Pervert cops and organized coverup

Nice cops, and their thin blue line...

Sheriff's office may have covered up...allegations of abuse
by destroying evidence and otherwise failing to
properly report Mr. Parrott's allegations to the Oregon State Police
for investigation. ...Malloy and Rietmann were eventually
arrested, charged and convicted ... Malloy was
convicted of compelling prostitution, sexual abuse, using a
child in the display of sexually explicit conduct
and drug-related offenses.



0:- wrote:
... what is going on here. Who is lying, who is telling the truth.
Quick Greg, give these folks some advice, eh?

He'll be able to tell us if the perps were homosexuals that targetted
children, and if they were being supported in their crimes by the
county and CPS. (Obviously CPS put them up to raping children, right,
Greg?)

http://www.bendweekly.com/Local-News/1159.html


Former Deschutes Couple Files $3-Million Suit Against County for Civil
Rights Violations
Nov 03,2006 00:00 by Richard Burton

A husband and wife today filed a $3 million federal civil rights
lawsuit against Deschutes County and the Deschutes County Sheriff's
Office as well as certain named employees of Deschutes County,
according to a news release by Bromley, Newton Attorneys at Law.

The suit alleges that the plaintiffs were threatened with bodily harm,
harassed, stalked, arrested under false pretenses, and threatened with
arrest for trumped up drug charges; forcing them to abandon their
Deschutes County residence and long-standing business.

The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Jesse B. Parrott and Vicky Parrott,
allegedly arises out of Mr. Parrott's February 2002 complaint against
then-Deputy Sheriff Mike Malloy and former Deschutes County Animal
Control Technician Mark Rietmann for engaging in sexual acts with and
sexually abusing minors, according to the attorney statement.


DCJ Photos
In 2005 Malloy pleaded guilty to 50 of 143 sex and drug abuse counts
against him, and received a prison sentence of over 17 years. In a
2006 plea agreement, Rietmann avoided jail time by pleading guilty to
reduced charges of one felony count of cocaine possession and four
misdemeanor counts of sexual harassment.


The allegations against Deschutes County, the Deschutes County Sheriff
in his official capacity, former deputy Mike Malloy in his official and
individual capacity, Mark Rietmann in his official and individual
capacity, county employee Mendoza in his official capacity, and John
Does #1-#10, as outlined in the news release by Bromley, Newton
Attorneys appears below in its full entirety:

"Between February 2002 and July of 2005, Malloy and Rietmann engaged
in a pattern and practice of violating the Parrotts' civil rights by
threatening them with bodily harm, by threatening to frame them and
arrest them for possession of drugs, by repeatedly pulling over
Plaintiffs while driving in their vehicle, without due process and
without proper authority, for the sole purpose of harassing them and
otherwise stalking them, by sitting in vehicles out front of their
residence, observing them through binoculars and otherwise making their
presence known with the intent to cause fear and apprehension in the
Parrotts.

In addition, Malloy and Rietmann's conspiracy to commit sexual abuse of
minors and to harass the Parrotts continued without any intervention by
the Deschutes County Sheriff's Office even after the Parrotts reported
Malloy's behavior.

It appears that the Sheriff's office may have covered up the
allegations of abuse by destroying evidence and otherwise failing to
properly report Mr. Parrott's allegations to the Oregon State Police
for investigation.

However, Malloy and Rietmann were eventually arrested, charged and
convicted in April 2005. Malloy was convicted of compelling
prostitution, sexual abuse, using a child in the display of sexually
explicit conduct and drug-related offenses.

The threats by Deputy Sheriff Malloy continued right up until the date
of his conviction.

In addition, Deputy Sheriff Malloy was disciplined by the Deschutes
County Sheriff's Office between the date of his arrest and the date of
his conviction for using official resources to locate victims so that
he could either continue to victimize them or harass them into silence.

Mr. and Mrs. Parrott are seeking $2,000,000 in damages for violation of
their civil rights, the emotional distress that has been inflicted on
them, and to cover the costs of secreting themselves. They feel that it
is necessary that they moved from Deschutes County and, most likely,
from the State of Oregon giving up their long-standing business and
their residence.

They have also sued for $1,000,000 in punitive damages against
Deschutes County and the Deschutes County Sheriff's Office, as the
Sheriff's Office failed to prevent the behavior of Malloy and Rietmann
even after Mr. and Mrs. Parrott reported the harassment.

Other victims of Malloy and Rietmann have already sued the Sheriff's
Office and additional lawsuits may follow as information is made
available to the public regarding this matter."

Greegor wrote:
Nice cops, and their thin blue line...

Some cops are bad. Some caseworkers are bad. Some Greg's are bad.

Not all of any of those are bad, Greg.

So tell us, whats the score, ratewise, between the Greg that we know,
and the rate of bad caseworkers, and bad cops, eh?

I hear you are one person and that would make it one hundred percent
failure to do the right thing for Lisa. The Lisa you fre....ahh..live
with.

Sheriff's office may have covered up...

