If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Poof! And he's gone.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 11:49:24 -0800, Doan wrote:
On 3 Dec 2003, Kane wrote: On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:19:18 -0800, Doan wrote: For you latecomers: Listen to the public clown! ;-) Look at the increasingly desperate attempts to escalate to an ad hom contest...moving away from the oh so difficult questions you set up yourself for. Doan seems to think "anti-spanking zealots" (you can tell us by our white hats...R R R R) can't tell the difference between a beating and a spanking. So you can't you or can't tell the difference between a spanking and a beating? Not in that amorphous point where the two meet. Never have been able too. That's why I'm no longer searching. Not only do I not have to know...since I don't spank and I advise others not to, but I have someone doing diligent search for the crossover point FOR ME. You, the best little scientist on the USC campus. He says we are logic impaired. Very true! :-) Isn't it lovely when we agree on what you say? Of course he posts nothing original as he drones on year after year, just the same garbage he claims no one successfully challenges him on, when in fact he drones them to death with is childish prattle. LOL! I cited my sources Mmmmmhmmmmm. Yes. You did that alright. My kids used to come running into the dinning room happily exclaiming and holding up a shiny new quarter, "the Tooth Fairy has been here." and logically defended my arguments. Please, Doan. My ribs. They just can't stand much more. Sad thing is I can't say that about you. I know you can't. You wouldn't know source and logic if it bit you in the ass....and of course your own has, repeatedly. In fact, the only thing you are good at is calling other women "smelly-****"! Thank you for that heartfelt acknowledgement coupled with your defense of a Wooden Fern. I am rather good at pointing out such things when they are appropriate. Now that you have tried, unsuccessfully, once again, to divert to an ad hom contest, shall we return to the subject...if you can remember it? Exactly what is "reasonable" as a standard, and what, for that matter is a "reasonable standard" and how does that let the spanking parent know where they should stop to avoid going into abuse, a beating? Take your time, Doan. Take your time. When you choke you get nervous and careless and you blurt out just about anything that comes to mind. Your momma and pappa would be dishonored by such a foolis outburst. So folks, will Doan come up with a scientific proof (as he demands of others, with data and citations) of exactly where spanking becomes abuse, a beating? I don't need to. Of course not. That is the point. You demand others defend their claims, but you don't have to defend yours. We know, Doan. We know how honorable, intelligent, logical and honest you are. You are welcome to make up your mind. Always have. Just don't force others to follow your "beliefs". :-) Never have. Not the subject or topic. Even when you come up with the clear, scientifically and logic supported definition of what the point of passing over from spanking to abuse is you can trust me not to force others to follow your "reasonable standard." It's just not my style. I prefer everyone come to the own conclusions, but that hardly would constrain me from expressing my own...all that I do. I don't lobby for anti spanking legislation, as tempting as it may be. Or, will he choke? Lay your bets before you scroll down...The Tree will hold the pot... after all, could a Plant be dishonest? LOL! You are a street clown! ;-0 Are you confined to Usenet? So Doan, you think that spanking is not a form of beating. I think that you have been asked a valid question: Just what is the difference between spanking and beating? It is based on the "reasonable person" standard. Just where does the boundary lie? It is where a "reasonable" person said it is. The is the same question in the 80's with regard to pornography. Where do draw the line? Where a reasonable person does, of course, just as you say. But you seem to have fallen a tad short on the criteria you demand of others, have you not? Where is the data, the citations, the authorities, the PROOF? Proof of what??? That there are "reasonable" person???? The question is the exploration of your "reasonable standards," what a "reasonable person" would say the spanking v abuse crossover point is. So the proof, you so happily jump up and down and demand...yet again with you sring of "????" is not if there ARE such persons, but what they standards are. If they cannot agree who might we respond then to the claim that we, the ASZ's, don't know one from the other, and of what use is it to claim the there is a difference if spankers cannot have the definition to avoid, as they all claim they wish to do, themselves going from spanking to abuse? You do know that this IS a problem addressed by child protective services, do you not? Rather often at that? Doan, we are on a real quest here and we need the power of the Red Long to be applied. Parents everywhere, responsible, caring, loving parents, need your help with this singular problem. How to discipline without damaging their child. Are you going to help, or are you going to equivocate? In other words, you have not really answered the question at all. Why am I not bowled or with surprize? You have posed two new questions. Neither of which you'll be able to answer with anything but more questions. Here they are for you: 1. What is a reasonable person? Define reasonableness please, and this time follow the request of you I made to meet your own demands...scientific proof please. You weaseled this time and you will again of course. 2. What WOULD more than one "reasonable person" actually say the line is? Get five, see I make it easy...not to many in the sample, people you think or can prove to yourself are reasonable. Without them having access to each other, determine that they all agree to what a spanking is and a beating is and more especially at what point the lessor becomes the greater, abuse wise that is. And please, if you EVER plan to be taken seriously again when you demand scientific proof on the level of the evidence you offered by the good medical doctor that is based on experimentation to be valid, provide us with scientific proof NOW, bubbah. I guess there no "reasonable" person in the anti-spanking zealotS's world. :-) Did I not break the questions down adequately for you? I apologize. I guess you'll have to bear with my lack of logic and lack of scientific acumen. Does this mean, Doan, that you aren't going to answer the two questions that came out of your response to my question which came out of your taunting and question for the ASZ's? It would be perfectly okay for you to once again declare, "I don't have to." We know what you are. And we can accomodate any need you have to recover and care for yourself and heal that bite you put in your own butt. Doan One thing the self defined "clever" ALWAYS do, is step into their own traps. These ngs are full of them. They are outstanding in their clumsiness. The problem isn't so much stupidity (which of course you have an ample supply by way of the proof of you believing you are so clever) but dishonesty. And you are the perfect example. :-) Of? Dishonesty? Show me where? To play their tricks they MUST LIE AND CHEAT and cut corners, and weasel words, and avoid admitting when they have screwed themselves publically. You forgot to add puffering: I teach math at the college level; I am a member of MENSA; I have a Ph.D; I am a computer expert.... ;-) Have members of MENSA, those with Ph.D's, and others with considerable computer skills been revealing that about themselves? Well, I never, humph. That sort of leaves us with the claim support posting logicial arguement giant of aps. Not a bit of puffery there, no sireebobb. So who yah gonna call, Ghostbusters? That's good one, Kane. It's one of my favorite movie. :-) I think I see the tail end of a whining weasel disappearing limply up a Doan's exremely well self-bitten ass. Yes, the little "pop" and disappearance will be coming right up, folks. Doan Kane |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Poof! And he's gone--hopefully both of you
"Kane" wrote in message om... snipped the BS Why don't you and your buddy take your sandbox antics to your emails and stop filling this NewsGroup with your childish crap. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Poof! And he's gone.
16
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Poof! And he's gone.
"Greg Hanson" wrote in message om... 16 Your IQ, Greg??? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Poof! And he's gone.
wrote in message ... "Dan Sullivan" wrote: "Greg Hanson" wrote in message om... 16 Your IQ, Greg??? No, the age that your victims age out, pedophile that posts under fake name of dan sullivan. Give it up, Dennis. You took the whole organization down the tubes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|