAnoun.pdf (167.2Kb)







CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A
DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL
SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....

CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.

every parent should read this .pdf from
connecticut dcf watch...

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com

Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS

*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*

Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13
Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12
Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5

Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse
and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the
citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold
parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY
government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and
death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more
human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which
they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that
they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when
children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a
bunch of social workers.

BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF
REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES
TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...