Sherriff's "office" or an individual, Greg?

allegations of abuse
by destroying evidence and otherwise failing to
properly report Mr. Parrott's allegations to the Oregon State Police
for investigation. ...Malloy and Rietmann were eventually
arrested, charged and convicted ... Malloy was
convicted of compelling prostitution, sexual abuse, using a
child in the display of sexually explicit conduct
and drug-related offenses.

Sounds like they were very bad men. That's why I posted this below:

0:- wrote:
... what is going on here. Who is lying, who is telling the truth.
Quick Greg, give these folks some advice, eh?

He'll be able to tell us if the perps were homosexuals that targetted
children, and if they were being supported in their crimes by the
county and CPS. (Obviously CPS put them up to raping children, right,
Greg?)

So Greg, where they homos? Is that what made them sexually abuse?

Did CPS in fact have anything to do with this? Can we "Fern" CPS on
this one?

You do know it's a standard ploy to sue the organization someone works
for when they are actually the only culprits, right, Greg?

Do you really think the sherrif was in fact actively engaged in the
acts claimed against the plaintiffs in this case?

I thought this would amuse you, and you seem to be taking it so
seriously.

So tell us, where was the homo and CPS element in this story?

Isn't there always such connections, Fer.....Greg?

0:-


http://www.bendweekly.com/Local-News/1159.html


Former Deschutes Couple Files $3-Million Suit Against County for Civil
Rights Violations
Nov 03,2006 00:00 by Richard Burton

A husband and wife today filed a $3 million federal civil rights
lawsuit against Deschutes County and the Deschutes County Sheriff's
Office as well as certain named employees of Deschutes County,
according to a news release by Bromley, Newton Attorneys at Law.

The suit alleges that the plaintiffs were threatened with bodily harm,
harassed, stalked, arrested under false pretenses, and threatened with
arrest for trumped up drug charges; forcing them to abandon their
Deschutes County residence and long-standing business.

The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Jesse B. Parrott and Vicky Parrott,
allegedly arises out of Mr. Parrott's February 2002 complaint against
then-Deputy Sheriff Mike Malloy and former Deschutes County Animal
Control Technician Mark Rietmann for engaging in sexual acts with and
sexually abusing minors, according to the attorney statement.


DCJ Photos
In 2005 Malloy pleaded guilty to 50 of 143 sex and drug abuse counts
against him, and received a prison sentence of over 17 years. In a
2006 plea agreement, Rietmann avoided jail time by pleading guilty to
reduced charges of one felony count of cocaine possession and four
misdemeanor counts of sexual harassment.


The allegations against Deschutes County, the Deschutes County Sheriff
in his official capacity, former deputy Mike Malloy in his official and
individual capacity, Mark Rietmann in his official and individual
capacity, county employee Mendoza in his official capacity, and John
Does #1-#10, as outlined in the news release by Bromley, Newton
Attorneys appears below in its full entirety:

"Between February 2002 and July of 2005, Malloy and Rietmann engaged
in a pattern and practice of violating the Parrotts' civil rights by
threatening them with bodily harm, by threatening to frame them and
arrest them for possession of drugs, by repeatedly pulling over
Plaintiffs while driving in their vehicle, without due process and
without proper authority, for the sole purpose of harassing them and
otherwise stalking them, by sitting in vehicles out front of their
residence, observing them through binoculars and otherwise making their
presence known with the intent to cause fear and apprehension in the
Parrotts.

In addition, Malloy and Rietmann's conspiracy to commit sexual abuse of
minors and to harass the Parrotts continued without any intervention by
the Deschutes County Sheriff's Office even after the Parrotts reported
Malloy's behavior.

It appears that the Sheriff's office may have covered up the
allegations of abuse by destroying evidence and otherwise failing to
properly report Mr. Parrott's allegations to the Oregon State Police
for investigation.

However, Malloy and Rietmann were eventually arrested, charged and
convicted in April 2005. Malloy was convicted of compelling
prostitution, sexual abuse, using a child in the display of sexually
explicit conduct and drug-related offenses.

The threats by Deputy Sheriff Malloy continued right up until the date
of his conviction.

In addition, Deputy Sheriff Malloy was disciplined by the Deschutes
County Sheriff's Office between the date of his arrest and the date of
his conviction for using official resources to locate victims so that
he could either continue to victimize them or harass them into silence.

Mr. and Mrs. Parrott are seeking $2,000,000 in damages for violation of
their civil rights, the emotional distress that has been inflicted on
them, and to cover the costs of secreting themselves. They feel that it
is necessary that they moved from Deschutes County and, most likely,
from the State of Oregon giving up their long-standing business and
their residence.

They have also sued for $1,000,000 in punitive damages against
Deschutes County and the Deschutes County Sheriff's Office, as the
Sheriff's Office failed to prevent the behavior of Malloy and Rietmann
even after Mr. and Mrs. Parrott reported the harassment.

Other victims of Malloy and Rietmann have already sued the Sheriff's
Office and additional lawsuits may follow as information is made
available to the public regarding this matter."