A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Kids Health
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Quackpot news: FTC Vindicates Hulda Clark....



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old December 5th 04, 02:35 AM
David Wright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
john wrote:
http://www.whale.to/b/croft.html

try this zapper, worth a try for 3 weeks on all cancers except leukemia &
prostate. Plenty of evidence cancer is a microbe,
rife/livingstone/cantwell/reich etc. 3 weeks is the viral life cycle


It's rare to find such a high density of misinformation, even in a
Scudamore posting. There's very little evidence that most cancers are
viral in origin, though a few are (Kaposi's sarcoma, for example).

There's no evidence that the zapper will do anything to cure anything.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)






  #93  
Old December 15th 04, 02:03 PM
Mark Probert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ilena Rose" in her official capacity as the DIVERTING,
DEFAMING, Dominating Directorix of the FDA DE-listed, San Diego DE-licensed,
and apparently DE-funct Humantics Foundation, wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:30:39 -0500, "Mark Probert" Mark
wrote:


I wish she had survived and we would not be having this conversation.
However, she was killed by Hulda Clark.


There is very good reason that you are not a judge ... in fact, why
you are not even allowed to "practice" what you went to law school for

You are a bought off fool and make absurd and inaccurate conclusions


You snipped out the context merely to make a personal attack. let's restore
it, so people can see how evil you are.

Here is the message you were editing for your depravity. Now, try real hard
and deal with the issues. At the very least, Hulda stole whatever real
chance to live from Esther Figueroa.

"Ilena Rose" in her official capacity as the DIVERTING,
Dominating Directorix of the FDA DE-listed, San Diego DE-licensed, and
apparently DE-funct Humantics Foundation, wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:21:09 -0500, "Mark Probert" Mark
wrote:


Another Quack Barrett Victim.

How so? Barrett never treated her.


Thank God for that!


Since you are amoral, why am I not impressed?


His "treatments" typically are his SLAPP suits and using the court
system to harass and defame and stalk those of us he hates ...
remember, he was never board certified and had no medical license for
years. How convenient ... no governing board over him to protect
people like Mrs. Figueroa from his filthy tactics.

He used the Figueroa's for this suit against Dr. Clark ...


Since the Figueroa's contacted him, your claim is utter bull****. As
expected.

as did
Malicious Prosecutor Grell ...


Mr. grell was determined by a court in California to not have commenced a
malicious prosecution. Thus, your claim is utterly specious and an outright
lie.

When they had to put up a bond to continue ... they dropped it. It was
the responsibility of Grell to advise his clients of what must be done
... including depositions etc. BEFORE the suit was filed.


Of course, you have no basis for knowing that the Figueroa's were not told
about this. You are legendary on Usenet for making baseless and false
accusations.

And, of course, you are ignoring the fact that the Clarkites strung out this
case for a long time in the hopes of Mr. Figueroa dropping dead from Hulda's
failed treatment.

The Figueroa's were used as Barrett's pawns ... and I can only imagine
the additional stress she experienced. All you are posting is Barrett
Propaganda ... not her life before Dr. Clark and why she turned to her
... how conventional medicine had failed her.


How do you know that conventional medicine had failed her? There is not one
scintilla of information that supports that claim. If you disagree, post a
reference.

The Figueroa's were seeking redress for the fraud perpetrated upon them by
Hulda Clark, etc. That is a fact even you cannot deny (it is part of the
public record of the suits).

May she rest in peace ... away from the crazed madness of Quack
Barrett and Team.


I wish she had survived and we would not be having this conversation.
However, she was killed by Hulda Clark.


------------

Now, deal with it, and the fact that Hulda's Henchmen agreed that even they
cannot prove that her "treatments" work.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.