If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Not knowing the child was his until 15yrs later
My husband is having to pay not only child support but back child
support for a child he did not even know was his. She married and the birth certificate has the other man as the father and the child was named after this man. They were only married a few years and when he tried to get custody she pulled the DNA surprise and it was not his. 15yrs later the state knocks on our door saying my husband owes for the child. We had a DNA test and my husband is the father but is it right that he has to pay for a child he has never seen and the other man was duped into believing it was his child. I understand a child has a right to be supported but he also has a right to know the truth regarding his real father. Why did it take so long for the state to demand child support. Does my husband have any legal recourse regarding having to pay the back child support? Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Not knowing the child was his until 15yrs later
"Karren" wrote in message ups.com... My husband is having to pay not only child support but back child support for a child he did not even know was his. She married and the birth certificate has the other man as the father and the child was named after this man. They were only married a few years and when he tried to get custody she pulled the DNA surprise and it was not his. 15yrs later the state knocks on our door saying my husband owes for the child. We had a DNA test and my husband is the father but is it right that he has to pay for a child he has never seen and the other man was duped into believing it was his child. I understand a child has a right to be supported but he also has a right to know the truth regarding his real father. Why did it take so long for the state to demand child support. Does my husband have any legal recourse regarding having to pay the back child support? What kind of back child support is he being charged? My husbamd found out he was the father of a then-13-year old a few years ago. He only had to pay 2 years of back child support, plus current support until the young lady is 19 or graduates high school. What state are you in? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Not knowing the child was his until 15yrs later
teachrmama wrote:
"Karren" wrote in message ups.com... My husband is having to pay not only child support but back child support for a child he did not even know was his. She married and the birth certificate has the other man as the father and the child was named after this man. They were only married a few years and when he tried to get custody she pulled the DNA surprise and it was not his. 15yrs later the state knocks on our door saying my husband owes for the child. We had a DNA test and my husband is the father but is it right that he has to pay for a child he has never seen and the other man was duped into believing it was his child. I understand a child has a right to be supported but he also has a right to know the truth regarding his real father. Why did it take so long for the state to demand child support. Does my husband have any legal recourse regarding having to pay the back child support? What kind of back child support is he being charged? My husbamd found out he was the father of a then-13-year old a few years ago. He only had to pay 2 years of back child support, plus current support until the young lady is 19 or graduates high school. What state are you in? "only had to pay 2 years?" how about this: when the father first learns that the child is his (not when he is notified), that's when support starts. Giving the state the power to retroactively go after child support all the way to when the child is born is like giving an alcoholic the key to your wine cellar. Doing this would recognize that the father is NOT a criminal: he didn't deliberately abandon his child. He had a one night stand, doesn't mean any blame on him or on her. But you cannot be held responsible for a debt you don't know exists nor should you be. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Not knowing the child was his until 15yrs later
"John Meyer" wrote in message . .. teachrmama wrote: "Karren" wrote in message ups.com... My husband is having to pay not only child support but back child support for a child he did not even know was his. She married and the birth certificate has the other man as the father and the child was named after this man. They were only married a few years and when he tried to get custody she pulled the DNA surprise and it was not his. 15yrs later the state knocks on our door saying my husband owes for the child. We had a DNA test and my husband is the father but is it right that he has to pay for a child he has never seen and the other man was duped into believing it was his child. I understand a child has a right to be supported but he also has a right to know the truth regarding his real father. Why did it take so long for the state to demand child support. Does my husband have any legal recourse regarding having to pay the back child support? What kind of back child support is he being charged? My husbamd found out he was the father of a then-13-year old a few years ago. He only had to pay 2 years of back child support, plus current support until the young lady is 19 or graduates high school. What state are you in? "only had to pay 2 years?" how about this: when the father first learns that the child is his (not when he is notified), that's when support starts. Giving the state the power to retroactively go after child support all the way to when the child is born is like giving an alcoholic the key to your wine cellar. Doing this would recognize that the father is NOT a criminal: he didn't deliberately abandon his child. He had a one night stand, doesn't mean any blame on him or on her. But you cannot be held responsible for a debt you don't know exists nor should you be. "Shouldn't be" and "aren't" are 2 different things, though. Big Daddy Gubmint wants, and wants, and wants. And takes all it can get. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Not knowing the child was his until 15yrs later
"John Meyer" wrote in how about this: when the father first learns that the child is his (not when he is notified), that's when support starts. Giving the state the power to retroactively go after child support all the way to when the child is born is like giving an alcoholic the key to your wine cellar. Doing this would recognize that the father is NOT a criminal: he didn't deliberately abandon his child. He had a one night stand, doesn't mean any blame on him or on her. But you cannot be held responsible for a debt you don't know exists nor should you be. A woman can cut off contact with the bio dad and he does not hear a word from her in years. She can file a CS claim in any state and the court is not held liable to personally inform him. It becomes a criminal matter when the arrearages amount to over $5000 and a felony warrant is put out for his arrest. He gets pulled over for a speeding ticket and is arrested and taken into custody. This could take a few weeks to resolve if he is in another state, because extradition hearings are needed to transport him over state lines. In my case, I spent 36 days in detention and I did lose my job too. (While there, I did learn where Bob Barker invested his money and how they also charge $15 for 5 minutes on their phone system. Lets not forget the in-house cantina with extortionate prices! Even the prison system makes money from your deadbeat soul) On the day of my hearing where I thought i was going to sort this nightmare, I was handed a summons for $42,000 and told to sign a demand for payment in the amount of $1200/mth or go to prison from 1 to 4 years. SUre I signed it, but how do you pay that amount making only $10/hr? Further more, because I just immigrated here from Canada, I'll now be deported for committing a felony crime involving moral turpitude. (I could have stolen a car and not been deported) It all makes perfect sense, I'm sure the politicians are very proud of their performance record! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A dentist's child abuse crime (also: Pregnant citizens: URGENT) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 1 | September 7th 05 11:00 PM |
AL: Court issues history-making decision in child custody case | Dusty | Child Support | 1 | August 3rd 05 01:07 AM |
Sample US Supreme Court Petition | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 28 | January 21st 04 06:23 PM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Dennis was U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking | Kane | Spanking | 63 | November 17th 03 10:12 PM |